Why zig-zagging Obama can’t be taken seriously on Syria
President Obama’s decision to seek the endorsement of Congress for an attack on Syria fits into one or more definite patterns of behaviour, if not strategy. His preference, much praised by the media until recently, for ‘leading from behind’ suggests at least some aversion to risk and responsibility. It also fits into the general zigzag of his Middle Eastern policy since his Cairo speech reaching out to Islam. Intended to undercut the appeal of radical Islamism, the speech looked appeasing and so encouraged it.