Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman is assistant editor of The Spectator and author of Why We Get the Wrong Politicians. She also presents Radio 4’s Week in Westminster.

Keir Starmer gets angry

15 min listen

PMQs today and – as predicted – Keir Starmer came out worst in a pretty unpleasant session. Kemi Badenoch pinned the Prime Minister on the continued Mandelson fallout and now the scandal over Matthew Doyle, the former No. 10 comms chief who – just four weeks after his ennoblement – Labour have already been forced to kick out of their party in the House of Lords, after it emerged he had campaigned for a friend charged with possessing indecent images of children. Once again, one of those mysterious appointments for which the Prime Minister is never responsible came back to haunt him in public – sound familiar?

Keir Starmer gets angry

What could a Starmer government possibly achieve now?

What is the point of Keir Starmer’s government now? Morgan McSweeney’s departure may have been an attempt by the Prime Minister to buy some extra time, like a patient bargaining for expensive life-extending drugs, but it doesn’t change the diagnosis: this is a government that no longer works. Ministers who had previously been very loyal to Keir Starmer had been privately saying it was only a matter of time that he went a couple of months before the latest revelations about Peter Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. But even before that scandal first blew up in the autumn, MPs and some ministers had started to lose hope, having already stopped trusting the Prime Minister.

Do MPs really want to save the Houses of Parliament?

Is there a building in Britain more important than the Palace of Westminster? Depending on who you listen to today, parliament is so important that MPs and peers really must agree to an expensive restoration that would see the Palace being emptied and rebuilt either in stages or all at once – or is it so important that MPs and peers should resist this dangerous plan with all their might? The building is crumbling, at risk of a catastrophic and preventable fire, and has neither proper sanitation nor adequate access. Everyone accepts those facts, but what MPs cannot agree on is what to do about them. Today the restoration and renewal client board, the body trying to work out how to fix the building and make it fit for the future, has published a set of options on restoration.

The Mandelson scandal could spell the end for Starmer

15 min listen

Another impressive PMQs from Kemi Badenoch – but she had plenty of ammunition to deploy after the Peter Mandelson scandal took a bleaker turn this week. The Prime Minister clearly wanted to make a strong statement in his first answer to Kemi Badenoch, saying that ‘Mandelson betrayed our country, our parliament and my party’. He added: ‘He lied repeatedly to my team when asked about his relationship with Epstein before and during his tenure as ambassador. I regret appointing him.’ He then listed the actions he had taken to strip Mandelson of his title, remove him from the Privy Council, and refer material to the Metropolitan Police. The whole thing exposed Starmer’s biggest weaknesses: his over-reliance on process and his inability to consider how the public see him.

The Mandelson scandal could spell the end for Starmer

The question Starmer didn’t want to answer about Peter Mandelson

Prime Minister's Questions today highlighted Keir Starmer's weakness, and not just when it comes to Peter Mandelson. The Prime Minister made clear in his first answer to Kemi Badenoch that 'Mandelson betrayed our country, our parliament and my party'. He added: 'He lied repeatedly to my team when asked about his relationship with Epstein before and during his tenure as ambassador. I regret appointing him. If I knew then what I know now, he would never have been anywhere near government.' He then listed the actions he had taken to strip Mandelson of his title, to remove him from the Privy council, and to refer material to the Metropolitan Police.

Met launches criminal investigation into Peter Mandelson

Once again, Keir Starmer’s government has ended up talking about scandal, rather than policy: something the Prime Minister once levelled as an accusation at the Tories. Health ministers had hoped to spend today talking about improving cancer treatment, but instead we are settling into an entire week dominated by Peter Mandelson.

Breaking news: Lammy was good at PMQs

10 min listen

It is our solemn duty to inform listeners that David Lammy won deputy PMQs at a canter today. To be frank, it was a low-rent affair. Andrew Griffith was the Tory sent out to question David Lammy while Keir Starmer is in China, and the shadow business secretary didn’t do a particularly good job. Perhaps he had assumed that Lammy would have another disastrous session, like he did when a prisoner was accidentally released last autumn. There were a few decent jokes in there – mainly about football – but the overwhelming winners were Kemi and Keir, who by comparison look like Gladstone and Disraeli. James Heale speaks to Tim Shipman and Isabel Hardman. Produced by Oscar Edmondson.

Breaking news: Lammy was good at PMQs

For once, David Lammy had a good DPMQs

Today's Deputy Prime Minister's Questions was a particularly low-rent affair. Andrew Griffith was the Tory sent out to question David Lammy while Keir Starmer is in China. The shadow business secretary didn't do a particularly good job: perhaps he had assumed that Lammy would have another disastrous session like he did when a prisoner was accidentally released last autumn. The Deputy Prime Minister was unflappable today though, and clearly enjoyed himself, while Griffith sounded like he was at a departmental questions session, not the set-piece political event of the week. Lammy ended up joking that 'he's not going to get this gig again', and he was probably right.

Suella Braverman defects – not another one!

15 min listen

It’s psychodrama all round on Coffee House Shots today. Between Andy Burnham – who over the weekend was denied the opportunity to stand in the Gorton and Denton by-election – and Suella Braverman – who has just announced that she’s defecting to Reform (shock horror) – it seems like the main parties are competing to see who can appear the most split. After high-profile Labour MPs gave their support for Burnham’s return, what impact will this have on Labour party unity? And with this latest defection of a former Tory, can Nigel Farage dodge accusations that Reform is becoming the Tory party 2.0? Isabel Hardman speaks to Tim Shipman and Gabriel Pogrund. Produced by Oscar Edmondson.

Suella Braverman defects – not another one!

Starmer blocks Burnham from parliament

Keir Starmer has blocked Andy Burnham from running for parliament, with the party’s National Executive Committee voting 8-1 against his candidacy for Gorton and Denton. The Prime Minister himself voted against Burnham, while his deputy Lucy Powell was the only member of the committee to vote in favour.  There is an obvious argument for blocking someone who is such an explicit threat to Starmer’s leadership. Given the Prime Minister’s weakness, it is not a given that he could see Burnham off, and so he would essentially be saying he was ready for the leadership contest that many Labour MPs think will definitely happen in May. Burnham being blocked doesn’t change the likelihood of that contest, though: it just affects the list of who the contenders will probably be.

Starmer turns on Trump

10 min listen

Keir Starmer scored a rare win at PMQs, talking tough on Trump in light of the President’s escalating rhetoric on Greenland and the Chagos Islands. Kemi Badenoch pressed the Prime Minister on foreign affairs and Britain’s relationship with the US president, and Starmer departed from his usual caution to strike a notably firmer tone. What does this moment tell us about Labour’s emerging approach to Trump – and is the UK political class finally losing patience with the volatility of the White House? Was this the closest we’ll get to a Keir Starmer Love Actually Prime Minister moment? James Heale speaks to Tim Shipman and Isabel Hardman. Produced by Oscar Edmondson.

Starmer turns on Trump

Keir Starmer talked tough on Trump at PMQs

Keir Starmer tried to use Prime Minister’s Questions today to deliver what he hoped was a tough new line on Donald Trump. It wasn’t quite a Love, Actually moment – mercifully; more of an ‘Er, actually’, but still. In his first answer to Kemi Badenoch, Starmer told the chamber that: I want to be clear with the House: I will not yield. Britain will not yield on our principles and values about the future of Greenland under threats of tariffs, and that is my clear position. The Prime Minister then added in his second answer that: President Trump deployed words on Chagos yesterday that were different to his previous words of welcome and support when I met him in the White House.

Why is Keir Starmer so irritable?

16 min listen

It is the first Prime Minister’s Questions of the new year – and Keir Starmer returns to the Commons already under pressure. With major international crises unfolding, Kemi Badenoch used PMQs to question whether the Prime Minister is present, engaged or in control. In response, Starmer just seemed narky. As the exchange descended into rows over Ukraine, Venezuela and the role of government lawyers, the issue of the armed forces – how they are supported and resourced – came up once again. With global events dominating the news agenda, are British forces prepared to be deployed – and does the Labour party really grasp the political danger of that debate? Oscar Edmondson speaks to Tim Shipman and Isabel Hardman. Produced by Oscar Edmondson.

Nigel Farage was the winner of PMQs – and he wasn’t even there

‘He has got no choice but to be here for Prime Minister’s Questions! That’s why he’s here. If he could skip this, he would!’ That accusation from Kemi Badenoch would apply to any week, but it was striking that at this first session of the New Year, Keir Starmer looked like he wanted to skip a session dominated by his comfort zone of international diplomacy. The Prime Minister did not have a good session, and had Badenoch continued to be strong throughout her six questions, then his delicately worded statements about Donald Trump might have started to disintegrate as well.

It’s a bit rich for Keir Starmer to urge ministers to hold their nerve

Before Keir Starmer managed to escape Westminster for the relative safety of a European summit discussing war, the Prime Minister had to hold a cabinet meeting. The PM told colleagues they needed to hold their nerve, arguing that: ‘I do not underestimate the scale of the task. But I have no doubt about this team. Governments do not lose because polls go down. They lose when they lose belief or nerve. We will do neither.’ The readout from Downing Street also said that ministers discussed ‘successful recoveries of centre-left parties in Norway, Australia and Canada through focusing on delivery and cost of living issues’.

A ‘classically awful’ PMQs to round out the year

10 min listen

Today was the final PMQs of the year – and it was certainly not a classic. It is customary for the Prime Minister and the leader of the opposition to make some attempt at Christmas cheer by telling jokes at the despatch box, but this year’s zingers were awful. Despite a promising start from Keir Starmer, it soon degenerated into quips about whether the Prime Minister has ‘the baubles’ and whether Kemi Badenoch will be ‘Home Alone’. None of the jokes were delivered with any aplomb. Is this parliament at its worst? Also today, Wes Streeting is under pressure as the junior doctors’ strike begins – how is he dealing with the walkout? James Heale speaks to Isabel Hardman and Tim Shipman. Produced by Oscar Edmondson.

Badenoch – and Starmer – should work on their PMQs jokes

Kemi Badenoch and Keir Starmer conformed to time-honoured tradition today at Prime Minister’s Questions by producing lots of jokes that would be rejected by a cracker company in their exchanges. The Tory leader’s lines included that the government was full of turkeys, Starmer didn’t have the baubles to stand up to striking doctors, and all Labour MPs wanted for Christmas was a new leader. Starmer had one decent joke Starmer had one decent joke that someone else had written for him at the start. As he wished the whole House a happy Christmas, he had some ‘advice’ for Reform UK, which was that ‘if mysterious men from the East appear bearing gifts, this time report it to the police’.

Ministers mull overhauling public inquiries

Do you have an issue you care about? You should probably be calling for a public inquiry into it, then. Public inquiries have become so popular in British politics that there are currently 25 running at the moment, and barely a week goes by without an MP calling for a new one at Prime Minister’s Questions. Last week MPs on the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee announced an inquiry into inquiries, which follows another inquiry into inquiries by the House of Lords Statutory Inquiries Committee last year. That inquiry was in part looking at whether the previous inquiry, held ten years before, had managed to have any lasting impact (it hadn’t, and neither had many of the public inquiries themselves in the interim).

Where is the violence against women and girls strategy?

There was a revealing moment in today’s Liaison Committee session with Keir Starmer where the Prime Minister was asked about violence against women and girls. The government’s VAWG strategy is ‘due’ this week - in fact, it has been ‘due’ since the summer - and Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood did the Sunday morning broadcast round heralding it yesterday. But when Home Affairs Committee chair Karen Bradley asked Starmer about the strategy itself, he still couldn’t say when it would actually be published. All he would say was that it would come out ‘as soon as possible’, adding: ‘I was in Downing Street when we brought together all the various bodies that are helping, working with us on that, the week before last, and so now we are looking at very shortly in the future.

The Liaison Committee exposed Starmer’s weaknesses

13 min listen

It’s nearly Christmas, but there is still lots of excitement to be had in Westminster, including Keir Starmer’s trip to the Liaison Committee. This is where the Prime Minister sits in front of senior MPs and is grilled on various policy areas. Today’s topics included the leaks (Wes Streeting and the OBR) and Keir Starmer’s integrity more generally, as well as the farm tax, the House of Lords and the government’s long-anticipated strategy to counter violence against women and girls. How did today’s proceedings expose the ‘paucity’ of Starmer’s Labour? Oscar Edmondson speaks to Isabel Hardman and James Heale. Produced by Oscar Edmondson.