Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman is assistant editor of The Spectator and author of Why We Get the Wrong Politicians. She also presents Radio 4’s Week in Westminster.

Friday

Isabel Hardman

Hunt prods Burnham for NHS policy details

One of the many problems that Andy Burnham has encountered this week is that he has had to spend more time defending his record in the last Labour government than scrutinising the current government's changes to the health service. He has performed the first task in a rather emotional manner, and the Conservatives may well feel that politically this week has been rather successful. But now they're going after him on the policy side of things too, perhaps to underline how preoccupied Burnham is with his own reputation. Jeremy Hunt has this afternoon written a letter to Ed Miliband, seen exclusively by Coffee House, which demands to know whether Labour supports the government's new hospital inspection regime.

Isabel Hardman

Raw deal for Green Deal

When the government first launched its Green Deal, it was part of its 'greenest government ever' pledge, which ministers seem to have forgotten about entirely now. The programme of energy efficiency improvements is looking rather green, but in a peaky sense, rather than because it is successfully greening this country's homes. The latest figures show only 36 households had signed up to the Green Deal by the end of June, which is hardly the most impressive take-up for a programme that is supposed to have attracted 10,000 sign-ups by the end of this year. Some programmes do take a while to get off the ground, but it's worth noting that the two Coalition parties do like to blame one another for the stuttering start to this one.

Isabel Hardman

Are fracking tax breaks really necessary?

George Osborne is taking the 'global race' to a new level today. The Chancellor is not just allowing Britain to enter the fracking revolution by unveiling a shale gas allowance, he's also offering the most generous tax breaks in the world for the exploitation. The allowance will mean shale production income will be taxed at 30 per cent rather than 62 per cent. Osborne's own MPs should be delighted that the government is keen to support an industry that could keep energy bills down and create thousands of jobs. But Peter Lilley - who wrote in the Spectator recently about the need to get a move on with fracking - yesterday sounded a note of caution about whether the incentives were really necessary.

Thursday

Isabel Hardman

Labour’s filibuster on the EU referendum bill cheers Tory hearts

As a rule, public bill committees aren't really the kind of thing even the most insular Westminster bubble inhabitant buys popcorn to watch. But last night, James Wharton's private member's bill found itself the subject of midnight drama in the committee room. Labour MPs decided to filibuster on a series of troublemaking amendments, with the whips calling a late night cooling down break in an attempt to move the proceedings on. Even though Wharton and Tory colleagues on the bill committee may be rather dozy this afternoon, the late night drama, eventually resolved at 12.30, does allow them to make a political point out of what is normally a very poorly-followed committee stage.

Wednesday

Isabel Hardman

The Lynton Crosby question Number 10 can’t quite answer

It's difficult to find a Tory MP who doesn't think Lynton Crosby is making their party more aggressive and impressive. The Wizard of Oz has been a good thing. Most MPs think his tough-talking vision for how the party can fight Ukip and Labour rather than fighting one another has made a huge difference. Crosby was hired to advise the party on strategy (as well as swear at people), but the one thing that makes a few MPs want to swear back is the possibility he has had some undue influence over the government's public health policy, which has zig-zagged one way and then another. As James said earlier, this row will keep going, and Number 10 did nothing after PMQs to slow things down.

Isabel Hardman

Labour could be jumping the gun with early EU mischief-making

If you've felt your heart beating a little faster than usual, and a strange sense of excitement creeping all over you, it's because #letbritaindecide fever is back in Parliament. Yes, folks, the fun returns, and this time for the committee stage of the bill, from 2pm today. I've already reported Mike Gapes' amusing amendments to the legislation which are designed to cause trouble. He has put a few more down of a similarly mischevious ilk, changing the question about Britain's membership of the EU to a question about whether Britain should join the Schengen Agreement, or the euro. But Labour's frontbench has also tabled some changes to provoke a row.

Isabel Hardman

Reshuffle delay leaves Tories dwelling on many reasons to be cheerful

David Cameron has decided to delay his mini-reshuffle until the autumn. He had been planning to have it this week, and as we reported last week, rumours were circulating about who was vulnerable. But it is sensible to delay. The party is in a serene mood currently. Sacking good ministers and failing to promote equally good backbenchers again will cause strife, and the party management machine will struggle to keep tabs on the really hurt members over the summer. Better to send everyone back to their constituencies in a good mood that will rouse the grassroots a little, rather than brooding about what they perceive to be poor treatment. There are many reasons to be cheerful at the moment if you're a Conservative MP.

Isabel Hardman

The bloody tussle for the moral high ground

Alan Johnson and Stephen Dorrell have just conducted an impressively reasoned debate on the NHS on Radio 4. This was all the more impressive given both their parties have boxed themselves into corners on NHS care scandals, from which they will continue to lash out today at the last PMQs of the summer. Whether or not Andy Burnham bears responsibility for the hospital failings detailed yesterday, his circumstances significantly constrained his ability to scrutinise the policies the government announced. Because he is in the extremely uncomfortable position of shadowing the brief he held in government, Burnham spent more time defending his own record than he did anything else.

Tuesday

Isabel Hardman

NHS review: Where did the “13,000 deaths” figure come from?

There is a lot of rage in Westminster today (beyond the everyday anger exhibited by some of its inhabitants that Parliament contains other people who disagree with them) about the 13,000 deaths figure that has been bandied around ahead of the publication of the Keogh review. It's worth noting firstly that Jeremy Hunt did not refer to this 13,000 in his statement to the Commons, but the figure made its way into the newspapers before the report's publication.  He did say that 'no statistics are perfect, but mortality rates suggest that since 2005, thousands more people may have died than would normally be expected at the 14 trusts reviewed by Sir Bruce'.

Isabel Hardman

NHS political football, full-time report: Hunt and Burnham’s fouls and fury

Jeremy Hunt's statement on the Keogh review marked one of the uglier Commons sessions in this parliament. Amid shouting, muttering and angry pointing from the Opposition benches, the Health Secretary announced that 11 of the 14 hospitals in the review would be put into 'special measures', while making clear that he blamed the culture the Labour government had nurtured in the NHS, and pressure from ministers to cover up bad news. Labour MPs hated the last assertion in particular, roaring with disagreement as Hunt said: 'It is never acceptable for the government to put pressure on the NHS to accept bad news because in doing so they make it less likely that poor care will be tackled.' Burnham accused him of being partisan and guilty of 'one of the most cynical spin operations of our time'.

Isabel Hardman

NHS political football, half-time report: Crosby and warnings ignored

Labour and the Tories played the first half of NHS political football this morning at health questions. The scrap began with Opposition MPs asking what influence Lynton Crosby had over the decision to drop plain packaging for cigarettes. It is their equivalent of the Tory attack on union influence, and as such has a fair bit of clout. The first question came from Labour's Cathy Jamieson, who asked: 'Given some of the previous pronouncements by the Public Health Minister I think some of us could be forgiven for thinking that the government's policy has changed in relation to this. And I wonder therefore if she could advise the House, who overruled her support for this policy? Was it the Prime Minister? Was it the Health Secretary? Or was it Lynton Crosby?' Ian Austin had a go too.

Isabel Hardman

Angry Burnham hits back

listen to ‘Andy Burnham defends Labour's record on Health’ on Audioboo Andy Burnham was in a furious mood this morning when he toured the broadcast studios. It was hardly surprising: most people would grow rather ratty if CCHQ wasn't just coming after you but briefing that it is coming after you. He angrily told listeners that he did not 'accept this attack on the integrity of the last Government'. He listed all the actions of the Labour government that he believed showed he and colleagues were not in the wrong. That list included: 'It was the last government that introduced independent regulation into the NHS'. 'I brought in Robert Francis to investigate what happened' at Stafford Hospital. Burnham said he overruled civil service advice when he engaged Francis.

Monday

Isabel Hardman

Tory MPs see gains on justice and home affairs opt-outs

Justice and Home Affairs ministers have spent a muggy afternoon in the Commons slogging through several hours of tetchy questions from backbenchers about the government's plan to opt out of European Union justice and home affairs measures, before opting back in to the ones the government has decided it likes. It's at times like this that anyone other than Theresa May, who spent a considerable amount of time hopping up and down to take endless interventions from her own Tory colleagues, would start to wonder whether the party leadership really was a prize worth working so hard for, given the amount of reassurance MPs need on just one policy area. But the Home Secretary and her colleague Chris Grayling remained extraordinarily patient throughout.

Isabel Hardman

Sticks and stones won’t break the Bones

If you're looking for the big Westminster row this week, chances are you've missed where the real action is. On Wednesday afternoon, MPs and peers will vote again in the elections for chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Human Trafficking. Normally APPG elections are so tame that few MPs outside their own membership even know they are going on. But the APPG on Human Trafficking has had to call a second vote because of a contentious draw in the first election. The group has printed more than 1,000 ballot papers in anticipation of a huge turnout from groups supporting rivals Peter Bone and Fiona Mactaggart. Tensions are rising between the camps, leading to the formidable Mrs Jennie Bone intervening.

Isabel Hardman

Lib Dems face challenge to show Trident review is being taken seriously

The Trident Alternatives Review hasn't even been published and already the Conservatives are attacking any proposals the Liberal Democrats might have cooked up to water down the nuclear deterrent. The Prime Minister's official spokesman told the morning lobby briefing that the Prime Minister has 'seen no evidence that there is a way of providing an alternative to a like-for-like replacement' of Trident, while in his Daily Mail article today, Defence Secretary Philip Hammond says 'there is no alternative to Trident that provides the same level of protection and ability to deter an aggressor'.

Isabel Hardman

Liam Byrne changes tack to say benefit cap isn’t tough enough

Liam Byrne's attack on the workless benefit cap this morning is interesting, because he's trying to position himself as tougher than the Conservatives on out-of-work benefits. Labour's shadow work and pensions secretary said: 'The benefit cap is a good idea in principle but it's already fallen apart in practice. Ministers have bodged the rules so the cap won't affect Britain's 4,000 largest families and it does nothing to stop people living a life on welfare. The government needs to go back to the drawing board, design a cap without holes and put a two-year limit on the time you can spend on the dole, like Labour's compulsory jobs guarantee.

Isabel Hardman

Benefit cap’s polling success paves way for tough 2015 promises

The government's £26,000 benefit cap is one of the most popular policies pollsters have ever come across. No wonder, then, that CCHQ is putting this infographic about to underline the political power of this emblematic policy as it is rolled out nationwide today. Of course, it's not entirely true that Labour supports limitless benefits, as the party is considering some kind of regional benefit cap, with more money paid to recipients in London to reflect the higher cost of living. But Liam Byrne and Ed Miliband's decision to lead the party into voting against the cap in the end makes it very easy for the Conservatives to slap Labour with the 'limitless' tag.

Friday

Isabel Hardman

Sarah Wollaston: Tories are ‘pandering to election strategists’ on plain packaging

Sarah Wollaston is angry. Again. This time it's about plain packaging on cigarettes. She told the World at One that the decision to stall introducing plain packaging was 'pandering to election strategists' and that this was a 'very sad day for public health'. You can listen to the full interview below:- Now, this is obviously deeply annoying for the Tory leadership as it hardly helps them tackle the narrative that they're always caving into their friends in big business. Even more annoying, perhaps, for Anna Soubry, who unlike Wollaston had to back the decision in the Commons this morning even though she personally supports plain packaging.

Isabel Hardman

Reshuffle gossip points to ‘innocents’ and women

There's just a week left of the Parliamentary term to go before MPs go back to their constituencies to mull that awkward pay rise over the summer. But one thing that's keeping Tory MPs from relaxing is the possibility of a ministerial reshuffle next week. The word from reliable sources is that it will take place next Thursday with a sign-off meeting this Monday. This is a minister-of-state-level reshuffle. The names of supposedly vulnerable ministers are circulating. They include housing minister Mark Prisk, energy minister Greg Barker, universities minister David Willetts, and employment minister Mark Hoban. They're known as the 'innocents': ministers who are all thought to be doing a good job and who have not messed up but who are not considered likely to move up into the cabinet.

Thursday

Isabel Hardman

Why Universal Credit delay is a good thing, not a political failure

'Iain Duncan Smith must now ask himself if he is fit for purpose.' That's what Liam Byrne thinks of the Work and Pensions Secretary's admission that the roll-out of Universal Credit is being delayed. The original plan was for all new claims for out-of-work support to go into the universal credit rather than the current benefits system from October 2013. But a written ministerial statement yesterday said the pilots of the new benefit will be extended to six hub JobCentres instead. Labour says the 'we have final confirmation that the welfare revolution we were promised has collapsed'. If deep down you don't want universal credit to succeed, then you must be quite chuffed with the slowing of the timetable. But its supporters should be happy, too. Why?