Alex Massie

Alex Massie

Yes, Brexit could very easily lead to the break-up of Britain

Oh, look, it's time for another episode of Jocksplaining. That is, time to remind some people south of the wall that what's obvious to them is not at all obvious to the folk north of the wall. There has been, in recent days, a flurry of articles claiming that, look, there's no need to worry about a British exit from the EU because it will have no negative consequences whatsoever. You certainly shouldn't think that it might prompt fresh demands for a new referendum on Scottish independence (even though the SNP say it might) and you really shouldn't think such a referendum might produce a Yes vote (even though the most recent poll on the matter says it would). There's nothing to see here. Shut-up, everyone.

Three cheers for the new politics

I love the new politics. It warms my heart even on cold and gloomy winter mornings. The novelty of the always-new, freshly-minted, happy-shiny, more-decent-than-thou new politics will never fade. Consider this stirring tale from beyond the wall. The Scottish Asian Women's Association (SAWA) was launched amidst what tradition dictates we must refer to as great fanfare at a lavish opening gala at Stirling Castle in 2012. The canapes alone cost £4,500. It is likely you have never heard of this charity which ostensibly exists to 'promote religious and racial harmony' by raising the profile of Scottish Asian women. Or, at any rate, raising the profile of one Scottish Asian woman.

David Mundell comes out as the first openly gay Tory cabinet minister. So what?

David Mundell, the Secretary of State for Scotland, is gay. And you know what, so what? Of course Mundell is not the first gay Tory cabinet minister, merely, it's believed, the first to "openly" acknowledge the fact. He did so in typically low-key fashion, writing on his website: Having taken one of the most important decisions of my life and resolved to come out publically as gay in 2016, I just want to get on with it, and now, just like that, I have said it. How can it be both so easy and so hard to say a few short words? Good for him and good luck to him. Mundell would not, I think, like to consider himself a pioneer and yet while it has, generally speaking, never been easier to come out in this fashion it remains the case that the general is not the same as the personal.

The painful truth for Ruth

Minority sects are often more interesting, and more colourful, than their more popular rivals. That must explain why the Scottish Tories continue to be the subject of so much fascination. Barely a month passes without someone, somewhere, asking if this — at long last — is the moment for a Scottish Tory revival. Spoiler alert: it never is. Logic says that at this year’s Scottish parliament elections, things should be different. It is generally agreed that Ruth Davidson, the party leader in Scotland, had a ‘good independence referendum’; generally agreed, too, that after Nicola Sturgeon, she might be the most impressive politician in Scotland.

2016 will be another great year for ‘The most dangerous woman in Britain’

Yesterday a new Scottish opinion poll reported that 58 percent of voters intend to endorse SNP candidates when the choosing time comes for next year's Holyrood elections. By any reasonable measure this is excessive, even extravagant. But there we have it. As it happens, I would be surprised if the SNP polled that well on election day itself but we live in a time of astonishment so even the previously impossible can no longer be reckoned entirely improbable. And, besides, what is the alternative? Nicola Sturgeon's greatest strength is that no-one else - or at least no-one outside her own party - can be thought a plausible First Minister.

Donald Trump vs Alex Salmond: it’s a shame they can’t both lose

Let it be understood that, in the realms of pressmen everywhere, the sight of two blowhards hammering away at one another is worth the silent stoicism of a thousand sensible folk. Let it also be understood that Henry Kissinger's evaluation of the Iran-Iraq war also applies to the increasingly intemperate - by which I mean entertaining - stramash between Donald Trump and Alex Salmond: It's a shame they can't both lose. Today, Alex Salmond* branded Trump a "three-time loser" as the American megalomaniac mogul's latest challenge to an offshore wind farm that will, he implausibly claims, ruin the views from his Aberdeenshire golf course, was rejected by the Supreme Court. In response, Trump fired-back: "Does anyone care what this man thinks?

Every journalist should have the courage to betray his party. Does Owen Jones?

You know what's tough these days? Being a left-wing polemicist, that's what's tough these days. You don't need to take my word for this. Just ask Owen Jones. Here he is, complaining about the "unfree media" that makes it "impossible to have a rational conversation about Jeremy Corbyn, Labour, or just politics full stop."  Now you may be tempted to say 'Aw shucks, too bad for the poor booby'. But this would be a needlessly ungenerous reaction. Because he has a point. True, it's a point occluded by leftist posturing about the unfree press but, beneath all that guff, there is a point to be made here about the nature of modern political engagement and how that all too easily crowds out common sense. There is, that is to say, a tragedy of the commons at work here.

Why isn’t David Cameron’s EU referendum strategy working? (Because it’s stupid)

Expediency is usually just trouble deferred. That's the first thing to remember about David Cameron's ham-fisted approach to his european referendum problem. The second thing to remember is that it is not, and never has been, about europe at all. It's always been about the Tory party. Which means the third thing to know is that it's hardly a surprise Cameron's approach is failing. Sure, everyone says, the Outers need to be ten points ahead if they're going to win. And maybe that is right. But they're running 50-50 at the moment and if I were an Outer I'd be happier about that than if I was an Inner. (This should obviously be known as the Belly-Button Referendum.

A liar but not a crook; Alistair Carmichael is good enough for parliament

This morning a pair of judges in Edinburgh dismissed a petition seeking to overturn the result of the general election in Orkney and Shetland. Alistair Carmichael is not guilty of breaking the Representation of the People Act (1983) and may remain a Member of Parliament. There will be no by-election in the northern isles. Obviously this was an outrage and not just because everything in Scotland these days is an outrage. It was a disgrace. A whitewash and an establishment stitch-up. A stitch-up slathered with whitewash. All across Scotland you could hear the screeching as nationalist fury chimps rattled the bars of their cages. A dirty protest of the mind will doubtless follow.

Donald Trump throws a dead cat onto the table

Everyone knows how useful a dead cat can be, right? The Australian political strategist - and Tory campaign chief - Lynton Crosby is credited with coming up with the dead cat ploy. It has the great virtue of being as simple as it is colourful. When, Crosby says, you are in a hole or faced with the tricky task of diverting attention away from some unwanted piece of news you should throw a dead cat onto the table. Hey presto! No-one is talking about the bad news; everyone is talking about the dead cat on the table. Donald Trump deployed the dead cat tactic yesterday.

William McIlvanney, 1936-2015

A few weeks ago, a shivering intimation of imminent mortality was felt all across literary Scotland. Willie McIlvanney was not well. Very far from well. The kind of unwell that requires a lung transplant. If the news was hardly revelatory - McIlvanney had, for more than sixty years, given his body a pretty thorough work-out - it was still gloomily depressing. We might not have Willie McIlvanney for very much longer. And so it came to pass and we no longer do. It does McIlvanney a great disservice to say that, until today, he was Scotland's greatest living novelist. He was much more than that. His writing was ineradicably rooted in Ayrshire, Glasgow and the West of Scotland but there was nothing limited about its power or ambition.

The left at war: how can Hilary Benn and Jeremy Corbyn remain in the same party?

Last September, the House of Commons debated the merit and wisdom of sending British servicemen and women into action yet again. The enemy was the same then as it is now and many of the arguments for and against military action were just as familiar. But back then, back in September 2014, parliament was convinced. MPs voted in overwhelming numbers to authorise military action against ISIS in Iraq. 524 MPs voted Yes and only 43 opposed sending the RAF into the sky again. Then, as now, this was a limited action with a sharply limited set of objectives. As close to a police action as it was to a fully-fledged "war". But it was not, quite evidently, considered hugely controversial. No-one threatened to deselect MPs who voted the 'wrong' way.

A free vote on military action in Syria is the least bad option available for everyone

Well, this is another fine mess, isn't it? Jeremy Corbyn opposes (surprise!) extending the UK's anti-ISIS mission from Iraq to Syria and this, we are told, is the Labour party's official position. Nevertheless, Labour MPs will not be whipped whenever the matter is eventually put to a vote in the House of Commons. They will be free to vote as their conscience, and their calculation of the national interest, demands. By virtue of discovering that all his other options were unsustainable, Corbyn has blundered into the only choice that was feasible all along. Truly, another memorable profile in leadership.

Death of a political party: Jeremy Corbyn has killed Labour

It's all over. In fact, it was over before it ever really began. I knew it, you knew it, and even many of the poor fish who voted for Jeremy Corbyn knew it. And now everyone knows, as Morrissey put it, That Joke Isn't Funny Anymore. The Labour party, it should now be obvious to everyone, no longer exists as a functional political organisation. Order has disintegrated and it's every man - and woman - for themselves. Save what you can while you can because things are going to get worse - a lot worse - before they get any better. It is a shambles; a once great party reduced to competing rabbles of independent gangs scavenging for whatever meagre comforts they can rescue from the rubble. Love, peace and harmony? Very nice. But maybe in the next world.

The SNP’s ‘new politics’ seems to be rather like the old politics it despises

Update, 5.59pm: Natalie McGarry has now resigned the SNP whip over the campaign fund probe. First there were 56. Then there were 55. Pretty soon it seems entirely possible there will be only 54. SNP MPs, that is. Natalie McGarry, the 34 year old MP for Glasgow East, is the latest (that is, second) member of the SNP's record-breaking 2015 intake to be in discussions with the police. Ms McGarry was a leading member of Women for Independence, one of the plethora of independent campaigning organisations agitating for a Yes vote during last year's referendum campaign. Unfortunately, it seems as though a substantial amount of money, believed to be in the region of £30,000, has gone missing.

There’s no need to laugh at Jeremy Corbyn; you should pity him instead

Weakness comes in many guises. Last night, for instance, I found myself feeling something close to pity for Jeremy Corbyn. Pictures of the House of Commons may be notoriously unreliable but they can still tell a story. And there it is: Corbyn Alone, Jeremy Agonistes, Jezza Contra Mundum. Mocked by his enemies and abandoned by his notional supporters, the question is no longer whether Jeremy Corbyn is a disaster for the Labour party but, rather, when his leadership will be put out of its misery. Not for a while yet, I fancy, even though he hirples on like a blind, three-legged, cancer-stricken, dog. An object of pity not scorn. Comparisons with Michael Foot are grotesque and grotesquely unfair to Mr Foot and not just because that was 1983 and this is 2015.

We cannot live with Islamic State so we shall have to live without them

Of course it is complicated. Of course there are no obvious or simple or even, perhaps, persuasive solutions. And yet, despite that, some things are clear. First, is confronting Islamic State in this country's interest? Yes. Because the alternative is even worse. Foreign policy only rarely affords the choice between 'good' and 'bad' options. It is not a risk-free enterprise. Often, the options lie between 'unpalatable' and 'appalling'. But we are where we are and no good can come from pretending reality can be wished away. If it was not apparent before, it should now be clear that 'containing' Islamic State is a non-starter.

Why is anyone surprised by Jeremy Corbyn’s foreign policy views?

It is shocking isn't it? I mean, who knew Stop The War (sic) threw a Christmas party each year? You'd have thought they'd be more of a Winterval crowd. Perhaps there is hope for them after all. But it is not at all shocking that Jeremy Corbyn, leader of Her Majesty's loyal opposition, is, as matters stand, going to attend the most glittering event of the festive season. This is who he is. This is who he has always been. This has been obvious, too. All you had to do was open your eyes. All you needed was the ability to read. It is not, I think, an exaggeration to think that Jeremy Corbyn has more friends at Stop The War than inside the parliamentary Labour party.

You may not be interested in war but war is interested in you

We weep with France today. Tears of sorrow but also, unavoidably, of rage. And behind those tears lies something else: a fearful sense of apprehension rooted in the knowledge that this will happen again, somewhere else. It already is happening elsewhere. The assault on Paris last night followed another Islamic State attack in Beirut in which at least 41 people were killed by two suicide bombers. Near abroad and far abroad; it makes little difference to Islamic State. The sickening truth about terrorism is that it works. Who can truly feel secure tonight? Who can avoid the creeping dread that this will happen here too? It is only a matter of time. The intelligence services can only do so much; they cannot be perfect all the time. We do what we can but we cannot do everything.

The EU referendum is not about identity. That’s why it is easy to vote to stay In

A few weeks ago, I suggested that many of the arguments that will be trotted out during the forthcoming - and lacklustre - EU referendum will be wholly familiar to anyone who paid attention to last year's referendum on independence for Scotland. And so it is proving. Sensible people - of whom there are more than is sometimes realised - should be able to appreciate, even if they are minded to vote In, that leaving the EU would not be a disaster for Britain. In like fashion sensible Unionists - of whom there were also more than is sometimes appreciated - could concede that an independent Scotland was not doomed to become a Tartan Basket Case. Even the name of the No campaign, Better Together, conceded as much since Better Together does not in itself mean Dreadful Apart.