NATO won’t bleed for Ukraine
Acknowledging that is the single best way to stop a Russian invasion, yet policymakers refuse
Acknowledging that is the single best way to stop a Russian invasion, yet policymakers refuse
Blame its energy dependence as the situation with Ukraine rapidly escalates
It could kill thousands, even lead to World War Three. A diplomatic path must be found
David Frum smears those who don’t toe a hawkish line on Russia, but that’s so 2003
Americans demand that Europe take charge of its own defense yet chide the French for doing just that?
It’s past time for the continent to step up and take charge of its own defense
And that’s OK. It’s time to accept the next best thing to being number one
Politicians love them because they’re cheap and easy but they end up entrenching regimes rather than dislodging them
Time for the West to finally follow through and send a strong message to Vladimir Putin
Ukraine isn’t going to join NATO. It’s time to make that clear and not drag America into another pointless conflict
Biden’s bleak assessment wasn’t necessarily wrong — and diplomacy remains the best hope
Had the West embraced Moscow after the Cold War, Putin might not be menacing Ukraine today
Putin can’t back down now and China is watching closely as the US and Europe face this extraordinary challenge
Just as under Obama, the Biden administration seems to think it can stop Putin by tweeting
Putin hopes to assert Russian control in the region, keep the West off-balance and face no consequences
The Russian president will only halt his prospective move on Ukraine if he fears the costs and risks of invasion are too high
And naturally he’s blaming Israel too. Surprised?
That cold reality ought to be the backdrop to the ongoing crisis diplomacy between Washington and Moscow
Biden’s secretary of state has released his Spotify playlist and its invitations to weakness are many
Our choices are constrained by the needs of our internal order