Fascinating piece in today’s Washington Post about Republican’s fears that they are “losing the Web.” What was once a side-show for political geeks is becoming core electoral terrain. Actually the best thing about Gordon Brown’s “listen and learn” campaign is his website.
Few people have a good word to say about Don Rumsfeld right now and there is little doubt that he was an absolute disaster in his second stint at the Pentagon. The Rumsfeld doctrine—just enough troops to lose, as one Washington wag dubbed it—is largely responsible for the Coalition’s inability to bring order to Iraq after the fall of Saddam. Having said all that, his latest wheeze does seem like a good idea. He is planning to set up a foundation to provide fellowships for those in the private sector who want to do a stint in public service.
If man-made global warming is killing Africans, as the climate change alarmists suggest, shouldn't we reduce our carbon footprint? Tesco did just that, says Dominic Lawson, and reduced by two-thirds their fruit and veg imports from East Africa. The result: poorer Africans. "All it does is make Tesco look better in North London. I find it repulsive," Lawson said on 18 Doughty Street television . This clip shows a 15-minute discussion which you're unlikely to see from mainstream British broadcasters who seem to view their role as 'raising awareness' rather than debating. The success of Channel Four's Great Global Warming Swindle documentary was largely due to relief that a broadcaster did not treat audiences like kids, unable to decide facts for themselves.
Today’s news that Gordon Brown will back the next generation of nuclear power plants is further proof of his desire to put the Tories on the back foot. Nuclear power is one of the issues that divide the opposition with Alan Duncan declaring himself “instinctively opposed” to it while many others see it as the only form of energy that offers security of supply at a sufficient quantity. If Cameron backs nuclear power he’ll alienate Zac Goldsmith and many of his green chums who Cameron has so assiduously cultivated. He’ll also hand the Lib Dems a distinctive issue with which to attack the Tories in the south. Yet if he refuses to back nuclear power, Brown will be able to ridicule him for being incapable of taking tough decisions.
From our US edition
More power to Kazakhstan Sir: Elliot Wilson rails against the alleged bureaucracy, corruption and nepotism that he argues are strangling business opportunities for foreign investors in Kazakhstan (Business, 28 April). But his three examples of Western companies who have ‘decided to leave’ are misleading. PetroKazakhstan, which emerged from nowhere as Canadian-based Hurricane Oil, was very happy to sell its Kazakh assets to the Chinese national oil corporation in 2005 for more than $4 billion. The same is true of Nations Energy, which in 2006 was sold by the owners for almost $2 billion.
Frank Luntz, the US polling guru whose Newsnight focus group gave David Cameron a crucial boost in the Tory leadership election, has an interesting piece in today’s Guardian. He argues that Brown is getting it all wrong and that people won’t be persuaded by his protestations that he wants to hear their thoughts. Instead, Luntz thinks that Brown needs to embrace who he is and persuade the public that these are serious times that call for a serious leader. Here’s the opener for the speech Luntz thinks Brown needs to give: "Some people say I'm boring. Well, they're right. In challenging times such as these, Britain doesn't need an entertainer. We need a leader.
The most perceptive indictment of the Blair era was delivered, in an admirably candid speech last September, by Alan Milburn (interviewed by Fraser Nelson on page 14). Describing his own rise from a council estate to the ranks of the Cabinet, Mr Milburn asked, ‘Do we think that for a child growing up today in one of Britain’s poorest estates such mobility is possible or likely? Sadly, I think not.’ That observation should inspire the core mission statement of the next Conservative government. Asked about his gilded schooling at Eton and youthful indiscretions, David Cameron has stuck to the mantra that a person’s origins should be irrelevant: ‘What matters most of all is what you’re going to do.
"George Bush could never get elected President if he went to Yale now," according to Google CEO Eric Schmidt. His argument is that he’d be caught on mobile phone cameras every time he got out of control; making a political career impossible. Schmidt might be right about Bush, he was after all the scion of a famous political—and Yale—dynasty. But I’m not sure that this applies to that many other people. For instance, are people now snapping the Bullingdon when they go out? I actually don’t think Bush would have been elected president without his hell raising past as it alleviated any concerns that Americans might had about the regal nature of the presidential succession.
A fact I dropped into my political column has been picked up by Iain Dale and (rightly) questioned. Could unemployment for under-25s really be worse than under the Tories? I accept, it sounds made up. Didn’t Brown piously rail against this youth unemployment and call them “Major’s children”? Hasn’t he delivered millions of new jobs in this economic boom? It’s worth responding to in full, because as this cuts to the heart of the myth of Brown’s economic “miracle”. There’s new jobs created all right – as our immigration figures testify. But for young Britons unemployment is actually worse now (14.5%) than the day Blair stepped into office (14.3%).
Throughout the French presidential campaign Nicolas Sarkozy was lambasted by his critics as an American neo-con with a French passport. This description was excessive, but there’s little doubt that Sarkozy is more pro-American than the average French politician and his acceptance speech on election night sounded some distinctly neo-con notes about the universality of human freedom. So at first glance it is surprising that he has handed over the foreign ministry to a Socialist. But on closer inspection, it is not. Bernard Kouchner, the founder of MSF, is one of the very few French politicians who was publicly prepared to say that they saw merit in overthrowing Saddam because of the brutal nature of his dictatorship.
Good to see Paul Wolfowitz taking my advice. In a way the whole story's about bad timing. For him, in the sense that a relatively insignificant and disputable allegation of misconduct caught him out at a time when an unstoppable tide was running against the ideological clique of which he's a leading light. And bad timing for us, in the sense that if he'd gone a year ago, a despairing Gordon Brown might have applied for the World Bank presidency and been hailed as the perfect man for the job. How much better it would have suited him than the one he's just got.
The last Bush-Blair press conference marks the end of an era. However, close the relationship between Bush and Brown turns out to be—and I expect it will be closer than people expect—there won’t be the same level of bonhomie that there has been between these two. Nor will Gordon Brown speak American as fluently as Blair does. But Brown starts the relationship with a lot of capital in the bank. Crucially, the Bush administration has grasped that Brown will need to something to show for being close to Bush—so expect something meaningful on education in Africa. There is also a recognition that pro-Americanism is no longer the default in British politics.
It is the worst kept secret in Washington—and that is saying something—that Al Gore and Hillary Clinton don’t get on. Many DC insiders have long claimed that Gore would get in to the Democratic race if he thought that was the only to stop her. So these comments he made to the New York Times about running for president are bound to fuel speculation that he’s planning to jump in later this year:. “I’m not issuing a Shermanesque statement because that’s not where I am. I’m not ruling it out for all time. Although I cannot presently foresee any circumstances, such circumstances could emerge.” “And such circumstances could emerge in 2008?” “It’s extremely unlikely, but not impossible.
What are museums for? I wish I’d never asked the question but I did once unfortunately in a Douglas-Home-Memorial-Prize-winning essay which caused a bit of a stink in the increasingly PC museums and galleries sector, and which I’m now going to have to justify in a debate starting at 6pm tonight at Merseyside Maritime Museum in Liverpool. I've been invited, I fear, to be the evil elitist posho in the suit who everybody hates.
It is hard to utter the phrase “glorious summer of sport” with a straight face today thanks to the grim drizzle that is our lot but the sporting summer is now officially under way with England taking on the West Indies at Lords. Spare a thought for the Windies, though. Not only have they fallen from being the undisputed masters of the game to one of the worst teams in the world but they also had to start this Test Match without having bowled a single competitive ball; testimony to the absurdity of the current international cricketing treadmill.
So Alex Salmond has become Scotland's first minister, with no majority. If he can't legislate, his administration may be the best Holyrood has had yet. Its hard to think of one Scottish Parliament bill which has been any use since 1999. And easy to think of appalling misgovernment. Jack McConnell's old slogan was 'do less better'. He ended up doing nothing, appallingly. Yet always with a flurry of junk legislation in the background. Scotland needs competent government more than new laws. If Salmond provides that, he'll be doing well.
In politics, as in life, destiny is a capricious business. Andrew Mackinlay, the Labour MP for Thurrock, must have assumed that it was his bleak fate to be remembered as the politician who hectored the wan Dr David Kelly and called him "chaff" at a Commons select committee meeting in 2003. This evening, however, history has revealed a quite different role for Mr Mackinlay who became the 308th MP to back Gordon Brown, prompting John McDonnell, the last remaining alternative candidate, to throw the towel in. It is certain that Mr Brown will now be Labour leader and Prime Minister - the first PM since Eden in 1955 to have reached Number Ten unchallenged and the first leader of his party since Lansbury in 1932 to have got the job without a contest.
Is it just me, or is David Willetts largely right in the great Tory grammar school row? Ah yes, it would appear to be just me who thinks so. That is if the Conservative blogosphere is anything to go by. I have just bumped into Mr Willetts, who appears remarkably calm for a man responsible for The Greatest Cameron Sell-out (so far). And so he should be. This really might be Cameron’s Clause 4 moment. That was Labour’s out-moded expression of its gut instincts which the party accepted had not been implemented when it was last in power and would not be when it next got into government. In that case, why cling to dogma when the world has moved on? The greatest domestic issue this country faces is the backwards slide of social mobility.
Now, I am as much a fan of reality television as the next man, but there are limits. It’s one thing to take inspiration from Golding’s Lord of the Flies – as all reality shows do – and quite another to try to recreate that masterpiece, as Variety reveals CBS now proposes to do. The idea is apparently to take forty children aged 8 to 15 off to ghost town (rather than an island) and let them start from scratch. Now you have to be a bit weird to want to watch children returning to the Hobbesian state of nature, but my experience as a parent suggests that most of them will have the time of their lives, and the rest will be able to quit when they like. But literary sacrilege is another matter.
We’ve just posted our editorial which is a strong attack on the Tories for their anti-grammar school stance. Scroll down for further comment on the subject from Matthew d’Ancona and James Forsyth. Update: Iain Martin argues that this might be Cameron's Clause 4 moment below and David Willetts defends himself on ConservativeHome.