Peter Hoskin

Are the Lib Dems spurning Tory advances?

From our UK edition

Plenty of posturing from the Lib Dem corner today, as their Spring Conference continues in Harrogate.  Both Nick Clegg and Vince Cable are laying into the Thatcher Years and, by extension, the Tories.  Here, for instance, is how the Guardian quotes Cable:    "[The Tories] have been completely caught flat-footed by this crisis ... They didn't anticipate it. Many of the problems we have originate from the Thatcher years. If you take for example the way in which they demutualised building societies, which became banks, that was a real Thatcher policy and those institutions have been at the heart of the crisis of irresponsible lending. It originated in the Tory years.

Introducing the new Spectator Book Club

From our UK edition

Peter Hoskin celebrates The Spectator’s rich literary tradition and welcomes bibliophiles across the world to a new online home The Spectator offices at 22 Old Queen Street are a bibliophile’s paradise. Books are, quite simply, everywhere: in bookcases; on top of filing cabinets; on the floor; and in the recesses where fireplaces should be. The piles grow daily, as publishers send books by the dozen to our literary editor, Mark Amory, and his deputy, Clare Asquith. Until at some point — usually when we fear a terrible literary avalanche — there’s A Great Clear Out, and the process starts all over again. Of course, the books aren’t there for show.

Introducing the revamped Spectator Book Club

From our UK edition

Just to flag-up the The Spectator's revamped, online Book Club - which you can access here.  Plenty of stuff there that bibliophilic CoffeeHousers may find interesting - including Book of the Month recommendations (this month: Jonathan Littell's The Kindly Ones); a massive, well-sorted review archive; and a discussion board.  Would be great to see some of you over there.   To mark the launch, The Spectator's holding a short story competition.  There are full details in the latest issue of the mag - but, in case any of you want to enter, I reproduce the terms here:  To celebrate the launch of the Spectator Book Club, The Spectator is giving you the chance to have a short story published in the magazine.

A neat little video

From our UK edition

I've just got round to watching, somewhat belatedly, this footage of William Hague reviewing his own PMQs performance. It's a bit more detailed than the post-match analysis that Cameron gave at the end of this video last year, and a cracking example of a politician engaging purposefully with the internet to give the public a nice insight into life at Westminster. From the Tories' perspective, it also helps them push their own narrative of what happened in PMQs, so don't be surprised to see this kind of thing again.

PMQs live blog | 4 March 2009

From our UK edition

With Brown in America, David Cameron on compassionate leave, and Nick Clegg looking after his newborn son, it's a Harman-Hague-Cable match in PMQs today.  Expect a subdued affair, although there could be some sparks over Harman's comments about Fred Goodwin's pension.  Stay tuned for live Coffee House coverage from 1200.  You can watch proceedings here. 1205: First question for Harman from Keith Vaz, on the "increasing level on violence in video games".  Harman: "There must be tough classification..." etc. 1208: Hague stands to cheers from the Tory benches.  Offers his condolences to the victims of the Lahore terror attack yesterday - Harman didn't.

You know things are getting really bad for Brown when…

From our UK edition

...Cabinet ministers would rather be in opposition than in his government.  This from Alice Miles in today's Times: "Can the country really bear another 14 months of this? Not even ministers are sure they can endure it: one member of the Cabinet told me recently that, despite the hell of being in opposition, he could hardly wait for the election to get away from the misery and directionlessness of the Brown regime: 'Gordon doesn't start from a position of conviction, he just wants to create dividing lines with the Conservatives.

A humble rift

From our UK edition

So, it seems that Alistair Darling wasn't speaking on message when he called for some "humility" from government yesterday.  The Mail reports that Brown was left "fuming" by Darling's intervention, and there's much talk of a rift between the PM and his Chancellor.  Brown's since tried to paper over the cracks, telling Nick Robinson that there's "always a need for humility", but he then tore the paper down with this follow-up: "And the idea ... that somehow this is a British problem that was a British government mistake, actually what happened is that round the world, as everybody understands, the whole global financial system seized up.

Spelman guilty of “inadvertent breaches”

From our UK edition

As ConservativeHome reports, the official investigation into 'Nannygate' has found Caroline Spelman guilty of "inadvertent breaches" of Commons rules.  The "inadvertent" bit means she'll keep her job in the shadow cabinet, but Paul Waugh writes that she'll have to repay £9,600 of expenses that she used to pay her nanny.  Much like the Brown decision last week, I doubt the outcome will do much to revive people's faith in the political class.

Is Brown’s global mission dehumanising him?

From our UK edition

Over at The Bright Stuff, Martin flags up this passage in Rachel Sylvester's excellent Times column today:  During one recent conference call involving Ed Balls and Lord Mandelson (Mr Brown's new core team who have regular strategy meetings) the Prime Minister was pressed repeatedly to deal with a list of specific issues but kept turning the conversation to his plan to create a new economic world order. It's a compelling snapshot, and cuts deep into many of Brown's political problems.  Unlike his predecessor, our current PM struggles to do human; an impediment at the best of times, but potentially fatal when repossessions, bankruptices and unemployment are shooting ever skywards, and people want a friend not a calculator.

Tragedy on the streets of Lahore

From our UK edition

Grim echoes of the Mumbai atrocities this morning, as the news came in that a bus carrying the Sri Lankan cricket team had been attacked in Lahore.  Once again, it seems that the perpertrators are a Pakistani terrorist organisation, perhaps even the same Lashkar-e-Taibar; once again, the attack is being described as "well organised"; and, once again, the end result is tragic: at least six people have died and around seven are injured.  Perhaps the main difference is that this took place on Pakistani soil.  Another is that the gunmen haven't been captured or killed, and most likely won't be. It encapsulates the chaos that reigns in Pakistan right now.

Is Darling paving the way for some “humility” from Brown?

From our UK edition

Hm.  I was quite surprised by Alistair Darling's interview with the Telegraph this morning.  To my ear, Government rhetoric has been hardening over the past few weeks; the same old soundbites about "Tory cuts" and "Problems which started in America" used ever more defiantly.  But here we have a softening of approach, and - although there are some sleights of hand (Darling refers to mistakes made over the "last 15 years" - i.e. these were Tory mistakes too) - something close to an admission of Government guilt.  Here are the key passages from the article: “There are a lot of lessons to be learnt by regulators, governments, all of us,” [Darling] says.

Brown’s Mandy dilemma

From our UK edition

Oh dear.  You feel it had to happen sometime, and here it is: news that Labour MPs are calling on Gordon Brown to "rein in" Peter Mandelson.  Predictably, it's over the continuing Royal Mail row; something that, as it happens, Mandy's on the right side of.   So far as Brown's concerned, increased hostility towards Mandy puts him in a tricky position.  After all, it was Brown's idea to ennoble Mandelson and draft him back into government in the first place.  He did so against a fair amount of internal opposition.  So if the PM doesn't stand by his business secretary - if he caves into the calls coming from the backbenches - it leaves him looking especially weak.

It’s the fundamentals, stupid

From our UK edition

Nestled among all the coverage of Brown's meeting with Obama, and of Harman's denunciation of Fred Goodwin, is this story in the FT: "The government’s flagship £10bn business lending guarantee scheme, due to come into force on Monday, is weeks behind schedule. The delay will fuel business and union concerns about the pace of government measures to combat the recession. The £10bn scheme was the centrepiece of a package of measures, branded “real help for business”, unveiled by business secretary Lord Mandelson on January 14. The scheme is designed to support up to £20bn of existing short-term bank lending to medium-sized companies, freeing up capital for new corporate loans.

Brown gets mad with Harman – but will he get even?

From our UK edition

Last we heard, Brown wasn't convinced that Harriet Harman was positioning herself to succeed him as Labour leader.  But this Mail on Sunday story paints a different picture, claiming that he's actually threatened to sack her for her "disloyalty".  Here's a key snippet: "The Mail on Sunday understands that the Prime Minister’s anger boiled over at a private meeting in No10, with Mr Brown shouting: ‘Who the hell does that woman think she is?’ Sources say Mr Brown swore more than once during heated exchanges with aides on how to silence Labour Deputy Leader Miss Harman. At one point, he is also said to have discussed the possibility of demoting her from her Cabinet post of Commons Leader. One MP said: ‘Gordon is sick to the back teeth of Harman.

Krohn 2032?

From our UK edition

I doubt even Rod Liddle was as precocious as this aged 13: [Footage of thirteen-year-old Jonathan Krohn addressing the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington DC yesterday] Hat-tip: Paul Waugh.

A failure of expectations management ahead of Brown’s meeting with Obama

From our UK edition

Just as an addendum to James's post earlier, one thing that strikes me about the run-up to the Brown-Obama meeting is how counterproductive the message coming out of Downing street is.  Today's Times report contains another example of the kind of quote that's been cropping up: a "seasoned Labour strategist" saying that this is the PM's "best, if not last, chance" to win the next election.  These sentiments have now become the dominant narrative. Not only is this a failure of expectations management - meaning that the meeting will probably be judged by its potential to save Brown's premiership - but it strengthens the idea that Brown needs Obama far more than Obama needs Brown.

Why have Mandelson and Clarke been kept apart?

From our UK edition

Reading Bagehot a couple of weeks ago, on the prospects for a televisual clash between Ken Clarke and Peter Mandelson, it struck me how the dynamics of the situation have changed.  Despite the drooling anticipation of numerous political observers, both Labour and the Tories have seemed reluctant to put their two business frontbenchers up against each other.  But, at first, most of that reluctance came from Tory folk I chatted to - their fear being that Mandelson, face-to-face with Ken, would milk the occasion for all its split-story worth. Now, though, after weeks of strong message discipline from Clarke, that fear seems to have subsided.  Instead, there's much more reluctance on the part of Labour people I know.

Labour to hire Sir Alan for mayoral bid?

From our UK edition

Much ado round Westminster about Andrew Gilligan's claim that Labour, through their London director, have approached business-supremo-cum-TV-personality Alan Sugar to run as their candidate for London Mayor in 2012.  As Paul Waugh reveals, Labour are denying it all - but the story still makes a lot of sense.  After all, Sugar is high-profile; popular with the public; and, despite his burgeoning friendship with Gordon Brown, sufficiently independent to remain unsullied by this Government.  And, to top it all off, he's not Ken Livingstone.  To my mind, he could could be a formidable opponent for Boris, and Tory grassroots seem to agree - respondents to a ConservativeHome survey last week put him as "Boris's most dangerous opponent in 2012".

Mandelson struggles to pull the media strings

From our UK edition

There's an air of desperation about Peter Mandelson's article in the Wall Street Journal today.  The notion that the UK's uniquely well-placed to deal with the downturn seems to have been jettisoned - Mandy gives the excuse that "the U.K. has taken an early hit from a credit crunch that began with a serious failure in financial markets - perhaps even more than most because of its large financial-services sector." - but the essential message is still the same: creditors, please don't worry, the UK will remain solvent.  This paragraph contains it in a nutshell: "Just as importantly, when the government announced its borrowing plans last year, it made clear commitments to specified tax increases and a slowed rate of public-spending growth from 2011 onwards.