Isabel Hardman

The Commons has gone into meltdown this evening over the Speaker’s handling of the Gaza ceasefire motion, with the Speaker expressing ‘regret’ for the way the debate ended up. SNP and Tory MPs stormed out at one point, and MPs voted on whether to close the chamber to the press and public as part of the row about the selection of two amendments to the SNP motion calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. It was defeated with just 20 MPs voting in favour. The vote was delayed because Tory MPs staged a sit-in in the No lobby. The motion as amended by Labour was then passed on the nod, without a vote on the SNP motion as originally tabled, but even that is now being disputed. The government had withdrawn its own amendment in protest at the Speaker’s decision.

The government has now tabled its own amendment to the SNP motion calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. This change to the text calls for ‘negotiations to agree an immediate humanitarian pause as the best way to stop the fighting’, and then ‘moves towards a permanent sustainable ceasefire’. It also says that a ceasefire requires all hostages to be released, the formation of a new Palestinian government and – crucially – ‘Hamas to be unable to launch further attacks and no longer in charge of Gaza, and a credible pathway to a two-state solution’. It’s worth remembering that this is an Opposition Day debate, which is not binding on the government at all, and thus far the pressure has been on Labour, rather than Conservative, MPs.

Labour has significantly shifted its language on Israel’s conflict with Hamas over the past 24 hours. But has it changed its position? Yesterday Keir Starmer gave a speech to Scottish Labour conference in which he called for ‘a ceasefire that lasts’, adding: ‘That is what must happen now. The fighting must stop now.’ His aides have clarified that this is not a call for a ceasefire now, but a sustainable one, which means Hamas stopping its attacks on Israel and releasing hostages. But this morning, Shadow Health Secretary Wes Streeting told Times Radio that ‘objectively, Israel has gone too far’ and that ‘what we have seen are actions that go beyond reasonable self-defence’.

Sadiq Khan has announced six new names for the previously boringly-named Overground. The practical point of it is that the Overground goes everywhere and is quite confusing to navigate if you’re an occasional visitor. Breaking up the orange (which only stayed that way because Boris Johnson liked it being the same colour when he was shown a draft map) isn’t particularly disputed, but what has excited interest is the choice of names. Lioness, Mildmay, Windrush, Weaver, Suffragette and Liberty have a certain progressive ring to them. They’ve been received in some quarters as names that are seeking a reaction rather than just reflecting London’s heritage.

Labour has now suspended Graham Jones as a parliamentary candidate after a recording emerged of him allegedly saying that Britons who travel to Israel to fight for the IDF should be ‘locked up’. The former MP, who is standing again in Hyndburn, was taped appearing to refer to ‘f***ing Israel’, and saying it was ‘illegal’ for Britons to fight for Israel. It isn’t – the UK recognises the right of dual nationals to join ‘legitimately recognised armed forces’, but it is a point that has been debated within politics, and suggests that Keir Starmer is lowering the bar following the fallout from his Rochdale decision. Starmer has made a real mess of the Rochdale situation.

Who to blame for the demise of Labour’s £28 billion annual green investment pledge? According to Keir Starmer, it’s the Conservatives. He said this afternoon: ‘What would be really irresponsible is to know the damage done to the economy by this failed government and ignore that and pretend it didn’t happen.’ The party briefing is that because the Conservatives have crashed the economy and Jeremy Hunt plans to ‘max out’ the country’s credit card, the £28 billion is now unaffordable.  A quick way to set fire to voters’ trust in you is to drop your fiscal rules as soon as they don’t feel very fun. Within the party, there is a debate about whether Ed Miliband or Rachel Reeves is to blame.

Brianna Ghey’s father has called on Rishi Sunak to apologise for his ‘degrading’ comments at Prime Minister’s Questions. Peter Spooner told Sky News: For the Prime Minister of our country to come out with degrading comments like he did, regardless of them being in relation to discussions in parliament, they are absolutely dehumanising. Identities of people should not be used in that manner, and I personally feel shocked by his comments and feel he should apologise for his remarks. As reported earlier, Sunak didn’t edit his oft-used script about the number of things Keir Starmer has flip-flopped on at PMQs today, despite having just heard that Brianna Ghey’s mother Esther would be in the public gallery.

Nicola Sturgeon’s afternoon at the Covid Inquiry was pretty brutal. She was subjected to a difficult round of questioning on whether she used the pandemic to advance the case for Scottish independence. Funnily enough, the former first minister didn’t agree with that analysis.  In fact, her memory was that she had never thought ‘less’ about politics than during the pandemic. She became quite fixated upon the purity of her motives in dealing with Covid, to the extent that her evidence started to resemble Tony Blair’s lengthy ruminations during the Chilcot Inquiry.