Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman is assistant editor of The Spectator and author of Why We Get the Wrong Politicians. She also presents Radio 4’s Week in Westminster.

Harriet Harman: Labour is making steady progress

'I don't think things are going wrong,' Harriet Harman insisted on the Today programme. 'I think we're making steady progress. And if you look at when people actually vote, for example in council elections, then actually around the country we've got nearly 2,000 more councillors since Ed Miliband became leader.' listen to ‘Harman: ‘I don't think things are going wrong’ with Labour’ on Audioboo Miliband last night admitted on ITV's The Agenda that 2015 will 'be a close election'.

Cameron continues silver offensive

David Cameron is doing his best to do what the Tories haven't always been that impressive at: capitalising on the clever political bits in this year's Budget. He was at a PM direct event in Peacehaven today, driving home the importance of the government's reforms to pensions to his target voters. But he also had the opportunity to woo them with other policy treats, such as what the Tories might promise on inheritance tax in their next manifesto. 'Would I like to go further in future?' he said. 'Yes, I would. I believe in people being able to pass money down through the generations and pass things on to their children.' He added that 'it's something we'll have to address in our manifesto'.

Michael Gove attacks Tristram Hunt for not knowing difference between education and health

Education questions is always interesting in the sense that the main players are quite energetic and keen for debate and there is a genuine divide now between the two main parties (and indeed within the Coalition). But today's session was interesting in the sense that a grandmother describes a Christmas present they don't quite understand as 'interesting' because Tristram Hunt used his slot to grill the Education Secretary about a health issue. 'More and more research shows the importance of early years development in a child's education. The Labour party Sure Start programme was focused on supporting those vital infant years, a policy of prevention rather than cure.

Labour’s localist lurch

One of the other things worth noting from this morning's letter from the 'members of the progressive community' who are anxious that Labour isn't attempting to make a big offer in 2015 is that the alliance of groups and figures from the left and right of the party back decentralisation. The letter calls for: 'Devolution of state institutions, by giving away power and resources to our nations, regions, cities, localities and, where possible, directly to the people.' As I explained in my Telegraph column last week, a battle in the shadow cabinet has resulted in a surprise victory for Hilary Benn and Jon Cruddas, who had been pushing for a Labourish sort of localism. We saw some of the outworkings of that in Ed Miliband's Hugo Young lecture.

Labour thinkers see danger in playing safe

David Cameron's attack on Labour for "flailing and dithering" over whether to support the government's pension reforms would seem unfair had the party not struggled to present a clear message over the weekend. It would be unfair to expect a snap judgement on the changes from a responsible opposition party, but the weekend press and the papers this morning suggest that Labour doesn't even have a neat holding line as it works out how far to extend its support. But what should worry Ed Miliband far more than the attack from Cameron is the increasing anxiety from his own side about Labour's message. The Guardian's letter from 19 leading Labour groups and thinkers including the Fabians, Progress and Compass, is far more concerning.

What today’s polls mean for the Tories and Labour

The Labour party's reaction to today's opinion polls will tell us a great deal about how well Ed Miliband has really invested in his party. If the backbenchers feel they have a stake in the Labour leader, and as though he is worth fighting for - which Conservative MPs have often not felt about Cameron, leading to them airing their dirty laundry in public - then the panic in the party won't break out beyond John Mann's intervention today. The backbencher told Pienaar's Politics that 'of course it's a warning shot and it would be naive to think otherwise. I think the message is that we need to be much clearer and I think simpler in putting across what our alternative is and what we stand for.' Mann said this wasn't just a Miliband problem but also the Shadow Cabinet and the whole party.

Tory Wars: Backbenchers threaten backlash against Shapps backlash

There is a rather furious backlash underway against the backlash that Grant Shapps finds himself in the middle of after his bingo gaffe. Supporters of the Tory Chairman suspect he has been stitched up in some way. I understand that the graphic was emailed out to a number of tweeting MPs who all tweeted it at roughly the same time - Shapps was the first. And as Chairman, he has to take the flak. Others privately suspect that other ministers who are after his job are responsible for briefings such as this one to the Sun that he could lose his job if the Tories take a drubbing in the European elections.

How food banks were shunted around government departments

It is well worth reading Paul Waugh's interview with Iain Duncan Smith in the House Magazine for a number of reasons - not least his hint about docking child benefit in the future. But the Work and Pensions Secretary also makes an interesting comment about food banks: 'We are not responsible for food banks, that policy area generally is Cabinet Office and so it should remain. I'm happy for people to visit food banks, I don't have a particular problem with them.' I've written before about why people visit food banks, and why even if we had a very good benefits system that paid people the right amount of money on time, there would still be a need for these examples of strong communities.

Of course Labour doesn’t trust people with their money: the party made little effort to teach them about it

Labour's response to the biggest announcement of the Budget, on pensions reform, was never going to be snappy. It would be unfair to expect an Opposition to deliver an immediate response to such a surprising and complex reform. But that's not to say that the way the party has responded has been exemplary. They were not helped by John McTernan's Newsnight interview on Wednesday night in which he framed the debate about the pension reforms as being about whether or not governments should trust people to manage their own money.

Labour’s campaign pickle

Douglas Alexander has given an interesting interview to the Independent in which he reveals that Labour has set up a team to monitor Ukip. It will go some way to reassuring those at the top of the party who, as I report in my Telegraph column this morning, are growing increasingly nervous about the party's chances in the European elections. There have been awkward confrontations in Shadow Cabinet meetings about the party's election strategy, and demands for something a little more tangible on the doorstep from shadow ministers from all wings of the party, and from candidates. It's interesting that Labour is taking Ukip seriously, as some party chiefs initially read the result of the Wythenshawe by-election as a sign that Nigel Farage's attempt to nick Labour voters wasn't working.

Labour sticks to cost-of-living attack as Budget debate rumbles on

If Ed Balls thought he could have done a better job than Ed Miliband at responding to the Budget, today he got his chance. The debate on the measures announced by George Osborne rumbles on in the House of Commons, and Ed Balls gave his speech on it this afternoon. He started by telling the Chamber that this was 'the Chancellor's last chance to make decisions and announce measures that will make a real difference before the general election'. Balls claimed that 'for all [Osborne's] boasts and complacency, the Budget did nothing to address the central reality that will define his time in office - the fact that for most people in our country, living standards are not rising but are falling year on year'.

George Osborne’s Budget elephant trap is still open and waiting for Labour

Yesterday the Opposition didn't really do all that much opposing. Labour announced it was going to vote in favour of George Osborne's AME welfare cap, with Ed Balls arguing that Ed Miliband had set this out in a speech last year anyway. This cap was supposed to be an elephant trap for Labour, but Labour initially appeared to have tip-toed around the edge without falling in. But Osborne has set a secondary snare for the party: the 'bedroom tax'. The Conservatives are keen to point out that restoring the 'spare room subsidy' would lead to a £465 million welfare spending rise in 2015/16, and want Labour to answer how they could avoid breaching the welfare cap.

Tories: There never was a bingo poster

George Osborne got the front pages he wanted this morning. 'A budget for Sun readers' proclaims his target newspaper. But Labour, which doesn't have very much to say about the Budget, has been celebrating Grant Shapps' unfortunate infographic which he tweeted last night which takes a rather David Attenborough-style tone when describing what hardworking people like to do in their spare time. 'Cutting the bingo tax and beer duty to help hardworking people do more of the things they enjoy' the image says. Labour is delighted and many Tories are horrified. George Osborne has been pressed repeatedly about it on his post-Budget broadcast tour.

Labour doesn’t want to talk about today’s budget

Ed Balls has just delivered quite an odd post-Budget briefing. It was odd because he didn't really want to criticise anything. Of course, when the Chancellor has just unexpectedly announced major reforms to the pensions system, it would be foolish for an opposition to start criticising a reform that it probably doesn't quite understand. But the furthest the Shadow Chancellor would go was that it was 'underwhelming'.

Budget 2014: The Tories gave Ed Miliband licence to become a class warrior

No opposition leader looks forward to responding to the Budget. It's one of the harder gigs as you get little notice of the detailed measures that may cause real rows and are scribbling feverishly throughout the statement to try to make your pre-written speech sound relevant. But it is still an achievement that Ed Miliband in his own response managed to avoid talking about anything in the Budget other than the new design of the pound coins. He started by reminding the House of Commons of how much further the Chancellor needs to go before hardworking families up and down the country feel as cheerful as the Tories. He said: 'But he did not mention one central fact: The working people of Britain are worse off under the Tories. Living standards down: month after month, year after year.

What could George Osborne’s rabbit be?

Presuming that George Osborne isn't sitting in the Treasury, perspiring slightly as he tries to work out what on earth he could offer as a big surprise in the Budget, here are some suggestions on what that surprise rabbit from the hat could be*. A lower AME welfare cap funds a higher personal allowanceThe Chancellor is due to set the level of the spending cap for welfare in today's Budget. Could he set it much lower than expected, and use the extra money saved to raise the personal allowance much higher than expected? This would mean he can tie welfare spending to taxpayers' money in an even more explicit way than he has done previously, and challenge Labour to vote against the cap by saying that they'd be denying taxpayers more of their hard-earned cash during a cost-of-living crisis.

Budget 2014: Will Cameron’s disciples spread the message?

Lynton Crosby addressed the Conservative parliamentary party last night about the party's messaging for the European elections. Amusingly, I hear he told those gathered to watch one of his powerpoint presentations that while Jesus only had 12 disciples, David Cameron has 305 to spread his message. Perhaps the next Downing Street wooing event will see the Prime Minister handing out loaves and fishes to his backbenchers. After a rather off-message week, the Conservatives need their MPs to get into line and start talking about that long-term economic plan today as George Osborne unveils his Budget. One of the key words to look out for is 'resilience', which the Chancellor has already dropped into his tweets about the exciting new pound coin.

Will Ebbsfleet lead to a deluge of new garden cities?

One of the announcements in tomorrow's Budget that George Osborne has been very keen to trail is his support for a garden city at Ebbsfleet. It's not a new location, and the project has got many eagle economic eyes fixed on it; I wrote about the ambitions that Labour's Lord Adonis holds for the area back in February. But one crucial difference between the Adonis plan and the Osborne plan is that the Chancellor doesn't see Ebbsfleet as a way of making the case for more garden cities in the future. This New Town or garden city or whatever you fancy calling it is remarkable because it has the support of the two local MPs and the local community, who would rather see brownfield land developed into pleasant, high quality housing than the land staying undeveloped and ugly.

Sir Malcolm Rifkind delivers a stern warning on Ukraine

MPs moved seamlessly today from debating the breeding season of the hare to the situation in Crimea. It's been quiet recently, but this afternoon the House of Commons chamber hosted one of its better speeches from Sir Malcolm Rifkind, who was bristling with a cold, disapproving fury. This crisis, he told MPs, wasn't just a crisis for Ukraine, it was a crisis for every European country. And Europe was failing to recognise this, and failing to respond adequately, he argued. 'For the first time since 1945, a European state has invaded the territory of another European state and has annexed part of its territory.