Economy

  • AAPL

    213.43 (+0.29%)

  • BARC-LN

    1205.7 (-1.46%)

  • NKE

    94.05 (+0.39%)

  • CVX

    152.67 (-1.00%)

  • CRM

    230.27 (-2.34%)

  • INTC

    30.5 (-0.87%)

  • DIS

    100.16 (-0.67%)

  • DOW

    55.79 (-0.82%)

Three ways to get Britain’s economy moving

There was a palpable frustration from the Prime Minister in his Labour conference speech this week. ‘I would love to go quicker’, Andy Burnham told delegates, explaining he was constrained by the reality of our public finances. But his frustration isn’t just about not being able to splash the cash within the fiscal rules. He feels he needs a fresh mandate before making the more radical changes he’s keen to make. In some ways we should be thankful; despite the clearly impressive oratory and the totally sound decision to break the ratchet effect of the triple lock, it was a speech with some quite radical socialist principles at its core. Principles that have Britain’s financial ruin at their end. That’s for the election though.

Spotlight

Featured economics news and data.

Cutting Britain’s giant welfare bill would be an act of kindness

Does having money really matter that much? There are those, usually with quite a bit of it, who want us to care less about materialism. But, unequivocally, money really does matter – not because of any status it supposedly brings, but for the freedom it buys: freedom to choose how we live and how we look after others. Considering this, it seems that the deep disillusionment with mainstream politicians in recent years stems from a protracted and ongoing period of stagnant living standards over which they have presided. But the truth is that the average person has not got poorer since the global financial crisis. They have got a little bit richer. Employment levels are still exceptionally high. And, both historically and internationally, we are a very rich country.

Andy Burnham’s Great British Grid is doomed

There was a very big hole in the Chancellor John Healey’s claim yesterday that he is going to generate a new age of industry. Why would anyone want to open a factory, or any other kind of industrial plant, in Britain when they would be paying far more for their energy than in other countries? UK non-domestic customers paid an average of 26.63 pence per kilowatt-hour for their electricity in 2024, more than any other member state of the International Energy Agency (IEA) and 60 per cent more than the IEA average. It is little wonder that our chemical plants, oil refineries and many other industries are rapidly leaving our shores in the search for cheaper power. But worry not, the government has a plan, or two plans.

Can Labour really reindustrialise Britain?

15 min listen

Noa Hoffman is joined from Labour conference in Liverpool by James Heale and economics editor Michael Simmons to discuss Chancellor John Healey’s keynote speech. They discuss his attempt to sell fiscal discipline in distinctly Labour language, whether the government’s reindustrialisation plans add up and what the speech tells us about the economic argument Andy Burnham wants to make. Plus, as the bars begin to swell on day two of the conference, can Labour's united front continue for Shabana Mahmood's speech? Produced by Patrick Gibbons.

John Healey’s ‘new age of industrialisation’ is a fantasy

The first half of John Healey’s first Labour conference speech as Chancellor reminded me of old men in a bowls club reminiscing about the Korean war. For more than 15 minutes Healey set out his credentials as a Labour veteran. He’d gone from his constituency Labour party to the trade union movement and then to No. 11 (note, no mention of private business experience). He’s been around the block so long that Labour is ‘literally’ his family, he said, paying tribute to his wife. Once the thanks to the Mrs were out of the way, things moved to his true love: Gordon Brown. It felt, at times, like the Liverpool Convention Centre had been given over for a Brown memorial rather than the governing party’s conference.

Russia’s economy is slowly rotting

For several years already, every autumn, Russia's finance ministry has performed the same ritual. It unveils a budget that looks sober, even responsible, with a shrinking deficit and falling inflation. Every year, it is ignored by reality. The budget for 2027, outlined at the end of last week, is no exception. The headline promise is a deficit of 2.2 per cent of GDP next year, about 5.5 trillion roubles (£49 billion), down from roughly 3 per cent expected this year. Revenues are to rise by 7.5 per cent, which after inflation is barely 1 per cent. Spending will grow by less than 6 per cent, which after inflation is a cut of about 1 per cent.

Scrapping the pensions triple lock won’t pay for Burnham’s care service

Andy Burnham told the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg yesterday that he’s ready to ‘rip the plaster off’ and introduce a new social care service, free at the point of use, for everyone in England. ‘Everyone contributes, everyone’s covered,’ the Prime Minister said – but how exactly they will contribute is a question he’s left to Baroness Casey to answer and for voters to endorse at the next general election. The Health Foundation has estimated that the cost a care system like Burnham suggests could be £18.5 billion a year in 2035. (He says it’s ‘not that high’ – but he didn’t offer an alternative.

The problem with the Tories’ benefits crackdown plan

The Conservatives have had a change of fortune of late. With the latest YouGov polls suggesting that the Tories have pulled neck-and-neck with Reform, even the most sceptical must acknowledge there has been a 'Kemi bounce'. PMQs is often touted by SW1ers as a cause of this, but having Starmer, and now Burnham, it is hard to suggest Badenoch’s shooting at anything but an open goal. Instead, I would put it down to a good reshuffle and, importantly, to good policy announcements. The abolition of stamp duty and inheritance tax will have undoubtedly endeared the party with their traditional voters concerned with whether to pivot towards their teal-coloured competitors. Shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately’s latest policy announcement certainly fits this trend.

The wealthy person’s guide to fleeing Britain

Behind the scenes of The Spectator’s wealth tax debate this month there were lots of nervous whispers. ‘Wealthy people we work with are absolutely terrified about an exit tax,’ one Westminster figure remarked. The economist Arthur Laffer, one of the debate’s speakers, couldn’t believe a wealth tax was even being considered. Britain is already near the top of his famous curve – the point beyond which taxation reduces the Treasury’s take – and seems determined to push things to destruction. The latest fiscal rumour – that we might seize millions on a wealthy migrant’s departure – is a dangerous one. According to reports, it’s also the reason Chris Rokos, the third-highest taxpayer on the Sunday Times tax list, has decided to leave for Greece.

Net Zero has made Britain less safe

Our very ability to keep the lights on and maintain critical infrastructure is under threat. That is the stark message from Sir Richard Dearlove, the former ‘Chief’ of MI6. In the Global Warming Policy Foundation’s Annual Lecture, Dearlove asked whether Britain has thought seriously enough about the vulnerabilities that are being introduced into our increasingly complex energy infrastructure. His answer was emphatic and sobering. “We have as a nation negligently wandered close to a cliff edge,” he said. Britain has allowed the security dimension of energy policy to become an afterthought. We are, according to Dearlove, effectively inviting hostile disruption.

Government borrowing surged in August

Five weeks out from his first Budget, John Healey is scrambling to make the numbers add up. Figures just released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show the government borrowed £18.3 billion in August, making it the second highest August on record behind 2020. It was also £3.5 billion over the Office for Budget Responsibility’s (OBR) forecast for the month. ‘Spending increased more than government income from taxes… partly reflecting the impacts of inflation’, the ONS said, with borrowing for August up £2.9 billion (19 per cent) compared with last year. What’s worse is this borrowing increase came despite an increase in tax receipts, which are £2.5 billion higher than a year ago, with income tax revenue up 6.6 per cent.

Does Andrew Griffith have what it takes?

Appointments to the shadow cabinet recall Ernest Shackleton’s job advert to cross the Antarctic. ‘Men wanted for hazardous journey, small wages, bitter cold, long months of complete darkness, constant danger.’ One of those brave – or foolhardy – enough to sign up for Kemi Badenoch’s top team was Andrew Griffith, last month named the new shadow chancellor. Griffith is a successful businessman, ex-Treasury minister and can boast of being the only ex-FTSE100 boss currently serving in the Commons. With a Budget looming in six weeks’ time, this morning he made his first big speech in the role. Griffith opted to play it safe in his first outing, speaking at the Capital City College Group in Tottenham to talk tax, jobs and small businesses.

The Bank holding interest rates will be of little relief for John Healey

The Bank of England has just voted six-three to hold interest rates at 3.75 per cent, a decision that makes Britain’s central bank an outlier following rate hikes from both the European Central Bank and America’s Federal Reserve. It’s the sixth time in a row the Bank has voted to hold rates. The decision also comes in spite of yesterday’s news that inflation climbed further away from the Bank’s 2 per cent target, hitting 3.1 per cent in August, and the Monetary Policy Committee’s own forecast that rising energy prices will drive inflation above 4 per cent in the first few months of next year. In a letter to the chancellor, Andrew Bailey, the Bank’s governor, also warned energy bills are likely to rise 24 per cent in the winter.

Could I bear to vote for Zack Polanski?

Will Labour’s ‘visitor levy’ generate £52 million of revenue for public spending in York and North Yorkshire, as a House of Commons briefing suggests? Or will it deter holidaymakers from exploring the region I love – and every other English destination where the levy is applied – while piling adversity on a hospitality trade already caned by employment cost hikes and tight consumer wallets? Modelling by the Tax Policy Associates thinktank offers a central estimate that the proposed tax on overnight stays (at up to 5 per cent, as set by local authorities) could raise £603 million a year for the loss of 5.8 million room-nights and £689 million in overall visitor spending, roughly half from overseas.

Another cost of living crisis is coming

Britain is heading head first towards another cost of living crisis. Figures released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show inflation rose to 3.1 per cent last year – up from 2.9 per cent the month before. ‘Sharp’ rises in petrol and diesel costs were the main driver, the ONS said, with air fares making a considerable contribution too. The Chancellor, John Healey, put the blame on global events, saying: ‘The war in the Middle East is impacting on inflation worldwide, not just here at home. In our bills, our weekly shop and at the petrol pumps.

Britain’s public sector wage spiral

Britain is in a wage spiral – though not a traditional one. Instead, job and wage growth is surging in the public sector while the private sector struggles. Unions put pressure on the government because of the cost of living, Labour grants pay rises, the cycle continues and a dwindling private sector picks up the bill. Figures just released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that while private sector wage growth in the three months to July was flat at 2.9 per cent, it grew to 6.3 per cent in the public sector. Statisticians continue to insist that this is partly a ‘base effect’ whereby the timing of public sector pay rises occurred earlier than normal, but this explanation has been used for so long it is no longer credible.

Surging gilt yields are making Healey’s fiscal headroom even tighter

Once again, ahead of a Budget, all the talk is of headroom and how much of a buffer John Healey will have before bumping up against the government’s fiscal rules. In March, the Office for Budget Responsibility put the headroom – the margin that lets the government spend a little more, or have a weaker-than-expected economy without having to raise taxes or cut spending – at £23.6 billion. Since then, the government’s cost of borrowing has soared as investors have dumped government debt. That means the government’s interest costs will rise, and that extra interest cuts the Chancellor’s headroom.