Stephen Daisley

When it became clear that Labour had fallen far short of its overhyped expectations in the local elections, I tweeted this: https://twitter.com/JournoStephen/status/992317867004657664 I would now like to retract, but only in one instance. Adam Langleben, councillor for West Hendon in Barnet, lost his seat on Thursday. Given Barnet's sizeable Jewish population, and Labour now being the Hampstead Hezbollah, in all likelihood his party's antisemitism cost him re-election. Which is perverse since Langleben has been one of the bravest partisans in a counter-insurgency of Jews determined to expose and expel antisemites from Labour's ranks.

Theresa May's tragicomic run of rotten luck continues. Amber Rudd has self-deported to the backbenches and the Prime Minister will have to find a credible replacement at a moment of acute strife. Why anyone would want the job is a mystery to most of us, but then we lack that combination of ambition and self-delusion essential to political life. The Home Office is where potential is thrown on the rack and brutalised, where careers go to die slow, ignominious deaths; it is Whitehall's ultimate hostile environment. (Ministers disagree and began speculating about a Rudd return with unseemly haste. They may be right but they could at least feign a bout of reflection and contrition.) Home Secretaries enter the office with one of two mindsets.

What's Nicola Sturgeon playing at on Brexit? Quick answer: politics. Longer answer: politics.  The SNP leader has rejected a deal to resolve the impasse between Westminster and Holyrood over the repatriation of powers from Brussels. She accuses the Tories of a 'power grab' because some areas of responsibility will initially go to the UK rather than Scottish parliament and threatens to deny consent to the government's Brexit Bill. If she does so – and her SNP holds a majority of seats at Holyrood with unofficial junior coalition partners, the Greens – it will fix a procedural wheel clamp on Brexit. At which point, the only way the Bill could go ahead is if Westminster explicitly overruled the Scottish Parliament.  You see where I'm going with this?

The best that can be said for Jeremy Corbyn’s response to air strikes against the Assad regime is that he is at least consistent. Why did he assert that the smart cuff meted out last night risked ‘escalating further… an already devastating conflict’? Because in Corbyn’s worldview, it is the felling of chemical weapons factories, not the extermination of children with the chemical weapons those factories produce, that escalates conflict. Why did he echo Syrian state media in questioning the legality of military action? Because Corbyn is a cynic who calculates that feigning concern for the global rules-based order -- something he believes in only intermittently -- is useful for stalling, deflection and water-muddying.

I'm not one to say 'I told you so’ but the thing is, I did. At the SNP's mass-recruiting, concert-touring, swingometer-skelping zenith, I warned that the party's failure to rein in its most fervent ideologues, not least the digital stormtroopers known as cybernats, would do it a mischief one day. Instead, the Nationalists not only tolerated cybernats, but some got in on the act themselves. None more so than Pete Wishart, the sneer on the snarl of Scottish nationalism, whose late-night maledictions against 'nawbags' and 'wanks' had the faithful testifying and retweeting with equal fervour.  Now the boot is on the other foot and he is coming in for a kicking from his own squad.

Not this again. How many new parties have been proposed now? Andrew Rawnsley says 34 have registered with the Electoral Commission since January. A political party is for life, not just for a twitterstorm. Still, the Tories' annexation by Ukip and Labour's transformation into some hideous fusion of CND and the BNP has left those of us who mosey around the centre ground electorally homeless. Why shouldn't we have a party that articulates our worldview? That seems to be the thinking behind a new group touted on the front page of the Observer. In the works since 2016 (and still there, since there are no plans beyond a few meetings and some WhatsApp threads), the 'Centre Party' is said to have access to £50 million from wealthy benefactors.

Here is a list of things that happened in Scotland this week. See if you can guess which caused the biggest political row:  GDP statistics showed economic growth less than half the UK rate, the third consecutive year Scotland has lagged. One in 12 under-25s is now on a zero-hours contract. The chair of NHS Tayside was forced to resign after the health board dipped into donations to buy a new computer system. Labour councillors voted to increase the allocation of Tory seats on Falkirk Council’s executive committee. Attempts to quit smoking hit a record low after the SNP slashed cessation budgets. Primary classes with 30 or more pupils soared by 44 per cent. School exclusions for assault with a weapon reached a five-year high.

None of this is normal. It's important that we cling to that. It's not normal that British Jews are forced to protest for their fair treatment and safety. It's not normal that four-fifths of the Labour Party think such protests are a political tactic or a Zionist plot. It's not normal that the man who would be Britain's next Prime Minister has to delete his Facebook account because he cannot be sure how many hate groups he is a member of.  Anti-Semitism is a historical constant but it is not normal. We decide our norms and if we are still a just and civilised people we ought to regard it not only as wicked but as a unique wickedness, one that demands special vigilance and loyal enmity.  Jeremy Corbyn is not normal. He sits outside our sense of taste and decency.

A question for Labour's moderates, however we define the term and assuming they are still sizeable enough to merit the plural: Do you want to see Jeremy Corbyn become Prime Minister? Specifically, do you think he possesses the character and temperament of a national leader? Does the prospect of a Corbyn-led Labour government fill you with hope? I'm not asking how you'd feel finally to be rid of this hopeless government, with its prodigious incompetences and petty cruelties. I'm not asking about the Labour Party in your heart but about the one out here, in the world, standing before the voters. That is Jeremy Corbyn's Labour Party and it is the only one on offer. Do you want this Labour Party to come to power? Answering is not easy but your response is important.

'The Scottish Conservatives aspire to lead the next government of Scotland,' proclaims Ruth Davidson in a pamphlet setting out the party's thinking.  Could it really happen? Could the Tories go from wipeout in 1997 to triumph in 2021 – from resisting devolution to effectively running the show in a generation? Too long; didn't read answer? Yes. More complex answer: Yes, if...  Scottish, Conservative, Unionist is a 'Yes, if' document, informed by an understanding that the party cannot sit back and wait for voters to come to it. Muhammad must launch a charm offensive on the mountain. The booklet features contributions from leading lights and rising stars.

The Labour Party brings to mind any number of Yiddish expressions — most of them involving the performance of lavatorial functions — but none more so than the proverb Der mentsh trakht un Got lakht. Man plans and God laughs.  The Almighty’s black humour is surely at work in the resignation of Christine Shawcroft, chair of the Labour Party disputes panel. The woman responsible for rooting out anti-Semitism has been caught defending a council candidate accused of posting Holocaust-denying content on social media. In a leaked internal email, Shawcroft called for Peterborough’s Alan Bull to be reinstated after suspension for 'a Facebook post taken completely out of context and alleged to show anti-Semitism'.

We may be witnessing a #MeToo moment in Labour anti-Semitism. Britain's Jews, so damn accommodating and willing to extend the benefit of the doubt, have finally snapped and said 'enough is enough'. At 5.30pm tonight they will gather in Westminster to protest in the most British way imaginable by handing the Labour Party a strongly-worded letter. The letter calls Jeremy Corbyn a 'figurehead for an anti-Semitic political culture' and says he has repeatedly 'sided with anti-Semites rather than Jews'. If anything, it goes a little easy on him.  The spark was Corbyn's defence of, and dissembling over, an anti-Semitic mural in east London but the frustrations have been building up over time.

The SNP is a coalition that behaves like a megachurch and when the spirit is low, the congregation remembers its schisms. One such departure is defence, because, for all they appear a homogenous rabble of bomb-banners to unsympathetic outsiders, the Scottish Nationalists are quietly but keenly divided on security. The combination of their current political funk and the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal has forced this into the open.  Nicola Sturgeon's response to the Salisbury incident surprised some of her opponents and appalled some in her party. Her instinct was to tweet in support of Theresa May's statement and package of sanctions, including the expulsion of 23 Russian diplomats.