Ross Clark

Britain’s republicans won’t give up. In spite of trying to use the coronation of Charles III as an opportunity to push their campaign to abolish the monarchy, support for the institution has remained stubbornly high. It is our elected politicians – on both sides of the political divide – who seem to have lost support rather than the new King.       Not to be put off, however, the campaign group Republic has this week published its latest Royal Finances Report, claiming that the royal family is really costing us £510 million a year, nearly five times as much as the sovereign grant.      How does it arrive at such a figure? It claims the costs of the monarchy break down as follows: Sovereign grant – £ 108.

I am sure that the business secretary Jonathan Reynolds picked up many useful skills in his previous job in local government, but does he really know more about how to run a business than the people who run one of the world’s most successful companies?    Apparently, yes. Asked on LBC where his comments about encouraging remote working fitted in with Amazon’s decision to order its staff back to work five days a week in the office he said:  If I was talking to a business like that I would say that every piece of evidence that has ever been collated suggests that flexibility, when agreed between employer and employee, is good for productivity and is good for staff resilience. You get to retain your staff for longer, you get more out of them.

First, the good news. The Irish government is about to receive a €13 billion windfall in the form of back taxes from tech giant Apple, after the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled against the company. That should pay for a good few social homes in a country that has an even bigger housing crisis than Britain’s. It could even go some way to providing universal free public healthcare (at the moment most adults have to pay something, even at public hospitals). Why should countries which have been successful at managing their finances be forced to jack up tax rates? Now the bad news. Ireland doesn’t actually want to receive the money any more than Apple wants to pay it. It has spent millions of euros fighting the European Commission (EC), which initiated the case.

Keir Starmer won the Labour leadership election in 2020 on the back of a promise to nationalise public utilities. In one of his most blatant flip flops, he later went back on that, committing instead only to nationalise the rail industry – and even then by degrees as current franchises reached the end of their lives. But could the Prime Minister find himself driven towards a much broader nationalisation after all, and at high political cost? The question arises because of Thames Water, which has warned it could go bust next year if it is blocked from jacking up customers’ bills to help fill its own £15 billion financial black hole. The company wants to raise bills by 60 per cent over five years, but the regulator Ofwat only wants to allow an increase of 23 percent.

Ed Miliband told the EnergyUK conference this morning that he wants to take on the 'blockers, delayers and obstructionists' who stand in the way of Britain’s energy security. Oh good, does that mean that finally he appreciates that the North Sea needs some encouragement? And that a UK fracking industry will finally be allowed to commence, after years of being blocked in the courts by environmentalists spinning false stories about how it will cause your water taps to burst into flames and cause devastating earthquakes (including those actually felt at the Earth’s surface)? Er, sadly not. Miliband, of course, rather likes blockers and delayers when they are on his side.

If Starmer were to rejoin the EU tomorrow, arch-Remainer Gavin Esler tweeted the other day, what benefits of Brexit would you miss most? I've got one for him: affordable cars.  Britain, even under a more EU-friendly Labour government, has declined to copy the EU – as well as the US – in imposing punitive tariffs on imports of Chinese-made electric cars.  For some manufacturers the new EU tariffs will reach 37.6 per cent, which together with the existing 10 per cent tariff will bring it close to 50 per cent. Britain, critics will say, will now become a target for ‘dumping’. That is another way of saying that UK motorists are about to enjoy a cornucopia of affordable electric cars – something which European manufacturers have failed completely to engineer.

Predictably enough, and not unreasonably, the 1700-page final report into the Grenfell disaster apportions the bulk of the blame with the companies who manufactured and sold the flammable cladding and insulation.  The report doesn't spare the London Fire Brigade What has emerged from this inquiry is astonishing: you hardly need a degree in engineering to work out that it is not a good idea to wrap a tower block in combustible material. That manufacturers seem to have 'deliberately concealed' the risk that their products posed is something which is almost inevitably going to be picked over further in the courts. Why it has taken seven years to produce this report – thereby holding up possible criminal cases – is itself a scandal.