Isabel Hardman

Tim Loughton was one of the surprise sackings in September's reshuffle: he was an able minister who knew his portfolio very well indeed. He's evidently reluctant to let that ability go to waste, and has already made interventions on child protection and benefit cuts. His speech later today for the Centre for Social Justice hits the nail on the head of a big Tory problem: marriage. Loughton isn't joining some of his colleagues in attacking gay marriage specifically, but rather the Conservative party's failure to reintroduce tax breaks for married couples. He has written of his dissatisfaction that the Autumn Statement contained no such measures in the Telegraph today: Family matters to Mr Cameron and to the Conservative Party. I hope that family still matters to this Government.

Coffee House has learned that a Tory MP is engaged in a fight with the Home Office on safeguards for its proposed 'snooping bill'. The fate of the Draft Communications Data Bill could be decided on Tuesday when a cross-party committee reports back on the legislation. Nick Clegg is already reported to be considering dropping the Liberal Democrats' support for the Bill, and the joint committee's report is expected to take a negative view of the proposals. One Liberal Democrat member, Lord Strasburger, told Home Secretary Theresa May that the proposals for monitoring internet users' records were a 'honeypot for casual hackers, blackmailers, criminals large and small from around the world, and foreign states'.

A Tory MP has accused the Home Secretary of a 'dereliction of duty' that will put the British people at risk. His criticism concerns the way in which she is handling the Abu Qatada case. Theresa May won permission this week to appeal against the Special Immigration Appeals Commission's decision to block the deportation of Abu Qatada to Jordan. But the Home Office has confirmed in a letter to Tory MP Mark Reckless, seen by Coffee House, that it will base its strategy for the case on the judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, which rejected the Islamist cleric's appeal in May, rather than the test confirmed by the House of Lords in Othman v SSHD 2010, when the House of Lords was at that time the highest court in the land for this country.

In addition to his effective attack on Labour's welfare policy, George Osborne used the Autumn Statement to take on Ed Miliband on another key electoral battleground. Over the past few months, the Labour leader has been trying to convince voters that he has the solution to their cost of living woes. His biggest offer so far has been the Living Wage, which sounds lovely to voters because it involves them being paid more money, but actually doesn't work (something Miliband is clearly sufficiently aware of to stop him pledging to make a living wage mandatory). The coalition already had its own offer in the form of the rise in the personal tax allowance announced in March's budget, but that got little airtime as everyone was upset about pasties and caravans.

The Liberal Democrats are keen to use today to show that Coalition works, but Lord Oakeshott is in a less charitable mood. I've just had a chat with him about George Osborne's explicit rejection of the mansion tax in his statement today as 'intrusive'. The former Lib Dem Treasury spokesman in the House of Lords says: 'I'm not withdrawing anything I have said about the Tories and the mansion tax. Intrusive is exactly what taxes on high-end tax dodgers have to be. George Osborne has performed a screeching handbrake turn on Tory donors' orders.' Nick Clegg's aides have been trying to labour the proalition point in their briefings , though.

The government's airports review will simply end up on a shelf, and major airlines will still be operating from a two-runway airport at Heathrow in 2050. That was the stark warning delivered by the chief executive of British Airways' parent company IAG Willie Walsh this afternoon as he gave evidence to the Transport Select Committee. Walsh told the MPs on the committee: 'I think the decision of the government to establish the Davies commission has been seen by some as a step in the right direction.