Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman is assistant editor of The Spectator and author of Why We Get the Wrong Politicians. She also presents Radio 4’s Week in Westminster.

Ashcroft poll shows potential cost of union reforms for Labour – and the opportunity for the Tories

Ed Miliband was clear yesterday when he announced that he will run a special party conference next spring to vote through his reforms to Labour's relationship with the unions that there would be a 'cost' to the party. Now we have the first indications of how great that cost might be. Lord Ashcroft has released one of his inimitable polls, this time of Unite union members. It finds that only 30 per cent of members would choose to opt in to Unite's political fund, while 53 per cent said they would not and 17 per cent had not decided. There wasn't much support for the current opt-out system, either, with 31 per cent saying they backed it, and 57 per cent saying they preferred an opt-in. When asked whether hey would join the party, 12 per cent said they would.

PM’s porn crackdown replicates Tory EU campaign success

Further evidence of Number 10 finding a hard-headed campaigning zeal reaches this blog, in the form of a campaigning website called Protecting Our Children. It includes a petition 'to support David Cameron's call for ISPs to introduce Family Friendly Filters as soon as possible', and facts about internet safety and what it is that the 'the Prime Minister and ISPs have worked together to ensure'. If you can hear a faint sound of bells ringing as you browse this site, that's because it is a carbon copy of the LetBritainDecide website. Tory MPs, including those who don't always put their hand up to support the Prime Minister, are tweeting away about his 'bold' move and directing followers to the site.

Timeless TMS is keeping all its wits about it

Michael Henderson has written a rather brave piece for this week's Spectator in which he brands Test Match Special 'Radio Halfwit' and argues that it has lost its edge. This is braver even than admitting that you don't #lovethenhs because TMS is an institution even more beloved and revered the world around. Perhaps Danny Boyle missed a trick in the Olympic opening ceremony by not projecting a giant light-up image of 'Boycott Bingo' onto the floor of the stadium. Criticism is hard to take, especially when it is aimed at our most loved institution. I adore TMS, and during tests in different time zones, frequently go to sleep with the radio buzzing gently throughout the night.

David Cameron’s porn announcement shows unusual media aggression

If it was front page warmth and approval he was looking for, the Prime Minister's sudden crackdown on internet firms has been a resounding success. Just the sort of thing to stir up even more good feeling as the Conservative party bounces from one bit of good news to another. He has of course provoked a fierce row between libertarians and conservatives about whether a filter is the right thing, whether it will work, and whether the Prime Minister and his adviser on the sexualisation of childhood Claire Perry have conflated legal porn and illegal child pornography. And the strange thing was that the talks between Maria Miller and the internet firms were largely progressing rather well. So why's he doing it?

Well-organised differentiation could help Cameron avoid Coalition break-up pressure

That senior Tories are urging David Cameron to break up the Coalition early so the Conservatives can fight the election unencumbered by those pesky Lib Dems is hardly going to dent the Prime Minister's chillaxing this summer: his party is in a good shape and the timing of Graham Brady and Bernard Jenkin's intervention in the Sunday Telegraph suggests they are genuinely trying to be helpful rather than cause internal party strife to damage the Prime Minister. All the indications from the top are that both Tories and Lib Dems want to go all the way with this Coalition, and those who might benefit from an early split, such as Vince Cable, don't currently seem to have much purchase in terms of leadership coups.

Hunt prods Burnham for NHS policy details

One of the many problems that Andy Burnham has encountered this week is that he has had to spend more time defending his record in the last Labour government than scrutinising the current government's changes to the health service. He has performed the first task in a rather emotional manner, and the Conservatives may well feel that politically this week has been rather successful. But now they're going after him on the policy side of things too, perhaps to underline how preoccupied Burnham is with his own reputation. Jeremy Hunt has this afternoon written a letter to Ed Miliband, seen exclusively by Coffee House, which demands to know whether Labour supports the government's new hospital inspection regime.

Raw deal for Green Deal

When the government first launched its Green Deal, it was part of its 'greenest government ever' pledge, which ministers seem to have forgotten about entirely now. The programme of energy efficiency improvements is looking rather green, but in a peaky sense, rather than because it is successfully greening this country's homes. The latest figures show only 36 households had signed up to the Green Deal by the end of June, which is hardly the most impressive take-up for a programme that is supposed to have attracted 10,000 sign-ups by the end of this year. Some programmes do take a while to get off the ground, but it's worth noting that the two Coalition parties do like to blame one another for the stuttering start to this one.

Are fracking tax breaks really necessary?

George Osborne is taking the 'global race' to a new level today. The Chancellor is not just allowing Britain to enter the fracking revolution by unveiling a shale gas allowance, he's also offering the most generous tax breaks in the world for the exploitation. The allowance will mean shale production income will be taxed at 30 per cent rather than 62 per cent. Osborne's own MPs should be delighted that the government is keen to support an industry that could keep energy bills down and create thousands of jobs. But Peter Lilley - who wrote in the Spectator recently about the need to get a move on with fracking - yesterday sounded a note of caution about whether the incentives were really necessary.

Labour’s filibuster on the EU referendum bill cheers Tory hearts

As a rule, public bill committees aren't really the kind of thing even the most insular Westminster bubble inhabitant buys popcorn to watch. But last night, James Wharton's private member's bill found itself the subject of midnight drama in the committee room. Labour MPs decided to filibuster on a series of troublemaking amendments, with the whips calling a late night cooling down break in an attempt to move the proceedings on. Even though Wharton and Tory colleagues on the bill committee may be rather dozy this afternoon, the late night drama, eventually resolved at 12.30, does allow them to make a political point out of what is normally a very poorly-followed committee stage.

The Lynton Crosby question Number 10 can’t quite answer

It's difficult to find a Tory MP who doesn't think Lynton Crosby is making their party more aggressive and impressive. The Wizard of Oz has been a good thing. Most MPs think his tough-talking vision for how the party can fight Ukip and Labour rather than fighting one another has made a huge difference. Crosby was hired to advise the party on strategy (as well as swear at people), but the one thing that makes a few MPs want to swear back is the possibility he has had some undue influence over the government's public health policy, which has zig-zagged one way and then another. As James said earlier, this row will keep going, and Number 10 did nothing after PMQs to slow things down.

Labour could be jumping the gun with early EU mischief-making

If you've felt your heart beating a little faster than usual, and a strange sense of excitement creeping all over you, it's because #letbritaindecide fever is back in Parliament. Yes, folks, the fun returns, and this time for the committee stage of the bill, from 2pm today. I've already reported Mike Gapes' amusing amendments to the legislation which are designed to cause trouble. He has put a few more down of a similarly mischevious ilk, changing the question about Britain's membership of the EU to a question about whether Britain should join the Schengen Agreement, or the euro. But Labour's frontbench has also tabled some changes to provoke a row.

Reshuffle delay leaves Tories dwelling on many reasons to be cheerful

David Cameron has decided to delay his mini-reshuffle until the autumn. He had been planning to have it this week, and as we reported last week, rumours were circulating about who was vulnerable. But it is sensible to delay. The party is in a serene mood currently. Sacking good ministers and failing to promote equally good backbenchers again will cause strife, and the party management machine will struggle to keep tabs on the really hurt members over the summer. Better to send everyone back to their constituencies in a good mood that will rouse the grassroots a little, rather than brooding about what they perceive to be poor treatment. There are many reasons to be cheerful at the moment if you're a Conservative MP.

The bloody tussle for the moral high ground

Alan Johnson and Stephen Dorrell have just conducted an impressively reasoned debate on the NHS on Radio 4. This was all the more impressive given both their parties have boxed themselves into corners on NHS care scandals, from which they will continue to lash out today at the last PMQs of the summer. Whether or not Andy Burnham bears responsibility for the hospital failings detailed yesterday, his circumstances significantly constrained his ability to scrutinise the policies the government announced. Because he is in the extremely uncomfortable position of shadowing the brief he held in government, Burnham spent more time defending his own record than he did anything else.

NHS review: Where did the “13,000 deaths” figure come from?

There is a lot of rage in Westminster today (beyond the everyday anger exhibited by some of its inhabitants that Parliament contains other people who disagree with them) about the 13,000 deaths figure that has been bandied around ahead of the publication of the Keogh review. It's worth noting firstly that Jeremy Hunt did not refer to this 13,000 in his statement to the Commons, but the figure made its way into the newspapers before the report's publication.  He did say that 'no statistics are perfect, but mortality rates suggest that since 2005, thousands more people may have died than would normally be expected at the 14 trusts reviewed by Sir Bruce'.

NHS political football, full-time report: Hunt and Burnham’s fouls and fury

Jeremy Hunt's statement on the Keogh review marked one of the uglier Commons sessions in this parliament. Amid shouting, muttering and angry pointing from the Opposition benches, the Health Secretary announced that 11 of the 14 hospitals in the review would be put into 'special measures', while making clear that he blamed the culture the Labour government had nurtured in the NHS, and pressure from ministers to cover up bad news. Labour MPs hated the last assertion in particular, roaring with disagreement as Hunt said: 'It is never acceptable for the government to put pressure on the NHS to accept bad news because in doing so they make it less likely that poor care will be tackled.' Burnham accused him of being partisan and guilty of 'one of the most cynical spin operations of our time'.

NHS political football, half-time report: Crosby and warnings ignored

Labour and the Tories played the first half of NHS political football this morning at health questions. The scrap began with Opposition MPs asking what influence Lynton Crosby had over the decision to drop plain packaging for cigarettes. It is their equivalent of the Tory attack on union influence, and as such has a fair bit of clout. The first question came from Labour's Cathy Jamieson, who asked: 'Given some of the previous pronouncements by the Public Health Minister I think some of us could be forgiven for thinking that the government's policy has changed in relation to this. And I wonder therefore if she could advise the House, who overruled her support for this policy? Was it the Prime Minister? Was it the Health Secretary? Or was it Lynton Crosby?' Ian Austin had a go too.

Angry Burnham hits back

listen to ‘Andy Burnham defends Labour's record on Health’ on Audioboo Andy Burnham was in a furious mood this morning when he toured the broadcast studios. It was hardly surprising: most people would grow rather ratty if CCHQ wasn't just coming after you but briefing that it is coming after you. He angrily told listeners that he did not 'accept this attack on the integrity of the last Government'. He listed all the actions of the Labour government that he believed showed he and colleagues were not in the wrong. That list included: 'It was the last government that introduced independent regulation into the NHS'. 'I brought in Robert Francis to investigate what happened' at Stafford Hospital. Burnham said he overruled civil service advice when he engaged Francis.

Tory MPs see gains on justice and home affairs opt-outs

Justice and Home Affairs ministers have spent a muggy afternoon in the Commons slogging through several hours of tetchy questions from backbenchers about the government's plan to opt out of European Union justice and home affairs measures, before opting back in to the ones the government has decided it likes. It's at times like this that anyone other than Theresa May, who spent a considerable amount of time hopping up and down to take endless interventions from her own Tory colleagues, would start to wonder whether the party leadership really was a prize worth working so hard for, given the amount of reassurance MPs need on just one policy area. But the Home Secretary and her colleague Chris Grayling remained extraordinarily patient throughout.

Sticks and stones won’t break the Bones

If you're looking for the big Westminster row this week, chances are you've missed where the real action is. On Wednesday afternoon, MPs and peers will vote again in the elections for chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Human Trafficking. Normally APPG elections are so tame that few MPs outside their own membership even know they are going on. But the APPG on Human Trafficking has had to call a second vote because of a contentious draw in the first election. The group has printed more than 1,000 ballot papers in anticipation of a huge turnout from groups supporting rivals Peter Bone and Fiona Mactaggart. Tensions are rising between the camps, leading to the formidable Mrs Jennie Bone intervening.