Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman is assistant editor of The Spectator and author of Why We Get the Wrong Politicians. She also presents Radio 4’s Week in Westminster.

Airports Commission focuses on new runways at Heathrow and Gatwick

In the past few minutes, the Airports Commission has published its interim report. It's the first big opportunity for there to be a political row over aviation capacity since the government kicked the issue into the long grass, and Sir Howard Davies' shortlist in this interim report certainly provides some opportunities for a row. The shortlist as it stands does not include Boris Johnson's favoured Estuary Airport, instead favouring new runways at Heathrow and Gatwick. The Commission will now consider a 3,000 metre runway south of the existing runway at Gatwick, and two different runways at Heathrow: a 3,500 metre runway to the northwest of the airport, and a 6,000 metre runway to the west which could be run as two separate runways.

‘Mission accomplished’ in Afghanistan?

If a Prime Minister uses a phrase as historically loaded as 'mission accomplished' to describe the situation in a country, it suggests that he's pretty confident that things are - and will continue to be for a good chunk of time - all hunky dory there. Today David Cameron touched down in Camp Bastion and declared 'mission accomplished' in the country, ahead of the planned withdrawal of troops next year. Asked whether the troops were returning with 'mission accomplished', Cameron said: 'Yes I think they do. I think they can come home with their heads held high. You know, we will not leave behind a perfect country or a perfect democracy.

The Labour split on planning and housebuilding

Ed Miliband's housebuilding announcement today is rather a re-heated announcement of his conference pledges on housing. Eric Pickles has already set out on Coffee House his belief that these new ideas are 'more of the same high-tax and top-down policies that led to their housing boom and bust'. The announcement certainly allows for a bit of a knockabout between the two parties, neither of which has much to boast about when it comes to housing, but there's one point that's worth noting about the Labour leader's announcement today.

Theresa May: We need to restrict free movement rights

Ministers don't comment on leaked reports, as Theresa May said on the Today programme this morning, but they can jolly well make clear what they think of them, especially if those leaked reports are quite helpful to calming Conservative backbench grumbles. The Home Secretary didn't distance herself from the leak in the Sunday Times that she wants a 75,000 cap on the number of EU migrants per year, and repeated David Cameron's call for reform of freedom of movement, saying: 'What the Prime Minister has said and what I said is that in looking at reform of the EU we need to look at this whole question of the arrangements of new countries that come in, so-called accession countries.

Nadhim Zahawi’s child benefit call is rare outburst from No10 policy board

Number 10 was quick to pour cold water on Nadhim Zahawi's suggestion in the Mail on Sunday that child-related welfare benefits should be restricted to two children per family (for new births only), with a source saying that 'this is not government policy and is not supported by the Prime Minister'. But aside from whether this is a good policy or not, Zahawi's intervention is interesting as it marks a significant departure from the way the Number 10 policy board, of which he is a member, works. Zahawi has only recently joined, but his colleagues on the board have been instructed to be entirely discreet about their work.

What is the big Ukip plan?

Today's announcement that migrants cannot claim benefits if their English is so bad that they are unemployable looks suspiciously like another attempt by ministers to reassure fears about the end of those transitional controls on Bulgarian and Romanian migrants. And that is, in turn, an attempt to reassure Tory MPs that the government has done everything it can to keep Ukip at bay. But what is the Tory plan for Ukip? It needs to work out how to fight Nigel Farage's party in the European elections, how to pre-brief the European elections (presumably by talking up Ukip's chances so much that any result looks like a disappointment), and how to stop the inevitable post-European elections panic.

George Osborne thickens his welfare dividing lines

We already knew that welfare would be a key dividing line for George Osborne at the next election. He set up the dividing lines in the emergency budget and comprehensive spending review in 2010, and they have largely stuck, which is a testament to the Chancellor's skill as a strategist. But at today's Treasury Select Committee, Osborne thickened those dividing lines with Labour by saying that the welfare budget must take another billions of pounds' worth of cuts. It was the language that Osborne used, as much as anything else, that revealed how the 2015 debate will pan out. He said: 'My view is that welfare expenditure cannot be excluded from the difficult decisions that need to be made.

Labour denies Heathrow U-turn

Spectator readers won't have been particularly surprised by the FT's story that Ed Miliband is dropping his opposition to a third runway at Heathrow: James reported that the Labour leader was softening his stance on aviation back in November: 'Miliband is also determined to avoid a head-on collision with his shadow chancellor. Having put Balls back in his box over HS2, he now seems to be softening his opposition to a third runway at Heathrow. This extra runway is something which Balls regards as vital to Britain’s economy and which the pair fell out over in government.' But if that softening is continuing apace, Labour isn't ready to go public with it. I've spoken to a party source this morning who said: 'FT suggestion Labour is changing its position on Heathrow is wrong.

Miliband demands party leaders block pay rise tomorrow

After his suggestion of cross-party talks on MPs' pay at PMQs today, Ed Miliband has just upped the stakes by suggesting that the three party leaders meet Sir Ian Kennedy of Ipsa tomorrow to set out their opposition to the pay rise. His letter, which you can read in full below, reminds Cameron that he said at noon that 'my door is always open to the right honourable gentleman', and adds: 'The public expect us to resolve this now and not wait until 2015. it only undermines confidence and trust in our political system if the uncertainty about MPs' pay is allowed to continue. 'Therefore I believe the three party leaders should meet Sir Ian Kennedy tomorrow to make clear our view that we cannot go ahead with the current proposition.

Shock as Government agrees with Bill Cash

Something extraordinary happened on the Committee corridor in Parliament today. A government Secretary of State turned up to a session led by veteran troublemaker Bill Cash to accept a bill that the Tory MP was pushing. More extraordinary still to those unfamiliar with the range of subjects that Cash takes an interest in is that this had nothing to do with Europe: it was his Gender Equality Bill. Cash has been plugging away at this Bill, which lays a statutory duty on the International Development Secretary to ensure that women and girls are supported and promoted through UK aid.

PMQs: Backbenchers eerily silent as bosses discuss their pay

Ed Miliband started off with a soft question to which he already knew the answer at PMQs: 'Does the PM agree with me that given the crisis ordinary families are facing in their living standards, MPs should not be given a pay rise many times more than inflation in 2015?' The PM did agree, and offered some further thoughts on the situation. Then Miliband pushed him a bit further. He asked whether the Prime Minister was keen 'to work with me to find a way on a cross-party basis to make Ipsa think again?' This whole exchange was carried out to an amusingly eerie silence from backbenchers listening to their bosses denying them a pay rise. But the PM replied that 'my door is always open', and then the conciliatory stuff ended and the two men - and their MPs - started scrapping again.

What the National Audit Office really said about free schools

Is the free schools project unnecessary and costly? If you take your news from the BBC, then you might be forgiven for answering 'yes': the Beeb's reporting on the National Audit Office's latest report on Michael Gove's pet policy suggests that the whole thing has been an expensive vanity project. The report itself doesn't seem to say quite the same thing, though: it argues that the Education department has 'achieved clear progress on a policy priority' and that ministers face a 'rising capital cost trend' in spite of much lower average construction costs than previous programmes (free schools often use existing buildings, while the department allows smaller space standards and reduced building specifications to create an average reduction in construction costs of 45%).

May’s Brussels-blocking gesture to Tory right

Why is Theresa May stalling on the publication of the Balance of Competences review? The Times is reporting that the Home Secretary feels the review underestimates the extent of benefit tourism, which would certainly chime with what's been published so far - the last tranche of review documents made the European Union sound like something no sensible person could ever find fault with. But aside from the policy issue, which is becoming more and more sensitive as the deadline for the lifting of transitional controls on Bulgarian and Romanian migrants approaches, there could be another reason the Home Secretary wants to be seen to be delaying on this review.

Ed Balls is back on form, but that doesn’t give Labour economic credibility

There were two key lessons from Treasury Questions today. The first is about Labour's post-autumn statement line of attack. We already knew from Ed Balls' briefing last Thursday that he feels cost of living is still a valid debate for the next year, while ministers want to talk about credibility and the need for a credible government to finish the job. But today he wove that together with the government's claims about the cost of living, arguing that ministers had fudged their figures to claim that living standards are improving. He said: 'Let me ask the Chief Secretary: on Thursday the Chancellor claimed in this House that living standards are rising. On Friday the institute for Fiscal Studies said that living standards are falling. So who's right?

Border Force ‘neglecting duties’ and ‘weakening’ security – MPs

Is the Border Force fit for purpose? At one point it became a model for reform with ministers arguing that its performance had improved significantly since it was split from UKBA in March 2012 into a separate law enforcement body. But today the Public Accounts Committee suggests the Border Force isn't quite fighting fit: more puffing at the back of the line and a bit paunchy. The PAC's report points to weakened security at the border as the Border Force is forced to prioritise passenger checks over checking freight for illicit goods or illegal immigrants, gaps in intelligence on those coming into the country, and 'inadequate IT systems'.

Pathfindering and lobster pots: IDS defends Universal credit

If you'd judged the success of universal credit purely on Iain Duncan Smith's tone at the Work and Pensions select committee this afternoon, you might conclude that things weren't going very well at all. IDS was in a fabulously grumpy mood this morning on the Today programme, muttering about the presenters trying to find fault, and he didn't seem to have cheered up by the time he arrived in the Wilson Room for his select committee grilling, accusing Labour MP Debbie Abrahams of 'moaning' and Glenda Jackson of 'conflating so many issues here, it's almost becoming risible'. So what did we learn? IDS insisted that 'in essence it will be delivered by 2017': his plan was still the same as the original one he'd outlined to them in September.

What Tory ministers think about European reform: exclusive details

Remember that shopping list of EU reforms that Conservative party members sent ministers in the summer? Well, they've finally got a reply. I've got hold of a letter to members from Europe Minister David Lidington, which answers some of their concerns and gives us an interesting glimpse into where Conservative party thinking currently stands on European reform. The first point worth making is that while Lidington's letter is very upbeat about the prospects of reform in Europe, the minister focuses on the opportunities for Europe-wide reform, rather than the likelihood of a new relationship with the EU for the UK.

Nigel Farage: Establishment and media are out to get us

After the Mail on Sunday's awkward front page about Ukip Councillor Victoria Ayling's apparently unsavoury views, Nigel Farage has sent an email around to party members complaining about the story and reassuring them that Ayling's views have been distorted. Here is the text of the email: 'I am sure many of you are aware of the attack by the Mail on Sunday on a Ukip Councillor this weekend. 'I firstly want to reassure you that I believe this attack on Victoria Ayling to be unwarranted, and have the utmost sympathy with her. Her words on immigration it would appear were deliberately distorted and taken out of context in order to paint a very nasty picture. She has personally assured me that this is the case and I have no reason to doubt her.

Number 10 defends IDS and universal credit

It's a bit pointless asking whether the Prime Minister has confidence in Iain Duncan Smith, so this morning his spokesman was asked a slightly different question: why does the Prime Minister have confidence in Iain Duncan Smith? The spokesman replied: 'Because the Secretary of State is leading this very important programme of welfare reform, which is so important to the economy and is the right thing to do on the grounds of fairness as well.' He argued that the delay to the rollout of the credit was 'absolutely the right thing' because 'the Universal Credit rollout was designed to be a gradual process that enables the project to take on board findings from the pilots and rollout process and to build on those. That is absolutely the right thing to be doing.