Alex Massie

Alex Massie

Mitt is not so daft as to pick Condi

If you think it's a coincidence that Matt Drudge has put his siren on to blast the 'news' that Condoleezza Rice is the 'front-runner' to be Mitt Romney's running-mate just as Romney's campaign fends off fresh questions about his record at Bain Capital then, my friends, you're charmingly naive. This isn't a serious proposition. It's just a smokescreen. Romney may be many things but he's not wholly daft. He's not going to pick a pro-choice woman who is also, probably, in favour of gay marriage. Nor, alas, does Condi bring a record of achievement to the ticket. As Daniel Larison observes, in typically withering style: Quite. Rice may have a paper record demonstrating some fitness for the position but her actual record is another matter entirely.

The paranoid centre and life in the American fever-swamp

Reince Priebus, chairman of the Republican National Committee, told Fox News Sunday last weekend: 'The fact is, it’s not a question of whether can Mitt Romney win. The statement is, Mitt Romney has to win for the sake of the very idea of America. Mitt Romney has to win for liberty and freedom. We have to put an end to this Barack Obama presidency before it puts an end to our way of life in America.' There you have it, the conservative movement's flammable combination of hysteria, hyperbole and cynicism in a single soundbite. Verily, American politics has become an ugly thing, dominated by boors and scoundrels animated by a spirit of hyper-partisanship for the sake of it and to hell with the national interest.

Romney’s pitch for the new America

Tim Stanley says Mitt Romney's speech to the NAACP's annual convention was his campaign's first ‘moment of magic’. Up to a point. It's true, as Stanley observes, that Republicans once had a better record on civil rights than Democrats (it was once the Party of Lincoln after all). True too that Mitt's father George, governor of Michigan, was one of those northern Republicans who agitated for decency before it was popular or politically-expedient to do so. Romney has a story to tell here and it's not a bad tale either. The speech had two chief aims. First, Romney wins pundit-points for being ‘brave’ enough to speak to a largely-hostile audience. Secondly, when it comes to votes Romney wasn't really looking for black votes.

Ageing Britain needs more immigration

Some generalisations hold good. Young people, for instance, tend to be less hostile to immigration than their elders. This speaks well of their decency but also, as today's report form the Office of Budgetary Responsibility makes clear, to an intuitive sense of their own self-interest. If there's one thing today's Fiscal Sustainability Report makes clear, it is that the under-40s are going to need some help if Britain's ageing population isn't going to cripple the country. Of course, the standard caveats need to be applied: the OBR makes projections and projections are vulnerable to events. The purpose of these reports is to help provide a context within which policy can be debated. Policy choices will have an impact on future projections.

Scotland needs more immigrants

I've written an article for the Scotsman today arguing that Scotland needs many more immigrants. Aside from all the usual arguments in favour of this kind of blood transfusion I should also have said that increasing the number of non-Scots in Scotland is a useful hedge against being governed by, you know, Scots should we ever get around to voting in favour of independence... Anyway, here's the gist of the damn thing: Though polling data says Scots are about as immigrant-friendly as Londoners – and, therefore, likely to be more relaxed about immigration than people in other parts of the United Kingdom – that still means some 70 per cent of respondents agree with David Cameron’s claimed determination to reduce the number of immigrants settling in Britain.

The enigma of Mark Ramprakash

A pearl richer than all his tribe who, alas, loved batting not wisely but all too well. If tragedy seems too strong a term for Mark Ramprakash's career there remains ample room for sadness when one considers the fate of the best batsman England has produced since Gooch and Gower announced themselves more than 30 years ago. The answer to the eternal question 'What might have been?’ is rarely less than melancholy but never sadder or more frustrating than when pondering Ramprakash's fate. The outline of his story is familiar to all who've followed English cricket these past 20 years: the most gifted batsman of his generation couldn't find a way of parading those gifts at the highest level.

American mythology

Happy Fourth of July America! As you salute that Star-Spangled banner today, however, please remember that the war which spawned your anthem was a farrago wrapped in a fiasco inside a folly: 'If Canada was the winner in the War of 1812, there was no doubt who the losers were. The Federalist Party, sensibly skeptical about the war from the beginning, was nevertheless a victim of its prosecution. If their fate was irrelevance, though, much worse befell the Native American population. In the years after 1815, the United States turned its eyes westward. Even tribes such as the Cherokee who had fought with the Americans against the British discovered this service afforded them precisely no protection at all as the Indians endured their long, appalling trauma.

Obamacare and the Supreme Court: Partisan goose for the partisan gander

Like the French Revolution it remains much too soon to say what the consequences of the United States Supreme Court's decision to uphold Obamacare will be. Except this: defeat would surely have been a catastrophe for Mr Obama. The more one considers John Roberts' pivotal argument, however, the more it seems as cunning as it is undoubtedly neat. There is something for everyone in his judgement and something for everyone to fear too. Roberts, who appears to have changed his mind, produced an elegant solution: the federal government lacks the power to force citizens to purchase health insurance but it may tax them if they don't. So Obamacare survives and American liberals (not to be confused with, you know, proper liberals) may postpose their jihad against the court.

Government minister admits policy is insane; admits that insanity is only option

I like Ken Clarke. He remains a Class A act in a government that could do with more heft and bottom. So there's that. And his candid admission that the War on Drugs is a failure is welcome. Alas, even Ken can't quite bring himself to acknowledge that the only thing madder than continuing a mad policy is continuing a mad policy even after you've admitted it's mad. Still, here's Ken: 'We have been engaged in a war against drugs for 30 years. We're plainly losing it. We have not achieved very much progress. The same problems come round and round. I have frankly conceded that policy has not been working. We are all disappointed by the fact that far from making progress it could be argued we are going backwards at times.

Something of which to be proud

Past experience demonstrates that Rangers supporters won't find anything funny about this: As I say, Rangers fans are immune, even at this late stage, to even gallows' humour. Everyone else? Well, not so much. After all: If this - and sending Rangers into the stygian depths of Scottish football - constitutes success in the corporate restructuring world one scarcely dares contemplate the horrors of failure.

Chloe Smith was bad, and so was Jeremy Paxman

Poor Chloe Smith. First she must endure knowing that many of her colleagues in the Conservative party will have enjoyed seeing her flayed by Krishnan Guru-Murthy on Channel Four News and then, later yesterday evening, by Jeremy Paxman on Newsnight. Smith can't have enjoyed either interview. Then again, she can't have enjoyed being sent out to bat without a bat either. Odd, isn't it, that when the government has something especially incoherent to sell that that senior ministers are unavailable to defend the government line? So Smith was handed the Black Spot and told to do her best. That best wasn't very good, of course. The government's argument for abandoning the planned rise in petrol duty is pretty flimsy in all but one respect: it is probably pretty popular.

Is Cameron just not that into Scotland?

Nearly a decade ago, a book called He's Just Not That Into You became what is termed a ‘publishing sensation. I don't know if this attempt to explain men to women was persuasive or not (the odds seem against it being so) but its title seemed pertinent to yesterday's launch of the Unionist campaign to preserve the United Kingdom in a more-or-less recognisable form. Why? Because of the man who wasn't there. David Cameron didn't attend the Better Together event held at Napier University. This was not a surprise but his absence was still telling. Perhaps the Prime Minister has been persuaded his presence in Scotland is more liable to galvanise nationalist opinion than enthuse Unionists.

Miliband’s gutless speech

Here we go again. Ed Miliband gave another speech about immigration this morning proving yet again that this is a subject about which no-one is ever permitted to talk. Any time a Labour politicians talks about immigration and the party's record in government I am reminded of Evelyn Waugh's acid observation on hearing the news that Randolph Churchill had successfully endured an operation to remove a benign tumour. This, Waugh wrote in his diary, represented  "A typical triumph of modern science to find the only part of Randolph that was not malignant and remove it." Comparably, it seems a typical triumph of modern politics that Labour should disown one of the more reputable parts of its record in office.

The problem with government

David Frum offers a useful caution politicians might heed. Amidst the stupidity and vanity of politics it's occasionally worth remembering that government is an impossible business. It is much like George Kennan's description of the hazards faced by even weekend farmers: Here a bridge is collapsing. No sooner do you start to repair it than a neighbour comes to complain about a hedge row which you haven't kept up half a mile away on the other side of the farm. At that very moment your daughter arrives to tell you that someone left the gate to the hog pasture open and the hogs are out. On the way to the hog pasture, you discover that the beagle hound is happily liquidating one of the children's pet kittens.

The game is up

Michael Gove's plan to scrap GCSEs and replace them with a beefed-up O-Level are, as Brother Blackburn observed earlier, threatened by the Conservatives' coalition partners. It seems quite probable that Gove's proposals will be watered down following the usual "consultation" with the Liberal Democrats. This will, understandably, vex Tories. Gove's proposals have considerable merit even if, as always, the advantages of his plans are (partially) offset by their drawbacks. As successive governments have discovered it is difficult to build an education system that is demanding, universal and equitable. There must be winners and losers and the argument is chiefly about defining those terms.

Osborne’s latest ‘defining moment’

It is always sensible to pay attention to Ben Brogan's Telegraph column, if only because it so frequently seems to have been dictated by friendly chaps at the Treasury. Today's is no exception. Cunning Wee Georgie Osborne has had another one of his master-wheezes that, with a fair wind, will seal the next election for the Conservatives. Again. You see: ‘Conservatives yearn for red meat policies to please the voters. They want a political Plan B for a Tory majority in 2015 to replace the one based on the assumption of economic recovery and tax cuts that blew up in George Osborne’s hands last year. MPs wondering how to achieve a victory in today’s darkened circumstances want compelling measures that can be described in a few crisp words on the doorstep.

A provocation to God

The notorious splitters in the Free Presbyterian Church are at it again. The Wee Wee Frees (who should not be confused with the more numerous Wee Frees) warn that Scottish independence is a risky ploy since the Act of Union copper-bottomed the protestant faith and any change to that, however well-intentioned, risks wrath and much else besides. It could be ‘a provocation to God’, no less. It might be, you know. Though the SNP has devoted much time and effort to wooing the Catholic hierarchy, the fact remains that modern Scottish nationalism is an almost exclusively secular business.

Three little letters

It is almost invariably the case that whenever anyone favoured by the Guardian-reading classes chooses to accept an honour from Her Majesty the Queen the air is thick with suggestions said chap (for it is usually a fellow) has somehow "sold out". This time it's Armando Iannucci. Well so what? His own explanation - that it was polite to accept an OBE - is all anyone could desire.  But that doesn't excuse this Twitter-spat with Alastair Campbell. Oh sure, Iannucci scores a hit - of the palpable variety - with WMD. But by then he'd already lost the argument.  Of course Iannucci's trite suggestion Bush and Blair marched into Iraq "for no reason" may be the settled view of the majority of British people these days.

The best and worst of Britain

There are at least two things at which the British are very good: being jobsworths and complaining about jobsworths. Today's example of this feature of British life comes courtesy of Martha Payne and Argyll & Bute Council. Martha, as you may know if you've read the papers today, listened to the radio, or been on Twitter, is the nine year-old lassie from Lochgilphead who had, until today, published a blog — Never Seconds — cataloguing her school lunches. A suitably esoteric subject for the internet and an unlikely sensation but there you have it. Her blog, boosted by support from the likes of Jamie Oliver and Nick Nairn, reached two million hits in just two months. Each day she published a photograph of her lunch and awarded it marks out of ten for taste and nutrition.