Uk politics

Wednesday

Isabel Hardman

Miliband’s challenge is an opportunity for the Tories to reach out to union members

From our UK edition

The warm reception to Ed Miliband's speech yesterday was so eerily positive that it could never have lasted. Today we get the first taste of the real battle to come, with the GMB warning that they'd be 'lucky if 10% of our current affiliation levels say yes, they want to be members of the Labour party' and that as a result the union could disaffiliate from the party. This is a challenge for Ed Miliband to show that he is determined to force these changes, even if it means calling a party-wide ballot to overrule the union bosses But this is also an opportunity for the Conservatives. If the unions accept that few of their members would choose to join Labour too, then there is a reasonable argument to make for giving members an option to join the Tory party too.

Tuesday

Isabel Hardman

What do the Tories think about zero hours contracts? They don’t seem very keen to tell us…

From our UK edition

MPs held a debate in Westminster Hall today about zero hours contracts. Actually, to be specific, Labour MPs held a Westminster Hall debate today, which Jo Swinson replied to as the employment minister. Adjournment debates aren't often that newsworthy, but what made this debate noteworthy was that it marks another example of the Conservatives failing to respond to a social phenomenon, instead leaving a vacuum for Labour to stamp their own argument on it. What do the Conservatives think about these contracts, under which workers are not guaranteed a set number of hours per week? You could probably guess that MPs on the right would say there is a compelling argument for labour market flexibility in a country with a comparatively generous welfare safety net.

Isabel Hardman

Wot, no bad news? The bigger problem for Labour

From our UK edition

Journalists in the Westminster bubble like to point out on Big Speech Days like this that the public couldn't care a jot about whether Ed Miliband is having a Clause IV moment. They're right, but that doesn't stop everyone in the bubble getting rather overexcited about a speech in a sweaty room off Fleet Street as they did today. Miliband might be wiping his brow with relief this afternoon given his unions speech has gone down rather well with a surprising range of grandees, but he'll know only too well that the more awkward news has nothing to do with Len McCluskey. The International Monetary Fund announced this afternoon that, as expected, it was raising the UK's 2013 growth forecast from 0.7 per cent to 0.9 per cent.

Alex Massie

Ed Miliband’s Surprisingly Bold Plan for A New Model Labour Party

From our UK edition

Tony Blair has welcomed Ed Miliband's "big speech" on reforming Labour's relationship with its Trade Union backers. And so has Len McCluskey, chief potentate at Unite, the Union whose allegedly nefarious activities in Falkirk have prodded Miliband towards reform. Blair expects Miliband's proposals to change everything; McCluskey, presumably, is confident any changes will prove largely cosmetic. They can't both be right. But, actually, it is a little unfair to put "big speech" in inverted commas. This was, or at least has the potential to be, a transforming moment for the Labour party. Granted, no-one is quite sure how this will happen  - and the detail matters - but everyone agrees something is afoot.

Mark Wickham-Jones

If Labour is to be democratised, Ed Miliband must reform how his party chooses its leader

From our UK edition

By insisting that trade unionists must opt-in to party membership, Ed Miliband has taken a bold and brave first step in reforming Labour’s troublesome relationship with its affiliated trade unions. At a stroke, he has gone far beyond the achievements of his modernising predecessors, John Smith and Tony Blair. Considerable fanfare accompanied the introduction of one member one vote for party elections in 1993 but John Smith’s initiative proved to be flawed – an outcome demonstrated by the role that trade union leaderships were able to play in the 2010 Labour leadership contest. The abolition of Clause IV in 1995 was little more than a symbolic reform.

Isabel Hardman

Ed Miliband is back on the front foot, for now at least

From our UK edition

There was a point in Ed Miliband's speech on a 'better politics' where it became clear that for the rest of our lives we're all going to be trapped in an endless cycle of opposition politicians announcing that they are going to forge a 'new politics', as though some other chap hadn't said the same thing only a few years before. There really is nothing new under the sun. But it would be unfair to dismiss the Labour leader's speech as meaningless simply for saying what others have said before him: perhaps he was hoping that the goldfish bowl of the Westminster Village would turn out to contain a bunch of people with goldfish memories, too. His speech was in many ways impressive politically.

The Spectator

Ed Miliband’s speech on reforming Labour’s relationship with trade unions: full text

From our UK edition

Let me start by saying how pleased I am to be here at the St Bride’s Foundation. Only a few hundred yards from where the Labour Party was founded over a century ago. And especially to be here with so many community organisers and Labour Party members from right across the country. I am here today to talk about how we can build a different kind of politics. A politics which is truly rooted in every community of the country. And reaches out to people across every walk of life. That is what I mean by One Nation. A country where everyone plays their part. And a politics where they can. It is about a politics that is open. Transparent. And trusted. Exactly the opposite of the politics we’ve recently seen in Falkirk. A politics that was closed.

Alex Massie

Abandon all hope: the average voter thinks one in four Britons is a muslim

From our UK edition

Last month I wrote a post arguing that an awful lot of opinion polling is worthless. The public mood matters - and measuring it is important - but when it comes to the detail of actual government policy the public is, generally speaking, clueless. Well, whaddyaknow, but here's a new Ipsos-Mori survey which confirms my suspicions. The Great British Public may have many virtues and they may be able to tell you that poor Mr Clegg is a wrong 'un but when you peak beneath the bonnet you begin to fear that newspaper comment threads may not be quite as unrepresentative of the general public as you'd like to think they must be.

Isabel Hardman

Who owns Labour? Unite turns on the Right

From our UK edition

Ed Miliband's speech today isn't an attempt to close down the row over Falkirk, but to get back on top of the issue, rather than appearing to be bounced along by events. What it will do is open a huge row with the union bosses: one the Labour leader needs to be seen to have won at the end of it all. Here is a briefing on what to expect from Miliband. The Tories are pleased this morning that Len McCluskey has written in this morning's Guardian that 'switching to an "opt-in" for the political levy wouldn't work… would debilitate unions' ability to speak for our members and would further undermine unions' status as voluntary, and self-governing, organisations'.

Monday

Isabel Hardman

Ed Miliband’s ‘Clause IV moment’: what you need to know

From our UK edition

Ed Miliband is giving a speech tomorrow morning on 'the biggest Labour party reforms for a generation' to shake up the party's relationship with the unions. It's a 'One Nation Politics' speech, which shows the Labour leader thinks his 'One Nation' tag can even be applied to cleaning up a mess in your own party, and will contain what spinners are briefing is a 'radical' shake-up of the party. He will say that 'One Nation is a country where everyone plays their part and a politics in which they can'. This politics is the 'opposite of the politics we saw in Falkirk. Here's your guide to what he'll say tomorrow, and what appears to have been left out: 1. Opt-in arrangements for union members to choose whether or not to join Labour.

James Forsyth

Can Ed Miliband dodge the ‘weak’ tag?

From our UK edition

When a political party repeatedly uses an attack line it is nearly always because their polling shows that it works. This is certainly why the Tories keep calling Ed Miliband ‘weak’. Indeed, they’re so keen to keep hitting him with this charge that they’ve stopped accusing him of knifing his brother for fear of undercutting it. This is one of the many things that makes Miliband’s speech tomorrow so important. The Tories are desperate to portray Miliband as a weak leader being pushed around by the ‘bully boys’ of the trade union machine. If Miliband is seen to have ducked the issue, the Tories will have yet more ammunition for their ‘weak, weak, weak’ attacks.

Isabel Hardman

The long-term political benefit for both Coalition parties of Abu Qatada’s deportation

From our UK edition

If you had the misfortune to miss Theresa May's statement on the deportation of Abu Qatada this afternoon, it would hardly stretch your imagination to work out how the occasion went. It involved MPs cheering May, May making it clear that the government has done very well and then pointing out (again) that she does want reform (which the Lib Dems disagree with). MPs took care to praise the Home Secretary, mindful of all the chatter about Qatada's departure being good for her own leadership ambitions. Even if you're not on the TM4PM bandwagon, you might as well ingratiate yourself with her in case something unexpected happens. All pretty formulaic stuff.

Isabel Hardman

Exclusive: How the Tories plan to attack Ukip

From our UK edition

Last week Lynton Crosby and David Cameron briefed Conservative MPs on the threat posed by Ukip. Their timing was impeccable: today's YouGov poll showing 19 per cent of Conservative members would seriously consider voting for Nigel Farage's party could have sent Tory MPs into orbit, but instead they have been reassured that the party has a proper plan to deal with the enemies to the right, rather than the messy 'fruitcake' strategy of the past few years. I am told by a number of MPs who were present that Crosby talked generally about what attracts people to Ukip, rather than the specific problem of next year's European elections. This was based on polling the party has been carrying out.

Isabel Hardman

Mayor of London’s quiet attack on the creaking government machine

From our UK edition

It is interesting enough that Boris Johnson has attacked high-speed rail in today's Telegraph: the Mayor is undermining the priorities of the current government (while attacking Labour a little too), and reminding them that they are dithering on aviation policy. He warns that the project's costs will balloon to well over £70 billion. But the Mayor makes one very important comment about the government machine that should not go unnoticed. He writes: Talk to the big construction firms, and they will tell you the problem is not the cost of actually digging and tunnelling and putting in cables and tracks. Those are apparently roughly the same wherever you are in the world.

William Lowe

Heathrow is the answer – and we know how to make it work

From our UK edition

I realised I wanted to pilot Concorde the day I turned 25. I learnt to fly as a member of the Air Squadron at Birmingham University, but I wasn't sure I wanted to make a career of flying. But when I turned on the television on my 25th birthday and saw the first flight of the British Concorde, I thought 'that’s what I’ll do'. I became Concorde’s longest serving pilot: 27 years. Concorde has long since been retired, and I stepped down as Director of Flight Operations for British Airways a number of years ago. But the one problem that irked me throughout my flying career remains unresolved: what do we do about Heathrow? Heathrow is crucially important to the UK. It is responsible for 1 per cent of UK GDP and drives the economic competitiveness of London and the South East.

Isabel Hardman

New curriculum offers political points to Tories

From our UK edition

The funny thing about the new National Curriculum, published today, is that after all the fuss of the past few months, particularly over the history curriculum, it's probably the last ever national plan from the government. As more and more schools convert to academy status, and more free schools pop up to compete with poorly-performing schools, there will be fewer and fewer who must conform to this: the rest have been given freedom to teach what they judge is best for their pupils. Michael Gove's critics like to argue that he is a great centraliser, dictating the curriculum from Westminster while claiming to give schools freedom. But he only remains a centraliser where schools remain subject to centralisation and local authority control.

Sunday

Isabel Hardman

Ed Miliband prepares for his most testing week yet

From our UK edition

While the Tories bask in the glory of Abu Qatada's deportation, the progress of James Wharton's Private Member's Bill, and the general good atmosphere in the party, Labour is trying to work out what the best response to its terrible week is, and how to get to a situation where it is on top of the story, rather than jogging after it. The Independent on Sunday quotes one senior figure today as saying that Ed Miliband only has two weeks in which to resolve the Falkirk row, and his acolytes were out in force today to underline that the fightback is already under way. Michael Dugher has just appeared on Pienaar's Politics to say that the 'process of change, if anything, has got to accelerate and I think that's what you will see in the days and weeks coming after this'.

Charles Moore

Why not marry your dog?

From our UK edition

Looking forward, as one always must, I wonder if the law will eventually be changed to allow one to marry one’s dog. Until now, this would have been considered disgusting, since marriage has been a law revolving around sexual behaviour, and sexual acts with animals are still, I believe, illegal. But, as this column has pointed out, the unintended consequence of the same-sex marriage legislation has been to take sex out of marriage law. Civil servants, unable to define same-sex consummation, omitted it. So marriage, from now on, can mean no more than the legally registered decision of two people to live together while not being married to anyone else. The justification for this is ‘equality’, buttressed by the idea that love must carry all before it.

Saturday

Charles Moore

The system for MPs’ pay is an undemocratic absurdity

From our UK edition

MPs are incomparable. This may seem an odd thing to say in the current climate of opinion, but I mean it exactly: they cannot be compared with others. Now that a big rise is being suggested by Ipsa, the ‘independent’ body which sets their pay, people say they should be compared with local authority chief executives or head teachers, or that they are a profession. They cannot, and they aren’t. They are our elected representatives. We elect them to make our laws and to vote ‘supply’, i.e. to decide how much of our money government may spend. They therefore constitutionally must decide, in public, on their own pay (if any) and vote on it.

Friday

Isabel Hardman

Ed Miliband and Len McCluskey’s acrimonious rally

From our UK edition

Wham! Len McCluskey and Ed Miliband have spent this afternoon hitting criticisms back and forth over the Falkirk row. Earlier, the Labour leader sent a challenge shooting over the net to the Unite boss, telling McCluskey he 'should be facing up to his responsibilities'. Then the Labour party said it was referring the matter to the police. McCluskey slammed back on Sky News, saying Unite had 'done nothing wrong'. He said: 'I'm afraid the way it has been handled by the Labour party headquarters is nothing short of disgraceful.' And he warned Ed off having a confrontation with the unions: 'It's depressing that Labour leaders seem to want to have a Clause 4 moment, they have got to have a situation where they front up union leaders. Well, Ed doesn't need to front up me. I'm his friend.