Theresa may

Theresa May makes the most of her political capital

From our UK edition

With an ICM poll out today showing the Conservatives have an 18-point lead over Labour (one of the four worst results for Labour since the poll began in 1983), Theresa May clearly has a lot of political capital in the bank - and today she has been making the most of it. As the government’s Article 50 bill arrived in the Lords for its second reading, the Prime Minister, too, made her way to the Second Chamber to observe the start of the debate. Sat on the steps below the royal throne, May's presence acted as a reminder to the unelected house that ministers are taking the Lords' deliberations very seriously. While May has warned peers that she doesn't want to see 'anybody holding up what the British people want', she does not have too much to worry about.

The Stop Trump protests are the ultimate virtue signal

From our UK edition

This afternoon, across Britain, the most pro-establishment demo of modern times will take place. Sure, the Stop Trump protesters gathering outside Parliament and elsewhere will look and sound rad. They’ll chant and rage and blow whistles and hold up placards with Trump done up like a tangerine Hitler. But don’t be fooled. These people are the militant wing of the old establishment. They’re radicals for the old status quo, pining for the pre-Brexit, pre-Trump era when their kind ruled and ordinary people knew their place.  The aim of the Stop Trump gatherings is to encourage MPs to deny Trump a state visit. Starting at 4.

The one consolation for Labour? Ukip aren’t a slick fighting force

From our UK edition

Theresa May has been visiting Stoke-on-Trent today ahead of the ‘really important’ by-election in the city on Thursday. That the Prime Minister is bothering to pitch up to a campaign in a Labour heartland suggests that the Tories at least think they are in with a fighting chance of winning the seat - otherwise it would be not just a waste of May’s time but also a bit embarrassing if they were seen to have thrown not just the kitchen sink but also the PM at the fight. Labour, meanwhile, is throwing kitchen sinks wildly and at great expense in the two by-elections due this week, including buying the front page of the local newspaper in Copeland on a number of occasions to make stark warnings about the threats it claims the Tories pose to the local NHS in Cumbria.

DWP secretary’s business rates rebellion

From our UK edition

As the government considers plans to raise an extra £1billion next year through a revaluation of business rates, there has been much concern on the backbench that the move would see high street shops priced out of existence. Mark Field -- vice-chairman of the Conservative party -- has called on Philip Hammond to back down from the 'looming nightmare' of higher business rates in his Budget or risk a revolt among Tory voters. But surely the Chancellor can count on his Cabinet colleagues to back him up at this testing time? Perhaps not. Mr S couldn't help but notice that Damian Green -- the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions -- has liked a tweet critical of the government policy on business rates.

What the papers say: The good and bad news about Britain’s booming jobs market

From our UK edition

More Brits then ever are now in work, with the proportion of the working age population in jobs hitting 74.6 per cent at the end of 2016. Good news such as this about Britain’s job market has become ‘almost mundane’, says the Daily Telegraph. But even in this climate of healthy jobs figures, these latest numbers are worthy of attention. For the Telegraph, this is a 'vivid reminder that Britain’s flexible labour market has weathered all the recent storms’. Talk about joblessness and unemployment used to dominate the headlines. But no more; ‘the conversation’ now is more ‘about the nature of those jobs’. Talk of the ‘gig economy’ in particular is much discussed.

Caption contest: Theresa May’s Copeland charm offensive

From our UK edition

Oh dear. As Theresa May avoids questions about the NHS up in Copeland ahead of this month's by-election, brains at No 10 decided a trip to Captain Shaw's Primary School in Bootle would make for a safe photo opp. Alas things didn't go quite to plan when the Prime Minister struggled to raise a smile in the company of two pupils. What ever will Andrea Leadsom say? Captions on a postcard please.

The left are the Tories’ best friends

From our UK edition

Modern British history is largely a history of Tory rule and misrule. The Tories governed Britain from 1886 until 1905 with only the Gladstone/Rosebery minority administration of 1892 to 1895 breaking their dominance. They were in power every year from 1916 until 1945, either on their own or in coalition, except for 11 months in 1924 and from 1929 to 1931, when minority Labour governments clung to office. The Tories governed on their own from 1951 to 1964, and from 1979 to 1997. They governed first in coalition and then on their own from 2010 until…Well, think of a number then double it. Opponents who know that the Conservatives are not only a party of privilege but are perfectly capable of betraying the best interests of every class in the nation ought to fear them.

What the papers say: Britain’s defence spending isn’t enough

From our UK edition

A key part of Theresa May’s strategy for wooing Donald Trump was making it clear that Britain was pulling its weight with funding Nato, with the PM calling on other countries to match the two per cent of GDP that Britain spent on defence so 'that the burden is more fairly shared’. The report from the International Institute for Strategic Studies that the UK had, in fact, missed this target was potentially explosive then - and it’s no surprise the MoD stepped in quickly to bat away the claims. But whether too much or too little, the amount of money spent on military matters is the talking point in many of the newspapers this morning.

Number 10 distancing itself from Law Commission’s secrecy proposals

From our UK edition

There has been an understandable, and justified, outcry about the Law Commission’s proposed changes to secrecy legislation. The current proposals present a serious threat to investigative journalism and whistle blowers. But Theresa May’s Number 10 is very keen to point out that this review was something commissioned not by them, but by David Cameron’s Number 10. ‘This is a consultation by an independent body instigated by the previous Prime Minister’ is how one May aide describes it—which is a clear attempt to distance the current Prime Minister from this whole business. I am told that it is highly unlikely that the proposals will be implemented in their current form.

Trousergate designer: Nicky Morgan broke my heart

From our UK edition

Relations between Theresa May and Nicky Morgan took a turn for the worse last year after the former education secretary criticised the Prime Minister for wearing a £995 pair of trousers while claiming that she wanted to help those who are 'just about managing'. While the pair have since made -- uneasy -- peace, the woman behind the trousers is less than happy with Morgan over the incident. Speaking to the Sunday Times, Amanda Wakeley -- who designed the now infamous trousers -- says that Morgan 'broke her heart' by criticising another woman for her fashion choices: 'What broke my heart about Nicky Morgan criticising the Prime Minister was that it was a woman doing it to another woman. Come on! Aren’t we bigger than that? Haven’t we got other issues to deal with?

Why the Lords won’t block Brexit

From our UK edition

The government has no majority in the House of Lords and a majority of peers were pro-Remain. But despite this, the Article 50 Bill will get through the Lords I argue in The Sun this morning. Why, because the reason that we still have an unelected chamber in the 21st century is that the House of Lords has a strong self-preservation instinct: it knows its limits. If the Lords were to try and block something that had been backed in a referendum and had passed the Commons with a majority of 372, then it would be endangering its very existence. Indeed, I understand that the Labour front bench have already made clear through the usual channels that they won’t try and block the bill. There will, of course, be attempts to amend it.

What the papers say: Would the Lords dare block Brexit?

From our UK edition

Theresa May’s Brexit timetable is on track after MPs overwhelming backed the Government’s Article 50 bill in the Commons last night. Not everyone is happy with the role that Parliament has played so far in holding ministers’ feet to the fire over Brexit though. In its editorial this morning, the Guardian says MPs failed their first test: ‘Too many MPs genuflected’ to the referendum outcome - a result which the paper describes as one of the worst political decisions in the UK since the second world war. It seems as though the referendum took away Parliament’s power - and not even the ‘heroic efforts’ of Gina Miller in winning her case in the Supreme Court have helped get it back - the paper says. So what next?

Theresa May’s racing certainty

From our UK edition

There are few things more predictable than people talking about the unpredictability of politics. We live in an age, we are told incessantly, in which anything can happen politically — and regularly does. Yet there is one exception. Westminster is already sure about the result of the next general election: a majority for Theresa May. One long-serving Tory MP tells me the party has never been more certain of victory in his lifetime. The Tories, with their 15-point poll lead, do look far better placed today than they did, say, 18 months before either of the Thatcher landslides, in 1983 and 1987. It isn’t just the Tory tribe who are convinced they’ll win, either. Labour MPs are looking for jobs now to beat the rush that they suspect will follow the next election.

Will Philip Hammond’s Budget reveal the truth behind the Surrey ‘sweetheart deal’?

From our UK edition

Isabel Hardman has been investigating the social care issue in Surrey for the Spectator in recent days. Yesterday, she spoke to the man whose texts Jeremy Corbyn quoted at PMQs today, the leader of Surrey County Council, David Hodge. Isabel and Hodge spoke just after Tory-run Surrey County Council had made the decision not to hold a referendum on a 15 per cent council tax increase to pay for social care. He told Isabel that ‘we have always believed that there was a way forward which wouldn’t involve a council tax referendum and I genuinely believe that the government now understands the scale of the crisis’.

Jeremy Corbyn ambushes Theresa May at PMQs

From our UK edition

Jeremy Corbyn ‘won’ PMQs today thanks to an old-fashioned ambush. The Labour leader had copies of texts that the leader of Surrey County Council thought he was sending to Nick at DCLG, presumably Sajid Javid’s special adviser Nick King, but which he had actually sent to another person. The texts seemed to suggest that a Tory government had done a secret deal with a Tory council to see off a referendum there on raising council tax by 15 per cent to fund social care. Now, the suggestion that a government—whose Chancellor and Health Secretary are both Surrey MPs—was doing backroom deals with one of the richest county councils in the country was politically explosive.

Will Theresa May’s Article 50 plan emerge unscathed from its final Commons test today?

From our UK edition

After two days of testing Commons debates, Theresa May’s Brexit timetable remains on track. Yesterday’s ‘concession’ - or non-concession, depending on how you look at it - by ministers did enough to limit the extent of the Tory rebellion (only seven Conservative MPs went against the Government, despite earlier reports that as many as 20 backbenchers were considering doing so). This meant the Government's Article 50 bill emerged unscathed. Of course all that could change this afternoon. Today’s debate will be the last opportunity for MPs hoping to tinker with the bill which will kick start Brexit. In the spirit of this week’s mammoth sessions, it’ll be another long debate, starting at 1.30pm, with a final vote expected at around 8.30pm.

No 10’s secret weapon

From our UK edition

On Tuesday, the Daily Politics aired a segment lifting the lid on the staff in No 10. Among the power players featured were the Prime Minister's chiefs of staff Nick Timothy and Fiona Hill, her press secretary Lizzie Loudon and a man by the name of... Philip May. 'One more activist seen working at CCHQ made his way into No 10. An investment guru pictured phone banking at a recent by-election campaign -- otherwise known as Philip May.' Mr S can disclose that it was at a Sleaford telephone canvassing session Philip was snapped -- though he is thought to make a regular habit of lending an ear: One to watch...

What the papers say: John Bercow the ‘pipsqueak’ and Sajid Javid’s missed opportunity

From our UK edition

John Bercow has defended his comments about Donald Trump by saying his remarks were made ‘honestly and honourably’. Today’s editorials, however, do not see it that way. ‘This time he has gone too far,’ says the Daily Mail, which calls the Speaker an ‘egotistical publicity speaker’ and a ‘pipsqueak’. The Mail goes on to say that Bercow has shown that he is far from politically neutral. It calls the Speaker - who has welcomed visitors from North Korea to Parliament - a hypocrite, and says that his ‘persistent bias’ and ‘lavish expenses’ also show that he is not an asset to the Commons. So what should Bercow do? The answer, the Mail says, is simple: it’s time for him to go.

Government staves off a Brexit rebellion

From our UK edition

For a second day running, the government yesterday defeated all amendments proposed to its Brexit bill. Most notably, MPs voted down Chris Leslie's Labour amendment that would have stopped ministers striking a Brexit agreement until it had been passed by MPs and peers, by a comfortable majority of 33. This was an issue the government worried would inspire a Tory rebellion. David Jones, the Brexit minister, attempted to placate Parliamentarians by announcing that MPs would have a say on the final draft Brexit agreement before it was voted upon by the European Parliament. While Keir Starmer was quick to hail this as a ‘huge and very important concession’, it turned out that the shadow Brexit secretary had actually mistaken crumbs for bread.