Labour party

Ofcom to rule on Murdoch’s purchase of BSkyB

From our UK edition

If News Corporation was not trying to buy the whole of BSkyB, there’s a good chance that phone hacking would not still be in the news today: that decision was one of the things that led to a revival of interest in the story. As has been said many times during the past few days, securing full ownership of BSkyB is regarded as crucial by the Murdochs and that is one of the reasons they were prepared to take the dramatic step of shutting down The News of the World. But the letter from Ofcom about the takeover and the possibility of Labour forcing a vote in the House of Commons on the matter on Wednesday, means that the bid is in real jeopardy. As Robert Peston points out, BSkyB shares have fallen as the City computes the obstacles now standing in the way of the take-over.

Miliband is running out of attacks — but he’ll use what he’s got

From our UK edition

It's a strange thing, amid all venom and spite over the phone hacking scandal, how the three main parties are actually converging on the same responses. A judge-led inquiry? That's now party policy for them all. The end of the PCC? Likewise. In his press conference earlier, Cameron even came close to saying that Rebekah Brooks should have lost her job. For once, there are trace quantities of Agreeing With Ed in the air at Westminster. This is both a boon and a bitterness for Ed Miliband. A boon, because he can at least claim that Labour led the debate, and Cameron followed. A bitterness, because the politics of the situation were so much easier for him when there were clear divides between his party and the government.

A newspaper has died, and the recriminations are only just beginning

From our UK edition

The blood of the News of the World is sprayed right across the front pages this morning. And yet there's still more bleeding to be done, it seems. The Guardian has been reporting since last night that Andy Coulson is to be arrested today, over suspicions about his knowledge of phone hacking and police bribery at the paper he once edited. The Mail quotes "supporters of Mr Coulson" as saying that, "he could make damaging claims about Mrs Brooks, who edited the News of the World before him, which in turn could result in her being questioned." Which rather captures the sense that this story could still intensify, even after Rupert Murdoch's dramatic attempt to cauterise the wound.

The phone hacking scandal tests the ties that bind the coalition

From our UK edition

Gosh, this phone hacking scandal is moving at a pace. Fresh from the wire comes news that even the government is reviewing its advertising contracts with the News of the World; signs that Jeremy Hunt won't budge on the BSkyB deal; as well as further interventions by everyone from Ed Miliband to Boris Johnson. Overarching all that, though, are the hardening differences of opinion between the Tories and the Lib Dems. The yellow half of the coalition is going further and further in pushing for both an enforced pause to the BSkyB deal and a judge-led inquiry into the whole mess. Both Lord Oakeshott and Simon Hughes have called for the former. Nick Clegg's email to party members last night called for the latter, as did Chris Huhne on the Today Programme earlier.

Miliband gets serious about phone hacking

From our UK edition

The striking thing about the phone hacking debate is that Ed Miliband is sitting on the Labour front bench, a statement of how seriously the Labour leader is now taking this issue. Miliband nodded vigorously when Chris Bryant declared that if Rebekah Brooks had a single shred of decency she would resign. Dominic Grieve is currently replying for the government and is taking a consensual line. I suspect that Grieve, unlike many ministers, has no great love for News International. His career has never recovered from his clashing, when Shadow Home Secretary, with Rebekah Brooks over how the tabloids report crime. It is said that from that day on, Andy Coulson put the black spot on him and Grieve was subsequently moved in the next reshuffle.

PMQs live blog | 6 July 2011

From our UK edition

VERDICT: A crescendo of a PMQs, which started in sombre fashion but soon swelled into a vicious confrontation between the two leaders. It is strangely difficult to say who won, not least because both men had their moments. Ed Miliband's persistent anger — including over Rupert Murdoch's takeover of BSkyB — will have chimed with public sentiment. But Cameron went further than expected by backing a public inquiry into the phone hacking affair, and without much equivocation either. In the end, though, I'd say Miliband probably came out on top, for seeming less on the side of News International. 1242: No surprises from Cameron's statement on Afghanistan.

Westminster prepares for a day of News International

From our UK edition

The cascade of News of the World stories has, this morning, become a deluge. On top of last night's Andy Coulson news — which, as George Eaton points out, really oughtn't be that surprising — we have the Indepedent claiming that Rebekah Brooks personally "commissioned searches" from one of the private investigators tangled up in the Milly Dowler affair. The Guardian reveals that Cabinet ministers are minded to establish a full review into both ownership and regulation of the media. And the Telegraph suggests that the bereaved families of those killed in the 7 July bombing may have had their phones targeted.

The parties take their positions as the phone hacking story deepens

From our UK edition

The political plates on phone hacking are shifting rapidly. The story has now ‘gone mainstream’ following the accusations about how the phones of Milly Dowler and the parents of the Soham victims may have been hacked.  Politicians are racing to catch up. Ed Miliband is rapidly moving into a more robust position. The Labour leadership doesn’t want to appear vindictive, to turn this into Labour v. Murdoch.

Labour make a public inquiry their cause

From our UK edition

I briefly mentioned Ed Miliband's assertive remarks about the News of the World earlier. But it is worth returning to the video, above, to highlight one of his specific demands. "A police inquiry needs to take place without fear of favour," said the Labour leader, "and then we need a much wider inquiry to restore the reputation of British journalism." Harriet Harman has since echoed this sentiment in Deputy Prime Minister's Questions, urging the government to "act" and establish a public inquiry into the newspaper trade. So, only hours after Tom Watson berated his party leadership for their timidity on this front, a public inquiry appears to have become official Labour policy.

In Praise of Dan Hodges

From our UK edition

It is important to praise Dan Hodges. He should be nurtured and honoured and bathed with tender affection by the right. Hug him close my friends, otherwise there's a risk the left might start to listen to him. Since they would be wise to do so he should be cultivated by Tories so much the better to discredit his perfectly sensible analysis of Labour's troubles. His latest post for Labour Uncut is a splendid thing indeed. Tearing in to Blue Labour, Purple Labour and all the rest* of it he concludes: But where in God’s name are the politicians? Where, more to the point, is the leader of the Labour party?

To see whether the coalition will last, watch how the Lib Dems respond to Dilnot

From our UK edition

The approach that the Liberal Democrats take to social care over the next few weeks and months will be the best guide we have to how they now view the future of the coalition. If, in the coming all party talks, they effectively ally with Labour and try to score points off the Tories by suggesting that their coalition partners are ‘too mean’ to fund a solution to the problem then it will be apparent that they have moved fully into distancing mode and are preparing to position themselves as the party who restrained the Tories. This would imply a Lib Dem exit from the coalition sometime well before the 2015 election.

Osborne’s voteless recovery?

From our UK edition

This is a strange old recovery. The News of the World has an interesting ICM poll today, showing that 66 per cent think the economy is getting worse. It’s not: GDP is growing and we have the second-highest job creation in the G7. Rather than losing jobs to China, we’re flogging Coventry-made Jaguars to Beijing billionaires (one of the random gems uncovered by our new Twitter feed @LocalInterest). So why is everyone so glum? And why do 52 per cent think that David Cameron and George Osborne are doing “a bad job” with the economy?   In theory, Osborne’s recovery is coming on well. His "cuts" agenda is simply a souped-up version of Alistair Darling’s, but Osborne cuts about 1 per cent a year faster.

Cooper takes on the coalition from the right

From our UK edition

What an intriguing interview Yvette Cooper gave to Sky's Dermot Murnaghan show this morning — and not just because she was standing, ruffled and incongruous, in a field somewhere. I was live-tweeting proceedings here, and there was much to anticipate even before she appeared. On top of today's stories about housing benefit, social care and immigration, the shadow home secretary would also have to deal with the comments made by Lord Goldsmith during the show's newspaper review. "It's not clear what Ed Miliband stands for," said Goldsmith, to cheers from the Tory press team. "I don't think the rifts in the party have been healed.

Miliband’s Viral Moment: Fame At Last!

From our UK edition

Nice to see that American political bloggers, including Adam Sorensen and Kevin Drum, have picked up on Ed Miliband's absurd robot-interview. I think this must be just about the first time he's made any kind of impression beyond this sceptered isle. So he's got that going for him. Meanwhile, Duncan Stephen wins the day with his Ed Miliband Random Statement Generator. Here's a 20-second car-crash: Finally, here's Damon Green's account of the interview. If Ed Miliband ever becomes Prime Minister, well, I'll eat my hat join the Labour party.

Small Election in Inverclyde; Not Many Bothered

From our UK edition

Sorry Pete, but I don't think there's anything hugely ambiguous about the result from the Inverclyde by-election. This was a pretty solid victory for Labour and another reminder - if these things are needed - that Westminster and Holyrood elections are played by different rules. Labour and the SNP ran neck-and-neck in the gibberish spin stakes last night as some Labour hackettes, preposterously, tried to claim that the seat "was the SNP's to lose"; for their part the nationalists tried to suggest they'd never been very interested in winning Inverclyde at all. More weapons-grade piffle. Then again, without this stuff how would anyone fill the weary hours of television before the result is announced?

Labour’s ambiguous victory in Inverclyde

From our UK edition

Amid all the union sturm und drang yesterday, it was easy to forget about last night's Parliamentary by-election in Inverclyde. But a by-election there was, after the death of the seat's previous Labour MP, David Cairns, in May. And the result was in some doubt, too. After the SNP's strong showing in last month's corresponding Scottish Parliamentary election, there was a sense, beforehand, that Labour's majority could be whittled down to naught. But, in the end, it wasn't to be. Labour won with a comfortable majority of 5,838 and a vote share of 53.8 per cent, albeit it down on the 14,416 and 56 per cent they secured in last year's general election.

Miliband keen to relieve the squeezed middle from Thursday’s strikes

From our UK edition

Ed Miliband is learning. He has written a blog on Thursday’s strikes and it is plain that he has learnt from the errors he made during the March against the Cuts by associating himself with militancy. First, he places himself firmly on the side of parents who will be inconvenienced by Thursday’s strikes: “The Labour Party I lead will always be the party of the parent trying to get their children to school, the mother and father who know the value of a day’s education.” Miliband gives the unions and their members pretty short-shrift to be honest. He writes: “I understand why teachers are so angry with the government.

The coming battle over university places

From our UK edition

Until now, the debate over universities has dwelt inevitably on how much students need to stump up in tuition fees. With the release of today's White Paper, the government will hope that the emphasis shifts to what students receive in return for that cash. Basically, it is all about fixing a subverted market by making it more transparent. With universities good, bad and indifferent rushing to charge the maximum possible amount for fees, the idea is that forcing them to release more information about their courses — about teaching standards, job prospects and the like — will help students decide which are offering value-for-money. Who knows? It might even shame one or two institutions into lowering their asking prices.