The Spectator

Letters | 13 September 2008

Taking care of Toby Sir: Kirsten Dunst never insisted that I ban Toby Young (Status anxiety, 6 September) from the set of How To Lose Friends & Alienate People. Toby’s piece stemmed from a recent article of mine in Empire magazine. In his opening paragraph, he says he learned from it that ‘the reason I was banned from the set of the film is because Kirsten Dunst insisted on it’. But Toby didn’t read my article before he wrote his. For the record, Kirsten told me on set that Toby had given her a performance note. (Toby says she overheard him give a note about her performance to a third party. The difference is negligible and entirely unacceptable behaviour either way.

Fannie, Freddie and Gordon

Last week, at a cost of a billion pounds or so, the Chancellor announced a package of measures to boost the housing market, including a temporary raising of the stamp duty threshold and some tinkering with shared equity schemes and social housing budgets. In response, the pound — already depressed by Alistair Darling’s observation that Britain now faces arguably the worst combination of economic circumstances in 60 years — fell a little further. Lord Lamont, the last chancellor to resort to a stamp-duty holiday in the face of a house-price collapse in December 1991, pointed out that the device did no good at all for the housing market or his own reputation.

The week that was | 12 September 2008

Here are some of the posts made over the past week on Spectator.co.uk:   Fraser Nelson shows that Balls still hasn’t got the right schools policy and highlights Brown’s immigration and jobs fudge. James Forsyth shows how Cameron and Osborne differ on Iraq and explores the dangers of a Tory Brown bubble. Peter Hoskin picks up on another non-electoral milestone for the Tories and questions whether power-sharing will work in Zimbabwe. Brian Cullen explains why Labour’s agenda is confused and how China is keeping quiet about change. Sean Martin shows Brown may be in trouble after all and gets CoffeeHousers to test their maths. Melanie Phillips is shocked by the “greenwashing” of a jury. Stephen Pollard thinks estate agents deserve all they get.

Brown’s got his notebook at the ready

A self-standing quote from a Telegraph story entitled "Gordon Brown takes part in children's reality show": "Broadcaster Jonathan Dimbleby is the Sir Alan Sugar figure in the 10-part [children's TV] series Election, which is being filmed at the moment for CBBC. [Gordon] Brown will meet the victor in the final episode and hear their thoughts on democracy and the political system. He is expected to take notes and glean inspiration from the encounter.

Win a luxury holiday to Dubai

The Spectator have teamed up with Dubai tourist office and Pure Luxury to offer one lucky reader a free holiday in Dubai.  To be in with a chance of winning, enter the competition here.

In this week’s issue…

On the latest Spectator letters page you'll find a response by Robert Weide to Toby Young's Status Anxiety column last week.  Weide's the director of the forthcoming film of Toby's semi-autobiographical book How to Lose Friends and Alienate People, and he objects to Toby's account of the actress Kirsten Dunst's on-set behaviour.  As Weide puts it, “After reading unwarranted internet criticism of Ms Dunst for having Toby ‘banned’, I thought someone needed to print the truth.”  And that "truth" is?  You'll have to click here to find out. P.S. Also among the new magazine content is Fraser Nelson’s article on immigration, which he previewed yesterday. And Rod Liddle asks: Have we ever faced an enemy more stupid than Muslim terrorists?

The latest Strategist has gone live

The Strategist section of the latest Spectator Business has now gone live. In association with IBM, Strategist brings you in-depth analysis of the latest business issues. You can access the new articles here. Do also check out Strategist Online - an exclusive vodcast concentrating on one of the articles. You can watch the latest episode here. The next episode will appear early next month. If you have any questions that you'd like featured in the programme, please e-mail them to: strategist@spectatorbusiness.co.

CoffeeHousers’ Wall, 8 September – 14 September

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which – provided your writing isn’t libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency – you’ll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there’s no need to stay ‘on topic’ – which means you’ll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There’s also no constraint on the length of what you write – so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything’s fair game – from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.

Just in case you missed them…

…here are some of the posts made over the weekend at spectator.co.uk: Fraser Nelson picks apart the British reaction to VP nominee Sarah Palin and shows how another Brown critic gets struck by lighning. James Forsyth questions whether Nick Clegg’s tax plans will appeal to his party’s supporters and shows that Stephen Carter won’t go without a fight. Peter Hoskin thinks Harriet Harman might have found a better way to quell leadership speculation and wonders whether Labour have any alternative to Brown. Clive Davis maintains that opposition to Palin is not necessarily sexist. And Americano looks at Sarah Palin’s pragmatism and explores Obama’s plans for education.

Letters | 6 September 2008

Heartbeats of delight Sir: Few would disagree with Paul Johnson’s view that prolonging the human lifespan is of little value if it merely gives us extra years of Alzheimer’s and debility (And another thing, 30 August). But we do not all live for the average span, and one reason for the increase in average age since the early 19th century has been the massive reduction in child mortality. It is difficult to believe that in his historical studies Johnson has not encountered the miseries caused by the death of beloved children. Numerous books, for example, describe the pain which Charles Darwin suffered as a result of the death of his favourite daughter Anne in 1851, and Thomas Huxley’s grief when his son Noel died of scarlet fever in 1860.

Make your excuses and go

Politicians, like novelists, are obsessed by posterity. Practitioners of the here and now — tomorrow’s headline, the latest poll, the next electoral hurdle — they nurse secret and often vainglorious hopes that their greatest plaudits will come in the future. Before New Labour swept to power in 1997, senior Blairites used to joke about the need to get ‘their betrayals in early’. Now, 11 years later, as the government disintegrates painfully and publicly, Cabinet ministers are rushing to get their side of the story across, to make excuses, and to pass the buck. Few political interviews have been parsed so closely or caused such an instant storm — financial and political — as Alistair Darling’s cri de coeur in Saturday’s Guardian.

The week that was | 5 September 2008

Here are some of the posts made over the past week on Spectator.co.uk: Fraser Nelson reports for Americano from the Republican National Convention in Minneapolis-Saint Paul.  He gives his take on Sarah Palin's speech here, and on John McCain's speech here.  Also on Americano, James Forsyth suggests that McCain has to sell himself as a reformer. Dominic Grieve gives his answers to CoffeeHousers' questions. James Forsyth wonders whether the Brown-Miliband truce will hold until after conference, and claims that things just keep getting worse for Labour. Peter Hoskin reports on Charles Clarke's latest outburst against Gordon Brown, and notes how the media have registered a vote of no confidence. Daniel Korski outlines the real European conflict.

Comments

Comments haven't been working across the site since yesterday evening. We've got the techies working on it, so hopefully the problem will be fixed soon. Apologies to everyone who may have made a comment overnight, or who would like to submit one now. We can't be sure, yet, whether we'll be able to salvage the ones that didn't get through. We'll keep you up-to-date. Again, apologies.

Are Labour the new nasty party?

Have Labour become the new nasty party?  Ross Clark certainly thinks so, and he outlines his reasons why in this week’s Spectator cover piece.  You can read his article here, but – as a taster of what to expect – here’s an extract: “It used to be backbench Tory MPs who made up the ‘hang ’em and flog ’em’ brigade. Watching the crime debate at Conservative conferences used to be an excruciating business as one spotty activist after another tried to trump all who had gone before him by devising a still crueller and more unusual punishment.

Letters | 30 August 2008

We did it, not the state Sir: I am not a social historian but surely Liam Byrne fatally undermines his whole argument when he praises the founding of various organisations and movements 150 years ago to deal with the ‘huge change which swept millions from the countryside to the cities’ (‘Give us back our Big Idea, Mr Cameron’, 16 August). Isn’t the whole point that the state did not do this — individuals and groups did? Less state interference allows individuals and groups to help their communities and Britain as a whole rather than being strangled by the red tape, form-filling and box-ticking so beloved by Liam Byrne and New Labour.

Taxing questions

Demoralised Labour backbenchers, watching helplessly as their government disintegrates and the prospect of electoral humiliation looms, have at last found a cause to which they can rally: higher taxes on the ‘super-rich’, both private and corporate. In the first of those categories, the target is anyone with an annual income of £250,000 or more. In the second category, the proposal gathering support not only on Labour benches but also in opinion polls is for a windfall tax on utility companies which have jacked up the prices of electricity and gas so dramatically in recent months, blaming soaring wholesale energy markets, yet still have the gall to announce handsome profits.

Just in case you missed them… 

Here are some of the posts made over the bank holiday weekend on Spectator.co.uk: A Coffee House poll asks whether the Tories should pledge to cut public spending. Fraser Nelson says it’s getting harder for first-time buyers, and claims a big state means a spying state. James Forsyth picks up on how an MI5 report shies away from mentioning ideology, and reports on another strong opinion poll showing for the Tories. Peter Hoskin suggests that the Tory hares and tortoises are set to do battle once again, and highlights a rather strange quote from Gordon Brown. Clive Davis gives his take on the Olympics handover concert at Buckingham Palace.

Letters | 23 August 2008

Spectator readers respond to recent articles Bombast in Beijing Sir: David Tang is right (Diary, 16 August) that Zhang Yimou, the choreographer of the Olympic ceremony, produced ‘maniacal... bombast...’. Mr Tang suggested Pyongyang as a model. But years ago Mr Zhang told me that he could get his films on screen in China, where they were hardly shown, if he made one like Leni Riefenstahl’s Triumph of the Will about the 1936 Nazi Olympics. Mr Tang mentions the ‘sleight of hand’ of the faked fireworks — which would have got a similarly faking athlete sent home. But that is only one example of the ceremonial Potemkin. The Chinese internet sites admitted everything, afterwards.

The Benetton candidate

When R.A. Butler, quoting Bismarck, described politics as the ‘art of the possible’, he was spelling out the pragmatist’s creed. Yet, if nothing else, Barack Obama’s rise to become the Democrats’ candidate for the White House shows that ‘the possible’ can still be extraordinary. Only four years ago, Obama was a mere state senator in Illinois, a rookie legislator with a keen intellect and a bright future. Now, as his party gathers for its convention in Denver, Colorado, he is only two and half months away from the presidential election that could make him the most powerful man in the world.

The week that was | 22 August 2008

Dominic Grieve wants your questions Fraser Nelson outlines Brown's Bubble, and describes Boris's gift to Labour. James Forsyth wonders who the PM's siding with in the Brown-Miliband dispute, and reports on another poor poll for Labour. Peter Hoskin reflects on the lessons of history, and gives his take on the latest economic growth figures. Brian Cullen thinks Russia's aggression shows weakness as much as strength, and spells out the deceit of protectionism.  Sean Martin says school isn't for everyone, and claims it's time to stand up to the RMT. Daniel Korski dishes out the award for worst foreign policy. Stephen Pollard wonders whether England can beat Andorra. Trading Floor writes on Britishness.