The Spectator

Fatal attractions

The Oxford Despoiler, by Gary Dexter Twisted Wing, by Ruth Newman Windows on the Moon, by Alan Brownjohn The Oxford Despoiler is a collection of eight stories introducing Henry St Liver, a Victorian detective, and his biographer and assistant, Olive Salter. Henry is tall and lean, with a lofty bearing but the habits of the most dishevelled bohemian. Olive drifted to London and met Henry, and in very little time became his invaluable foil. If it sounds familiar, it should, since this is in part a warm and cleverly observed pastiche of the Victorian detective genre and of the Sherlock Holmes stories in particular.

CoffeeHousers’ Wall, 27 April – 3 May

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which – provided your writing isn’t libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency – you’ll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there’s no need to stay ‘on topic’ – which means you’ll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There’s also no constraint on the length of what you write – so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything’s fair game – from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.

Just in case you missed them… | 27 April 2009

...here are some of the posts made on Spectator.co.uk over the weekend: Fraser Nelson warns that David Cameron needs to up his game. James Forsyth reports on Cameron's warnings of tax rises from the Tories' spring conference, and questions their unwillingness to support the creation of a bad bank. Peter Hoskin introduces Coffee House's national debt counter, and says that any chance Brown had for a comeback is behind him.  Martin Bright hails Janice Turner's attack on the undeserving rich, and shares his visions of a Boris future. Clive Davis discusses Jack Johnson. And Alex Massie celebrates Dolly Parton.

Letters | 25 April 2009

The beat goes on Sir: I read with growing rage James Delingpole’s column (You know it makes sense, 18 April). After castigating the policing of the G20 demonstrations, he takes the opportunity to list a number of actions the police have taken in recent times that he objects to. But some context is required. I have worked for nearly 20 years in a large metropolitan police force which deals with nearly 2,000 incidents a day on average. We arrest hundreds of people, and respond to thousands of calls for help and assistance. Nearly 4,000 of us do this — regular police officers, special constables (and sorry, James — they do have full police powers and those you accused of not saving a drowning boy were not special constables), community support officers and police staff.

How is Boris doing?

We asked a distinguished panel to assess the Mayor’s progress — and what he should do next David Cameron Boris and his team have done a brilliant job in the last year. Under his leadership City Hall has become less extravagant, and more focused on the right priorities: making London a safer, greener and more affordable place to live. Boris has certainly confounded his detractors. In terms of the future (other than synchronising the traffic lights so those of us who cycle across Hyde Park Corner are less likely to be squashed by a bendy bus) he should carry on doing the excellent work that he is doing. Michael Bloomberg, Mayor of NYC During the election campaign, Boris’s detractors said that if he were elected, the world would fall apart.

The pips squeak

On Budget Day, Alistair Darling achieved something rare among chancellors of the exchequer and unique among members of this Labour government. He actually made us feel sorry for him. By common consensus, he faced — with a stoical calm that has come to be admired even by his opponents — an almost impossible job. Markets and taxpayers wanted him to unveil a strategy to set the public finances on a long-term path back towards fiscal balance without crushing fragile indications of a distant recovery. The Prime Minister clearly wanted him to regain some political ground by being seen to address the sharply rising rate of job losses, while dishing out some fiscal punishment to the rich in a way that would trip up the Tories.

Budget 2009

Here's a selection of the Budget-related posts that have been made on Coffee House today: Coffee House live blogged Alistair Darling's Budget statement here. Matthew d'Ancona sets out the politics of the 50p tax rate, and wonders whether any politicians will stand up for aspiration. Fraser Nelson reveals what the Treasury told lobby journalists, and sets out the top ten Brownies in the Budget. James Forsyth thinks that the 50p tax rate is a diversionary joke, and highlights the Tory line on tax. Peter Hoskin laments Alistair Darling's dodgy forecasts, and says that Labour's debt crisis has become a catastrophe. Lloyd Evans watches David Cameron lay into the Government of the Living Dead. Norman Lamont says that the Red Book doesn't put the public finances on a sustainable path.

CoffeeHousers’ Wall, 21 April – 26 April

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which – provided your writing isn’t libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency – you’ll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there’s no need to stay ‘on topic’ – which means you’ll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There’s also no constraint on the length of what you write – so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything’s fair game – from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.

Just in case you missed them… | 20 April 2009

...here are some of the posts made on Spectator.co.uk over the weekend: Fraser Nelson watches Ed Balls struggle against the truth, and reports on Liam Byrne giving his support to Balls. James Forsyth reveals what a broken ballot box tells us about the future of the Labour Party, and wonders whether Labour will greenwash the Budget. Peter Hoskin reports on Smeargate II, and says that the Tories should step around any more 45p tax traps. Dr Eamonn Butler tells us what to expect in the Budget. Martin Bright looks ahead to the Budget. Clive Davis gives his take on the Georgia Gould fiasco. And Melanie Phillips laments the UK's involvement in the Durban II summit.

Letters | 18 April 2009

Liddle’s Lent Sir: As someone who is employed by and works within the Church of England I have been waiting 20 years to see an article like Rod Liddle’s (‘The C of E has forgotten its purpose’, 11 April) appearing in a major British publication. He is accurate in nearly everything he says. The current church is sadly lacking in leaders of any serious Christian commitment, passion or confidence in the gospel. It is as if they prefer any religion to the Christian one, which they have pledged to ‘defend and stand for’ in their ordination vows. Bring back Bishop Nazir-Ali and sack the liberal self-loathing secularised bishops!

Lies, damned lies, and emails

In his long preparations for next Wednesday’s Budget, Alistair Darling must have constantly asked himself: could the challenge possibly be more gruelling? The task facing the Chancellor was always going to be formidable: he cannot go on borrowing without limit, amassing undreamed-of fiscal deficits in order to maintain inflated levels of public spending. Indeed, the danger point is fast approaching at which the gilts market will no longer absorb the torrent of new debt, and an IMF bail-out will become a serious prospect. As Frank Field warns on page 10, this Chancellor or his successor will clearly be obliged to put a freeze on day-to-day spending, and take an axe to a range of pet government projects and quangos.

Obama’s 100 days and Guido’s triumph

There's a special pullout in this week's issue of the magazine, analysing Obama's first 100 days in power.  All the article from it are available online, and you can access them via these links: Reihan Salam, the leading young conservative intellectual, argues that although Obama isn’t doing badly, the sheen has already come off his presidency. Adam Boulton opens up his Washington diary. Irwin Stelzer says that Obama’s budget shows that he wants to turn the United States into a European-style social democracy British Conservatives may be reaching the end of their term in the wilderness.

A reminder | 14 April 2009

Just to remind CoffeeHousers that we're running a Q&A with Eric Pickles.  We'll be taking your questions until 10pm this evening, before putting the best to the Tory chairman.  To submit a question click here.

Smeargate

Here are some of the posts about the Damian McBride scandal on Spectator.co.uk: Matthew d'Ancona says that the McPoison remains, ands casts his eye over the usual suspects. Andrew Neil stresses that Gordon Brown let the dogs out. Fraser Nelson analyses what McBride tells us about Brown, and reveals the smears that backfired. James Forsyth suggests that McBride's self-destruction is a tonic for the Tories, and urges Brown to apologise. Peter Hoskin says that Brown has lost all moral authority, and reveals the PM's unconvincing clean-up operation. Martin Bright wonders whether it could get any worse. And Alex Massie asks: how much does McBride's disgrace actually matter?

CoffeeHousers’ Wall, 13 April – 19 April

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which – provided your writing isn’t libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency – you’ll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there’s no need to stay ‘on topic’ – which means you’ll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There’s also no constraint on the length of what you write – so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything’s fair game – from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.

Letters | 11 April 2009

Listen and learn Sir: We’re going to have to get used to cuts, says Kate Chisholm (Arts, 28 March), while criticising the axing of the last children’s programme on the BBC’s mainstream networks as a cut too far. Last year a meagre £1.6 million of the £460 million the BBC spent on its radio services went on programming for children. For years BBC executives have justified this neglect by saying that children don’t want radio but only TV and pop music. But do we remove fresh fruit juice and green vegetables because children prefer burgers and pop?

An expense we cannot afford

The naming and shaming of MPs who are abusing the expenses system is becoming a Sunday ritual. Each week the papers carry a fresh set of revelations; each week public cynicism about our elected representatives becomes more deeply entrenched. This would be bad enough if the MPs involved in these scandals were merely time-serving backbenchers. But the culprits include the holders of some of the great offices of state. Worst of all, the guilty seem incapable of seeing what is wrong with their presumption that the public should pay for everything from their bath plugs to their holiday homes.

Nostradarling

As Oscar Wilde quipped of Little Nell’s death, you would have to have a heart of stone not to laugh. On 24 November, Alistair Darling told the Commons: ‘I, too, am forecasting that output will continue to fall in the UK, for the first two quarters of [2009]. But then, because of decisions taken in this Pre-Budget Report, I expect it to start to recover.’ This prophecy seemed preposterous enough at the time, as we pointed out immediately on our Coffee House blog. Four and half months later, it is downright surreal that the custodian of the nation’s finances felt able to make such an obviously bonkers prediction to the Commons and the electorate. On Sunday, the Chancellor had to admit that he had been talking nonsense.

The latest issue of The Spectator

Just to flag up that, because of the Easter weekend, the content from the latest issue of The Spectator has been uploaded to the website a day earlier than usual.  You can access all the articles here, but here are some highlights: Rod Liddle says that the Church of England has forgotten its purpose. Fraser Nelson claims that the worst may be yet to come. And The Spectator gives its take on the continuing expenses row. The print edition of the magazine goes on sale in London today, and across the rest of the country tomorrow.

CoffeeHousers’ Wall, 6 April – 12 April

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which – provided your writing isn’t libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency – you’ll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there’s no need to stay ‘on topic’ – which means you’ll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There’s also no constraint on the length of what you write – so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything’s fair game – from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.