The Spectator

The week that was | 10 July 2009

Here are some of the posts made on Spectator.co.uk over the past week: Matthew d'Ancona reports on a poetic evening at 22 Old Queen Street. Fraser Nelson reveals why the Tories' Californian strategy should be taken seriously, and marks a welcome rejection of assisted suicide. James Forsyth notes the waning authority of the Iranian regime, and says that the Tories must be prepared to launch a reverse march through the institututions. Peter Hoskin tracks the latest in the Andy Coulson story, and wonders whether Nick Clegg is out of love with the Tories. Lloyd Evans cuts through the jargon. Daniel Korski observes that there are no Brits in Europe's likely new line-up. Martin Bright highlights some Iranian solidarity. Clive Davis reveals one way to save a local newspaper.

CoffeeHousers’ Wall, 6 July – 12 July

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which – provided your writing isn’t libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency – you’ll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there’s no need to stay ‘on topic’ – which means you’ll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There’s also no constraint on the length of what you write – so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything’s fair game – from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.

Just in case you missed them… | 6 July 2009

...here are some posts made over the weekend on Spectator.co.uk: Matthew d'Ancona reviews Blur's gig at Hyde Park. Fraser Nelson tracks details Ed Balls' involvement in the Government's approach to the public finances. James Forsyth reveals the greatest edit in history, and says that Tony Blair is right on climate change. Peter Hoskin highlights a few more blows to Brown's spending narrative, and celebrates Roger Federer's Wimbledon victory. Gabriel Middleton says that Gary McKinnon is a victim of injustice. Martin Bright gives his take on Yvonne Ridley and Press TV. Clive Davis adds a new entry to his notebook. And Alex Massie reports on Sarah Palin's resignation.

Letters | 4 July 2009

On the Iraq inquiries Sir: Lest myths become accepted as facts, may I correct two aspects of John Kampfner’s article (‘The secret Iraq deal’, 27 June) about the Iraq Intelligence Review, which I chaired. First, a myth has grown up that the Review’s criticisms of the government were originally more trenchant but were watered down following government pressure. The facts are that, as fair procedure required, we gave those affected by our criticisms an opportunity to respond and make some verbal amendments in response to their representations. But I do not recall any instances in which these affected the substance of the criticisms.

Bad

As Mark Earls writes on page 16, the rush to mourn Michael Jackson has been matched only by the surge of instant jokes about the singer — many of them in catastrophically poor taste. Our very own Taki lets one or two out of the bag this week (see page 44). Some say these one-liners about a recently dead superstar are despicable. We beg to differ. They are a necessary corrective to the frequently silly and disproportionate wailing and rending of garments that follow the death of a global celebrity nowadays. It is sad that Michael Jackson is dead. But it is not, with respect to him and his family, a global catastrophe. We will all soldier on. Second, it is hard not to feel a measure of pride at the lead Britain took in producing these gags.

Calls from Balls

Tuesday was a busy day for Ed Balls, the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families. Not only did he launch ‘Your Child, Your Schools, Our Future’, the government’s new White Paper on schools reform, a document which he claimed enshrined ‘a radical devolution of power to head teachers, backed up by stronger accountability, and an uncompromising approach to school improvement so every child succeeds’. He also found time to phone two Spectator journalists — in one case, repeatedly — to harangue them at length about a post on our Coffee House blog. The post in question, by our political editor, Fraser Nelson, took strong issue with Mr Balls over his performance on Tuesday’s BBC Today programme.

The week that was | 3 July 2009

Here are some of the posts made over the past week on Spectator.co.uk: Fraser Nelson reveals Ed Balls' lies, and outlines the scale of the debt crisis. James Forsyth says a shadow Cabinet member needs to call Brown on his lies, and sets out the Tories' higher goal for education. Peter Hoskin looks at how cuts can be advertised, and tracks the Government's approach on a spending review. Martin Bright reveals how New Labour policy making works. Clive Davis gives his take on the death of Michael Jackson. Alex Massie has a few simple questions for Alan Johnson. And Melanie Phillips says that the Schools Secretary has forgotten where he is.

CoffeeHousers’ Wall, 1 July –  5 July

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which – provided your writing isn’t libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency – you’ll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there’s no need to stay ‘on topic’ – which means you’ll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There’s also no constraint on the length of what you write – so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything’s fair game – from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.

The great grammar school debate

The full audio of The Spectator’s debate on grammar schools with David Davis and Stephen Pollard speaking for them and Charles Clarke, Fiona Millar and Simon Jenkins opposing is now available online. You can listen here.

Letters | 27 June 2009

A nuclear Iran Sir: Should there be any doubt, following James Forsyth’s article (‘What to do about Iran and the bomb’, 20 June), that the Iranian government intends to build atomic weapons, it is answered by the forest of anti-aircraft weapons protecting their uranium enrichment plant at Nantaz. When in the area two weeks ago I saw battery after battery of anti-aircraft weapons, manned, every kilometre in from 25 kilometres from the plant along the route they have assumed a foreign air strike would come, and more on the exit. The plant itself is protected by an impressive paraphernalia of watch-towers, wire and berms. Peaceful atomic work does not require such protection. Nantaz symbolises the current Iranian tragedy.

The right inquiry

Taking the country to war is one of the most serious decisions a government can make. So it is right and proper that once the troops return home, there is a full investigation. To the greatest extent possible — given intelligence relationships and the need not to reveal information that could compromise national security — that inquiry should be public. It is essential for maintaining trust that people understand and have confidence in how such decisions are made. There is, however, something deeply unedifying about the debate over the coming Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq war and its aftermath. This inquiry is being convened for all the wrong reasons.

Release Athanasiadis

A journalist who wrote for last week's Spectator has been detained by the Iranian regime. He should be freed immediately.  Last week’s Spectator carried a fine atmospheric despatch from Tehran by the Greek journalist Iason Athanasiadis, who has also been covering the disputed presidential election for the Washington Times. At some point in the past week — the chronology is still hazy — Iason was arrested by the Iranian authorities and, as we go to press, remains in custody. The Iranian authorities have apparently objected that he exceeded the duration of his visa. Whether this allegation is correct, it is clearly a pretext for detaining a journalist who was reporting an inconvenient truth to the world, and doing so on the ground, as an eye witness.

CoffeeHousers’ Wall, 22 June – 30 June

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which – provided your writing isn’t libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency – you’ll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there’s no need to stay ‘on topic’ – which means you’ll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There’s also no constraint on the length of what you write – so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything’s fair game – from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.

Just in case you missed them… | 22 June 2009

...here are some of the posts made on Spectator.co.uk over the weekend: Fraser Nelson highlights more lies from Gordon Brown, and observes the latest Cabinet split. James Forsyth investigates how Brown views himself, and charts the PM's latest effort to relaunch himself. Martin Bright has the latest from your thinker in residence. Clive Davis highlights some street art with a message. Alex Massie tracks the online coverage of the situation in Iran. And Melanie Phillips gives her take on the decision to hold an inquiry into the Iraq War.

Letters | 20 June 2009

Built on a lie Sir: J. Alan Smith (Letters, 13 June) points out that Churchill from 1940-45 was, like Gordon Brown today, ‘a prime minister who was “unelected”’ — as though that should allay concerns about the democratic legitimacy of Mr Brown’s premiership. But the main concern about Mr Brown’s democratic legitimacy is not so much that he is ‘unelected’ as prime minister, but that at the last general election the then Labour leader, Tony Blair, promised expressly on 30 September 2004 that he, Mr Blair, would serve as prime minister for the full parliamentary term Logically, of course, that entailed a promise that no one else, and therefore not Mr Brown, would be prime minister during the term.

Reminder: Spectator short story competition

Just to remind CoffeeHousers that the deadline for the Spectator's short story competition is fast-approaching.  Entries have to be in before the end of Thursday, 25 June.  Here are details for anyone who's interested: To celebrate the launch of the Spectator Book Club, The Spectator is giving you the chance to have a short story published in the magazine. To enter, write a short story of 2,000 words or under, on the subject of invisibility, and email it as an attachment to shortstory@spectator.co.

Honestly, Gordon

Since his brush with political death, Gordon Brown has made ‘candour’ his word for the month. So it was extraordinary to hear how brazenly the Prime Minister distorted the truth in his address on Tuesday to the GMB’s conference in Blackpool: a thunderous campaign speech which sought to draw the sharpest of ‘dividing lines’ between virtuous Labour and wicked Conservatives. Using the age-old New Labour technique of the anecdotal case study, Mr Brown congratulated his government for saving the life of ‘a woman called Diane’ who had written to him to thank him, he said, for ensuring ‘that there is proper breast screening in the National Health Service’.

Peerless

There was something magnificently comic about Lord Rogers of Riverside accusing the Prince of Wales of ‘unconstitutional’ behaviour. The modernist architect is predictably outraged that his hideous design for a development on the site of the old Chelsea Barracks has now been ditched — after Prince Charles wrote to a member of the Qatari royal family, which was financing the project. The Rogers project would have been a horrible eyesore so close to Sir Christopher Wren’s Royal Hospital, and the Prince was right to urge the Qataris to consider an alternative design commissioned from Quinlan Terry. No doubt Lord Rogers feels aggrieved to have been outmanoeuvred by the royal Rolodex.

The week that was | 19 June 2009

Here are some of the posts made on Spectator.co.uk over the past week: Matthew d'Ancona introduces the Spectator's 50 Essential Films, and observes Gordon Brown following a dividing line to oblivion. Fraser Nelson notes George Osborne's milestone article, and watches Brown do the Time Warp again. James Forsyth thinks that Margaret Beckett would only just make a better Speaker than John Bercow, and comments on another Balls-up. Peter Hoskin picks up on a dividing line that's dividing government, and says that Alistair Darling's measured approach will drive Brown mad. Lloyd Evans reviews PMQs. Martin Bright says goodbye to the departing Treasury minister, Kitty Ussher. Clive Davis gives his take on the situation in Iran.

CoffeeHousers’  Wall, 15 June – 21 June

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which – provided your writing isn’t libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency – you’ll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there’s no need to stay ‘on topic’ – which means you’ll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There’s also no constraint on the length of what you write – so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything’s fair game – from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.