The Spectator

The week that was | 16 October 2009

Here are some of the posts made at Spectator.co.uk over the past week. Fraser Nelson debates the politics of growth. James Forsyth believes that the broken society must be rebuilt from the bottom up, and sees Russia pocket Obama’s concession and move on. Peter Hoskin has a feeling of déjà vu, and wonders what the Tories can learn from Boris’ fare hike. David Blackburn argues that only the catharsis of a general election can end the expenses saga, and says that the formation of Labour Future suggest the party is destined for post-election internecine confrontation. Daniel Korski thinks that our allies need to prepare anti-insurgency capabilities. Lloyd Evans witnesses a very sombre PMQs. Mark Bathgate deconstructs David Blanchflower.

This week’s issue of the Spectator

The latest issue of the Spectator is released today. If you are a subscriber you can view it here. If you have not subscribed, but would like to view this week’s content, you can subscribe online now. Four articles from the latest issue are available for free online to all website users: The political left is discredited, but a new force has risen to attack the Conservatives. James Forsyth reveals how the Tories plan to fight the war that has been declared on them by the cultural left. Matthew Lynn argues that Generation Recession are confused and cross because they’ve been sold a pup by the government, their teachers and even their parents. What can be done to restore their confidence?

CoffeeHousers’ Wall 12th October – 18th October

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which - providing your writing isn't libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency - you'll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there's no need to stay 'on topic' - which means you'll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There's also no constraint on the length of what you write - so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything's fair game - from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.

Just in case you missed them… | 12 October 2009

...here are some of the posts made at Spectator.co.uk over the weekend. Fraser Nelson illuminates who is affected by Brown’s double hit. James Forsyth asks why the Pakistani Taliban are being given another opening and argues that Brown remains divorced from voters. Peter Hoskin thinks that No.10 will welcome Alan Johnson’s backing and says that Westminster will have to start thinking about expenses again. David Blackburn debates the rumour that David Davis is planning to return to frontline politics and sees the Italian Right preparing for life without Berlusconi. Martin Bright thinks that the Conservative conference proves that the party is far from being unbeatable. And Rod Liddle wonders when Rod Liddle will win the Nobel Peace Prize.

Beware the cheese police

Let’s hope that Gordon Brown was too busy trying to hex Cameron this week to notice the story about the Sainsbury’s staff member who refused to sell a pregnant customer cheese. Let’s hope that Gordon Brown was too busy trying to hex Cameron this week to notice the story about the Sainsbury’s staff member who refused to sell a pregnant customer cheese. Sainsbury’s defence was that it might be bad for baby, but it’s just the sort of incident that gives our desperate Prime Minister ideas. For all Labour’s devotion to guidelines and chivvying, not many of their bossy initiatives have much effect on behaviour — warnings don’t stop smokers; tax doesn’t moderate our drinking.

The Cameron era has begun

Power, or the expectation of it, has a transformative effect on political parties. It was draining from the Labour party at its conference in Brighton last week, just as obviously as it was rushing towards the Conservatives in Manchester this week. Gordon Brown sounded angry and shrill, saying nothing about how he would tackle the deficit. His was a strategy for opposition. The Conservatives provided leadership — talking about public sector pay freezes. They were listened to with the respect afforded a government-in-waiting. This was the objective of the conference, and it was clearly achieved. What we learned in Manchester, primarily, was the way in which a Conservative government will set about remedying the public finances.

Letters | 10 October 2009

Invest in the state Sir: David Cameron will never be a revolutionary if he follows your advice and concentrates only on government spending (‘Is Cameron a revolutionary?’, 3 October). He needs to completely rethink taxation, too. You say that taxes must rise. But putting up taxes now, as conventional wisdom suggests, will increase the government deficit, not reduce it. Cameron should make massive cuts in taxes on personal incomes, savings and capital. Suppose he reduces taxes and at the same time allows individuals wishing to set up new schools to issue ‘education convertible bonds’ underwritten for the first ten years by the government? As long as these are made attractive to savers, individuals will have a reason to buy them.

Portait of the Week

Among austerity measures outlined by Mr George Osborne, the shadow chancellor of the exchequer, at the Conservative party conference in Manchester was that the pensionable age for men should rise to 66 no earlier than 2016, instead of by 2026. He also promised a one-year pay freeze for public-sector workers, apart from the million who earn less than £18,000. On the eve of his speech, Mr Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, came up with the wheeze of suddenly announcing that pay for people in the public sector such as GPs and judges would be frozen. The Conservatives also showed their seriousness in responding to the public deficit by banning overt consumption of champagne at their conference.

The week that was | 9 October 2009

Here are some of the posts made at Spectator.co.uk over the past week Fraser Nelson praises Cameron’s revolutionary speech, and believes that the Tories’ welfare plan doesn’t go far enough. James Forsyth argues that the Tories cannot be matched, and says that the Europe won’t go away fot the Tories. Peter Hoskin witnesses a job well done by George Osborne, and sees Andrew Lansley keeping the spending taps on. David Blackburn thinks that Cameron must tackle the expenses scandal head on, and finds the Culture Secretary declaring war on the BBC. Lloyd Evans says Dave has his Goliath in his sights. Daniel Korski is perturbed by General Sir Richard Dannatt. Martin Bright reflects on the Tory conference.

This week’s issue of the Spectator<br />

The latest issue of the Spectator is released today. If you are a subscriber you can view it here. If you have not subscribed, but would like to view this week’s content, you can subscribe online now. Three articles from the latest issue are available for free online to all website users: James Forsyth reveals the Tory plans that George Osborne didn’t mention in his speech. Samir Shah argues that racism that is no longer an issue in the UK And Rod Liddle says that the electorate prefers its toffs to act with chutzpah Additionally, all of last week's issue has now been uploaded to the website. Here is a selection of articles from it: Anders Hultin argues that the profit principle is will be essential if the Swedish voucher system is to be introduced here.

CoffeeHousers’ Wall October 5th – October 11th

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which - providing your writing isn't libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency - you'll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there's no need to stay 'on topic' - which means you'll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There's also no constraint on the length of what you write - so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything's fair game - from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.

Just in case you missed them… | 5 October 2009

…here are some of the posts made at Spectator.co.uk over the weekend. Fraser Nelson says the times they are a changing, and thinks that now is the time to start banging on about Europe. James Forsyth wonders which of the speakers at this Tory conference will make it into Cameron’s cabinet, and watches the Tories trying to hold the line on Europe. David Blackburn discusses the implications of Brown agreeing to appear in a TV debate, in principle, and argues that Cameron’s radical agenda is best for Britain. Martin Bright ponders Cameron’s strange European bedfellows. Rod Liddle notes that the bankers were contrite but resistant to change. And Alex Massie knows his Wodehouse.

Time to grow up

It was a poetic coincidence that the week the Labour party made its defiant last stand in Brighton, the newspapers reported a story that sums up precisely why this country so urgently needs another government. The case of the two policewomen who have been ordered by Ofsted to stop their sensible, reciprocal babysitting arrangement, under the terms of the 2006 Childcare Act, shows just how damaging Labour’s addiction to risk-averse legislation can be. In this case, it has turned neighbours into vindictive sneaks — the WPCs’ babysitting deal was said to have been reported by an anonymous local with a personal grudge; and it has dissuaded two diligent mothers not just from working, but (they said) from having more children as well.

How to ‘seal the deal’

David Cameron will be Britain’s new Prime Minister by next summer — this was the main conclusion drawn from the Labour party conference. David Cameron will be Britain’s new Prime Minister by next summer — this was the main conclusion drawn from the Labour party conference. It did not need to be announced formally, but it suffused everything, from the desperation in the platform speeches to the gallows humour in the Brighton bars. This week, Britain has seen the spectacle of a party whose MPs are going back to their constituencies and are preparing for retirement — or abject defeat followed by a brutal civil war. There is now only one party of government in Britain, and it meets in Manchester on Monday.

Letters | 3 October 2009

The task ahead Sir: Am I alone in finding the Tories’ pre-election triumphalism nauseating (Finkelstein et al, 26 September)? When I last walked past my local constituency association, the grubby frontage still had the old logo. Tony Blair at least built a modern political party. David Cameron hasn’t even begun to build a dynamic political organisation. If I were still a Tory, my feeling would not be swaggering confidence but intense trepidation at the scale of the task ahead. Brian Jenner Bournemouth Sir: David Selborne tells us that in 1997 Labour ‘gained office but lost its sense of direction’ (‘How can Labour save itself?’, 26 September). The Tories should learn from their example.

Final frontiers

Five travel writers journey far and wide to find the world’s last unexplored wildernesses Patagonia Lucinda Baring Arriving in Patagonia, the region spanning Argentina and Chile at the southernmost tip of South America, I really felt I’d reached the end of the earth. The journey is an epic but rewarding one – this was the most spectacular scenery I’d ever seen. My destination was Hotel Salto Chico in the Torres del Paine National Park in Chile. This small enclave of comfort, surrounded by wide green lagoons and sheltered by snow-capped mountains, is designed specifically to cosset you after a day spent amongst the elements.

The week that was | 2 October 2009

Here are some of the posts made at Spectator.co.uk this week. Fraser Nelson can’t believe the lines Labour MPs are coming out with, and says it’s game over for Labour in Brighton. James Forsyth says that getting shirty with the media won’t do Labour any favours, and sees Brown’s speech fall flat in Brighton. Peter Hoskin believes that Brown’s fightback is already over, and reckons Brown’s drinking in the last chance saloon, again. David Blackburn argues that the banks are our route to salvation, and observes Labour begging for the return of Blair. Martin Bright asks why say it if you won’t act. Rod Liddle wants to eradicate his inner racist. Alex Massie wonders if Labour’s next leader will be Darling.

This week’s issue of The Spectator<br />

The latest issue of the Spectator is released today. If you are a subscriber you can view it here. If you have not subscribed, but would like to view this week’s content, you can subscribe online now. Three articles from the latest issue are available for free online to all website users: Fraser Nelson interviews with David Cameron Bruce Anderson asks whether the Tory leader can transform Britain. And Rod Liddle gives his take on Andrew Marr's infamous interview with Gordon Brown. Additionally, all of last week's issue has now been uploaded to the website. Here are a selection of articles from it: Daniel Finkelstein tells Peter Mandelson how to revive the Labour party. Douglas Murray remembers Irving Kristol. Matthew Parris is thrilled by go-getters.

Parliamentarian of the Year | 30 September 2009

The Spectator/Threadneedle Parliamentarian of the Year Awards are fast approaching. As we did last year, we are inviting you to nominate a reader’s representative. This should be the elected official who you believe has best pursued the noble art of politics, putting the public interest ahead of everything else, especially expenses. All you have to do is click here and – in no more than 250 words – nominate your choice. We’ll print a selection of the best nominations in the magazine throughout October. Then, on the 28th October, the reader who has submitted the best-written nomination will be revealed. The closing date for entries is Monday 26th October 2009. Good luck.

CoffeeHousers’ Wall 28th September – 4th October

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which - providing your writing isn't libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency - you'll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there's no need to stay 'on topic' - which means you'll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There's also no constraint on the length of what you write - so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything's fair game - from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.