The Spectator

For richer, for poorer Sir: Ferdinand Mount’s article (‘David Cameron should honour his marriage vow’, 23 January) is not entirely accurate. After noting that Geoffrey Howe was unable to persuade Margaret Thatcher to agree to the introduction of transferable tax allowances between married couples, he writes: ‘Nigel Lawson after him argued the same, with no better luck.’ In fact, I announced the introduction of transferable allowances in my 1988 Budget, and it was duly implemented in 1990. The full story may be found on pages 881 to 887 of my memoirs, The View from No. 11. Nigel Lawson London SW1 Sir: Well done to Ferdinand Mount and The Spectator for standing up for marriage.

Here are some of the posts made at Spectator.co.uk over the past week Fraser Nelson reveals Blair’s real crime. James Forsyth says that the Tories’ Northern Ireland talks had nothing to do with electoral advantage, and reviews the economy’s anaemic recovery. David Blackburn thinks it will take decades to stimulate social mobility, and says that the Tories need to be clearer about localism. Martin Bright wants to save Wikileaks. Susan Hill is thinking about cuts. Rod Liddle understands that the MCB is moving in the right direction. Alex Massie ponders the same tired old utterances delivered at the State of the Union address. Melanie Phillips analyses British Social Attitudes. And Cappuccino Culture has turned into Cappuccino Amis, sorry.

The latest issue of the Specatator is published today. If you are a subscriber you can view it here. If you have not subscribed, but would like to view this week’s content, you can subscribe online here, or purchase a single issue here. For all his talk about devolving power, Mr Cameron has as Tory leader centralised power at every opportunity. It is a long-standing joke that anyone who works as one of Mr Cameron’s aides automatically outranks any shadow Cabinet member. James Forsyth argues that Cameron and Osborne must listen to their backbenchers – or face revolt. It’s a mistake to focus on the dodgy dossier, says Fraser Nelson.

Hastings’s battle Sir: Max Hastings, one of the shrewdest and well-informed writers about defence, is right (‘The military’s last stand’, 16 January). There is a good case for increasing the defence budget, but no British government is likely to do so unless there is a dramatic deterioration in the international situation. Budgets are likely to be cut, but our defence forces can and should continue to be important for our country’s security, reputation and influence. The forces are crying out for a Strategic Defence Review and the longer one is delayed the more will be the uncertainty and wasted defence money.

The latest issue of the Specatator is published today. If you are a subscriber you can view it here. If you have not subscribed, but would like to view this week’s content, you can subscribe online here, or purchase a single issue here. A selection of articles from the latest issue is available for free online to all website users: Labour’s Green Paper on families makes it clear that the party is opposed to promoting marriage. Ferdinand Mount says it’s crucial that the Tories don’t waver, but stick to their promise of a financial incentive. It is not often that David Cameron lavishes praise on a Labour achievement. But that’s exactly what he was doing on Monday morning at Walworth Academy.

As part of our ongoing efforts to improve Spectator.co.uk, we’d like to know a bit more about you, our readers, and why you visit the site. So, if you’ve got ten to fifteen minutes to spare, please click here to take the Spectator survey. As a thank you for taking part, your name will be included in a draw to win a case of wine courtesy of the Spectator Wine Club. Three winners will be announced when the survey closes in two weeks time. Good luck.

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which - providing your writing isn't libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency - you'll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there's no need to stay 'on topic' - which means you'll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There's also no constraint on the length of what you write - so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything's fair game - from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.

Gangster paradise Sir: Owen Matthews’s article (‘Something rotten in the state of Russia’, 9 January) brilliantly encapsulates and explains the condition of Russia today. But he omits to mention that the subversion of the judicial system and pervasive corruption have been in evidence for a long time, which does raise the question of whether Hermitage capital should have been in this European country at all. The murder of Alexander Litvinenko in 2006 and the refusal of the Russians to extradite the chief suspect constituted — unless you are wilfully blind — a good reason to suspect that Russia is run by crooks.