The stupidity of demanding an apology for slavery
In his big Commonwealth speech in Antigua today, King Charles III is now expected to speak with 'unflinching honesty’ and 'sincere sorrow’ about Britain’s role in the slave trade. He may stop short, however, of issuing a formal apology, which is bound to trigger another round of agonised media discussion. But Britain has nothing for which to apologise, and the never-ending ‘slavery apology’ debate is facile and riddled with stupidity. We can understand the concept of slavery better – and the arch ignorance that many people bring to the topic – by considering other important historical relics, less contentious than slavery now, but which equally elude our present-tense, present-day bias. Two of the most obvious are providentialism and ideas about equality.