Peter Hoskin

Purnell’s resignation letter in full

From our UK edition

Courtesy of the Sun: Dear Gordon We both love the Labour Party. I have worked for it for twenty years and you for far longer. We know we owe it everything and it owes us nothing. I owe it to our Party to say what I believe no matter how hard that may. I now believe your continued leadership makes a Conservative victory more not less likely That would be disastrous for our country. This moment calls for stronger regulation, an active state, better public services, an open democracy. It calls for a government that measures itself by how it treats the poorest in society. Those are our values, not David Cameron's. We therefore owe it to our country to give it a real choice.

Reshuffle and resignation rumours

From our UK edition

There are plenty of rumours swirling around the Wesminster washbowl, but two are worth pulling out in particular.  The first comes courtesy of Danny Finkelstein (who is, incidentally, running a useful rolling post over at Comment Central on the latest leadership gossip): "Contrary to all previous reports, rumours are now circulating that Alistair Darling would be willing to take another job in the reshuffle, and that the Chancellorship isn’t the be-all-and-end-all for him that everyone had assumed. Presumably though, this get-out-of-jail card for Brown would hang on offering Darling exactly the right kind of job..." And then this appeared on Paul Waugh's Twitter feed: "Word in Westminster is that at 10pm tonight, when the polls close, a Cabinet minister will quit.

Is there a graphologist in the house?

From our UK edition

In his analysis of Blears' resignation letter and Brown's response, the Times's Philip Collins picks up on one of the strangest minor details of the entire saga: neither letter, in 12 whole paragraphs, contains one full-stop.  As Collins quips wonderfully: "No full stop appears in either letter.  New Labour began with no verbs and it ends in no punctuation." But what could it mean?  A quick internet search for "graphology" and "no full-stops" has proved fruitless, so maybe CoffeeHousers have some ideas.  Are Gordon and Hazel revealing an inner desire for things not to end?  Or are they just following the government style guide?  Your theories below, please.

Look to the reshuffle to see whether Brown’s enemies have any bottle

From our UK edition

And so we come to Election Day 2009.  But the voting itself is being overshadowed by the melodrama on Downing Street; or at least being anticipated through the prism of What It All Means for Gordon.  For any CoffeeHousers who have been out of the country for the past few days - and even those who haven't - there's a great summary of events by Francis Elliot in today's Times.  But the question remains of what will happen next.  Personally, I can't see the election results being much better than a disaster for Labour, so the pressure on Brown will certainly be ratcheted up a notch.  But will the plotters strike?  Or will Blears' exhilarating actions be ignored rather than followed? One of the key indicators will be the reshuffle.

Did Watson fall on his sword for Brown’s sake?

From our UK edition

Ok, so maybe we're all going a bit reshuffle crazy in Westminster, but here's a theory about Tom Watson's resignation that just popped into my head.  Imagine, if you will, that you're the Dear Leader and you hear that Jacqui Smith's resignation has leaked.  This wasn't Downing St-sanctioned information, and it's certainly not part of your gameplan - so what do you do?  Do you do nothing, and watch everyone get into a frenzy about how the Government has lost control of its own ministers?  Or do you get one of your lapdogs to do exactly the same thing, so that people think Downing Street must be in control of things?

Resigned to catastrophe

From our UK edition

Unbelieveable.  It's going from bad to worse to apocalyptic for Labour.  The latest news is that Tom Watson - a key Brown ally, and minister for digital engagement - is set to resign as well.  The main question doing the rounds in Westminster is whether this spate of leaks is designed to undermine Brown; whether ministers, knowing they're going to be pushed, are jumping to create disarray.  Or whether this is all part of the Dear Leader's mad plan.  Whatever the reason, this is fast becoming one of the worst days of Brown's premiership: the day when it all, quite literally, fell apart.

May responds | 2 June 2009

From our UK edition

Here are Theresa May's answers to the questions put forward by CoffeeHousers last week: John Moss "Is a time of financial crisis when many people are losing their jobs not the best time to push through radical reform of welfare to gain public trust in the system and get control of cost." John, I agree with you that radical welfare reform is long overdue. I wish it had started earlier, such as in 2007 when David Freud published his groundbreaking report, which was at the time rejected by Gordon Brown. But yes, the recession cannot be used as an excuse for not bringing about the reform that we need. That is why we are supporting the Government’s Welfare Reform Bill although it doesn’t go far enough.

Brown won’t gain from a purge

From our UK edition

And so the expenses fiasco looks set to claim its biggest scalp yet - in the form of the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith.  To be honest, it's not much of a surprise: Smith - with her bathplugs and her husband's porn rentals - became the embodiment of the scandal a couple of months back, and many expected Brown to at least move her in the forthcoming Cabinet reshuffle.  The word in Westminster has been that she'd rather welcome an opportunity to concentrate on defending her slim majority in Redditch: an impossble task, if you ask me. The question now is how Brown engineers the situation.  Does he downplay the expenses aspect to Smith's downfall, and make it seem like this is all just part of a normal reshuffle?

A disgraceful approach to economic management

From our UK edition

Absolutely worth reading Rachel's Sylvester column in the Times today, on the growing frenzy inside the Cabinet.  There are plenty of noteworthy snippets about Ed Balls (e.g. "Lord Mandelson's allies suspect the Schools Secretary of spreading rumours that he would be moved to the Foreign Office because he wanted him out of the way"), but it's this passage on the Budget's growth figures which jumped out at me: "In the run-up to the Budget, I am told that the Prime Minister tried to upgrade the growth forecasts to make the economic outlook appear rosier than it was; the Chancellor refused." Thing is, the growth figures which actually made it into the Budget - predicting a trampoline recovery - are already optimistic to the point of madness.

Has Charles Clarke’s moment come?

From our UK edition

Anyone who thinks that Cabinet members will immediately come out against Brown in the aftermath of this week's elections had better take a look at this quote in today's Mirror: "One senior figure said pressure will 'ratchet' up on the PM if Labour slips to third or fourth place. He added: 'There is no person in the Cabinet ready to do the damage, it needs a stalking horse. But we are running out of time.'" Like last summer, the signs are that none of the main candidates for the Labour leadership are willing to to bloody their hands over this.  In which case, if Brown's going to be ousted, then it will require an intervention from a prominent backbencher.  But who would be up for the task?

Crunchtime for Darling

From our UK edition

Oh dear.  The pressure really is on Alistair Darling now.  After the revelations about his serial flipping, today's Telegraph flags up another potential misdemenour on the Chancellor's part: that he claimed parliamentary expenses on a south London flat which he rented out, while also claiming second home allowances for his grace-and-favour properties.  Not only does this look plain bad for a minister who is supposed to be guiding the country through a recession, but - as the Telegraph puts it - it "would appear to contravene parliamentary rules that allow MPs to claim on only one property at a time." The spotlight now falls on Gordon Brown.  What will he do with his Chancellor, especially if it's the case that rules have been broken?

How to kill, rather than save, a premiership

From our UK edition

There's something grimly hilarious about the frontpage headline of the Sunday Times today: "Gordon Brown wants Ed Balls as Chancellor".  Sure, we've known that for years, but now it sounds as though the Dear Leader may actually be on the verge of making it happen.  The story goes on refer to a "top-level leak" from Downing St, saying that Brown wants the move to be the "centrepiece" of a "sweeping rehsuffle" designed to "restore Labour's political fortunes". The stupidity of it almost doesn't bear thinking about.  After all, Balls is hardly the most popular figure with either the public or his own colleagues.  Let's not forget that this is the man who devised much of the regulatory and fiscal framework which has dragged the country into economic hell.

Labour trailing behind the Lib Dems in ICM poll

From our UK edition

Well, well, well - it just goes from bad to worse for Labour.  A new ICM poll for the Sunday Telegraph has them behind the Lib Dems when it comes to general election voting intentions.  The Tories are well ahead on 40 percent (up 1), then it's Clegg & Co. on 25 percent (up 5), and then Labour trailing in third, on 22 percent (down 6).  I stress: this is in answer to the question "Who would you support in a general election?" - it's nothing to do with European or local elections. Of course, all the usual caveats apply.  This could well be a rogue, and - even if it's not - the Lib Dem support could, theoretically, plummet once the spotlight stops shining on Nick Clegg.

Coffee House poll: the elections and Brown’s future

From our UK edition

As it's Friday, and with the elections coming next week, here's a poll triple-header (after the jump) for CoffeeHousers.  The three questions are very much interrelated, and are certainly doing the rounds here in sunny Westminster.  We'll keep them running until 1230 next Monday.

Staring defeat in the face<br />

From our UK edition

This snippet from today's Guardian tells you everything you need to know about Labour morale at the moment: "Gordon Brown is facing an escalating crisis of confidence inside the parliamentary Labour party as record numbers of his MPs apply to sit in the House of Lords after the next general election. In the clearest indication to date that increasing numbers of Labour figures believe the party is heading for a heavy defeat at the hands of David Cameron, the Guardian has learned that at least 52 MPs have formally approached Downing Street to be given places in the upper house. The MPs include current chairs of select committees as well as past and serving middle and junior ranking ministers, according to Labour sources. They account for a seventh of those elected at the last election.

Is Blunkett on a mission to take out Johnson?

From our UK edition

Now that Damien McBride's out of the picture, just who will Brown use to take out his political opponents?  Well, David Blunkett seems like he could do a thorough job.  He's got an article in the Guardian which takes the fight to the AV+ voting system proposed by the Man Who Would be King, Alan Johnson, earlier this week.  Here's the key passage "I could wear the alternative vote­ system if I had to, but couple voter disempowerment with the AV-plus system of 'topping up' the Commons from a party list and you have a dual disaster: the inability to get rid of placemen with no constituency accountability, and the undermining of constituency MPs who are doing the real work." There could be nothing in it, of course.

Two approaches, same result

From our UK edition

It's typical, isn't it?  Coffee House decides to stop working for a couple of hours and, in the meantime, two MPs confirm that they're going to stand down.  You've probably caught the news elsewhere on the good ol' blogosphere but - yes - Margaret Moran and Julie Kirkbride won't be running for Parliament in the next election.  Hardly surprising, really. With these two delayed resignations coming at the same time, the contrast between the Labour and Conservative approaches is even more striking.  We've barely heard a squeak from Moran over the past couple of weeks, as Labour MPs are subjected to behind-closed-door meetings with the "star chamber".  Whereas Cameron is encouraging Tory MPs to air their dirty laundry in public, and take their case to voters.