Matthew Dancona

Diary – 27 October 2007

From our UK edition

Valhalla: Row H, Seat 9 It’s Wednesday, so it must be Rheingold. In an unlikely logistical triumph, I have managed to build my week around the second cycle of the Ring at the Royal Opera House — and quite something it is, too. As much as I might aspire to be George Bernard Shaw’s ‘Perfect Wagnerite’, I am still very much a novice in the world of neurotic gods, Niebelungs, giants, Walsungs, dragon music, stolen gold, sacred spears and Rhinemaidens. So the privilege of attending this amazing event — an unalloyed triumph for Tony Hall and his team at the ROH — feels all the greater (for expert opinion, see Michael Tanner’s review on page 75).

Rats to product placement

From our UK edition

The magic of Pixar films - especially the Toy Story duet and The Incredibles - is that they appeal to adults as well as the children at whom they are primarily aimed. The latest creation of the CGI giant, Ratatouille, is arguably the best so far, and I certainly enjoyed it as much as my two young sons. No surprise then to read in today's Indy that there is a run on rats in the nation's pet stores. Product placement works at every level, it seems. I am just glad that we already have two gerbils.

The Iran problem isn’t going away

From our UK edition

Don't miss the excellent Toby Harnden's interview with Norman Podhoretz in today's Daily Telegraph in which the US conservative guru - an adviser to, amongst many others Rudy Giuliani - calls unequivocally for military action against Iran. This bolsters the case made by James a few weeks back - that Iran is a problem that will be dealt with by the next US President if it is not settled by the incumbent.

Matt Suggests

From our UK edition

BOOK Nixon and Kissinger: Partners in Power by Robert Dallek: The double biography is a genre that, in the hands of a master, can shed fresh light on the most familiar materials. Alan Bullock’s Hitler and Stalin is the example nonpareil and, more recently, Andrew Roberts has produced splendid volumes on (for example) Napoleon and Wellington. Funnily enough, I attended a lunch in Kissinger’s honour at Andrew’s house recently, as I was ploughing my way through Dallek’s majestic book which shows how the lives of these two very different men were interwoven and shaped the destiny of America in the second half of the twentieth century.

No question about it, it was a great performance

From our UK edition

Around Westminster today plenty of normally hard-bitten folk have been saying to me how good Fraser was on Question Time. He's far too modest to say it, so let me add my own congratulations, and here's Tim at Conservative Home (who is a very nice guy but doesn't dole out praise indiscriminately) doing the same. What do Coffee Housers reckon? A star is born, I'd say. (I just hope Fraser invites me on when he gets his own show).

The Blair memoirs

From our UK edition

Tony Blair has announced the name of the ghost writer for his forthcoming memoirs: Frank But-not-disloyal. Mr Blair and Frank go back a long way, and their laughter could often be heard echoing down the corridors of Number Ten from the Prime Ministerial den. I would imagine that Gordon Brown doesn’t find this announcement entirely reassuring.

Who would have thought it?

From our UK edition

There is a long tradition of the pop intelligentsia getting involved with academe or publishing -- Pete Townshend’s work as an editor for Faber being the obvious example, Jah Wobble’s labours over Blake’s poetry rather less so. Sir Paul McCartney was the driving force behind the Liverpool Institute of Performing Arts. The Spectator’s own Alex James is the best bassist of his generation, and lived the pop life to the full, but he also has the cerebral firepower to hold his own in an academic common room or editorial meeting. So there ought to be nothing unsettling about the Smiths’ former guitarist, Johnny Marr, becoming a visiting professor of music at Salford University. One only has to hear, say, the opening chords of “How Soon is Now?

Brick Lane’s queen strikes gold on the silver screen

From our UK edition

Four years ago I published a book set in the East End, about a troubled young woman who lives and works in the vibrant multiethnic community of Bethnal Green. It was fun to write, and reasonably well-reviewed. But just before publication I turned around and saw a magnificent tidal wave filling the literary horizon, and approaching fast. ‘Another book about the East End,’ I thought to myself. ‘Wow, that looks rather impressive. I wonder what it is? . . . Glug. Glug. Glug.’ The tidal wave was a debut novel of stunning confidence and elegance called Brick Lane and, four years on, I am sitting in a Dulwich bistro with its author, Monica Ali, to discuss the film of the book, which is about to be released.

Miliband’s constitutional muddle

From our UK edition

Glutton for punishment that I am, I watched all of the Commons European Scrutiny Committee's cross-examination of David Miliband on Tuesday (you can share my pain by going to the committee's website). Most of the press coverage has focused on the angry exchanges between the Foreign Secretary and the MPs, and particularly his justified fury at the invocation by the chairman, Michael Connarty, of the Munich agreement and Chamberlain's appeasement of Hitler. This was a deplorable allusion, and Mr Miliband had a duty as well as a right to express the strongest possible objections.

It must be Clegg

From our UK edition

I have just watched Simon Hughes, the Lib Dem President, tell his BBC interviewer that the downfall of Ming Campbell was the fault of "the press". Even by Mr Hughes's exacting standards, that is absolute nonsense. As Ming has faltered and cried out for support, the silence of his senior colleagues has been deafening. Truly, the Lib Dems are the "nasty party" now. I stick by what I wrote in a Daily Telegraph column in January 2006. Nick Clegg is, as he was then, the only man for the job. Ming's problem was never age - Mick Jagger and Michael Heseltine are proof enough that you can still bring down the house after 60. It was the Lib Dem leader's countenance - a bearing he has always had - that made him unfit to be at the helm of a modern party: patrician, diffident, a little aloof.

The Blairites can’t fight the last war all over again without destroying Labour

From our UK edition

Tony Blair, as I report in today's Sunday Telegraph, is trying to rein in his supporters, keen that they not become to Gordon what the Eurosceptic 'Bastards' were to John Major. The former PM is right that his own reputation will suffer if a neo-Blairite rump is perceived to be sabotaging Brown. Such considerations, however, do not seem to have restrained Lord Falconer, the ultra-Blairite former Lord Chancellor, who pointedly calls on Gordon today to offer a 'vision' - the very word used by the PM when he explained why he was not holding an election now. It is widely reported that Alan Milburn, Stephen Byers and Charles Clarke are preparing to weigh in. This would be a grave error. Whether or not the Blairite critique of Gordon is justified, the public hates divided parties.

Another panic-induced u-turn

From our UK edition

Andy Burnham is a talented minister but his interview in Saturday's Daily Telegraph represents yet another ignominious U-turn by this Government in response to Conservative pressure. For almost two years, Labour's unshakeable response to David Cameron's belief that marriage should be recognised in the tax system has been to say, scornfully, that policy should help all children, not endorse one family structure rather than another. Only 12 days ago, Gordon Brown invoked the words of Jesus - 'suffer the children' - to condemn the Tory position on tax and marriage. Mr Burnham's remarks represent a spectacular capitulation.

Dave is back–he hasn’t been Terminated

From our UK edition

A few weeks ago I was reliably informed by an adviser to Arnold Schwarzenegger that the Governator, as a consummate “image man”, had cancelled his trip to the Tory Party conference partly because there is nothing worse than being photographed with a loser. Well, Arnie seems suddenly to have overcome his reservations. Whatever made him change his mind, do you think?

From Oscar to Nobel

From our UK edition

I think I am right that Al Gore and George Bernard Shaw are the only two people ever to have won both a Nobel Prize and an Oscar. Can Coffee Housers confirm this?

The Tories force Darling to play catch up

From our UK edition

The most important line was George Osborne’s: “From this day on let there be no doubt who is winning the battle of ideas.” That’s right. Darling was chasing the Tories in this statement in a way Gordon Brown never did – or had to - when he was Chancellor, although there was a hint of the future in Mr Brown’s last, supposedly “tax-cutting” Budget earlier this year. For a decade, the public bought into the line that the priority was to “invest” in health and education and that Conservative proposals to make even the most modest tax cuts would lead inexorably to the closure of schools and hospitals and the sending of poor wee children up chimneys.

A taxing friendship

From our UK edition

At the risk of infuriating Coffee Housers (and Polly), I rather like Polly Toynbee. She’s good company and we chatted happily before appearing on Marr on Sunday. It’s just that she’s wrong, and particularly wrong about tax. See her article in today’s Guardian, calling on Gordon to open up clear red water between himself and the Tories, and to explain “what tax is for, why it is a public good and not a burden, how it is the agent of social justice.” Tax is a necessary evil to most people, especially the least affluent. They accept it as the membership fee of society, and the price they pay for common goods such as health, education, welfare, transport infrastructure, law and order and national defence.

A ringside seat

From our UK edition

Just left the Andrew Marr Show, where I was on the sofa discussing the day's big story before the full broadcast of Andrew's pre-recorded interview with Gordon, in which the PM called off the snap election. As I argue in today's Sunday Telegraph, it is only a fortnight since Brown was on the very same show, insisting coquettishly that he would not be providing a 'running commentary' on his election planning. Now it looks as though it is he himself who is 'running' - from the people's judgment which, his pollsters told him, could not be assumed to be positive. So often impressive since he entered Number Ten, Gordon looked evasive and irritable today.

Cameron passes the test

From our UK edition

Bookended by the soothing techno of Moby and a (perhaps unintended) reference to Jimmy Cliff's "You Can Get It If You Really Want It", David Cameron today gave a speech that - if nothing else - stretched the boundaries of virtuosity in political performance. To speak with grace and confidence, for more than an hour, with only a few notes was an astonishing feat of memory and endurance. This, of course, is an important part of the Tories' election message, starting today. They want to present Dave as gutsy and up for it, in contrast to Gordon the Ditherer, Bottler Brown. The final passage of the speech was as close to "Come and get it if you think you're hard enough" as this suave Old Etonian will ever get.

Will Gordon ask the Commons before heading to the Palace?

From our UK edition

Peter Ridell makes an excellent point in The Times today. Three months ago, in a Green Paper Gordon proposed a new convention that the PM should be 'required to seek the approval of the House of Commons before asking the monarch for a dissolution.' So: if he goes for an election announcement next week, will he honour the principle behind his own proposal and ask MPs first?

How many minutes are left on the election countdown clock?

From our UK edition

I am on a Today Programme panel this week playing a prediction game modelled on the famous Doomsday Clock. The idea is for Michael Portillo, Jackie Ashley, John Curtice, Peter Kilfoyle and myself to guess how close we are to midnight—if 11:45 is the furthest away we can be, and midnight is the calling of an election. This morning, I thought the positive headlines for the Tories would nudge Gordon in the direction of caution, and opted for 11:53. Michael went boldly for 11:57, only three minutes away from blast-off, on the grounds that the PM has made his mind up but is just waiting for Cameron's speech as a final check. We have to update our estimates every day as the political picture changes. I have to send my next prediction in on Wednesday morning. What do Coffee Housers think?