John Power

In a speech yesterday Andy Burnham promised that there will not just be ‘fair pay’ in social care but ‘bigger reform to improve the workforce’. He said that this could include a restructure to make pay work as it does in the NHS, ‘progression routes’ from care to the health service and even thinking about NHS and care ‘as one workforce’. This builds on the ‘fair pay agreement’ (FPA) which Keir Starmer’s government was working on, which is planned to take effect from April 2028.  Burnham said after his speech that much of this will be ‘possible within existing resources’ and without breaking the 2024 manifesto pledges to freeze income tax and national insurance.

Just one day after Ed Miliband was made Foreign Secretary we heard in the Telegraph that the White House is upset about the appointment, and even warned against it. Donald Trump is apparently unimpressed by Miliband’s role in blocking North Sea oil drilling. Miliband has also railed against Trump in the past, calling him a ‘racist, misogynistic self-confessed groper’ on the BBC’s World at One in 2016, as an example – but in fairness his predecessor David Lammy called Trump ‘beneath contempt’ before he became foreign secretary. Trump can forgive and forget – so long as his interlocutor is willing to forget their own pride. Miliband could bend the knee, but there is also some appetite to confront Trump.

Miatta Fahnbulleh, who has just become the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero – and has been very involved with helping Burnham’s strategy over the past few months – is so far the most successful MP from the Labour party’s 2024 intake. She has risen from the backbenches to a full senior cabinet position within two short years, a very rare achievement made even more impressive by the fact that Labour won a landslide majority in 2024 after a dismal performance in 2019, meaning there are many new, sharp-elbowed MPs also trying to make their way up. Part of the explanation for her meteoric rise may be her experience in Westminster, both in the Cabinet Office and think tanks.

Zia Yusuf gave a speech yesterday on the security of MPs, in which he accused several politicians of inciting violence against Ann Widdecombe through their words. He called out David Lammy for saying ‘we must stand up to them [Widdecombe] before it’s too late’. He criticised Wes Streeting for saying ‘if only science had a cure for Ann Widdecombe’, Jess Phillips for saying ‘Ann Widdecombe better go this week’ and Ed Davey for describing Reform as a ‘threat from within’ worse than Iran or Russia. He said we should not be surprised, given such ‘reckless rhetoric’ against Reform, that people could be moved to confront that apparent threat with violence. This is not the first time that Yusuf has complained about rhetoric endangering Reform politicians.

Reporting on the news that Nigel Farage is planning to resign his seat to force a by-election, Le Monde described the stunt as a ‘highly unusual move’, the Wall Street Journal called it ‘unconventional’ and the Australian Special Broadcasting Service called it ‘unusual’.  Now, few of us would call what happened yesterday ‘conventional’. Nonetheless, it may be of help to some parts of the foreign press if we provide a bit of extra context on Farage’s dramatic by-election resignation. While events like this are infrequent, taking the Chiltern Hundreds to make a point still has well-established precedent in British political history.

Kemi Badenoch was interviewed last night by The Spectator's Political Editor, Tim Shipman, in front of a live audience at Church House in Westminster. Much of what the Conservative leader said was a retreading over familiar ground. The Conservative party was a ‘distressed asset’ when she inherited the leadership, she said, but is now getting a second hearing. Badenoch said, of the economy, that the country must cut spending before it cuts taxes, and that it is time that the government gets out of the way of business. The Conservative party was ‘for the people who get up every day’, she insisted, and that what is needed in politics is more common sense.

Today marks a hundred days since America and Israel began launching strikes on Iran on 28 February. The very next day, Donald Trump told the Atlantic that Iran’s leaders ‘want to talk’, saying they should have made a deal sooner and that ‘they played too cute’. Three days after Trump said this, Iran announced that the Strait of Hormuz was closed. Since then, we have been told dozens of times that we are on the brink of a lasting deal between Iran and America, often in the President’s statements on Truth Social. At the end of last month, Axios reported that US and Iranian negotiators had reached an agreement on a 60-day memorandum which would reopen the Strait, which simply needed Trump’s sign off.

The British Medical Association announced yesterday that junior doctors will be going on strike again next month, with a four-day walkout beginning at 7 a.m. on 15 June. It will be the sixteenth time they have gone on strike since 2023. The BMA is pressing ahead with this despite being given a very generous offer in March. The government was willing to concede a 4.9 per cent average pay rise this year, meaning that junior doctors would be on average 35.2 per cent better off than four years ago. Some more experienced junior doctors could, with additional earnings such as for working unsocial hours, be paid more than £100,000. The BMA continues to insist that this is not enough and that they will settle for nothing less than full ‘pay restoration’.

‘Technology is addling young people’s brains, impacting on their education and attainment, impacting on their health and wellbeing,’ Wes Streeting said on the Today programme this morning. It followed his remarks yesterday that ‘social media should be treated like tobacco – it’s extremely addictive, and bad for our health’. He was commenting on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges’ (AOMRC’s) response to a consultation, launched by Sir Keir Starmer at the beginning of the year, on the impact of social media on teenagers.

This morning the government was able to celebrate some sorely needed good news. Long-term net migration has fallen sharply to 171,000 per year, down from 331,000 this time last year. Net migration is now less than a fifth of what it was at the peak of the post-Covid immigration wave. If we discount the Covid years it is the lowest that net migration has been since 2012. It’s a remarkable achievement whichever way you cut it, though there is still clear room for improvement. The number of people immigrating for asylum has increased slightly from 87,000 to 88,000.