James Forsyth

James Forsyth

James Forsyth is former political editor of The Spectator.

10 years on

Tony Blair has just got out of his car and is walking down the street, hugging and embracing Labour supporters. It is a recreation of that famous walk down Downing Street on May 1st, 1997. The first of many pulls on the heart strings that we’re going to see today. You can say what you like about Blair but it is amazing how much of the magic has survived the decade Just look at this poll in The Guardian today, 44% think he’s been good for Britain—that's higher than the percentage of the vote that Blair got in 1997.

Reshuffle, Kerfuffle

Melissa Kite’s story in the Sunday Telegraph about a coming Tory reshuffle has ruffled feathers. This morning, via the indispensable Conservative Home, comes a highly personal attack on Kite from Alan Duncan who accuses her of “shoddy journalism”, “poor judgement” and tops things off with the line that, “If she really thinks this is authoritative then I doubt she will soon either enjoy much respect or access”.  Duncan’s full-frontal assault is spectacularly ill judged.

From black sheep of the family to president

Tonight isn’t the first time that the Queen and George W. Bush have broken bread together at the White House. But the odds are that the conversation tonight will be more stilted than it was the last time they did. Rewind to 1991 and the preidency of George Bush senior: “The Queen of England got two George Bushes for the price of one when she arrived at the White House last Tuesday. What she didn't know was that the president's eldest son, George Walker Bush, so unpredictable that the family never knows what he'll say in polite society, was under strict orders from his parents not to address the queen. Somehow, though, he and the queen got to talking anyway. About boots, the new pair he was wearing, made especially for the occasion.

How Sarko will cause trouble for Brown and Cameron

Nicolas Sarkozy is going to cause problems for both Gordon Brown and David Cameron. The headache for Cameron, as Matt pointed out the other day, is that Sarkozy sounds far more right-wing than he actually is. His victory speech was full of the kind of red-meat rhetoric that much of the Tory grassroots and press are yearning to hear. Just take this passage, which would—with Britain substituted for France—have them on their feet roaring for more at conference: I am thus going to restore the status of work, authority, standards, respect, merit. I am going to give the place of honour back to the nation and national identity.

Exit polls predict Sarkozy win

Belgium TV are reporting that Nicolas Sarkozy has got 53-54% of the vote in the French presidential election according to early exit polls. These are only exit polls but they got the first round result pretty much spot on. France's purely proportional system makes these polls far less prone to error than they are in this country or the States. More analysis coming soon.

Is it too painful to say the Tories did well?

Last night I said that it looked like being a mediocre result for David Cameron, well it looks like it was substantially better than that. The Tories have quietly rattled up 875 gains, far more than the 600 or so that they were expected to get. So the Tories must be considered, alongside the SNP, as the big winners. But you wouldn’t know that from listening and watching the Beeb today, who have diverted their eyes from anything as distasteful as a Tory triumph. This isn’t the first time the BBC has downplayed Tory local election success. They did exactly the same in 2003 when Crispin Blunt resigned straight after the polls had closed.

SNP the biggest party in the Scottish Parliament

So, finally we know the news from Scotland and it’s not good for Gordon Brown. The SNP have 47 seats to Labour’s 46. During the campaign, the Lib Dems made clear that they would enter coalition talks with the largest party first. But even if the SNP and Lib Dems make a deal they still be 2 seats short of a majority. The horse-trading is about to begin.

The forgotten party of British politics

Conservative Home asks why there isn’t more speculation about Ming Campbell’s future. It does seem odd how easy a ride he’s been given considering that the Lib Dems must be sorely disappointed by the results. But no one talking about why Ming must go is actually the worst possible news for him as it demonstrates how he and the Lib Dems are the forgotten folk of British politics. When the press can’t even be bothered to even fuel leadership speculation you know you’re in trouble. The situation is just going to get worse for the Lib Dems. For the next few months the media will fixate on Blair’s departure and then Cameron and Brown going head to head; crowding the uncharismatic Campbell out of the picture.

Tories up 1%, Lib Dems down 1%

And Labour pretty much as they were the BBC are projecting. That has got to count as a good night for Labour, in the circumstances, and a mediocre one for Cameron and one they'd rather forget for the Lib Dems.

Conservatives for Hillary?!

Former Reagan and Bush 1 staffer Bruce Bartlett thinks that conservatives might, out of necessity, end up embracing their favourite hate-figure. Crazy as it sounds his argument has something going for it. The Republicans are in dire straits and Hillary’s the most conservative Democrat running for president by some distance. But people don’t make political decisions on purely rational grounds and the personal animus against Hillary on the right is just too strong methinks. Even if she promised to abolish income tax, overturn Roe versus Wade and privatise social security most conservatives still wouldn’t be able to pull the lever for her.

What will Blair do next?

The reports this morning that Tony Blair might step down as an MP as soon as he quits as PM raise the question of what will Blair do next. (The denial from Downing Street, which is about timing not substance, doesn’t suggest that Blair is planning to become a Ted Heath-style fixture in the Commons.) We’re already pretty certain that there’ll be some kind of Blair foundation, although the address blairfoundation.com has already been taken by a US evangelical with missionary zeal (insert your own joke here.) But what cause will Blair’s foundation adopt? Gore’s already doing climate change and Clinton Aids.

Sarko clears the last hurdle

Nicolas Sarkozy survived last night’s French presidential debate. Opinion seems divided on who actually won but Sarko didn’t throw it away, as many feared he would, by flying off the handle. Ségolène Royal kept trying to rile him, to get him to display the side of his personality that scares so many voters yet Sarkozy stayed studiously calm. He even got in a shot at Royal for being too quick to anger. The result: a draw--which is almost certainly good enough for Sarkozy who is up by about 4 points in every poll. What struck me most, though, were the viewing figures: 20 million plus for a two and a half hour debate. How many would tune in for Brown versus Cameron?

The Tory media list

Iain Dale has an interesting post on which shadow cabinet members get the most press. What strikes you straight away is how David Davis, who gets the most with the exception of David Cameron himself, only gets 17% of the coverage that Cameron does. Indeed, the leader gets considerably more mentions than all of his shadow cabinet put together.

Hillary v. Obama is the real race

James Forsyth says that the mighty race between the two Senators — the first serious black contender against the first serious female contender — will be the main event, as the Republicans’ fate is decided in Baghdad Clinton’s in, Obama’s in, everybody’s in. Last week the 2008 presidential contest got serious, as the Democratic heavyweights Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama entered the race. Obama announced on Tuesday, Hillary followed on Saturday. Already 16 candidates have launched bids for the White House with as many as eight others expected to join the race soon.

Brown will find that there’s more to foreign policy than disowning Blair

From the moment that the snatched camera-phone footage of Saddam Hussein’s execution emerged, it was hideously clear that the sentence had been carried out in a deplorable manner. The Americans immediately briefed that their calls for a delay had been ignored by the Iraqis. On 4 January George W. Bush felt obliged to admit that he wished that the proceedings had been ‘more dignified’. Yet it took until 9 January for Tony Blair, normally a far more astute politician than the President, to speak publicly about how the manner in which the sentence was carried out was ‘completely wrong’. Even then Blair was visibly irritated, giving the impression of having been forced to the lectern only by Gordon Brown’s  condemnation of the execution.

‘When bloodied, we bloody’

‘Innocent people can’t do any good in the world. First of all, there are no innocent people, and, second of all, exercising power is not an innocent activity.’ This is not the kind of straight talk you expect to hear in Brussels, but Bob Kagan is a man with little time for polite fictions. Three years ago he ruffled feathers by arguing that the trans-Atlantic falling-out over Iraq was not an unfortunate misunderstanding but a consequence of the fact that today Europeans are from Kantian Venus while Americans are from Hobbesian Mars. Now he has written a book claiming that the traditional view of America as an innocent, isolationist power is a myth.

The Blair–Bush dilemma: is a nuclear Iran an acceptable price for a stable Iraq?

Tony Blair’s speech at the Guildhall adroitly placed him ahead of the news. By reiterating his support for dialogue with Iran and Syria on the same day that George W. Bush met James Baker’s Iraq Study Group, he has guaranteed himself some of the plaudits if and when Washington finally — and formally — talks to Tehran. It is credit that Washington is happy for Blair to take. His appearance, largely for appearance’s sake, before the Study Group on Tuesday shows just how much more sensitive the Americans have become to Blair’s domestic plight.

Iran could tear the Tories to pieces

Washington All you need to know about the effectiveness of Labour’s official attacks on David Cameron is that Siôn Simon’s toe-curling spoof video doesn’t look so bad in comparison. Labour has so far failed to land a killer blow on Cameron, suggesting that the next election will be a genuine contest. There is, though, one issue that could resuscitate the Tory Wars, and set Cameroon against Cameroon. The issue isn’t Europe, crime, immigration or even tax. It’s Iran. In Westminster, all attention might be on Iraq following General Sir Richard Dannatt’s ill-advised outburst. But the question of what to do about Iran’s nuclear programme is about to race on to the agenda.