Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman

Isabel Hardman is assistant editor of The Spectator and author of Why We Get the Wrong Politicians. She also presents Radio 4’s Week in Westminster.

Starmer doesn’t have a handle on his job as Prime Minister

From our UK edition

Keir Starmer had an appalling performance at Prime Minister's Questions today. It was summarised very well later in the session by Conservative MP Andrew Snowden, who told the chamber: Every week the Prime Minister comes here and reads out this pre-scripted nonsense that bears no resemblance to the questions he's actually asked. The leader of the opposition asked him about Peter Mandelson and he answered about the war in Iran. The leader of the opposition asked him about Peter Mandelson again, and he answered with an attack on the shadow justice secretary. He was asked about Mandelson again and talked about protests in London. What is he scared of? What is he hiding?

Is the government right to restrict jury trials?

From our UK edition

23 min listen

The government's plan to restrict jury trials passed its first parliamentary hurdle this week. It is one measure, amongst many, in a Bill designed to reduce the huge backlog currently facing the Courts. Labour MP Karl Turner and Danny Shaw, a former adviser, join Isabel Hardman to discuss why they have each come to their own, different conclusion about the merits of the Bill. For Danny, it is a pragmatic yet principled measure that will help mitigate an extreme situation. Karl, for his part, is – as you will hear – ferocious in his opposition, and argues that the evidence simply doesn't back it up. Amongst the debate though, there are moments of agreement – from the state of the justice system, to the government's handling of such a controversial measure.

Is the government right to restrict jury trials?

Starmer should be honest about why he picked Mandelson

From our UK edition

15 min listen

This afternoon we have had the first tranche of documents released by the government relating to the process by which Peter Mandelson was chosen to be US ambassador. Whilst we have got a clearer picture on the big question – how much Starmer and the government knew about Mandelson’s association with Epstein – Labour are not out of the woods. Quotes from Jonathan Powell reveal that the vetting process was rushed and that – he thought – they didn’t dig deep enough. There is also the small matter of Peter Mandelson’s request for a payout of over half a million pounds. Oscar Edmondson, Tim Shipman and Isabel Hardman discuss. Produced by Oscar Edmondson.

Starmer should be honest about why he picked Mandelson

Starmer and Badenoch were like squabbling kids at PMQs

From our UK edition

Prime Minister’s Questions today saw a leader under repeated attack for a ‘screeching U-turn’ and their suitability to be Prime Minister called into question. Unusually, though, Keir Starmer was the one making that accusation, rather than being on the receiving end of it. He came to the chamber determined to tell Kemi Badenoch that she had made the wrong call on whether to join the US-Israeli action in Iran and that he, therefore, didn’t need to take lectures from her. Badenoch was, as it happens, not really lecturing Starmer; she just wanted to know whether he was going to go ahead with the planned rise in fuel duty in September.

Is Keir Starmer good in a crisis?

From our UK edition

19 min listen

Tim Shipman is joined by Isabel Hardman to discuss the domestic fallout from the conflict in Iran – from oil prices surging past $100 a barrel to renewed pressure on Britain’s cost-of-living crisis. They examine how the rising price of energy could derail Labour’s economic plans, why Rachel Reeves may face difficult choices on fuel duty and support for households, and whether Keir Starmer has the political authority to navigate another economic shock ahead of the May elections.

Is Keir Starmer good in a crisis?

Labour humiliated by Chinese spy arrests

From our UK edition

12 min listen

It was a bad tempered PMQs today – Kemi Badenoch attacked Starmer over his involvement, or lack thereof with the Iran conflict. And Starmer hit back at Badenoch over her questions. Not the type of unity you'd want to see on the major foreign policy issue of the day. Also today, three more arrests have been made related to Chinese spy allegations. One of them is the partner of a Labour MP Joani Reid, who has said she is 'not part of' her husbands business activities. James Heale speaks to Tim Shipman and Isabel Hardman.

Labour humiliated by Chinese spy arrests

Badenoch attacks Starmer’s Iran response at PMQs

From our UK edition

Kemi Badenoch used Prime Minister’s Questions to accuse the government of being flat-footed in its response to the war in the Middle East. The Tory leader had plenty of material to use, and she did a good job with it: running through why the UK wasn’t allowing the RAF to attack Iranian missile sites, defence spending, the spring statement and Starmer’s own weak position as Prime Minister.

More reviews won’t fix the NHS’s failing maternity services

From our UK edition

NHS maternity services are in crisis: everyone knows that. In fact, everyone has known a lot more than that for at least a decade. There have been so many reports highlighting the precise nature of this crisis that the health service and government now have 748 recommendations that they could implement to improve care. Instead of implementing them, though ministers are commissioning more reports, just in case the next one uncovers the thing that everyone else has missed. Baroness Amos’s latest interim report from her own investigation has not managed to uncover that one big thing that would solve the NHS maternity crisis, though it does come close to pointing out the underlying problem that allows all the others to continue.

Badenoch rattles Starmer – but are they as bad as each other?

From our UK edition

17 min listen

Megan McElroy unpacks a rowdy PMQs with Tim Shipman and Isabel Hardman. Kemi Badenoch made Keir Starmer uncomfortable over student loans but – at a time when trust in the Conservative brand is low – could some of her rhetoric backfire? Plus, what did they make of the revelation that it was the Speaker of the House Lindsay Hoyle that reported Peter Mandelson to police as a flight risk? Produced by Megan McElroy and Patrick Gibbons.

Badenoch rattles Starmer – but are they as bad as each other?

Badenoch savaged Starmer at PMQs

From our UK edition

Kemi Badenoch was on savage form at Prime Minister’s Questions. The leader of the opposition has generally improved her performance in this session, but she has always been particularly good at verbally kicking politicians when they are down. Today, she came out with some brutal lines, including that Labour MPs were saying they were being called 'the paedo defenders party' and that Starmer had '411 MPs and not a single one of them has any imagination'. Starmer by contrast was still waffling on about 'the party of Liz Truss' and complaining that she was 'carping from the sidelines'. Badenoch was vicious when Starmer tried his regular joke about Conservatives defecting to Reform Badenoch's tail was up this lunchtime because she felt she had been leading the debate on student loans.

Why ministers want to talk about Andrew

From our UK edition

This afternoon’s Commons debate on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was unusual for all kinds of reasons. It was not just that the Speaker had decided that MPs could directly criticise the former Duke of York even though parliamentary convention normally prevents them from discussing the monarchy in the Chamber. It was not even that the government accepted the humble Address motion tabled by the Liberal Democrats calling for the release of the documents relating to Andrew’s appointment as trade envoy. It was also that the minister responding to the debate was able to spend most of his speech criticising someone else, rather than being on the defensive the whole time.

SEND plans: ‘cost-cutting or reform’?

From our UK edition

10 min listen

Bridget Phillipson has unveiled Labour’s long-awaited overhaul of the special educational needs and disabilities system – a £4 billion reform designed to rein in spiralling costs and bring order to what MPs across the House describe as a broken model. Ministers insist this is reform, not retrenchment – but with councils under intense financial pressure and families fearful of losing hard-won support, Labour backbenchers are watching closely. Is this a genuine attempt to fix an unsustainable system, or just a cost-cutting exercise? Tim Shipman speaks to Isabel Hardman. Produced by Megan McElroy and Oscar Edmondson.

SEND plans: 'cost-cutting or reform'?

Keir Starmer doesn’t know how close his government is to collapse

From our UK edition

Today’s unemployment figures aren’t just a reminder of the mess the government has made of the jobs market with its national insurance hikes. They also underline the futility of the government more generally. It has moved into survival mode and cannot pursue the welfare reforms that are clearly necessary. As Ben Miller sets out here, there are more factors than just the NI increase at play here, with weak growth and the rise of AI hitting young people being just two. A healthy government would be able to respond to the challenges for employers and those out of work. One stuck in survival mode cannot. Keir Starmer has long lost the trust of his backbenchers to be able to carry out any kind of meaningful welfare reform that goes beyond pots of money to ‘expand opportunities’.

Keir Starmer gets angry

From our UK edition

15 min listen

PMQs today and – as predicted – Keir Starmer came out worst in a pretty unpleasant session. Kemi Badenoch pinned the Prime Minister on the continued Mandelson fallout and now the scandal over Matthew Doyle, the former No. 10 comms chief who – just four weeks after his ennoblement – Labour have already been forced to kick out of their party in the House of Lords, after it emerged he had campaigned for a friend charged with possessing indecent images of children. Once again, one of those mysterious appointments for which the Prime Minister is never responsible came back to haunt him in public – sound familiar?

Keir Starmer gets angry

What could a Starmer government possibly achieve now?

From our UK edition

What is the point of Keir Starmer’s government now? Morgan McSweeney’s departure may have been an attempt by the Prime Minister to buy some extra time, like a patient bargaining for expensive life-extending drugs, but it doesn’t change the diagnosis: this is a government that no longer works. Ministers who had previously been very loyal to Keir Starmer had been privately saying it was only a matter of time that he went a couple of months before the latest revelations about Peter Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. But even before that scandal first blew up in the autumn, MPs and some ministers had started to lose hope, having already stopped trusting the Prime Minister.

Do MPs really want to save the Houses of Parliament?

From our UK edition

Is there a building in Britain more important than the Palace of Westminster? Depending on who you listen to today, parliament is so important that MPs and peers really must agree to an expensive restoration that would see the Palace being emptied and rebuilt either in stages or all at once – or is it so important that MPs and peers should resist this dangerous plan with all their might? The building is crumbling, at risk of a catastrophic and preventable fire, and has neither proper sanitation nor adequate access. Everyone accepts those facts, but what MPs cannot agree on is what to do about them. Today the restoration and renewal client board, the body trying to work out how to fix the building and make it fit for the future, has published a set of options on restoration.

The Mandelson scandal could spell the end for Starmer

From our UK edition

15 min listen

Another impressive PMQs from Kemi Badenoch – but she had plenty of ammunition to deploy after the Peter Mandelson scandal took a bleaker turn this week. The Prime Minister clearly wanted to make a strong statement in his first answer to Kemi Badenoch, saying that ‘Mandelson betrayed our country, our parliament and my party’. He added: ‘He lied repeatedly to my team when asked about his relationship with Epstein before and during his tenure as ambassador. I regret appointing him.’ He then listed the actions he had taken to strip Mandelson of his title, remove him from the Privy Council, and refer material to the Metropolitan Police. The whole thing exposed Starmer’s biggest weaknesses: his over-reliance on process and his inability to consider how the public see him.

The Mandelson scandal could spell the end for Starmer

The question Starmer didn’t want to answer about Peter Mandelson

From our UK edition

Prime Minister's Questions today highlighted Keir Starmer's weakness, and not just when it comes to Peter Mandelson. The Prime Minister made clear in his first answer to Kemi Badenoch that 'Mandelson betrayed our country, our parliament and my party'. He added: 'He lied repeatedly to my team when asked about his relationship with Epstein before and during his tenure as ambassador. I regret appointing him. If I knew then what I know now, he would never have been anywhere near government.' He then listed the actions he had taken to strip Mandelson of his title, to remove him from the Privy council, and to refer material to the Metropolitan Police.

Met launches criminal investigation into Peter Mandelson

From our UK edition

Once again, Keir Starmer’s government has ended up talking about scandal, rather than policy: something the Prime Minister once levelled as an accusation at the Tories. Health ministers had hoped to spend today talking about improving cancer treatment, but instead we are settling into an entire week dominated by Peter Mandelson.

Breaking news: Lammy was good at PMQs

From our UK edition

10 min listen

It is our solemn duty to inform listeners that David Lammy won deputy PMQs at a canter today. To be frank, it was a low-rent affair. Andrew Griffith was the Tory sent out to question David Lammy while Keir Starmer is in China, and the shadow business secretary didn’t do a particularly good job. Perhaps he had assumed that Lammy would have another disastrous session, like he did when a prisoner was accidentally released last autumn. There were a few decent jokes in there – mainly about football – but the overwhelming winners were Kemi and Keir, who by comparison look like Gladstone and Disraeli. James Heale speaks to Tim Shipman and Isabel Hardman. Produced by Oscar Edmondson.

Breaking news: Lammy was good at PMQs