Alex Massie

Alex Massie

Muesli Conservatism or Red-Meat Tories?

Tim Montgomerie says it's "time to stop apologising for being Conservative" and calls for an end to this Red Tory nonsense and, instead, a return to "red-meat Toryism". As a committed Conservative it's not too surprising that Montgomerie thinks this is the way to stabilise a wobbly Tory campaign. The base always thinks the problem is that the party has strayed too far from orthodoxy. (This is true of almost all political parties). It's a perfectly respectable point of view that is also, I suggest, perfectly mistaken. Apart from anything else such a strategy - banging on about europe*, crime and immigration - would delight Labour.

Scientology: Cult or Worse?

The problem Scientology has... Let me start again, among the problems with Scientology is that it wasn't founded a couple of thousand years ago. Had it been it might not seem quite so obviously fraudulent and, well, nuts. Age rubs off the harsh edges and all that and at least permits the creation of a splendid literature, if nothing else. And that literature is a bit more than nothing. But Scientology, apart from its artistic desert, also seems to be a wicked organisation. Consider this New York Times story: Raised as Scientologists, Christie King Collbran and her husband, Chris, were recruited as teenagers to work for the elite corps of staff members who keep the Church of Scientology running, known as the Sea Organization, or Sea Org.

Annual Forgetting About the Armenians Festival Begins

Poor Armenia. Just about the only time that wee country gets a mention in Washington is when the perennial Recognise-the-Genocide issue comes up. As tradition demands, the Secretary of State lobbied Congress to avoid passing anything resembling or hinting at any such thing. Nevertheless the Foreign Affairs Committee voted 23-22 in favour of the annual motion acknowledging the ghastliness. Whether it makes it to the floor remains a moot issue. Everyone, I think, recognises the practical and political difficulties in siding with the Armenians or, as may be the case, handing a sop to the American-Armenian community. Turkey matters more than Armenia. And Turkey is touchy and macho and quick to take offense.

Wilders in London

Like Mr Eugenides, I'm on record opposing the disgraceful ban that prevented Geert Wilders from entering the United Kingdom. So in that sense it's a good thing that he's in London today to show his little film to Lord Pearson and his pals. What I don't understand, like our redoubtable Greek friend, is why UKIP should be so keen to associate themselves with Wilders. For a party that I'd thought spent a lot of time stressing that it should in no way, shape or form be considered a kind of mini, more respectable BNP it's curious how keen they are to chum around with people such as Wilders. Each to their own, of course, and, again, I'm glad that he can now visit this country. That's a good thing. But it doesn't require one to approve of him.

Texas Wakes Up!

Sadly this is a safe Republican seat so Ms Rogers won't be going to Washington any time soon. Still - memo to David Cameron - this is what you can get when you have real* open primaries. Anyway, we've been rumbled! The victory in the 22nd Congressional District yesterday by LaRouche Democrat Kesha Rogers sent an unmistakable message to the White House, and its British imperial controllers: Your days are numbered.

The Election Debates will be Dreary. What would Improve Them? Debating!

More on the "exciting" debates between Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg that are, inevitably, going to become the most "important" moments in this year's election campaign. As I suggested at the Daily Dish, these are problematic for all sorts of reasons, not the least of which is that they won't be debates at all - at least not in the sense that anyone who's ever taken part in any real debating would understand the term. Mr Eugenides puts it well: What's ironic about this is that in the debating I know, it's usually the quality of a team's arguments that wins the day, not their style. Beyond a certain level of competence, everyone in the final of the Oxford Union intervarsity (say) is assumed to be confident, quick on their feet, at ease in front of an audience.

Life in Donegal

Frankly, one would be disappointed if this sort of caper weren't being run in Donegal: A 72-year-old Donegal man who denied running an illegal public bar in his shed, has been acquitted of two charges brought against him by the County Council under planning regulations. Patsy Brogan said the bar, which has become known as The Bog Hotel near Frosses, is for private use, and while he welcomes callers, he insists he does not charge for drink. At Donegal District Court today Judge Kevin Kilraine said there was no evidence anybody was being charged money at the bar. He said the shed had been converted to look like a bar and lounge and added ‘he just might like the idea of looking at it as a bar and lounge, many people have bars with bar stools in the basements of their homes.

The Problem of Too Much Democracy

In general terms I'm a fan of more, much more, local democracy. I think it could do much to improve civic life and promote a genuine local politics of real accountability and value. In other words, it can be a liberating force for good. However, it's also true that one can perhaps take the principle too far. Here's Jonathan Bernstein to explain why: Yesterday was election day in Texas, and I voted.  And I voted.  And then I voted some more.  If my count was correct, I voted fifty-two times.  I voted for Governor, and I voted for U.S. House and Texas House and Texas Senate...OK, I didn't actually know the candidates for the state legislature, by I did feel a bit guilty about that.  I voted for Lt. Governor (which is a big deal here in Texas).

Towards the End of the Night

Isaac Chotiner has a nice piece at TNR on Michael Frayn's classic Fleet Street novel, Towards the End of the Morning. Among his observations: The most astonishing aspect of Frayn’s novel [published in 1967] is that so many of the dilemmas and complaints of the characters are easily recognizable today. “He looked anxiously at the rack of galley proofs behind him. He had only seven ‘The Country Day by Day’ columns in print, and he had sworn never to let the Countries drop below twelve.

Hillary Clinton & the Falklands

Bagehot of the Economist is beginning to have some doubts about the Obama administration: I have hesitated to read drastic slights into the sometimes awkward diplomacy between Barack Obama and Gordon Brown. But this stance on the Falklands cannot be seen any other way. It really is no way for the Americans to treat their most important military ally—as some in America doubtless appreciate. What stance? Well Hillary Clinton has been visiting Argentina and was asked about the status of the Falklands. Here's what she had to say: And we agree [with Argentina]. We would like to see Argentina and the United Kingdom sit down and resolve the issues between them across the table in a peaceful, productive way.

Fox News “Realism”

Roger Ailes redefines realism: I see myself between the Hudson River and the Sierra Madres. I do not see myself at the Beverly Wilshire Hotel or Le Cirque here in New York. Those are people who aspire to different things. They’re the chattering class. They’re the people who think Ahmadinejad wants to have a chat with us and that we haven’t been reaching out to him enough. No, actually, Ahmadinejad wants to cut our heads off and blow us up with nuclear weapons. He’s made that clear. There is something about those people that makes them think, “Oh, he’s just kidding.” No, he’s not kidding. He wants to kill us.  I tend to be a realist about things. Emphasis added.

Why won’t immigrants assimilate?

Some readers don't think it's fair or reasonable for people living in rural areas to talk about immigration. Fair enough, though it's not as though I've always lived in the countryside. Anyway, some country dwellers don't much like immigrants either. Here's a note from a Dordogne correspondent: I live in the countryside and have pretty strong views on some immigrants. I'd like some of them to hop back over to the other side of the channel seeing they can't be bothered to learn French or even be polite enough to say Bonjour (or even Bonn Jaw) when they go into shops etc. l think many of them think they are in Kenya c.

A Credible GOP Candidate for 2012?

Ross Douthat may have found his candidate: Indiana governor Mitch Daniels. “I’ve never seen a president of the United States when I look in the mirror,” Daniels remarked last week, after officially inching the door ajar for 2012. You can’t blame him: At 5’7”, the Indiana governor wouldn’t be the tallest man to occupy the White House, and he’d be the baldest president since Dwight D. Eisenhower. If Romney looks like central casting’s idea of a chief executive, Daniels resembles the character actor who plays the director of the Office of Management and Budget — a title that he held, as it happens, during George W. Bush’s first term. Since then, though, he’s become America’s best governor.

Honoring an Embargo

Ah, the glories of the endless contest between hacks and PR flacks. Pretty mch every journalist will enjoy this, I think. This is a very true: "I will honor the embargo for the rest of my life because I have no intention of writing about it." [Hat-tip Media Bistro and SA and SM via Twitter. My Twitter feed is here.

Stay Classy, Gordon

Brilliant New Labour Tactic: the Tories are soft on rapists. Really, that's what they're saying. And all because the Conservatives think that innocent* people's DNA should not be held on a national database. Perhaps Gordon can explain why his ain party north of the border is equally "friendly" to rapists. After all the laws on DNA retention are different in Scotland and here you're DNA is removed from the database if you're not charged or convicted of a crime. That's something Scottish Labour were happy to maintain when they ran the Wee Parliament in Edinburgh. And rightly so. It's going to be an edifying campaign isn't it? *Yes, sometimes some of these people will commit a crime. But that's one of the prices we pay for living in an open society.

In the Country of Country

Like Norm says, you can't never have too many articles singing the praises of country music. So hats off to Simmy Richman for his excellent piece in the Independent today. He makes many of the essential points, not least the fact that this is universal music, not merely stuff for hillbillies and cowpokes (not that there's anything wrong with hillbillies and cowpokes): Were I ever to stop and question why this music was having such a profound effect on me, someone born so far from its origins, the answer might have lain exactly in that sense of distance – the space between what you are and who you want to be.

The Animal House Test

There's lots of sense in Matt d'Ancona's most recent column, not least his implied warning that if the Tories tack to the right this will, no matter how much it appeals to the base, be a terrible mistake for Dave and his boys. Whether you like it or not - and plenty of Spectator readers* don't, I fancy - such a move at this stage of the election cycle would delight the Labour party. Because it would prove what some of them really think anyway: the Tories really haven't changed at all. They're the same old nasty, service-cutting, intolerant, weird bunch you've rejected three times in a row. That's a story Labour want to tell and one that might have some merit too.

Apart from the Slavery, the Peasantry was Free, You Know…

More on this essay on American exceptionalism in due course, but first Conor Friedersdorf: In a post on President Obama and American exceptionalism, Victor Davis Hanson explains why he thinks our nation is different from all the others: Perhaps it would be better, when speaking of an early rural society, to talk of an absence of peasantry: We had no concept of a large underclass of only quasi-free people attached to barons as serfs; instead, yeomen agrarians were the Jeffersonian ideal, a nation of independent farmers rather than peasants. Odd that a historian should forget about American slavery! Quite.