Uk politics

Friday

Isabel Hardman

Winter fuel payments, broken promises, and the EU referendum

From our UK edition

Another day, another confusing briefing about public spending. Yesterday Downing Street got itself into a lather over defence spending. Today it's pensioner benefits. The Independent's story that the Lib Dems would only consent to further welfare cuts in the 2015/16 spending review if the Tories were prepared to cut pensioner benefits came up at the Number 10 Lobby briefing this morning. The Downing St spokeswoman said: 'We've done an awful lot to help pensioners but, clearly, speaking generally there are some difficult decisions to be made and the Treasury is leading on the spending review for 2015/16. The Prime Minister stands by what he set out in the Coalition Agreement.

Melanie McDonagh

Nick Clegg forgets that many married couples struggle to pay their way

From our UK edition

The disadvantage of live phone-in radio programmes is precisely that you don’t get to weigh your words. No doubt Nick Clegg would have expressed himself a bit differently on the subject of a transferable married couple’s tax allowance if he hadn’t had the subject thrown at him by a caller. But in response to a question on the issue, he said: 'The more people will look at this, the more they will think... why should you be giving, whatever it is, £3 a week to married couples?’  Naturally, people took this as indicative of just how out of touch the ruling elite is from everyone else... three pounds a week? Pah! And you know what? I think they’re right. Julius Caesar declared that he wanted men around him who were fat.

Isabel Hardman

Why are the Afriyie plotters bothering?

From our UK edition

David Cameron clearly rated Adam Afriyie's 'stalking horse' plot as a sufficiently ridiculous threat to make a joke out of it at Prime Minister's Questions this week. After their premature outing in the papers last weekend, the plotters might sensibly have gone to ground for some time while Afriyie fended off lunch invitations from journalists trying to get the measure of him. But according to the Mail and the Guardian, they're still at it, now with George Osborne in their crosshairs. They're clearly a determined bunch, plotting to deliver an ultimatum to the Prime Minister in May to replace his Chancellor if the Budget fails to revive the economy. That's quite some ask.

Thursday

Isabel Hardman

Tory battle of the letters intensifies

From our UK edition

It's the 200th anniversary of Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice this week, so perhaps it's the passionate letter from Darcy to Elizabeth that's inspired such an enthusiastic burst of letter-writing from Conservative MPs complaining about stories in the press today. Earlier, we had Jake Berry complaining to the BBC, and now there are more. Sadly, the latest missives I've got hold of from Harriett Baldwin don't contain declarations of love, or any insults for the recipient's mother: instead, Baldwin is angry about an article by Ed Miliband in today's Sun. Plugging his party's policy for every big firm receiving a government contract to train young people, the Labour leader writes: 'Among the major European countries, we are in the relegation zone when it comes to youth unemployment.

James Forsyth

Govt confusion on defence shows how painful the next spending review will be

From our UK edition

The government’s position on defence spending is, to put it politely, confused. After the completion of the SDSR and the defence spending settlement, there was an expectation that the military budget would begin to rise again in real terms from 2015. There has long been talk in Whitehall that David Cameron assured senior military figures that this would be the case and, as James Kirkup notes, he told the Commons that he believed that this would happen. So, this morning when we woke to the news from the Prime Minister’s plane that the defence budget would rise in 2015-16, it seemed that Cameron had imposed his will on the bureaucracy. But then Philip Hammond took to the airwaves and said that the only thing that was guaranteed was that the equipment budget would increase.

Isabel Hardman

Shapps aide delivers next blow in BBC cuts row

From our UK edition

Eric Pickles has been at war with the BBC over the way it reports council cuts for a while now. But today the battle took on a new front following the corporation's reporting of a report on council tax benefit cuts. This morning the Beeb picked up on a report from the Resolution Foundation which warned council tax bills for the poorest families could rise by as much as £600. The way the story, which you can read online here, was reported has angered Jake Berry, PPS to Grant Shapps, sufficiently to fire off an angry letter to BBC director of News Helen Boaden. The letter, which I've seen this afternoon, says: This morning BBC news outlets gave heavy prominence to a report on council tax benefit from the Resolution Foundation.

Alex Massie

Half of the British Army’s officer corps is privately educated. Does that matter? – Spectator Blogs

From our UK edition

An interesting spot, courtesy of the good chaps at Think Defence. From Hansard: Diana Johnson (Kingston upon Hull North, Labour) To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what proportion of new recruits to the Army at (a) soldier and (b) officer level previously attended state school. Andrew Robathan (South Leicestershire, Conservative) The proportion of soldier recruits that had previously attended a state school is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. Including the most recent intake of officer cadets to the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, in January 2013, 53.5% of the UK educated intake over the last 12 months came from state schools.

Alex Massie

Is the press biased against the SNP? Probably. But we are all nationalists now. – Spectator Blogs

From our UK edition

So we have a question and it is a simple one. Should Scotland be an independent country? There, that wasn't so difficult was it? It is, after all, the nub of the matter. Granted, one might agree that Scotland should be an independent country but still conclude that being so is a different matter. That might be a metaphysical matter beyond the Electoral Commission's ken. Nevertheless, it is not an unreasonable question. Some reports seemed keen to spin this as some kind of 'setback' for Alex Salmond. Apparently dropping the preamble 'Do you agree' - included in the SNP's favoured wording - is yet another indication the nationalists are on the ropes. This is unpersuasive guff.

Isabel Hardman

Cameron: defence spending is protected. Hammond: no it isn’t

From our UK edition

After Cabinet tensions on the matter, David Cameron was trying to reassure those worried about further defence cuts while visiting Algeria. The Telegraph reports a senior government source saying the Prime Minister will honour his pledge to increase defence spending from 2015. The source told the newspaper: 'The Prime Minister does not resile from anything he has said about defence.' But rather less reassuringly, Philip Hammond decided to clarify that reassurance this morning.

Wednesday

Isabel Hardman

William Hague goads Labour on Europe

From our UK edition

What a lot of fun William Hague had this afternoon in the Commons as he opened a debate tabled by the Prime Minister on Europe. 'I have not yet exhausted the list of the Coalition's achievements,' he told an MP trying to intervene. His speech was rather like a slow motion version of the PM's address last week, but with words like 'subsidiarity' added in for good measure, and a longer tour of how wonderfully robust the Tory party is on Europe. Though some Tory MPs made their own thoughts on the referendum clear (James Clappison called for legislation in this parliament for a referendum in the next, and Bill Cash said he'd rather the plebiscite take place before the European elections), the focus was on poking fun at the Labour party: a rare moment of Coalition unity.

Lloyd Evans

PMQs sketch: Dave prepares the Fortnums hamper for his food bank visit

From our UK edition

It was the croc that didn’t snap, the firework that failed to fly, the jeroboam that refused to go pop. Last week, David Cameron’s speech on Europe was supposed to heal a two-decade rift within the Tory family and to set Britain on a bold new course in our relationship with the continent. A week later and the great In-Out gamble didn’t rate a mention at PMQs. Not a peep. Not a syllable. Not a whisper. Ed Miliband didn’t bring it up either. Their mutual silence isn’t hard to explain. Both parties are acting tough but remain vulnerable on the referendum question. Cameron will accuse Miliband of not trusting the voters. Miliband will accuse Cameron’s MPs of not trusting Cameron. Hence the non-aggression pact.

James Forsyth

How the terms of debate on Europe changed

From our UK edition

The website of the new Centre for British Influence through Europe reveals just how far on the back foot the pro-Europeans are. Its introductory article states: ‘It is also wrong that the other extreme think that they own the European flag in their belief that the only future is full on in.’ This is a major concession by the pro-European forces. It is strikingly different from the Britain in Europe message that this country must join the single currency and be at the heart of Europe. Now pretty much everyone accepts that Britain isn’t going to join the Euro and isn’t going to pursue ever closer union with the rest of the European Union. The debate is about how much looser Britain’s relationship with the other EU member states should become.

Isabel Hardman

Tory opponents of gay marriage meet as whipping plans upset backbenchers

From our UK edition

Tory MPs opposed to gay marriage are holding a meeting in the next hour to discuss next Tuesday's second reading of the Bill, I understand. The meeting is being co-ordinated by, among others, David Burrowes, who has been a vocal opponent of the reforms. One of the things that is particularly upsetting the MPs is that there will be a three-line whip on the programme motion for the vote. The legislation itself will be a free vote, but the vote on how it is scrutinised will be whipped, which is leading some MPs to argue that this isn't a really free vote. Those opposed to the legislation want it debated by a committee of the whole house, not a public bill committee staffed with loyal MPs.

Isabel Hardman

PMQs: Ed Miliband argues Labour would borrow for success

From our UK edition

'We'd borrow more, but we'd use it better.' That was the message Ed Miliband found himself trying to get across when attacking David Cameron at PMQs today. He accused the Prime Minister of 'borrowing for failure', saying: 'He is borrowing for failure: that is the reality, and he is borrowing more for failure. That is the reality of his record. And here is the truth: they said they'd balance the books, they said they'd get growth, they haven't.' So Labour would borrow for success. What would that mean? Miliband decided to tease us by not mentioning how he'd do better borrowing. The two leaders traded quotes from various IMF staff members, as it's easy to find something in anything the IMF issues to suit your own theories about the economy.

Isabel Hardman

Cameron encourages his party to bang on about Europe

From our UK edition

Something quite curious is going to happen in the Commons this afternoon. David Cameron is encouraging his party to bang on about Europe. He has called a general debate, with the motion 'that this House has considered the matter of Europe', and it promises to be rather strange. The strangest thing is that a month ago, David Cameron would never have dreamed of tabling this sort of debate: his camp were busy in October trying to quell an uprising of backbenchers over the EU Budget. But after the speech that delighted even Mrs Bone last week, Cameron finally doesn't have to wait for a backbencher to pounce on him with entreaties on referenda and renegotiations: he's got nothing to hide now.

Isabel Hardman

David Cameron visits Algeria for talks on ‘generational struggle’

From our UK edition

The Prime Minister is visiting Algeria today to pay his respects to the victims of the hostage crisis. He will also hold talks with Algerian Prime Minister Abdelmalek Sellal, and The Sun reports that he will ask Sellal's permission for MI6 to hunt down the attack's mastermind, Mokhtar Belmokhtar. This will mark the next move in the 'generational struggle' he described in his Commons statement. One of the first big steps in this struggle took place yesterday, with Downing Street confirming the deployment of more than 330 troops to North Africa to help the French action in Mali. None of those troops will be in combat roles, with the majority training forces in neighbouring countries.

Tuesday

Isabel Hardman

George Osborne urged to drop Google boss as business adviser

From our UK edition

Starbucks had a go at David Cameron on Sunday for his 'cheap shots' at the coffee chain's tax arrangements in the UK. The company felt it was being unfairly singled out in comments about companies legally avoiding tax needing to 'wake up and smell the coffee'. So what about other firms known to be avoiding tax? Coffee House has learned that the former Lib Dem Treasury spokesman Lord Oakeshott is writing a rather scathing pair of letters to David Cameron and George Osborne about the government's dealings with Google, which paid only £6 million in corporation tax in the UK in 2012 by funnelling £6 billion worth of transactions through the tax haven of Bermuda. Google's executive chairman, Eric Schmidt, currently sits on the government's Business Advisory Group.

Isabel Hardman

Boundaries vote: what next for the Coalition parties?

From our UK edition

So the Lib Dems got their way in the end, teaming up with Labour and minor parties to delay the changes to constituency boundaries until 2018 by 334 votes to 292. There were Tory rebels, too, and here, thanks to the Press Association, are their names: John Baron Philip Davies David Davis Sir Richard Shepherd The minor parties also voted with the Lib Dems and Labour: only the Alliance's Naomi Long voted with the Tories. Nadine Dorries, who remains suspended from the party, also supported the Conservatives. Tempers ran high in the debate itself, with Tory Penny Mordaunt MP accusing the Libs of casting 'flirtatious glances' across the Chamber at Labour and of exchanging their sandals for flip flops. She didn't mention whether they'd also ditched their socks with the sandals.

Isabel Hardman

Backbenchers want a cost of living Budget

From our UK edition

Aside from Ed Balls' attack on George Osborne for going 'on the piste' in Davos, Treasury question time in the Commons today was interesting not for what Labour did or didn't have to say, but for some of the pushes from the Tory backbench on helping those on low incomes. Sometimes it's the pattern of the questions that matters more than the individual answers. Many of the questions were pitches for the Budget, which also gave ministers the opportunity to not really answer them. Robert Halfon asked about reintroducing the 10p income tax rate, to which Greg Clark said he noted the MP's bid for the Budget, adding: 'But he will know that we have taken people out of tax, which has been important in restoring incentives and the rewards people have for going back to work.

Jonathan Jones

Briefing: Immigration from Bulgaria and Romania

From our UK edition

What's changing? Bulgaria and Romania joined the European Union on 1 January 2007. This gave their citizens the freedom to travel unrestricted within the EU, but countries were allowed to impose transitional controls on their freedom to work for up to seven years. In 2004, when eight other east European countries (the 'A8') joined the EU, the Labour government decided not to impose such restrictions, but this time they did. Those controls must be lifted by 1 January 2014. What are the transitional controls?