The Evening Standard on Israel
A somewhat surprising headline in today’s Evening Standard: UPDATE: The headline has been changed to read “Israelis go to the polls in tight election race”.
A somewhat surprising headline in today’s Evening Standard: UPDATE: The headline has been changed to read “Israelis go to the polls in tight election race”.
Newsweek, facing declining sales and losing money and advertisers, has decided to move away from it’s wrestling match with TIME and try and be a gutsier, more opinionated, less-soporific enterprise. This is pretty daring stuff, really. This is part of it: “There’s a phrase in the culture, ‘we need to take note of,’ ‘we need to weigh in on,’ ” said Newsweek’s editor, Jon Meacham. “That’s going away. If we don’t have something original to say, we won’t. The drill of chasing the week’s news to add a couple of hard-fought new details is not sustainable.” This is sensible: one of the problems the news weeklies face is that they’re terribly
What I am about to do makes me more nervous than any other piece of writing I have embarked on since my first forays into journalism in the late 1980s. During most of my career I have had the luxury of writing for “people like me”: the sort of middle-class liberals who read the Guardian or the Observer and carry those publications under their arms as the outward symbols of their right-minded decency. I spent 15 years writing for one or other newspaper. I was deeply honoured during the run-up to the Iraq war in 2003 to be described as a “liberal eurotrash” on the right-wing Drudge Report website. Until
Could there be anything more juvenile than Fleet Street’s unanimous view that Gordon Brown has been embarrassed by Tony Blair “beating” him to an audience with Barack Obama? Sure, it’s always entertaining to dip back into the Blair-Brown psychodrama and everyone likes the idea of the PM watching Tone preach the word at the White House and throwing the TV remote against the wall in a fit of Presbyterian – “Bloody Tony uses the Good News Bible. He would, wouldn’t he? Good News! I ask you, what’s that? Not even a proper Christian. Cherie believes in crystals – fury… But I digress. the point is that the view that it
Lord knows, we all blunder from time to time. Still, this is pretty impressive: “Each year, in my last Economic View before Christmas, I try to shed some light on economic events of the previous 12 months by comparing what has actually happened with expectations published here in early January. This year, even more than usual, reading back through January’s predictions has been a shock. Almost all have turned out to be wrong”. Anatole Kaletsky, The Times, 18/12/06.“My last article of every year looks back on the predictions I made in early January to shed some light on the economic and financial events of the previous 12 months. This tends
Since I live-blogged a darts match, I’m in no position to chuck rocks, but can I just point out that the Guardian is live-blogging Jeff Stelling’s debut as presenter of Countdown*. New media; new rules I guess. As a friend says “This makes me happy!” And so it should. *Note to American readers: a long-running tea-time letters and numbers quiz show popular with pensioners, students and the bedridden.
I suppose it must have seemed a neat idea at the time, but Dan Drezner is absolutely correct: Bono’s debut column for the New York Times is simply gibberish*. I guess one of the perks of celebrity is being able to find a publisher for nonsense that would, quite correctly, be rejected out of hand were it submitted by an average hack. Like Dan, I’ve no idea what point Bono is trying to make beyond a) he knew Frank Sinatra and b) people like Sinatra’s songs. *And that’s after it was edited. Did no-one at the NYT pause to ask “Hang on, why are we printing this tripe?” Or did
For once. Also, for once, good news for a newspaper. Colin Freeman, the Sunday Telegraph’s chief foreign correspondent has been freed 40 days after he and his photographer, Jose Cendon, were kidnapped by Somali pirates. BBC report here; brief piece by Colin here. *Granted, if you’re actually Somali the news is, generally speaking, probably as lousy as ever.
There are times when it’s good to be away from the hurly-burly of American politics. Doubly so when the subject of gay marriage comes up. Here, for instance, is a story it is hard to imagine happening in the United States: Nick Herbert, the Conservative party’s Shadow Justice secretary has apparently become the second member of David Cameron’s Shadow Cabinet, to enter into a civil partnership. It’s hard to imagine too many senior gay Republicans feeling comfortable doing this, let alone doing so with the blessing of the party’s leader and their constituency assosciation. Then again, gay marriage in Britain has, generally speaking, been decoupled from religion. (Of course, some
Ah, it’s that time of year again! Yup, the splendid blog Regret the Error rounds up the most entertaining newspaper corrections of the year. Some of my favourites: The Daily Mail was among the newspapers to report that David Gest contracted herpes from Liza Minnelli on their wedding night. Not so! In articles published on 23 and 26 May 2008, we gave the impression that Mr Gest had contracted a sexually transmitted infection and alleged that he had Liza Minnelli’s dog killed without her knowledge. This was wrong. David Gest has never had a sexually transmitted infection and did not have Ms Minnelli’s dog killed. We apologise to Mr Gest
Ouch! The paradox of this scene was that the Obama campaign’s communications strategy was predicated in part on an aggressive indifference to this insider set. Staff members were encouraged to ignore new Web sites like The Page, written by Time’s Mark Halperin, and Politico, both of which had gained instant cachet among the Washington smarty-pants set. “If Politico and Halperin say we’re winning, we’re losing,” Obama’s campaign manager, David Plouffe, would repeat mantralike around headquarters. He said his least favorite words in the English language were, “I saw someone on cable say this. . . .” Actually, I think that’s a little unfair on Politico, but there’s something to this
Nice work, Reuters: Man who snatched wig will have toupee Hat-tip: Radley Balko.
Via Megan McArdle, I see that the Detroit News and the Detroit Free Press are taking a novel approach to the malaise that’s crippling newspapers across America (and Britain): make it much more difficult for people to buy your product. At first you may think that this is so counter-intuitive that it must be brilliant. But it’s not: it’s every bit as stupid (I think!) as it sounds. The Motor City papers are apparently only going to deliver papers to their readers’ homes three days out of every seven. The theory, as I understand it, is that all this printing and delivering is too expensive to be justified on lighter
Is such that, as you know, there’s no need to bribe the fellow. From Simon Hoggart’s Guardian column today: A colleague of the late Raymond Jackson, “Jak” of the London Evening Standard, had an interesting tale. Jak was famous for including the names of firms – restaurants, pubs, even skip hire companies – in his cartoons. He would then sell the originals to the people mentioned, so getting two substantial fees for each drawing. What I hadn’t realised is that he used to pre-sell the slot. He’d ring up Knight, Frank & Rutley, for instance, and ask if they wanted to appear as the estate agent that day. Then he’d
Commenter Rab O’Ruglen doesn’t have much sympathy for the crisis afflicting the Tartan press: While I have every sympathy for those who find themselves in employment difficulties through no fault of their own I cannot say I have any sympathy for the Scottish print medium whatsoever. If you are looking for an example of a people less well served by its press than Scotland’s, you have to go to totalitarian states to find it. It is incredible that when the Independence movement has reached the stage of forming a government, all-be-it a minority one, that every single one of Scotland’s public prints is pro-Union. Sometimes vitriolically so. These instruments in
Another sign of the times: every single employee of the Glasgow Herald, Sunday Herald and Evening Times was sacked today and told to reapply for their jobs (on changed – that is, less favourable – terms and conditions of course) if they hope to have some sort of a future in newspapers. Or at least at the Herald Group. Early indications are that the company wants to cut the workforce by something like 20%. But journalists and readers alike should not fret: Managing director Tim Blott said: “We are creating an efficient operation fit for the 21st Century which will provide even more compelling and unique content for readers of
For those of you interested in Scottish politics, it’s not a bad thing to be able, not before time, to welcome the country’s newspapers to the blogosphere. So, huzzahs for The Steamie then, a new blog devoted to tartan politics written by the political journos at the Scotsman, Scotland on Sunday and the Edinburgh Evening News. I think they’re having what’s known as a “soft launch” and it will doubtless take them some time to become accustomed to blogospheric ways, but it’s good to see them swimming in these waters…
One of the things that distinguishes a good columnist from the ordinary, run-of-the-mill shill is the ability to treat their own party’s failings as severely as they would condemn the blunders committed by the other lot. Similarly, there’s something to be said for the rigour that consistency demands. Polly Toynbee may be correct (though I’d wager she isn’t) that Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling played a blinder on Monday, but does anyone imagine that if it was a Conservative government presiding over this recession she would write anything as, I don’t know, cheerful and complacent, as this? Even if unemployment reaches 3 million, that still leaves 90% in secure jobs.
I’ve too much respect for my friends at The Times to ask if Rupert Murdoch dictated that this Peter Brookes cartoon appear on the paper’s front page today… The Thunderer’s leader column makes it pretty clear, I think, that the Times will not be endorsing Labour at the next election: Tony Blair and Gordon Brown both promised reform of public services that might have allowed the quality of services to be maintained at a lower rate of spending. In the absence of that reform, high spending and the maintenance of a large public sector workforce became the only way of maintaining servive levels. Yet such spending has proven unsustainable. It
Chris Dillow – always worth your time – casts a weary eye over a number of government policies and concludes: What this shows, I think, is that New Labour’s claim to believe in technocratic, evidence-based policy is a sham. They are not technocrats at all, but either priggish moralists or cowardly panderers to mob prejudice. Quite so. And as he says, we may need a revolution. Lord knows, however, where that might come from.