John Healey

Ministers must get the Defence Investment Plan right

The speech by Pete Hegseth, the US Defense Secretary, to Singapore's Shangri-La Dialogue was addressed to a Pacific audience. His sharpest messages, however, were for Europe, and especially for a British Government that still hasn't explained in practice how it plans to deliver the political commitments made a year ago in the Strategic Defence Review (SDR). Healey claimed that talking too much and delivering too little has now changed. The Defence Investment Plan is where that claim gets tested ‘Push-up Pete’ - who ostentatiously styles himself the Secretary of War - is a controversial figure. European governments have found it convenient to dismiss him. That is a mistake. Hegseth came to Singapore to unveil the US National Defense Strategy.

Is Rachel Reeves blocking defence spending because of ‘gender parity’?

When John Healey was asked, on stage at the London Defence Conference, whether the armed forces were ‘ready’ for war, the Defence Secretary replied: ‘Yes.’ One of those present says: ‘That was greeted with near incredulity in the room.’ Another attendee compared Healey’s plight to someone ‘playing French cricket’, with critics from all sides hurling balls at his ankles while he tried to bat them away. ‘You can’t score any runs in French cricket.’ George Robertson, Healey’s most respected Labour predecessor and a former secretary general of Nato, was not present; he was in Scotland celebrating his 80th birthday. But he returned to give a withering interview to the FT and a speech.