The Spectator

Just in case you missed them… | 15 June 2009

From our UK edition

Here are some of the posts made over the weekend on Spectator.co.uk: Fraser Nelson sets out the two sorts of cuts. James Forsyth reports on a morning of Mandelson and Miliband, and says that the next Speaker must command cross-party support. Peter Hoskin watches Ken Clarke both clarify and muddy the Tory position on Europe, and claims that the sword still hangs above Gordon Brown's head. Martin Bright reveals his thoughts on Labour's predicament. Clive Davis talks about immigration. And Alex Massie presents the best case for Scottish independence.

Letters | 13 June 2009

From our UK edition

Back to Black Sir: Taki (High Life, 16 May) exaggerated the ineptitude of my counsel in Chicago, and in this I am happy to agree with Tom Bower (Letters, 23 May), but they were not my counsel of choice, whom I was prevented from retaining by an asset seizure that was subsequently judged by the jury to be improper. Nor is this a tough prison. It is low security, not divided into cells, and without violence, but Taki is correct that the judge and probation officer recommended minimal security, for which I am technically not eligible as a non-American. Bower is completely mistaken in everything else he wrote in his letter. There has never been any amount remotely approaching $50 million of mortgages on my Toronto and Palm Beach houses and certainly is not now.

Whose country is it anyway?

From our UK edition

It is an exquisite irony that Gordon Brown, so determined to deny the British people the general election they obviously crave, has made the centrepiece of his (latest) relaunch an investigation into the Westminster voting system. Refusing to play the game, he launches a full-blown inquiry into its rules. It is the most insultingly scarlet of red herrings. There appears to be a measure of support on the Labour side for the so-called ‘alternative vote’ procedure. Under this system, voters rank the candidates in order of preference. If no candidate secures more than half the votes cast, the one who has fewest first-preference votes has his or her votes re-allocated according to voters’ second preferences. This continues until one candidate has more than half.

CoffeeHousers’ Wall, 8 June – 14 June

From our UK edition

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which – provided your writing isn’t libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency – you’ll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there’s no need to stay ‘on topic’ – which means you’ll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There’s also no constraint on the length of what you write – so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything’s fair game – from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.

Just in case you missed them… | 8 June 2009

From our UK edition

Here are some posts made on Spectator.co.uk over the weekend: Coffee House live-blogged the Euro-election.  You can read the live blog here. Matthew d'Ancona provides an update on the Labour coup. Fraser Nelson laments the government of automatons. James Forsyth wonders whether Brown will be forced out in the autumn, and reports that more Labour members want Brown to go than stay. Peter Hoskin looks into when Brown gave up on thie idea of Chancellor Balls, and wonders whether Harriet Harman will make her mark on Brown's week from hell. Martin Bright says that Brown's latest reshufflkke has delivered the least democratic Cabinet since the War. Clive Davis reveals the case for Alan Johnson. And Alex Massie gives his take on Caroline Flint's resignation.

Letters | 6 June 2009

From our UK edition

Racism isn’t right Sir: Reference is made in the headlines of Fraser Nelson’s article on the BNP (‘The rise of British racism may be horribly close’, 30 May) to ‘far Right politicians’. Surely Mr Nelson does not imagine that there is anything right-wing about the BNP? As its 2005 general election manifesto shows, it is a hard-left Old Labour-style party which supports nationalisation and trade union power, and opposes free trade. And surely he cannot think of racism as right-wing. As with nationalism, racism’s greatest supporters — Mao, Pol Pot, Stalin — were hard leftists, as is Mugabe today. And Hitler was the leader of the National Socialist German Workers party.

Enough, already

From our UK edition

The next few days will serve up plenty of reminders that this country does not have a written constitution. As the plotters decide how best to move against the Prime Minister, they will not be operating within any defined framework of rules to select a head of government. Rather, they will be muddling through. There will be much comment about the residual power of the monarch — notably, her ability to dissolve Parliament. But the Queen is wise enough to appreciate that for a modern monarch to exercise these prerogatives would be to ensure their rapid abolition. It is tempting to say that the coming turbulence shows why the United Kingdom needs a written constitution. But there is no inherent logic in this siren argument.

Labour in crisis: round-up

From our UK edition

Matthew d'Ancona highlights Alan Johnson's act of self-preservation, and says that the end has come for Gordon Brown. Fraser Nelson reveals why James Purnell resigned, and gives his take on John Hutton's resignation. James Forsyth says that the left needs to come to the aid of Labour, and claims that David Miliband has lost the invisible primary. And Peter Hoskin wonders what Miliband and Johnson are thinking, and live-blogs Gordon Brown's press conference.

CoffeeHousers’ Wall, 1 June – 7 June

From our UK edition

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which – provided your writing isn’t libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency – you’ll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there’s no need to stay ‘on topic’ – which means you’ll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There’s also no constraint on the length of what you write – so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything’s fair game – from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.

Just in case you missed them… | 1 June 2009

From our UK edition

...here are some of the posts made on Spectator.co.uk over the weekend: Fraser Nelson fisks Gordon Brown's interview with Andrew Marr. James Forsyth wonders whether the Labour press will decide Brown has to go, and gives his take on David Cameron's mortgage. Peter Hoskin reveals how to kill - rather than save - a premiership, and reports on a terrible opinion poll for Labour. Clive Davis becomes an Evertonian for the day. Alex Massie wanders Saturday Morning Country. And Americano sets out the rules of war for cyberspace.

Letters | 30 May 2009

From our UK edition

Time to talk it out Sir: The EU is certainly one important cause of parliament’s loss of self-respect, but you fail to mention (Leading article, 23 May) what is now the main cause of the malaise: in 1997 the Blair government introduced the routine timetabling of primary legislation, and did so with the connivance of a then supine official Conservative opposition. Several people, including myself — I was clerk of the bills between 1995 and 1999 — warned the shadow Cabinet that this spelt the end of effective parliamentary government, but we were ignored.

Britain’s got talons

From our UK edition

Next Thursday, voters in the UK’s 12 European constituencies, 27 shire counties and seven unitary authorities will go to the polls in the most extraordinary circumstances. There is, as Martin Vander Weyer argues on page 25, no shortage of local issues to exercise us in the county council elections, just as the unratified Lisbon Treaty ought, in theory, to loom large in the European elections on 4 June. In practice, of course, this so-called ‘Super Thursday’ will be something altogether different: the first true snapshot of public fury at the MPs’ expenses scandal, and a measure of how deep that crisis really is.

The week that was | 29 May 2009

From our UK edition

Here are some of the posts made over the past week on Spectator.co.uk: Fraser Nelson highlights the numbers which undermine the Budget deceit, and sets out the choice David Cameron faces now that we're over the cliff. James Forsyth outlines the grim international situation, and wonders whether Labour will dump Gordon Brown. Peter Hoskin gives his take on Julie Kirkbride and Margaret Moran standing down, and says that politicians must ensure that voters don't get left behind. The Skimmer raises a quizzical eyebrow at the Daily Mail's latest book serialisation. Clemency Burton-Hill reports from the Hay Festival. Clive Davis warns against an evening in Bath. Alex Massie picks up on more drug law madness. And Melanie Phillips reveals the fruits of appeasement.

Just in case you missed them… | 26 May 2009

From our UK edition

Here are some of the posts made over the bank holiday weekend on Spectator.co.uk: Fraser Nelson picks up on some damaging revelations for the Government, and reveals that Andrew MacKay is to step down. James Forsyth says that David Cameron has diagnosed the problem, and wonders whether Gordon Brown will bring David Blunkett back. Peter Hoskin reports on the voters' wrath, and observes Alan Johnson making his move on the Labour leadership. Daniel Korski wonders whether you know what your MEP is up to. Clive Davis looks into the future of humanity. Alex Massie asks: what the best sports city in the world? Melanie Phillips uncovers on the sexualisation of heresy. And Americano reports the memoir wars.

CoffeeHousers’ Wall, 25 May – 31 May

From our UK edition

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which – provided your writing isn’t libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency – you’ll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there’s no need to stay ‘on topic’ – which means you’ll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There’s also no constraint on the length of what you write – so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything’s fair game – from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.

A reminder | 25 May 2009

From our UK edition

We're taking your questions for Theresa May until around 1900 this evening, at which point we'll select the best five or so and put them to the shadow work and pensions secretary. To submit a question, please click here.

Letters | 23 May 2009

From our UK edition

Black as he is painted Sir: Taki is a wonderful man but his lament about Conrad Black (High Life, 16 May) cannot pass uncorrected. Conrad Black’s defence did not suffer because he was forced to rely on ‘friendly Canadian lawyers’. One lawyer, Eddie Greenspan, is Toronto’s top fraud defendant, while the second lawyer, Ed Genson, ranks among Chicago’s very best criminal defenders and would be offended to be called Canadian. In the event, both performed remarkably well, demolishing several key prosecution witnesses. Black pleads that he did not have sufficient money to hire better lawyers, but his filings with a Canadian court show that he still possesses a fortune, not least to sustain the $50 million mortgages on his mansions in Florida and Toronto.

The respect agenda

From our UK edition

If the first rule of success is to follow a failure, then the 157th Speaker of the House of Commons, whoever he or she may be, is off to a good start. Michael Martin was everything a Speaker should not be: partial, too deferential to the executive and an opponent of transparency. His alleged comment that ‘I did not come into politics not to take what is owed to me’ sums up so much of what has gone wrong. His removal was a necessary first step in the process of once more making Parliament an effective institution, and one of which the British people can be proud. But it would be wrong to imagine that it is the expenses scandal alone that has brought the Commons into disrepute.

Darwin’s birthday present

From our UK edition

The appearance this week of Ida, our lemur-like, 47-million-year-old ancestor, is a bright spot in an otherwise troubled world. Ida is being hailed as the original embryonic primate from which today’s great array of monkeys, apes and ultimately human beings sprang. Ida was six months old when she died and has been perfectly preserved in the Messel pit near Darmstadt in Germany, her baby teeth intact, her last vegetarian meal still in her stomach. Is Ida the ‘missing link’?

The week that was | 22 May 2009

From our UK edition

CoffeeHousers pick Frank Field as their choice to be the next Speaker. Fraser Nelson sets out the power of celebrity candidates, and is left unimpressed by Gordon Brown's press conference. James Forsyth says that talent needs a seat, and wonders whether Vince Cable will be able to resist the tempation to run for the Speakership. Peter Hoskin thinks that Michael Martin's resignation was a necessary first step, and sets out the Lumley effect. Toby Young believes an anti-sleaze party should contest 100 seats. Martin Bright reports on a collective sigh of relief. Clive Davis asks: where's Al Pacino when we need him? Alex Massie says that Parliament should be a gentlemen's club. And Melanie Phillips gives her take on a wary encounter.