Isabel Hardman

It's not a case of will they, won't they when it comes to whether Labour would borrow more, but will they admit it and try to sell this plan to voters? In the past few days, we've seen the party trying to work this out in public. Ed Miliband, in his awkward World at One interview, knew that saying 'yes, we'd borrow more to fund the VAT cut' would provoke triumphant howls from his opponents, and so ended up nervously jabbering away as Martha Kearney asked the same question over and over again. But yesterday he told Daybreak that 'I am clear about this: a temporary cut in VAT, as we are proposing, would lead to a temporary rise in borrowing'. He added that 'I suppose I felt it was rather a commonplace' to make that clear the first time around.

Not wanting to heap worries onto the Prime Minister when he's just about found harmony with his party, but as well as the underused backbenchers I mentioned this morning, he might want to think about his party's PPSs as well. Some of them feel they were offered their jobs with the promise that the role would become 'turbo-charged', but haven't found the reality quite so glamorous. I hear that the last meeting Downing Street held for ministerial aides didn't cheer many of them up.

David Cameron is really trying to reach out to his party at the moment. The announcements of a policy board of MPs and a policy chief who is also an MP were intended to show that it's not just the inner circle that calls the shots. Jo Johnson appears to have received a bigger promotion than initially announced: today's Sun reports he's not just leading on policy, he's also taking over from Oliver Letwin in writing the manifesto. But appointing Chris Lockwood to the policy unit has added to the impression that the PM really trusts his friends and those who hail from the same social circle. He did, after all, name this journalist as one of his friends in evidence to the Leveson Inquiry. It is an unfair impression: a proper look at the policy board reveals MPs from a range of backgrounds.

How do the Tories deal with UKIP? The party likes to split on most issues, and it has got a nice little fault line running across it at the moment on whether to squash the party as 'fruitcakes', or, as Conor Burns eloquently argued on Coffee House this morning, engage with the problems and anxieties that are driving Tory voters towards Nigel Farage. If UKIP does have a good showing in the local elections later this week, one side will blame the other for taking the wrong course. MPs like Burns will worry that colleagues such as Ken Clarke will have insulted their own voters, or that the party's obsession with whether all those nice-sounding pledges really add up has missed the point.

Bids for the 2015/16 spending review will land on George Osborne's desk today from Secretaries of State across Whitehall. Some, like Iain Duncan Smith and Patrick McLoughlin, are signed up to the idea that their departments need further cuts. McLoughlin, as a former chief whip, prefers to avoid conflict, while Duncan Smith has made it known for some time that he'd like a bit of conflict with the Lib Dems over his budget, with a number of cuts sitting ready on his desk if only Nick Clegg and colleagues backed down on their refusal to touch Work and Pensions spending again.

Even though Nick Clegg made a big song and dance this morning on LBC about blocking the Snooper's Charter, there is still a bit of confusion in Westminster about whether he has actually driven the fatal stake through its heart. The Prime Minister's official spokesman said this morning that discussions are still 'ongoing', while some of those fighting the legislation on the Tory benches were a little worried that what the Deputy Prime Minister actually said was that he was killing bits of the Bill that upset people the most, not the whole thing. This is what he told Nick Ferrari this morning: 'Well look, what people have dubbed the "snooper's charter", I just have to be clear with you, that's not going to happen.

Westminster has felt rather muted over the past few weeks: it may well continue to do so today, but for good reasons. That the first estimate of Q1 GDP figures recorded growth of 0.3 per cent means Labour spinners have to work much harder on falls in certain sectors in order to get their points across, and that George Osborne and David Cameron can relax, knowing they've just been gifted more good feeling in their party until at least the local elections. After the building tension over today's figures came a really rather good anti-climax. This means that the spotlight remains on Labour, and not the Conservative party. Len McCluskey's intervention yesterday - slapped down by Ed Miliband as 'reprehensible' - is just one of a number of cracks appearing in the party's unity.

So in spite of great excitement beforehand, Theresa May didn't confirm that the UK will seek a temporary withdrawal from the European Convention on Human Rights. Instead, she announced a new treaty - a mutual legal assistance agreement - with Jordan in order to enable Abu Qatada's deportation. This wasn't nearly exciting enough for Tory MPs, who started demanding that the UK ignore the Convention and jolly well put Qatada on a plane today. May decided the best way to respond to this would be to crack a joke using Mark Reckless' surname while explaining to him why the government must abide by the laws to which it is currently subject.

This morning, after the Sun and the Mail reported that ministers might go as far as to leave the European Convention on Human Rights in order to get their way, the Prime Minister's official spokesman refused to rule out such a move. He said: 'The government will explore every option in seeking to deport this dangerous individual and that's what we are going to keep doing. 'The Prime Minister met with the Home Secretary, the Justice Secretary and the Attorney General yesterday to discuss the case. I'm not going to get into specifics as to what the Government is considering, as I say, we are going to explore every option.