David Blackburn

Field: Harman would give Labour direction

From our UK edition

Gordon Brown, if you are about to pick up today’s New Statesman, I advise you to put it down, return to the sofa and start re-watching those Raith Rovers tapes. In it, Frank Field writes that Harriet Harman offers Labour a sense of direction that Gordon Brown’s government, which is simply drifting towards ‘the most horrendous defeat’, has lacked. Here are the most crucial, and the most gushing, bits: ‘You have to hand it to her. Harriet Harman has really shown how to use No 10 as a platform from which to direct policy. You may not agree with how she presented her programme, but, for the first time since 2005, there has been a real sense of direction and priorities from the government.

Corruption, not force, is the midwife of change in Afghanistan

From our UK edition

Attentive readers of Flashman will know that General Elphinstone and William Macnaghten met a dire end because they didn’t bribe the Ameers. President Karzai’s use of corruption to ensure victory has copped flak because it is seen to further destabilise Afghanistan. Fellow Presidential candidate Ashraf Ghani adds his criticism in a piece in the Times: 'The success of the Nato-led intervention in Afghanistan hangs in the balance in the elections that begin today. Without a new government committed to restoring the State’s sovereignty and working with the international community to stabilise the country, the insurgency will spiral further out of control.

The plot against Sir Richard Dannatt

From our UK edition

Aside from the irony that ministers think they can nail General Dannatt over his Civil List expenses, I can’t see how the government can benefit from smearing Sir Richard, assuming they placed the FOI request. (Although to be honest, I can't see why anyone other than these defence ministers would seek to damage Dannatt.) Friends of General Dannatt say that he will “do his duty and carry out his responsibilities to the Army and the country whether he is in uniform or not”. And I imagine the man who won the Military Cross fighting the IRA will take this smear campaign in his stride and write an especially savage book on defence under New Labour. Dannatt is a soldier’s soldier.

Another nail in Labour’s progressive coffin

From our UK edition

The day before A-level results are published, the Telegraph and the Independent report that traditional academic subjects, such as maths, physics and history are not being offered by a large minority of state schools. Here are the details:  ‘Around one in seven schools - 264 in total - did not enter any pupils for A-level geography in 2007 - the latest available information - and a similar proportion failed to enter students for physics. Figures also show that more than one in 10 comprehensives did not enter pupils for A-level chemistry, while six percent failed to enroll candidates for maths and seven per cent shunned biology. A further 145 schools - eight per cent - did not enter pupils for A-level history.

What has been going on at Bromley Council?

From our UK edition

Both the Standard’s original report and Bromley Council’s clarification suggested that giving assistance to fee-paying parents has been discussed because state schools in the area are becoming oversubscribed. Yet, Bromley Council informed me that state schools in the area were not oversubscribed and that the Council reviewed that issue frequently. So, if the Council were aware of that, why did they, as Councillor Stephen Carr says, feel “duty bound to consider this, as is good practice,” following a question being asked at a June meeting? And, why did Councillor Peter Morgan, the Conservative Councillor who raised the question, feel the need to do so? Mr Morgan was due to go on holiday next week, but has jetted off this week instead.

Who’s writing Andy Burnham’s scripts?

From our UK edition

To prolong the success of #welovethenhs, Andy Burnham wrote David Cameron a letter yesterday which was so absurd it read like a Private Eye spoof. And today, Burnham is still trying to keep the pressure on the Tories and missing his target. He writes in the Guardian that Tories intend to turn ‘Britain’s best loved institution into the world’s biggest quango’ – a soundbite worthy of The Thick of it. Burnham’s premise is that Labour is self-evidently the party of the NHS and therefore any Tory proposals are inherently a ‘Bad Thing’:  The second dividing line is on NHS pay. Andrew Lansley drops heavy hints that the Tories would reintroduce local pay bargaining...The third area concerns national accountability.

Are Labour still in “send” mode?

From our UK edition

Perhaps it was the barnstorming success of #welovethenhs, or the opportunity to create another Tsar, but Douglas Alexander has appointed Kerry McCarthy MP as ‘Labour’s Twitter Tsar’ ahead of the next election. In an interview with Labour List, McCarthy says she wants to emphasise that, “Rather than being something completely new, campaigning using new media is simply doing what we’ve always done in a new setting.” I’m intrigued to see how the government distils its ‘raft of measures’ into a tweet of 140 characters. McCarthy’s interview also suggests that Labour may have confused “sending” with “receiving”.

Labour isn’t working

From our UK edition

This PoliticsHome poll about ‘progressiveness’ hasn't been picked up much, but it makes dreadful reading for the government. The Tories and Lib Dems were tied first for the prize of being considered the most progressive party. A mere 12% thought that Labour was the most progressive party, and they finished fourth behind the Greens. It’s clear that Labour’s response to Progressive Conservatism isn’t working. The poll demolishes the government’s lazy assumption that progressive politics is exclusively the property of the left. That assumption informed Mandelson’s barbs about “political cross-dressing”, and his strategy that had everything to do with personalities and nothing to do with policy.

City bonuses need to be curbed, but more tax is not the answer 

From our UK edition

One upshot of George Osborne’s and Alistair Darling’s attacks on city bonuses was that the FSA had not gone far enough in trying to curb excessive reward. This morning, the left leaning think-tank Compass and Vince Cable have joined the debate. They suggest that there be a ‘High Pay Commission’, to examine wage ratios within financial institutions, and that the tax system is restructured to close the gap between income tax and capital gains. Cable makes the case in the Guardian, but this paragraph struck me: ‘There is no need for a return to a 1970s-style income policy for top pay – though, of course, the government is indirectly responsible for funding often outrageous quango pay. It should look at the principles and myths about top pay.

One way to slim down the quangocracy

From our UK edition

Despite Cameron's recent announcements on the issue, there's still quite a few frustrating question marks over how they'll go about demolishing the quangocracy.  One attractive is turning quangos into angos - making them autonomous by introducing market principles and ensuring that organisations operate profitably and efficiently. To a certain, limited extent, this process is already underway. An employee of the General Medical Council (GMC), a completely autonomous and profitable organisation, recently explained to me how the BMC is taking over the Postgraduate Medical Education Training Board (PMETB). The PMETB is representative of the explosion of the Quango state. Its accounts show snowballing costs, all funded by the taxpayer.

It is Fox News, not Daniel Hannan, who present a clear choice between the US and the UK health systems

From our UK edition

Daniel Hannan appeared on Fox News again, this time with Sean Hannity. I do not agree with Hannan’s assessment of the NHS, but I do think that this affair has been overblown. Hannan is not presenting a straight choice between the US and the UK models; that division has arisen through Fox News’ presentation of what Hannan is saying.   Hannity’s website features this transcript: ‘HANNITY: And one of the reasons I wanted to have you back. For example, I have here — last time you were on, it had been decided a week before that you have a government rationing body, your national health service is what it's called. And I read the British papers all the time.

Cameron plans to cut ministers’ pay

From our UK edition

Poor old Alan Duncan might have to survive on emergency rations. The Guardian reports that David Cameron is planning to cut ministerial pay if the Tories win the next election. Here are the details: ‘David Cameron is planning to make his ministers take significant salary cuts if he forms the next government, senior sources have told the Guardian. The Conservative party high command have calculated that if they are to push through cuts in public services, their politicians have to show they are prepared to "take a financial hit". A pay cut would also help the party as it attempts to renegotiate public sector pay deals. One senior Tory said a cut as high as 25% was being discussed, which would cost figures such as William Hague and George Osborne nearly £20,000 a year.

What’s wrong with being a career politician?

From our UK edition

Nadine Dorries has broken her holiday to argue that the fallout from the expenses scandal will alter the make-up of Parliament for the worse: ‘The new pernicious rule for MPs to declare hours spent on outside interests will prevent the multi-skilled, clever, articulate, learned individuals who are, by their own obvious track record of achievement, the type of people Parliament desperately needs to attract and retain - from even considering a life as an MP. Instead we will see the emergence of a new breed of MP: those who will enter Parliament because they are rich, or careerist.’ The contempt the public holds for politicians makes it unlikely that careerists will dominate Parliament.

Renaissance of the Prince

From our UK edition

‘Kindly pussycat’? ‘Minister for fun’? ‘A benign uncle?’ This was how Lord Mandelson described himself in that pantomime of an interview with the Guardian earlier this week. But this morning, the Prince of Darkness returned. Perhaps running the government for three days maligned the would-be Widow Twanky of Monday, but it is more likely that Mandy couldn’t resist crossing swords with George Osborne again. He launches a scathing personal and political attack on Osborne and his progressive agenda in today’s Guardian. Here are the key sections: 'To be a progressive is to believe that we can make a better society and improve the conditions of individual lives by acting together...It is to believe in the necessity and value of social justice.

Can the Afghan police be trusted?

From our UK edition

Lindsey Hilsum, Channel 4’s Helmand correspondent asked local Police Chief, Colonel Asadullah Shirzard, if the police were sufficiently free from corruption to manage the forthcoming election. The corpulent Colonel declaimed:  “We have eradicated corruption in our police force!” This is a seminal moment. Rudy Giuliani couldn’t do it, Sir Ian Blair failed, though that’s no surprise, and moving around Venezuela will confirm that even Hugo Chavez can’t stop his police taking a cut from the downtrodden population. But in war-torn Helmand, the perfect police force has been born.

Another Conservative MP won’t be standing at the next election.

From our UK edition

Michael Ancram is standing down at the next election on grounds of ill-health, you can read his resignation statement here. Former leadership candidate Ancram was embroiled in the expenses scandal, claiming £98.58 on swimming pool repairs and more than £4,250 in one year on cleaning and maintaining his second home. According to the Telegraph, he is understood to have been unhappy with David Cameron’s handling of the expenses scandal. William Hague paid tribute to Ancram's work as Conservative Party chairman through what were the Tories' "darkest times in opposition.

The trials of being in a power couple

From our UK edition

It seems Hillary Clinton is smarting from her husband’s Korean coup. Exhibit A: her Q&A session with Congolese students yesterday, where her translator relayed this question: “Mrs Clinton, we've all heard about the Chinese contracts in this country. The interference is from the World Bank against this contract. What does Mr. Clinton think through the mouth of Mrs. Clinton and what does Mr. Mutombo think on this situation?”    The Secretary of State offered a stark clarification: “My husband is not secretary of state, I am. I am not going to be channelling my husband." Here's footage: The official line is that it was all down to a mistranslation and the student actually said “Mr. Obama”.

To restore confidence, there must be an inquiry into alleged British involvement in torture. 

From our UK edition

Following Alan Johnson’s and David Miliband’s denial of British collusion in torture, Sir John Scarlett, the head of MI6, has inadvertently added a further denial. In a Radio 4 interview, recorded prior to the publication of Johnson’s and Miliband’s joint article, and which will be broadcast this morning, Sir John asserted that there has been "no torture and there is no complicity with torture.” Asked if Britain was ever compromised by its allies’, and particularly the Americans’, “different moral standards”, Scarlett replied: "Our American allies know that we are our own service, that we are here to work for the British interests and the United Kingdom.

Confusion reigns

From our UK edition

On Wednesday, the Downing Street press office confirmed with us that there was a timetable for ministers to stand-in for Gordon Brown. They said that Harriet Harman was in the job this week and last and that Lord Mandelson would begin “next week”. Today it’s emerged that Harman’s stint has ended prematurely, and that she’s been replaced by Mandelson – though he’s yet to return from Corfu. The Dark Lord is influential, but can even he run the government from the Med? We thought we’d check what was going and put in another call to Downing Street. This time they had a different story: we were told that there was no timetable; that there never had been a timetable.