Sunday Morning Country: Merle Haggard
From our UK edition
Townes van Zandt and Johnny Cash are dead but, man, I wanna see the Hagg play live before either of us dies. In the meantime the one fever it's ok to have is that ol' Ramblin' Fever...
From our UK edition
Townes van Zandt and Johnny Cash are dead but, man, I wanna see the Hagg play live before either of us dies. In the meantime the one fever it's ok to have is that ol' Ramblin' Fever...
From our UK edition
The main sufferers of this admittedly rare condition are London-based Scots. Fraser, I'm afraid, seems to have come down with a case of SDS if this post is anything to go by. The murder of Linda Norgrove is a ghastly, horrid business that might, one would think, be considered sufficiently awful to be above or beyond politics. Apparently not. I see nothing wrong far less anything political in the First Minister issuing a statement about the murder of one of his compatriots in Afghanistan. Criticising Salmond for making cheap political capital out of such an awful business is itself a cheap journalistic shot.
From our UK edition
In the grand scheme of things there are few less important things than the Shadow Cabinet. Nevertheless it's the only toy in town today and so must be chewed until something fresh and shinier comes along. Poor Ed Miliband, however, was in a lose-lose situation. Appoint Ed Balls to the Treasury brief and risk looking weak and in thrall to an over-bearing Shadow Chancellor; appoint someone else to the job and look weak too, scared of your erstwhile rival and a certified "Big Beast". Nevertheless, looking for a compromise candidare was reasonable. But choosing Alan Johnson (rather than, say, Jim Murphy) is a blunder. By his own admission Johnson wasn't up to the top job, so what makes anyone think he's up to the second most important job in the Shadow Cabinet?
From our UK edition
I'm reading Keith Jeffrey's history of the Secret Intelligence Service at the moment. There's plenty of good stuff in it. Including Our Man in Moscow's account of the death of Rasputin which, Samuel Hoare explained, was "a question...so sensational that one cannot describe it as one would if it were an ordinary episode of the war." Accordingly he wrote his report "in the style of the Daily Mail": 1st January, 1917. In the early morning of Saturday, December 30th, there was enacted in Petrograd one of those crimes which by their magnitude blur the well-defined rules of ethics and by their results change the history of a generation.
From our UK edition
Good stuff from Iain Martin: [Ed Miliband will] have to deal with Ed Balls and Yvette Cooper. Balls is an impressively robust “big beast” who wants to be shadow Chancellor, but Ed Miliband may not fancy sub-contracting his economic policy to someone so tricky to control. Subverting Lyndon Johnson’s famous rule, keeping Ed Balls inside the tent makes no difference - he’ll probably still urinate on his colleagues. Indeed. The Balls Problem is a tricky one. Ed Balls is a fine attack dog perhaps the best, certainly the most ferocious, Labour have. But if Miliband gives Balls the Treasury brief there's every chance that the Shadow Chancellor will eclipse the Leader of the Opposition.
From our UK edition
There were moments, I confess, when David Cameron's speech to the Conservative party conference this afternoon was oddly, disconcertingly reminiscent of George W Bush's second inauguration speech. Each address was soaring, passionate and heroically optimistic. Bush foresaw a world transformed; at least Cameron's ambitions are limited to remaking this sceptered isle. If Bush serves as a warning that words are not enough it might also be said that words are still required. There was, as Andrew Neil immediately pointed out, little that was new in the Prime Minister's address but, frankly, after the child benefit hash that was no bad thing. What we heard, however, was perhaps the most coherent - certainly the most passionate - declaration of Cameronism yet.
From our UK edition
Ah! Ticket speculation, how we've missed you! Or not, as the case may be. According to Bob Woodward Hillary Clinton could be drafted in to replace Joe Biden on the Democratic ticket in 2012. (Biden would be moved to Secretary of State, apparently). The Stenographic Sage muses that "It's on the table". I'm going to guess that a) it's not actually on the table and b) even if it were on the table it won't be picked up. Why? Because putting Hillary on the ticket would be an admission of failure and, should Obama be re-elected, leave him weak and in many ways less powerful than his Vice-President. The entire second-term would be viewed in terms of positioning Hillary for her own run at the Presidency in 2016 (by which time she would be 69). That's not a good thing for Obama.
From our UK edition
Did the (American) conservative reformers get everything wrong? That's the question Dave Weigel asks in a pleasingly mischievous Slate piece. You remember: all those books written by chaps such as David Frum, Ross Douthat, Reihan Salam etc warning that the GOP must change or face years in the wilderness. How do you explain the looming Republican House of Representatives, matey? How indeed? David, Ross and Reihan each do their best with this question but, in the end, try and dodge it with arguments that can be summarised, fairly, by Dave as: "We're not wrong. We're just not yet right." Their super-pamphlets: were written with the assumption that the GOP was going to serve more time in detention—and that detention was actually necessary.
From our UK edition
David, while one should never discount incompetence as the guiding force behind anything the Scottish Conservative & Unionist party proposes in this instance I fancy indifference - rather than self-interest or incompetence - is behind Aunt Annabel's apparent admission that the party won't take a view on the Alternative Vote. At present elections in Scotland are run using four different electoral systems: FPTP (Westminster), Additional Member System (Holyrood), Single Transferable Vote (council elections), Party List (European Elections). In other words, there's precisely nothing sacrosanct about FPTP and, indeed, the case against it has been conceded at both the Holyrood and council level.
From our UK edition
This week's top campaign ad comes from Christine O'Donnell, GOP Senatorial candidate in Delaware: I don't think she's a witch either! But doesn't this remind you of Nixon's "I am not a crook"? Perhaps not. Anyway Fred Davis, who made the ad, explains the concept here. UPDATE: See Toby Harnden for more. I agree with Toby that there's power in the "ordinary folks" approach (and that focusing on the witch sillyness is a means by which O'Donnell can disarm other, slightly more substantive, criticisms by suggesting that they're just as daft as the witchcraft stuff). However there's also a limit to folksiness: at some point, as Sarah Palin discovered, you need to have the policy chops to persuade voters you can really do the job.
From our UK edition
Rachel Sylvester's Times column (£) today concentrates on the philosophical divide at the heart of the government: [E]ven as ministers go to the wire in their negotiations over the “what” of the Comprehensive Spending Review that will be published in two weeks’ time, the Conservatives in the Cabinet are divided on the crucial issue of “why”. For some Tories, the recession has created the perfect opportunity to reduce the size and scope of the State. For others, the smaller State will be a by-product of the decision to hand power down from the centre to local people.
From our UK edition
Top spot by Amol Rajan: Daily Mail, p5: “Being slim ‘makes a woman happier than any man could’”. Daily Mail, p11: “Having a big bottom and thighs could shape up to a longer life, claim researchers”. As Amol says, living long and being happy ain't necessarily the same. But what this means, I think, is that the Daily Mail has a high opinion of its readers (at least its female readers anyway) since it expects them to satisfy Scott Fitzgerald's definition of a first-rate intelligence, namely "the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function." To wit: I must be slim and I must be curvy. Each in moderation, of course.
From our UK edition
The case against George Osborne's plan to eliminate Child Benefit for higher-rate taxpayers runs roughly like this: We work hard, we're successful - in fact we pay most of the income tax collected in this country - and we produce the children who will help pay for everyone's pensions and now we're the ones targetted by a Conservative Chancellor of the Exchequer? Why are we being penalised for having children? And yes, one can see why this would grate. According to this way of thinking Child Benefit is a small, but often very useful, rebate that is a kind of reward for Doing the Right Thing. It's a thank you from the state that's neither quite a luxury nor a necessity. Again, one can see why people would take this view.
From our UK edition
There's lots of good stuff in Peter Oborne's* Dispatches programme on the News of the World phone-hacking story even if, in the end and like many TV documentaries it over-reaches and tries too hard to build too large a conspiracy when simply laying out the established facts would seem enough. Nevertheless, it certainly deserves your time. Peter probably makes too much of the Murdoch-Downing Street relationship (and he should certainly have pointed out that Lord Puttnam is a Labour peer). Much worse from the perspective of Joe Public who kind of feels as though celebrities and politicians are some kind of fair game, was the story of "Sam" - the victim in a sexual assault case whose phone was apparently hacked by P.I Mulcaire, presumably at the request of someone on Fleet Street.
From our UK edition
A great effort from the Americans today but when it came to the final match you knew Europe could rely upon that tough little Ulsterman, Graeme McDowell. Not a chance he was going to let Hunter Mahan get a grip on their match. Great drama, mind you and pleasing too that every member of the side contributed points. Quality stuff all round. Even UKIP voters can like Europe today...
From our UK edition
Fraser is quite right: it is absurd that higher-rate tax-payers are paid child benefit. Ben Brogan is also right to note - though of course he uses some pretty extreme examples - that some people will lose from this measure. But this is not the case of the "squeezed middle", it's removing an upper-class benefit. Reading the Daily Telegraph you could be forgiven for thinking that half the country pays tax at the 40% rate. In fact just 10% of taxpayers make it to that bracket (though a rather higher percentage of families do). Certainly, the coalition's plans will "hit" stay-at-home mothers in the stockbroker belt but, as the FT points out, that's the virtue of this plan, not its vice. You can't possibly cut public spending without targetting the subsidised-wealthy.
From our UK edition
Blimey. Here's a turn-up for the books: in a bid to avoid being thought Europe's Most Useless Political Party the Scottish Conservative and Unionist party has done something sensible. They have decided that running an election campaign with the unofficial slogan Vote for Us, We're Only Interested in Opposition is a dumb idea. Hence, as Scotland on Sunday reports, the party is preparing (albeit and as usual tentatively) to take the bold step of declaring that they will countenance the idea of serving in government at Holyrood. Of course, the Tories would still require an invitation to the dance if they're to sit in government in Edinburgh and it may well be that Annabel Goldie is no-one's idea of a good date.
From our UK edition
My word, that Ozark twang is something magnificent...Sweet is the Melody indeed. I'm inclined to think Iris could be Emmylou's successor. If, that is, she wants or wanted to be. I hope she does.
From our UK edition
The bravest person in my school days was the only chap who, aged 16, told the rest of our boys-only (at that time) school that he was gay. It took some guts to be the only openly-gay boy at a rural boarding-school at which being called faggot was akin to being handed the black spot. I have no idea what Donald is doing now but hope it is, whatever it may be, brilliant. And that he is happy. We were a strange and often savage and expensively educated bunch and that's partly why I think plenty of kids should see this: More at Dan Savage's place.
From our UK edition
Long-time and recent readers alike will have noticed that I almost never write about climate-change or global warming or whatever you want to call it. That's because I think it an unusually tedious subject about which I lack both the ability and the interest to either care or make an informed judgement. Like many people, then, I take the view that it may well be a biggish problem but, as that wise man Mr Micawber nearly said, something may turn up to help us out of the jam. It is the Iran-Iraq War of policy debates in which one wishes that the most passionate advocates on either side could, well, just shut up. Nevertheless, it's good to discover that Richard Curtis, long-time purveyor of smug, self-satisfied tripe, has produced this ad for something called the 10:10 campaign.