Uk politics

Sunday

The Spectator

Should we treat phone hacking victims as experts on press regulation?

From our UK edition

Much of the response to the Leveson Inquiry has focused on the disappointment of the victims of phone hacking and other intrusions by the press that David Cameron is opposed to introducing statutory underpinning for a new system of newspaper regulation. But how much can victims tell us about how to change a system? In an article for the Spectator in May, Carol Sarler argued that it was unwise to treat victims of tragedy as universal sages. Sarler pointed to the way Sara Payne and Denise Fergus were often called to back certain laws in an 'automatic elevation of "victim" to "expert"'. She wrote: It really is no surprise to learn that Sara Payne favours restrictions to keep online pornography away from children.

Saturday

Isabel Hardman

Nick Clegg is changing the way the government works

From our UK edition

Say what you will about Nick Clegg's decision to take a different stance from the Prime Minister on Leveson, but the Deputy Prime Minister has this week effected another big change to the way Westminster government works. He has sent party members an email today explaining why he felt it was necessary to make a separate statement to David Cameron in the Commons on Thursday. The Lib Dem leader writes: As you may have picked up, the Prime Minister and I disagreed; there is not yet an agreed 'government line'. That's in part why we had to make separate statements - a major departure from Parliamentary protocol, apparently. I'm often non-plussed by the arcane rules of the House of Commons, most of which make no sense to ordinary human beings.

James Forsyth

What would Thatcher do if she was in power now?

From our UK edition

It is testament to Margaret Thatcher’s remarkable influence on British politics that 33 years after she won her first general election victory she still has such a hold on our political discourse. One of the things that the Tory party needs to do is understand both why Thatcher was so successful and how she changed Britain. In an interview with The Spectator this week, Elizabeth Truss, the new education minister who proudly describes herself as a ‘bit of a Thatcherite’, offers an interesting take on the question.

Friday

Isabel Hardman

Tory MP attacks Cameron for allowing party to become ’emaciated’

From our UK edition

Brian Binley is fond of giving journalists new ideas for illustrations featuring David Cameron's head superimposed onto a new and unusual get-up: his 'chambermaid' allusion caused quite a stir back in August. Today he's written another one of his angry blog posts, which takes his criticism of the Prime Minister on a little further. Today the Prime Minister is a caretaker, apparently, and one who isn't taking great care of his party. Binley describes the Conservative party as being 'in a very sorry state', and launches an attack on Cameron for setting his face against his own party.

The Spectator

Inside the mind of George Osborne’s newest adviser

From our UK edition

Neil O'Brien's appointment as a new special adviser for George Osborne has gone down very well in the Westminster bubble, partly because of the Policy Exchange director's ability to look beyond that bubble. He has written a number of times for the Spectator, and as an insight into the man who will be advising the Chancellor, here are some of his key pieces: In this week's magazine, O'Brien points to the North's growing detachment from Westminster, with 'an almighty 83 per cent of northern voters' believing that politicians do not understand the real world. He writes: 'Westminster politicians have repeatedly promised to close the North-South gap, but failed because they ignored economic reality, and flushed our money away on stupid gimmicks.

Isabel Hardman

Labour source tells Coffee House: govt could deliberately overcomplicate Leveson bill

From our UK edition

Labour sources are not happy with the Prime Minister's decision to draft legislation for statutory underpinning of press regulation. I've just spoken to one party source, who told me the worry is not that the legislation is being put together quickly, but that the government will draw up a bill that deliberately complicates the issue and undermines Lord Justice Leveson's call for regulation backed by statute. The source says: 'The issue with the draft bill is not the speed: we want speed. The issue is that there is a possibility that what they are going to do is overcomplicate and deliberately overload this draft in a bid to stop them doing the right thing. They have betrayed the victims, they should be looking at how to go forward on this.

James Forsyth

George Osborne hires head of leading centre-right think tank to push through new Tory agenda

From our UK edition

George Osborne has recruited Neil O’Brien, the director of the leading centre-right think tank Policy Exchange, as an adviser. O’Brien will start work in the New Year with a particular focus on the next phase of coalition policy development. I also suspect that O’Brien will have a major influence on Tory thinking heading to 2015 and beyond. The Northern Lights report he commissioned at Policy Exchange is regarded in Tory circles as one of the most important assessments of the challenge facing the party in trying to win a majority. I understand that Osborne has been impressed by the work that O’Brien has produced at Policy Exchange. At Policy Exchange, O’Brien has sought to craft a more economically focused centre-right agenda.

Isabel Hardman

Government to draft legislation on Leveson recommendations

From our UK edition

The first of many cross-party discussions on the response to the Leveson Inquiry lasted 30 minutes last night. The 'frank' meeting resulted in David Cameron agreeing to draft bill to see if the proposals in Lord Justice Leveson's report were workable. The idea is that the legislation will prove that the statutory underpinning of the new independent press regulator is unworkable, while Number 10 sources are briefing that the Prime Minister has 'not shifted one inch' on his position on the report. But agreeing to draft legislation, if only to prove those deep misgivings that Cameron retains, is a canny way of approaching the divide in Parliament over the response to the report.

Fraser Nelson

Press freedom has just acquired its most important defender: David Cameron

From our UK edition

For precisely 99 minutes yesterday, it looked like press freedom in Britain was doomed. At 1.30pm Lord Leveson announced his plans for statutory regulation of the press – with his bizarre instruction that we were not to call it statutory regulation. Worse, respectable commentators seemed to buy it. A very clever compromise, it was being argued. Self regulation really was being given another chance, albeit with a device which puts a legislative gun to the head of the press. If they obeyed his demands, he would not apply the force of the state. But at 3.09pm, the Prime Minister rejected all this outright. The existence of such a device, he said, would mean politicians setting the parameters under which the press operates which it hasn’t done since 1695.

Thursday

David Blackburn

Leveson Report – your guide to the regulatory recommendations

From our UK edition

Here is a six-point guide to the regulatory system proposed by Lord Justice Leveson: 1) The creation of a genuinely independent regulator Leveson agrees with the view, expressed by Baroness O’Neill and others, that ‘independent regulation’ does not mean ‘self-regulation’. The existing system of self-regulation should be wound up. In its place should emerge a regulator that is both independent of the government, parliament and the industry. It should be ‘established and organised by the industry’ in order to provide ‘effective regulation of its members’. Leveson does not rule out the emergence of multiple regulatory bodies, and indeed allows for it, but he does not advocate such an outcome. 2) How will it actually be independent?

James Forsyth

Leveson report: David Cameron left in a minority over press regulation

From our UK edition

Following this afternoon’s statements I am certain that David Cameron is in a minority in the House of Commons in not wanting to create a statutory back-stop for a press regulator. But, so far, no one can explain how even an alliance of Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Eustice Tories can force the Prime Minister to provide parliamentary time for a bill that he doesn’t want. Cameron got the tone and content of his statement right. I’m reassured that Cameron appreciates that while he set up an inquiry, he didn’t outsource his judgment to Lord Justice Leveson. He is also surely correct that a press law, however brief, would have worrying consequences. Just before the statement, a visibly agitated Miliband walked over to Cameron to talk to him.

Isabel Hardman

Leveson report: Nick Clegg backs statutory underpinning

From our UK edition

As trailed on Coffee House over the past few days, Nick Clegg used his own separate Commons statement to declare his support for the statutory underpinning of the new independent press regulator. He said that nothing in the debate that he had heard so far suggested to him that there was a better system of regulation than the one before MPs today. 'The long grass is the last place that this problem should end up in,' he said, adding: 'I am convinced that he has made a case for legislation.' The Deputy Prime Minister said he acknowledged that 'we now need to show how that can be done in a workable way'. But he argued that it was a 'straw man' to suggest that law is always a threat to the freedom of the press.

Lloyd Evans

Leveson press conference sketch: the supreme authority of the Lord

From our UK edition

The conference platform was surrounded by screens tinted a deep and easeful blue. At just after 1.30 pm, Lord Leveson ambled forth, sporting a white shirt, a grey suit and a slight stoop. He peered out at the assembled pack of journalists from beneath his curmudgeonly black eyebrows. Then he sat at his desk. Microphones at either end bowed towards him like praying mantises. He began to speak. His quiet voice and his dense, circuitous prose suggest that he’s used to being listened to in awed silence. So he was. Occasionally he slowed the pace and upped the volume suddenly. A court-room device, perhaps, to jog a dozy juror awake. ‘The press, operating freely,’ he intoned, ‘is one of the true safeguards of our democracy.

Fraser Nelson

Leveson report: Cameron’s defining moment

From our UK edition

I do believe that David Cameron has just pledged to  protect press freedom – and, in effect, reject the most illiberal proposals of today’s Leveson Report. He has asked the media to reform itself, and radically. He accepts the principles of the report and asks the media to 'implement them, and implement them radically'. But he asks. He doesn’t want to tell. And he draws a very important distinction between the two: parliament hasn’t told the press what to do since 1695 and Cameron doesn't want to start now.

Isabel Hardman

Breaking: David Cameron says ‘I am not convinced statute is necessary’ for press regulation

From our UK edition

David Cameron has just told MPs that while he accepts Lord Leveson's recommendations for a new independent press regulator, he rejects statutory underpinning of the new regulatory system. The Prime Minister said: 'I accept these principles... The onus should now be on the press.' He said he was in favour of giving the press a period of time to implement the recommendations. But to roars of disapproval from MPs on the other side of the Chamber, he said: 'I am not convinced... that statute is necessary.' He also told MPs that he accepted Leveson's recommendations on the relationship between the police and the press. The Prime Minister also took care to praise Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt, who was cleared of wrongdoing by the Inquiry.

Isabel Hardman

Leveson report: what the judge said about Jeremy Hunt

From our UK edition

Jeremy Hunt was one of the most controversial figures caught up in the Leveson Inquiry, with Labour calling for the then Culture Secretary to resign over contact between his office and NewsCorp lobbyist Fred Michel. But today Lord Justice Leveson's report finds 'no credible evidence of actual bias on the part of Mr Hunt', but the exchanges between the lobbyist and Mr Hunt's adviser Adam Smith gave rise to the perception of bias.

James Forsyth

Leveson report: To pass a law you don’t just need a majority in parliament, but time too

From our UK edition

There’s understandable excitement about whether a pro-Leveson Commons majority could be formed. At first glance, this looks likely if you add Labour, the Lib Dems and a handful of the Eustice Tories together you can get to 326 quite easily. But, in terms of passing a bill, you need more than majority. You need time. The vast majority of parliamentary time remains in the government’s gift. If the Prime Minister won’t let the government bring forward legislation, then there almost certainly won’t be a press law passed. David Cameron has tweeted that he’ll give a ‘clear sense of direction’ in his statement at 3pm. We will then after that have Nick Clegg’s statement.

Isabel Hardman

Leveson praises the media, then slaps it with ‘not statutory’ regulation underpinned by statute

From our UK edition

Lord Justice Leveson has just finished giving his statement to the Inquiry press conference, and told journalists that he would be 'making no further comment' about the report's contents. 'The ball is back in the politicians' court,' he said. We have 40 minutes until we find out how the politicians plan to play that ball. The judge took great pains to praise the media, saying: 'I remain firmly of the belief that the British press, I repeat, all of it, serves the country very well for the vast majority of the time. There are truly countless examples of great journalism, great investigations and great campaigns.' He was so fulsome in his praise that it sounded almost valedictory, and as the judge continued, it seemed that it was: 'But none of that means that the press is beyond challenge.

David Blackburn

Leveson report recommends statutory underpinning of press regulation

From our UK edition

'This is not, and cannot be characterised as, statutory regulation of the press.' This is the headline from the Leveson report. That said, Lord Justice Leveson recommends substantial changes to the current self-regulatory system, including changes that empower the civil courts. The changes will be underpinned by legislation to validate the new regulator, to guarantee independence from the industry, parliament and government, and to ensure compliance with certain guidelines. These changes are the consequence of the failure of the existing regulatory system and widespread press malpractice. Indeed, the report damns Fleet Street.

The Spectator

Nadine Dorries: Why shouldn’t a working class MP take a few days off?

From our UK edition

Fresh from the jungle, Nadine Dorries is the Spectator's diarist for this week. As well as observing that each of her 11 fellow contestants on I'm a Celebrity: Get Me Out of Here! was 'probably more right wing than I am', she also explains why she thought it was acceptable for a 'working class woman to take a few parliamentary days off' to go on the show, writing: Many MPs take jollies from the House of Commons, but in seven years I have never spent a day away from my Westminster duties. This is why I thought I would be allowed to devote a few days of my holiday to a reality TV show. As far as I could see, the Conservative party is intensely relaxed about such absences. Some of its MPs have full-time careers in the City, others run family businesses or write books.