Uk politics

Thursday

Ryan Bourne

Labour’s Valentine’s policy gimmick

From our UK edition

At long last, Ed Miliband delivered us a Valentine's Day present that everyone in the political world has been waiting for: a new policy! And a tax policy at that! Not just content with maintaining support for a temporary VAT cut, reversing the Coalition's tax credit restraint and reversing the 50p tax rate cut (all of which would worsen the deficit), the Labour leader has nailed his colours to a new mast. He wants to bring back the 10p rate of income tax, which his former boss Gordon Brown abolished, paid for by a mansion tax on homes worth £2 million. Now, there are many observations which can made about this. First, this is a huge u-turn for Miliband personally.

James Forsyth

Ed Miliband’s bold redistributive rebuke to Brown

From our UK edition

Those close to Ed Miliband stress that if elected, Labour will introduce a mansion tax to pay for the return of a 10p tax rate. I’m told that ‘short of publishing the manifesto two years early, we couldn’t be any clearer’. This new 10p band will apply to the first thousand pounds of income, making it a £100 a year tax cut. (Although the Cameroon think tank Policy Exchange calculates that low-paid working families would actually only be 67p a week better off under this policy.) The politics of the move, which has been in the works since Christmas, is fascinating. It is both a bold redistributive gesture and a rebuke to Gordon Brown, who scrapped the 10p rate. It also appealed to Miliband because it fits his whole critique of how politics works in this country.

Isabel Hardman

Miliband steals a march on Tory tax campaign

From our UK edition

Ed Miliband has just started his economy speech in Bedford, so as he gets underway, here's a quick thought on his plan to reintroduce the 10p tax band. Doing this steals a march on a brewing Conservative campaign. Robert Halfon has been pushing over the past couple of months for the restoration of the 10p tax band to help those on low incomes. He's badged it the 'Great Gordon Brown Repeal Bill', and David Cameron set some pulses racing yesterday at PMQs when he told Yvonne Fovargue that 'we will not forget the abolition of the 10p tax rate that clobbered every hard-working person in the country'. But on yesterday's Newsnight Jon Cruddas also dropped a hint that Labour could bring back the rate, and Miliband will shortly confirm this in his speech.

Alex Massie

David Cameron’s Immigration Reverse Ferret

From our UK edition

If you seek cheap entertainment, the sight of government ministers defending their immigration policies to the foreign press is always worth a sardonic chuckle or two. And, lo, it came to pass that David Cameron assured Indian TV that, actually and despite the impression his coalition may have given, Her Britannic Majesty's government is jolly keen on bright young Indians coming to the United Kingdom. Which is just as well. If, as the Prime Minister is keen on suggesting, Britain is but one entrant in a keenly competitive "global race" then it makes no sense at all to restrict our selection policy to those born on these sodden islands. The global gene pool is deeper and better than ours. Fortunately, Britain remains an attractive place to study, work and live.

Sebastian Payne

The View from 22 – Ex-Benedict, Mexican Horsemeat and goodbye to Sindy

From our UK edition

What does Pope Benedict XVI's resignation mean for the future of the Catholic church? In this week's View from 22 podcast, the Daily Telegraph's Damian Thompson and Freddy Gray discuss our in-depth cover feature on the papal resignation. What will be Benedict be remembered for? Will his sweeping reforms be left in place? How does his legacy compare to John Paul II? Was there more to the resignation than just his health? And what challenges lie ahead for his successor? And just who might that be? James Forsyth also joins to discuss his political column in this week's Spectator, revealing the huge scale of the horsemeat imports from Mexico. Listen in to hear more on the inside story about the coalition politics dominating the scandal.

Wednesday

Lloyd Evans

PMQs sketch: In which Cameron both chooses and answers the questions.

From our UK edition

Whoosh! Crasshh! Ploophm! Crummppp! The personal attacks came pounding in on David Cameron today. Ed Miliband asked about declining living standards and set about portraying the prime minister as an out-of-touch toff surrounded by plutocratic parasites. He cited the recent Tory Winter Ball where a signed mug-shot of Mr Cameron had been auctioned for the Warhol-esque sum of £100,000. ‘Then the prime minister declared, without a hint of irony, that the Tories are no longer the party of privilege.’ Cameron ignored the issue of living standards and told Miliband he’d raised the wrong topic. ‘If his question is – have you had to take difficult decisions to deal with the deficit, reform welfare and clean up the banks? Then yes, you bet.’ Interesting.

Jonathan Jones

Why Ed Miliband’s Reagan-esque attack won’t work

From our UK edition

Ed Miliband has taken inspiration for his 2015 attack line from an unlikely source: Ronald Reagan. In 1980, a week before the election between himself and incumbent President Jimmy Carter, Reagan told voters to ask themselves: ‘Are you better off than you were four years ago?’ At PMQs today, Ed Miliband told the Prime Minister ‘In 2015, people will be asking “Am I better off now than I was five years ago?”’ His hope, clearly, is that voters will decide the answer is ‘no’ — and that they'll vote against the government as a result.

James Forsyth

Owen Paterson worried by risks of Mexican horsemeat in British food

From our UK edition

The horsemeat scandal illustrates just how much of our daily government now takes place in Brussels. Owen Paterson is heading there today, for any real action on this crisis will have to be taken at a European level. One of those involved in the government’s response to this crisis tells me the problem is that once products are inside the European single market they are very few checks on them. This figure called it, ‘a faith based system that isn’t working'. This is particularly alarming because the horsemeat that is turning up in British food could not be from here or even Romania but the US via Mexico. In 2007, court judgments led to the last equine abattoirs in the US shutting down. But some American horses were still killed for food.

M.E. Synon

‘We are the voice of the people’: the MEPs planning to block the EU Budget cut

From our UK edition

The EU budget ‘victory’ cheers go on in the Commons, but the facts seem to have been lost in the Prime Minister’s ‘triumph’. What the cheering Tories can’t quite grasp is that all that came out of the European Council last week was an agreed position to make cuts in the EU’s long term budget. That’s all, an ‘agreed position'. It was not a deal. Under the Lisbon Treaty, there is no deal until the European Parliament agrees to one: and the Parliament is in no mood to agree any cuts in EU spending. And if the Council and the Parliament cannot reach an agreement? The Parliament would be delighted.

Isabel Hardman

The Tory 2015 message: times are tough, but they’d be worse under Labour

From our UK edition

Today's PMQs was not, as James says, a tricky one for David Cameron. He had some good jokes and embarrassing gossip to poke Ed Miliband with, even though the Labour leader chose to attack on the thorny issue of living standards. The key to the next election will be whether voters feel their lives have improved under the Coalition far more than it is about the latest ONS release on GDP. And the key challenge for the Coalition is to be clear that though things won't be rosy - as Miliband pointed out, the squeeze on living standards will still be taking place when polling day arrives - they would be worse under Labour.

Alex Massie

The SNP’s Vision for Tartan Neoliberalism – Spectator Blogs

From our UK edition

The SNP's rise to power at Holyrood was predicated upon two useful qualities. First, the party has successfully contrived to appeal to different audiences without the contradictions in their doing so becoming either too blatantly apparent or too crippling. The SNP have targetted erstwhile Labour supporters in western Scotland at the same time as they have consolidated their power-base in distinctly non-socialist Aberdeenshire and Perthshire. This has been a good trick, played well. Secondly, of course, they were not the Scottish Labour party. Some 90% of SNP supporters profess themselves happy with Alex Salmond's leadership. In one sense this is unsurprising. He has led them to within sight of the promised land.

James Forsyth

PMQs: Ed Miliband fails to bowl Cameron out

From our UK edition

I suspect that David Cameron was in a better mood at the end of PMQs than at the start. He sailed through the session with relative ease. Ed Miliband went on living standards, his specialist subject, but his delivery was oddly flat. It was as if he was giving Cameron throw-downs in the nets rather than trying to bowl him out. Cameron, who has been bested on the joke front these past few weeks, also had the better one liners. He gleefully read out an email from the Labour press office inviting people to a Miliband speech on the economy but warning there was no new policy in it. Labour, though, are claiming that they’re grateful for the plug for the speech.

Isabel Hardman

Eastleigh by-election parties fight over policy they both support

From our UK edition

Alarming news reaches this blog from the Eastleigh by-election, where the battle has descended into a catfight about a policy the two main parties support at national level. How unusual for parties to detach themselves from their own policies when a prize seat is in sight: this time round it's the Lib Dems and Tories fighting over a development of new homes in the area on greenfield land. The Lib Dem leaflets promoting Mike Thornton say 'residents are angry with the Conservatives for putting green fields under threat from big builders'. The Tories backing Maria Hutchings point out that Thornton and his Lib Dem colleagues on the council voted in favour of the local plan for Eastleigh, which includes provisions for up to 4,700 new homes on greenfield land.

Thomas Duggins

Adultery and the same-sex marriage bill

From our UK edition

Nadine Dorries said during the debate on same sex marriage last week that 'This bill in no way makes a requirement of faithfulness from same-sex couples. In fact, it does the opposite'. Her rather surprising claim stems from the government's plans to maintain the current definition of adultery in the equal marriage bill. Although not defined in statute, case law defines adultery as sexual intercourse between persons of the opposite sex. So while a heterosexual man can be divorced on the basis of unfaithfulness with another woman, a homosexual man could not on the basis of unfaithfulness with another man. The definition of adultery has caused legislators a collective headache as they have tried to adapt current marriage legislation so that it is capable of extending to same sex couples.

Isabel Hardman

The government’s work experience scheme isn’t headed for the plug hole

From our UK edition

Depending on which paper you read this morning, the government's work experience scheme is either heading for the plug hole or going from strength to strength. The Guardian has an editorial praising Cait Reilly, the geology graduate who fought the workfare scheme she found herself on, The Telegraph says workfare can 'still do the job for Britain', and The Sun carries a bullish piece by Iain Duncan Smith on why the scheme is not 'slave labour'. The problem is that everyone has managed to interpret yesterday's Court of Appeal judgement as favouring their own view of the scheme. Reilly emerged yesterday with her lawyer to claim victory, but the Work and Pensions department seemed relatively unperturbed, too.

Tuesday

Isabel Hardman

Lib Dems and Labour concerned by Tory Leveson Royal Charter plans

From our UK edition

Does the Royal Charter, published by the Conservative party this afternoon, take politicians any further away from meddling with press regulation? The charter is the Tory answer to the statutory underpinning recommended by Lord Leveson, and the party is keen to stress that it 'does not require statute and enables the principles of Leveson to be fulfilled without legislation'. But is this plan any better? Well, the charter, which you can read here, can only be unpicked or changed if the leaders of all three parties confirm they agree with this and if the change gets the support of at least two thirds of MPs. It also needs the support of all those involved in the cross-party talks. So what do they think?

Isabel Hardman

Wanted: Press officer for Afriyie plotters

From our UK edition

Adam Afriyie's team have been on the hunt for a press officer, I understand. Even though the backbencher has tried to play down claims that he's taking aim at the Tory leadership, a source in the communications community says that Afriyie's camp have been asking individuals to join them as a press spokesman and strategist. The Sunday Times reported at the weekend that Afriyie recently approached Portland Communications asking for advice, but it appears that his team have also been looking to take on someone to represent them and help with their plotting strategy. In this case, I hear the individual they approached turned their offer down.

Isabel Hardman

Nick Clegg: I spent months making the case for an EU budget cut

From our UK edition

Deputy Prime Minister's Questions is rarely an uplifting experience: more like watching some hapless chap stuck in a room full of his ex-girlfriends, all pointing angrily at him, like the wedding reception scene in Four Weddings and a Funeral. Somehow Peter Bone either manages to get his name on the Order Paper or to tag along at the end of another question to bring up one of the more painful rows in the Coalition relationship, the boundary reforms, or when he's in a really good mood, what the DPM would do if David Cameron were run over by a bus. He did so again today, even though the Tories have already lost the boundaries vote. Zac Goldsmith was moodily grumbling, too, because the promised Recall Bill still wasn't making its way onto the books. Others were less kind.

Isabel Hardman

Secret justice bill unites senior Tory and Lib Dem MPs

From our UK edition

Last week ministers managed to rewrite some of the protections in the controversial Justice and Security Bill while it was being scrutinised in committee: this week backbenchers MPs are starting to hit back. I reported in late January that Andrew Tyrie was considering amending the legislation, and that a group of Tory MPs was minded to support him. He has now tabled a series of changes for the report stage of the Bill in the Commons, with the support of Liberal Democrat deputy leader Simon Hughes. Tyrie's proposals involve creating an elected chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee who is an MP, which is one of the recommendations in his CPS paper on the Bill. These proposals relate to part I of the Bill, which is perhaps the less controversial section of the legislation.

Isabel Hardman

Cross-party consensus on Leveson tested with Royal Charter plan

From our UK edition

The Conservatives publish their plans for a Royal Charter to underpin regulation of the press today. Although the cross-party talks have been more successful than most imagined, with no rows or public posturing, today is the day when that consensus is tested. There's also another test on the way for the three parties, which is the return of the Defamation Bill to the Commons towards the end of February or start of March. This Bill was amended last week by peers - including Tories - to include low-cost arbitration for members of a press regulator, overseen by a 'recognition commission' and a statutory requirement for pre-notification.