Uk politics

Friday

Isabel Hardman

Friday fury in the lobbies

From our UK edition

MPs have just voted on the first set of amendments to James Wharton's #LetBritainDecide bill. There is still a great deal more debate to be had in the Chamber, but based on this morning's offering, it's not worth clearing your diary for this report stage, unless you enjoy filibustering and mischievous use of obscure parliamentary procedure to delay a bill. This morning we had a geography lesson from Mike Gapes about the populations of each of the overseas territories, an account of the 'grilling, gruelling' debate that Martin Horwood enjoyed at a school in his constituency, and a debate about what it is that the people of Gibraltar take joy in.

Alex Massie

Commemorating the First World War is not a festival of British Nationalism

From our UK edition

You should never, these days, under-estimate peoples' ability to be outraged - outraged, I tells you - by the most innocuous event. Never. There are, after all, a depressing number of chippy morons in this country. Even so, I confess to being surprised by the hostility with which plans to commemorate the First World War have been met. At least in some quarters. I had thought, naively it is now clear, this commemoration would be uncontroversial, what with the First World War being, by any reckoning, an episode of some seriousness and consequence. That's hardly to say that the war's arguments have been settled. Far from it. Interpreting or understanding the First World War remains a complicated, delicate, business.

Sebastian Payne

Is Nigel Farage losing his touch?

From our UK edition

Is Nigel Farage’s magic disappearing? On Question Time last night (his 15th appearance in four years) the Ukip leader was taken to task by an audience member who asked him to 'stop scaremongering the majority of people' — followed by the kind of rousing cheer that Farage himself used to draw. The Tory defence minister (and former TV anchor) Anna Soubry finished off the attack with an impassioned defence of immigration, in language that Farage usually uses to attack it. This left him flummoxed. Here’s what she had to say: 'You do not talk facts, you talk prejudice. You scaremonger, you put fear in people's hearts. Times are tough, we know that.

Isabel Hardman

How Tory Euroscepticism has changed

From our UK edition

In just over half an hour, MPs will flock to the Chamber to watch the report stage and third reading of the Wharton Bill. I explained yesterday that there will be a chunk of Tories  who find themselves forced to support Adam Afriyie's call for an early referendum because it is a UKIP 'red line', but there is little good feeling about it. One MP, who was going to back the amendment for those reasons, told me this morning that he'd decided to abstain because the amendment does not help the eurosceptic cause at all. Before #LetBritainDecide reaches fever pitch in the Commons, though, it's worth considering how that eurosceptic cause has changed recently.

Thursday

Isabel Hardman

Tory MPs flee dreaded ‘Europhile’ tag to Adam Afriyie referendum bill bid

From our UK edition

In case you've been wondering what that strange feeling of tension in the air across the country is, the #LetBritainDecide bill returns to the Commons tomorrow for its report stage and third reading. There is, actually, rather a lot of valid tension - in as much as a backbench bill that will never become law can create valid tension - over the legislation this time around. The first reason is that Labour's Mike Gapes has tabled a fantastic series of amendments to try to wreck the bill, which join his fantastic series of amendments that he tabled at committee stage. The second is that there are many more Tories planning to vote for Adam Afriyie's beleaguered amendment than the whips had initially assumed.

Wednesday

Isabel Hardman

Why Cameron’s NHS lines didn’t quite work at PMQs today

From our UK edition

Though the NHS made a welcome change from endless bickering about energy bills at today's PMQs, the exchanges were just as unedifying. There is very little gain in the sort of fact war that David Cameron and Ed Miliband tried to indulge in, as there is no killer fact that can silence an opponent on the NHS. Instead, the exchanges descended very quickly into 'let me give the right honourable gentleman the facts about the NHS under this government', 'we have a Prime Minister too clueless to know the facts' and 'once again, the right honourable gentleman is just wrong on the facts'. Each man used his own 'simple facts' that he claimed either showed the NHS was safe in the Tories' hands or that it was being killed by the Tories.

Isabel Hardman

Pritchard row refreshes second jobs debate

From our UK edition

Mark Pritchard is vigorously denying the Telegraph splash this morning, which alleges that he boasted of being able to use his political contacts to set up meetings. He says he is consulting his lawyers. But aside from the eventual outcome of this row, it has allowed Labour to reignite the debate about whether MPs should have second jobs anyway, with a Labour party spokesman saying last night that 'every passing scandal and further investigation only goes to reinforce why Ed Miliband was right earlier this year to call for new rules and new limits on MPs' outside earnings'. Miliband made that call in the middle of the Falkirk row as a way of turning the debate about influence on to the Tories, who were very much enjoying attacking the Labour party at the time.

Alex Massie

Russell Brand is right about one thing: he is a twerp.

From our UK edition

Oh for the love of God, he's back. Russell Brand, Britain's sophomoric revolutionary-in-chief, has written another call-to-something. At least this one is shorter than his previous manifesto. Alas it makes no more sense. What is interesting about Brand is not novel and what is novel is not interesting. Tom Chivers is right to note that: But those of you who are bothered, the Russell Brands and Occupy Wherevers of the world, don't pretend that the political system doesn't offer anything for you. It does. It offers lots and lots of things. The trouble is, most people don't want it.

Alex Massie

I see no ships (on the Clyde)

From our UK edition

The sorry truth of the matter is that Glasgow has been in decline for a century. 1913 was the city's greatest year. Then it produced a third of the railway locomotives and a fifth of the steel manufactured anywhere in Britain. Most of all, it built ships. Big ships and many of them. A ship was launched, on average,  every day that year. In 1913, 23% of the entire world's production of ships (by tonnage) was built and launched on the river Clyde. It was an astonishing achievement and the high-water mark of Scottish industrial prowess. Ship-building, more than any other industry, became part of Glasgow's essence. The locomotives and the steel and the cars and the sewing machines might all disappear but so long as ships were still built on the Clyde something would remain.

Isabel Hardman

Another rotten culture, another political risk on the NHS

From our UK edition

The allegations of a cover-up at Colchester General Hospital suggest something rotten in a culture, once again. The police have been called in by the Care Quality Commission to investigate claims that documents about patients' care were falsified and that managers bullied staff into doing this so that cancer care at CGH could meet its targets. Bernard Jenkin, the local MP, placed great emphasis in his interview on Today on the problems with culture in the NHS, which Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt is trying to resolve with a series of reforms to NHS leadership. But there will inevitably be a row about the role of targets in this scandal as well, given the allegations centre around falsified documents to give the impression CGH cancer care was meeting its targets.

Tuesday

Isabel Hardman

Tea at 22: An exclusive glimpse inside the Number 10 policy board with Margot James

From our UK edition

I am delighted to reveal the first of our 'Tea at 22' films: a series of short video interviews with Westminster personalities in the Spectator's 22 Old Queen Street offices. This week I spoke to Margot James, member of the Number 10 policy board and one of the stars of the gay marriage debate, about how the party is developing its manifesto. Here are some key points: James denied Westminster rumours (revealed in the Spectator's politics column) that the policy board members weren't getting along, and explained how the board develops manifesto and government policy. She revealed that she is currently working on ideas to improve ailing town centres.

Isabel Hardman

Labour stays stubborn over Falkirk

From our UK edition

Labour is standing firm over Falkirk, even though senior figures such as Johann Lamont and Alistair Darling are sufficiently worried by the allegations still emerging to call for a new investigation. This morning Caroline Flint was sent out in a stern mood to bat for the party, with the Shadow Energy Secretary telling Radio 4's Today programme that the party wouldn't publish its internal reports, but that it had already taken 'firm action'. She said: 'The current position is this: when reports were made to the party about concerns about the Falkirk selection, the party was suspended and put in special measures. Ms Murphy, who was one of the candidates at the heart of the process, withdrew her nomination from the process.

Monday

Isabel Hardman

Why Boris Johnson’s ‘slow and feeble’ attack on aviation policy isn’t so bothersome

From our UK edition

'Let's have it every 90 seconds!' shouted Boris to the CBI this afternoon as he played a series of clips of loud and quiet plane engines. He wanted to illustrate that 'quiet' planes would not make another runway at Heathrow palatable, and he used his customary strong language in attacking the government's position on aviation policy. 'End the dither, cut the cackle,' the Mayor of London told the conference, urging the government to rule out a 'toxic' third runway by Christmas. While he's trying to be loyal, the Mayor seems to have a special licence to attack the government on aviation. Today he said that 'you can't blame British business for failing to get into new markets if the British government is so slow and feeble [on aviation]'.

Isabel Hardman

May sails through TPIMs statement with disapproving attack on Yvette Cooper

From our UK edition

Aside from having to explain her government's policy on clothing that might be used as a disguise, Theresa May did pull it out of the bag, again, in that statement on Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed's TPIM. Her short speech at the start wasn't anything to write home about, simply setting out the bare bones of what was being done to find the terror suspect. But it was in her response to Yvette Cooper that the Home Secretary really got her eye in. She took a rather disapproving tone to answer Cooper's questions, telling her that she was wrong to suggest that TPIMs were in some way a watering down of Labour's control orders.

Isabel Hardman

Sir Gerald Howarth asks Theresa May to ban the burka so it can’t be used as a disguise

From our UK edition

When the Prime Minister's spokesman said this morning that 'we will look at whether there are lessons that we can learn from' the disappearance of Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed, what he probably didn't mean was that the Home Office should consider banning all things that can be worn as disguises. Sir Gerald Howarth clearly did, telling the Commons this afternoon that the Home Secretary should ban the burka partly because it had enabled this suspect to disappear.

Isabel Hardman

Theresa May has taken the heat out of Home Office rows

From our UK edition

Theresa May will give a statement to the House of Commons this afternoon on the disappearance of terror suspect Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed. The Home Secretary has earned a formidable reputation over the past few years for emerging unscathed from a variety of Home Office rows, and Labour has struggled to lay a finger on her. But this afternoon May will face a grilling from Yvette Cooper over the TPIM arrangements for Mohammed Ahmed Mohammed, and Labour wants to use this incident as a way of claiming that the Home Secretary's own policy is flawed.

Isabel Hardman

Ed Balls’ credibility mission

From our UK edition

The never-ending slew of messages from Labour figures about the party's 'clear' position on high-speed rail was part of an attempt by the party to show that it is a credible opposition that scrutinises policies rather than blindly supports them. But this got rather confusing last week as each 'clear position' was a little different to the last. So today Ed Balls tried to set out Labour's clear position more clearly when he spoke to the CBI conference. And it turns out that this position is the same as it was at the party's conference. Here is the section on the new line in the Shadow Chancellor's speech: 'Labour supports HS2 and the idea of a new North-South rail link because of capacity constraints on the existing rail network. But our support for it is not at any cost.

Isabel Hardman

Cameron aims to set agenda again on HS2

From our UK edition

Even though a significant number of Conservative MPs oppose the new high speed rail line, the focus for the past few weeks has been on what Labour plans to do about it, with a new 'clear' position coming from the party almost every day. Labour support now looks a little more likely given the language used by Mary Creagh at the report stage and third reading of the preparation bill last week. And while the fuss about Labour has died down a little, David Cameron is wisely seeking to wrestle back the agenda on this project from the Opposition. In a speech today to the CBI, Cameron will use one of his favourite lines at the moment: the accusation that Labour would be 'betraying the North' if it didn't support the new line.

Sunday

Isabel Hardman

The big question with Ed Miliband’s living wage pledge isn’t whether it will work

From our UK edition

Will Ed Miliband's pledge on the Living Wage, made in today's Independent on Sunday, work? Actually, that's not really the most important question: the experience of the weeks following the autumn conference season is that you don't actually need a workable pledge to be able to set the terms of debate. The Labour leader's plan is for private and public sector employers to receive a tax rebate - on average £445, but up to £1,000 - for 12 months for every employee whose pay is lifted to living wage level of £7.45 an hour. He says this will be paid directly through increased tax and national insurance receipts. The big question now is how the Conservatives respond to this.