Uk politics

How the Tories will write their manifesto

From our UK edition

This week, David Cameron will announce the creation of a series of policy commissions charged with drawing up policies for the next Tory manifesto. Strikingly, every commission will include on it the chosen representative of the Tory backbenches. The groups will, as I say in the Mail on Sunday, be made up of the relevant Cabinet Minister, a member of the Prime Minister’s policy board and the MP in charge of the 1922’s policy work in this area. The Downing Street Policy Unit will provide the secretariat. Number 10’s hope is that by bringing MPs into this process, they’ll feel more loyal to the manifesto once it is produced. As one source puts it, Cameron is 'reaching out and hugging people close’. But this strategy is not without its risks.

Why do the Tories lead on the economy and leadership but trail overall?

From our UK edition

One of the odd things about the polls at the moment is that the Tories lead on economic competence and leadership, traditionally the two most important issues, yet trail overall. There are, I argue in the column this week, three possible explanations for this polling paradox. The first possibility is that Ed Miliband is right, that the link between GDP growth and voters’ living standards is broken. A consequence of this is that voters put less emphasis on economic management in the round. Instead, they want to know which party will do most to help them with their cost of living. Then, there’s the possibility that the traditional political rules don’t apply in this era of coalitions and four party politics in England.

Police drop investigation into Grant Shapps’ former business

From our UK edition

One of the stranger rows since the Coalition formed has been over Tory chairman Grant Shapps/Michael Green, and whether or not businesses he ran before entering politics were engaged in unlawful activity. How To Corp, which Shapps founded before passing his share to his wife in 2008, sold a software called TrafficPaymaster, which copied content from other websites so that clients could make more money from Google advertising. Labour MP Steve McCabe complained about the firm to Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer and the Metropolitan Police, and today the Met have responded.

The next bitter battle over the NHS is looming

From our UK edition

It's been a while since we had a nice big fat NHS row, but those who enjoy watching Andy Burnham and Jeremy Hunt fight over the 'party of the NHS' crown can rest assured that there's a really bitter one coming up this autumn. NHS England has spent the past few months consulting on a change to the way clinical commissioning groups are funded that could end the current arrangement where more money per capita is spent on patients in deprived areas. The formula currently being considered would make the number of elderly people in an area a more important factor in the size of the grant that each CCG receives. You can probably already guess how this will play out in the political arena, but firstly, here's the argument behind changing the formula.

Nigel Farage wins The Spectator’s HS2 debate — but will the green belt be destroyed? (with audio)

From our UK edition

HS2 was given an emphatic vote of no confidence at The Specator’s debate last night, where Matthew Parris and Nigel Farage led their respective teams into battle. This was the debate that Westminster will not have (all parties are officially agreed on the project) which is all the better for us. Farage claimed he loves infrastructure projects in general but hates HS2 as it’s a Westminster vanity project. Farage attempted to marry Ukip's (inconsistent) support for high speed rail with his ardent opposition to HS2: 'There are so many things we could do. And yes, let's look at the Great Central railway project…we are not luddites, we are not backwards. I want Crossrail, I want to build some new motorways.

Qualified teacher status – who believes what?

From our UK edition

Should pupils in free schools and academies be taught by teachers without Qualified teacher status? This question has become the latest game political ping-pong involving all three parties. So much has been said it’s difficult to know what everyone believes. Here is a summary of where all the key players stand: Tristram Hunt (and Labour) No, well maybe — the Shadow Education Secretary's position is unclear. In a Daily Mirror interview, Hunt said 'they have to work towards qualified teacher status or they have to go'. But last night, Jeremy Paxman asked Hunt no less than nine times whether he would send his children to a school with teachers who do not have Qualified teachers status.

Tories give Tristram Hunt grief over ‘car crash’ interview

From our UK edition

It was quite strange yesterday that Michael Gove's allies were quite so happy to concede ahead of his first proper scrap with Tristram Hunt that it was going to be a tough fight. They'd never given Stephen Twigg quite so much credit, although the complications of the Al-Madinah free school row and Nick Clegg's wibbling and wobbling over qualified teachers have made life a little more difficult for team Gove. But the strategy was partly to add to the expectations on the new Shadow Education Secretary, and then to bring them crashing down when he actually appeared.

Ed Miliband supports the Boston Red Sox. This is all anyone need know about him.

From our UK edition

It is, of course, beyond dismal that the Boston Red Sox won the World Series last night. The only upside to this is that it ensured the St Louis Cardinals, the National League's most pompous franchise, lost. It is a very meagre upside. The Boston Red Sox: insufferable in defeat, even worse in victory. It comes as no surprise, frankly, that Ed Miliband is a devoted member of what is teeth-grindingly referred to as the Red Sox Nation. Dan Hodges and James Kirkup each salute Ed's willingness to embrace a cause as unfashionable as baseball. Why, it's charmingly authentic! Better a proper baseball nerd than a fake soccer fan. There is, I concede, something to this.

Labour announces its ‘message’ on HS2 is clear… but is it?

From our UK edition

It's a bad sign when a party has to insist that its position on a big policy is clear, but that's what Labour has done this morning, with a statement from Shadow Transport Secretary Mary Creagh marking the start of the HS2 preparation bill report stage and third reading: 'Labour supports HS2 because we must address the capacity problems that mean thousands of commuters face cramped, miserable journeys into Birmingham, Manchester, Leeds and London. However, Government mismanagement has pushed up costs. Our message to David Cameron is clear. Get a grip on this project, get control of the budget and get it back on track.

Tory MPs: here’s how you can get half-term off with your kids

From our UK edition

Don't expect this afternoon's vote on HS2 to be the biggest insurrection of all time: it is the preparation bill and there are a number of reasons why MPs who could yet oppose the project won't cause trouble this afternoon. One is the rather technical reason that some want to support this legislation in order to secure adequate compensation for constituents whose property will be blighted until an alternative route is chosen or all three parties agree to invest in existing lines. Another is that some remain to be convinced of the case for the line: the whips have been working rather hard on this, I hear.

Why Labour is getting cold feet about HS2

From our UK edition

People express surprise that Labour, having invented HS2, is now getting cold feet about it. But, as with rising energy prices, it is precisely because it invented the policy that it knows how expensive it is. Labour is like a big bank which went bust in the 2008 crisis but has somehow managed to continue trading without being either rescued or wound up. It knows how badly it did, and what a terrible state it is still in, and keeps hoping (with surprising success so far) that people won’t notice. Psychologically and politically, it is important for it to transfer blame for its own actions on to the coalition. Then it can be the prudent party at the next election, and the Tories and the Liberals can be the profligate ones.

Jam set for frightening, muddy future

From our UK edition

Today's Westminster Hall debate on the sugar content of preserves was positively jammed with puns. 'The minister seems to have found himself in a sticky situation, or in a bit of a jam,' said Tessa Munt, who was quite set on raising this subject with fellow MPs. 'Jam today, please, but I would like to see jam tomorrow as well.' Does anyone give a damn about the sugar content of jam? Well, according to Munt, the government's plans to allow manufacturers to reduce the concentration below 60% risks ruining jam forever. It will mean jams that apparently are darker, duller, and muddier. According to Munt, consumer confidence in jam could be shattered forever. It would be sham jam. Sitting in the public gallery in Westminster Hall, I was terrified.

Nick Clegg hints at HS2 red line for 2015 negotiations

From our UK edition

Nick Clegg used his monthly press conference this afternoon to deliver a strongly worded attacked on Labour over its energy price freeze and lengthy, unsolicited defence of what the government is doing to tackle the cost of living. There were some mildly interesting points from the Deputy Prime Minister on energy bills, as he insisted repeatedly that he was a 'pragmatist' about how the money for low income and vulnerable households is raised and that talks over how some green and social taxes and levies could be removed from fuel bills were going to continue between now and the Autumn Statement.

Labour: no change on HS2 position

From our UK edition

Yesterday marked the first reasonably good day that agitators for HS2 have had in a while. Northern business leaders started the day with a call to David Cameron to hold firm on the project, followed by Labour leader of Birmingham City Council Sir Albert Bore warning Labour of 'protracted public conflict' in the run-up to the general election if it continued to 'put out such a negative message on HS2'. This morning's Guardian story that Labour will support HS2 provided the project's chairman Sir David Higgins is given the power to bring down its costs appears to be damage limitation. But party sources are today rowing back from that line, which means Labour's support or otherwise is no clearer than it was yesterday.

Peter Hitchens is wrong (on the internet!). There really is a War on Drugs.

From our UK edition

Before I headed off on honeymoon I took a pop at Peter Hitchens' rather odd assertion that there was no such thing in this country as the War on Drugs. Mr Hitchens duly responded on his Mail on Sunday blog and this in turn deserves a response. Even a belated one. First, an apology: I rather regret suggesting Mr Hitchens is a nitwit. That was unnecessary. I do think his argument - impeccably sincere as it may be - runs towards nincompoopery but since we all hold beliefs other people consider idiotic we might do well, at least occasionally, to recall the usefulness of treating the man and the ball as separate concerns. Nevertheless, I can't say that I'm much persuaded by Hitchens' rebuttal. This may not surprise either of us.

Energy bosses boost Tory tortoise in energy row with green taxes pledge

From our UK edition

Like all good select committee hearings where MPs are grilling some unsuspecting witnesses on something they've decided to be very angry about, this hearing of the Energy and Climate Change committee took a very long time. It has been cut off for the time being from Ofgem's evidence by a series of votes in the Commons, but here's what we've learned from this first mammoth hearing in any case. The first is that the MPs clearly read Iain Martin's memo in the Telegraph about show trial-style select committee hearings. Only Ian Lavery managed the kind of fury that all members of these committees normally feel it necessary to manufacture, and even that was just a bit of a lecture rather than a rage.

Theresa May’s grubby little warning: an independent Scotland will be out in the cold

From our UK edition

It is a good thing that government ministers come to Scotland sometimes. It is a bad thing that they insist on opening their mouths when they do. Earlier this year we endured the spectacle of Philip Hammond making an arse of himself; today it has been Theresa May's turn to make one wish cabinet ministers would, just occasionally, contemplate the virtue of silence. The Home Secretary was in Edinburgh to warn that an independent Scotland would be a dangerous place. It would, in fact, be left out in the cold. It would not, you see, be part of the English-speaking-world's Five Eyes intelligence-poolling network. The UK, United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand will continue to share information. Little Caledonia will be left on the outside, all forlorn, friendless and at risk.