Uk politics

Why is Labour’s Shadow Cabinet saying so little?

From our UK edition

Normally the default response in the Labour party to a rough couple of weeks is to blame the Shadow Cabinet. They're not pulling together, they're thinking about their own future leadership prospects rather than backing Ed Miliband and so on and so forth. But while the Shadow Cabinet is looking weak this week at their party conference, for once it is not their fault. They are standing under a banner that announces 'Labour's Plan for Britain's Future', but then say no more about that plan. They are all being sent naked into the conference hall. All they are being required to talk about is their values, and what they have already announced.

Len McCluskey: Ed Balls’s long speech was good in parts

From our UK edition

One thing that made Ed Balls' speech to conference look a little less impressive was the barnstormer of an address from Len McCluskey to the hall shortly before. Delegates loved it, and not just because the Unite leader was saying the sorts of things that they wanted to hear. He was also passionate and interesting. He deservedly received the first proper standing ovation of the week. So what did McCluskey think of the speech that followed from Ed Balls? I caught up with the union boss afterwards, and he managed some faint praise: 'Well, I think it was a long speech, and it was a very embracing speech, and I thought in parts it was a good speech.

After a flat speech from Ed Balls, what is Labour conference holding its breath for?

From our UK edition

One of the curious traditions of Labour conference is that directly after the Shadow Chancellor's speech, hard copies of his wise words are sold outside the conference hall. Any fiscally responsible Labour types trying to make difficult decisions about how to spend their money might be best advised to keep their £1 in their pockets for the time being, though. Today was not Ed Balls' finest hour. It can't just be that many people at Labour are exhausted after the Scottish campaign to react to their Shadow Chancellor's speech. The reaction of the conference hall was far too flat for the last conference economy speech before the general election. And the reason for that was that there were no new announcements.

Ed Balls: English votes plan is ‘most un-prime ministerial’ thing Cameron has done

From our UK edition

Ed Balls wanted to spend his Today programme interview talking about his plans to cut the deficit by limiting child benefit increases to 1 per cent and cutting ministerial pay by five per cent. But he had two big stories to overcome that people seem more interested in. One is his accidental wounding of a journalist, which has made front page news, and the other is English votes for English laws, which is the even bigger front page news from the Labour conference so far (and with a newsless day in the hall yesterday, who can blame journalists for going after something else?). He tried two tactics, which rather cancelled one another out. The first was to argue that there was no 'easy solution to our constitutional situation', which was a suitably boring, no-quotes answer.

Ed Balls to freeze child benefit and dock ministerial pay

From our UK edition

Ed Balls, so used to dodging elephant traps laid by George Osborne, is going to lay a few of his own tomorrow when he gives his speech to the Labour conference. The Shadow Chancellor, in an attempt to do something about Labour's poll weakness on the economy, will announce that he would freeze child benefit and cut ministers' pay by five per cent until Labour has balanced the books. He will say: 'We will have to make other decisions which I know will not be popular with everyone… I want to see child benefit rising in line with inflation in the next parliament, but we will not spend money we cannot afford. So for the first two years of the next parliament, we will cap the rid in child benefit at one per cent. It will save £400 million in the next Parliament.

Coffee Shots: Ed Balls wounds journalist at bloody football match

From our UK edition

Ed Balls playing football each year at Labour conference is almost as big as Ed Balls Day. The Shadow Chancellor always participates enthusiastically in the annual hacks vs MPs match. Sometimes, he's a little too enthusiastic. Like today, when he accidentally wounded lobby journalist Rob Merrick. Still, the pair made up by the end of the match. Those who predict the General Election campaign will be a bloody battle were more correct than they could ever have imagined.

Tristram Hunt sweet talks party faithful with newsless Labour conference speech

From our UK edition

Tristram Hunt's speech to the Labour conference was short and sweet. It was laden with sweeteners for party delegates, which is as things should be at these events, but perhaps his Blairite predecessors are feeling a little sour after the Shadow Education Secretary spent a fair bit of his time on the stage denouncing the principles they once espoused. Clearly the aim was to keep the party faithful happy - and they'd spent the session beforehand making quite clear that they wanted a screeching reversal over many of the Coalition's education reform - because Hunt also attempted to galvanise them by talking about Michael Gove. And when he got bored of talking about Gove, he talked about Nicky Morgan, who he described as 'a "Continuity Gove", auto-pilot Education Secretary'.

Miliband confronted by the English Question

From our UK edition

Ed Miliband wouldn’t have wanted to spend his big, pre-conference interview talking about English votes for English law but that’s what he had to do on Marr this morning. Miliband was prepared to concede more English scrutiny for English legislation. But it is clear he won’t back English votes for English laws. He even argued that it was hard to describe tuition fees, which don’t apply in Scotland, as an issue just for the rest of the UK. listen to ‘Ed Miliband: 'In favour of greater scrutiny' of English issues by English MPs’ on Audioboo Miliband was much happier when the interview turned to the minimum wage and Labour’s plan to increase it to £8 by 2020.

Have the Scottish Tories been detoxified?

From our UK edition

The referendum campaign was a mixed experience for the Scottish Tories. On the one hand, it was a reminder of how much they are still hated in Scotland: End Tory rule forever, was one of the more frequently heard Nationalist battle cries. On the other, they had one of the campaign’s most effective advocates, Ruth Davidson and were accepted in as part of the cross party campaign. Indeed, it was telling that the Better Together campaign together rather than hiding Davidson away used her more and more as the campaign went on. In his Scotsman column today, the former Labour spin doctor John McTernan declares that ‘Ruth Davidson’s campaign has detoxified’ the Scottish Conservatives. This is a particularly striking statement coming from a former Labour partisan.

Podcast special: Alex Salmond’s resignation

From our UK edition

Was Alex Salmond's resignation a surprise? And what should the SNP do now that it has lost the referendum that it fought for over so many years? In a View from 22 Spectator podcast special, James Forsyth and Hamish Macdonell analyse the First Minister's decision, and who might replace him.

Indyref: Will Westminster really change?

From our UK edition

Lord Ashcroft's post-referendum Scotland poll gives politicians claiming they've 'heard' voters a number of clues if in reality they're still a bit confused. It suggests that those last few days of panic from the 'No' camp didn't really shift as many voters as some might have thought. The poll says 28 per cent of 'No' voters made up their mind within this year. 72 per cent had already decided before September 2013. Only nine per cent had settled on 'No' in the past week. And the reason more frequently cited for voting 'Yes' than any other was 'disaffection with Westminster politics', with 74% of those in favour of independence naming that, then 54 per cent also picking the NHS, followed by 33 naming tax and public spending.

With malice toward none and with charity towards all, now the real work begins

From our UK edition

Relief, actually. Not joy. A battle won is better than a battle lost but still an exhausting, bloody, business. There is no need to bayonet the wounded. It would, in any case, be grotesque to do so. Scotland voted and made, in my view, the right choice. The prudent choice. The bigger-hearted choice. But 45 per cent of my countrymen disagree. That's something to be respected too. Moreover a good number of No voters did so reluctantly and not because they were necessarily persuaded by the case for Union but because they felt the Yes campaign had not proved its own argument beyond a reasonable doubt. That's an important qualification. A reminder that the Union is a contract and support for it remains provisional.

Our Scottish campaign will encourage English Nationalism unless the voice of England is heard

From our UK edition

This is an extract from a speech delivered by Tory MP Conor Burns at a Conservative association dinner in Chris Grayling's constituency tonight: It would be extraordinary if I did not mention what is going on in Scotland this evening. I represent, as self-evidently, does the Lord Chancellor beside me a constituency in England. I have watched events in Scotland through that prism of course. But I have also watched as a staunch Unionist. I have always given equal weight to the full title of our great Party: Conservative AND Unionist. I was born and spent the early years of my life in Northern Ireland into a Catholic family with broadly romantic nationalist sentiment. Yet I knew early in my life that I rejected nationalism and embraced Unionism.

Salmond uses final rally to congratulate campaigners

From our UK edition

Anyone listening to Alex Salmond's final pro-independence rally tonight in Perth might have been forgiven for thinking the 'Yes' campaign was in the lead in the polls. He used most of it to congratulate his side for running such a successful campaign and for changing Scotland before the final result had even been declared. There was much less of a pitch for any undecided voters watching, unless the First Minister had concluded that anyone who was still wavering would be swayed by the idea that his guys had already won. listen to ‘Salmond: The referendum is 'our opportunity of a lifetime'’ on Audioboo He told the audience that 'what has emerged in this campaign is something very new; it has changed Scotland forever'.

Final polls put No ahead

From our UK edition

The last YouGov poll of the campaign, which has a far larger than usual sample size, has No ahead 52-48. The last phone poll of the campaign, a Survation effort, has No up 53-47. So, the No campaign is ahead by a clear but small margin. [datawrapper chart="http://static.spectator.co.uk/3gFhn/index.html"] The Sun’s political editor Tom Newton Dunn reports that YouGov finds that men in Scotland favour independence 54 to 46 but women back the Union 57 to 43. Its numbers show that only 4 per cent of voters remain undecided. Interestingly, those from the rest of the UK who have moved to Scotland—those living the Union—are voting No by a 72 to 28 landslide. By contrast, Scottish born Scots are split 50/50 on the independence question.

Yes or No, the little white rose of Scotland will bloom again

From our UK edition

And so our watch is all but over. Who knows what comes tomorrow but at least and at last the final reckoning is upon us. It is choosing time and there's no escape. Few people would wish the campaign any longer. Many voters tired of it some time ago. Their minds were made-up and would not change and they just wanted to move on to the next story. Whatever it may be. But I can't agree with the people who fret that this has been a nasty and divisive and awful experience. It hasn't. I mean, of course it's been divisive and of course passions have been running high but that's because it matters. You can't have a non-divisive referendum. This is a good thing I think and I think this is an argument we've needed to have. If not now, when?

Why a ‘No’ voter hurled abuse at ‘Yes’ campaigners

From our UK edition

I've just watched a passionate, informed debate about politics taking place on a street corner between three ordinary people. I've never seen that before. I should be thrilled, but instead I'm not. Why? That debate followed the first bad language and bad feeling I've personally witnessed while following campaigners from both sides of the Scottish independence debate around in Glasgow and Lanarkshire. I was with two 'Yes' activists, Jim Flynn and Neil Molloy, in Kelvin today, watching them delivering leaflets to residents of the gorgeous tenement blocks near the river.

‘No’ quietly confident on campaign trail

From our UK edition

I've just spent a couple of hours on the Burnhill estate in Rutherglen watching a group of Labour 'No' campaigners knock on the doors of voters to find out how they'll be voting on Thursday. Burnhill is a tidy estate of mostly social housing and a Labour council ward. The local Labour MP Tom Greatrex and his colleague Graham Jones, visiting from Hyndburn, were part of the group. I was surprised by the number of 'No' posters on display in the windows. I was expecting a plethora of 'Yes' placards, but fewer indications of the households whose inhabitants plan to reject independence, but on this estate at least, it's not the case. The activists say many, many more 'No' posters have appeared in the days since the shock Sunday Times poll that showed 'Yes' moving into the lead.

Is Scotland confident enough to vote No?

From our UK edition

We hold this truth to be self-evident: we are not an oppressed people. We have some liberty to chart our own course. We are, after all, choosing our path this week. We do not crave self-determination because we have always had that power. And many others besides that significant liberty. We are a free people. This is obvious yet also something worth recalling in these final hours. I have my own reasons for voting No on Thursday and, in truth, they have little to do with very much that has been said by the official Better Together campaign. But this kind of choice, this kind of referendum, inevitably prods one towards endorsing one team or the other. It is Rangers or Celtic and, in the end, there's no room for Partick Thistle or Queens Park or anyone else.