Titus Andronicus

Even Shakespeare was a slow starter

From our UK edition

Are Shakespeare’s early plays terrible? Rory Loughnane seems to think so, which is perhaps surprising, given that his new book is an account of Shakespeare’s writing life until the age of 30. The playwright starts out in 1588, aged 24, with The Two Gentlemen of Verona, which is mostly remembered for an unpleasant subplot about rape. ‘The treatment of the female characters is dreadful,’ writes Loughnane, while the ending is ‘underdeveloped and therefore somewhat dissatisfying’. Next up, Titus Andronicus, which was popular with audiences but less so with Loughnane, who gives a summary of the demented plot, quotes some long-dead scholars being mean about it (‘I wish I had never read it’), and concludes: ‘The end, phew.

Why Shakespeare remains the great playwright

William Shakespeare’s tragedies stand apart. Their impact is profound and lasting, in cultural, artistic, emotional and psychological terms. Who could forget the ghost’s first appearance in Hamlet, or Lear bearing the dead Cordelia? No other dramatist has achieved what Shakespeare did: in subject matter, emotional heft, innovative usage of source material, character development and startling deployment of language Shakespeare is (and there is no other word for it) extraordinary. He surpasses both his predecessors (sorry, Thomas Kyd!) and those that came after him. He built on the foundations the classical playwrights established, and then, almost casually, bettered them, too.

Shakespeare