Prince harry

King Charles III’s state visit to Washington this week is the monarchy executing its core diplomatic function with precision and dignity. In Donald Trump’s Washington, an invitation to an event with the British monarch remains the most sought-after in the city. By stark contrast, the King’s son and daughter-in-law careen around the globe representing no one but themselves. They dress up as royals in a sustained exercise in self-promotion and profiteering that repels observers and belittles the very institution that gave them their platform. One upholds the Crown’s purpose, while the other commodifies it. The Sussexes’ grift cheapens the Crown’s reputation and insults the public’s intelligence The King and Queen

When Prince Harry left the witness box at the UK High Court this afternoon, it was observed that he was “visibly emotional.” The Duke of Sussex was there to give evidence in his group legal action against the Daily Mail publishers Associated Newspapers a day earlier than expected. There is inevitably a certain amount of personal toil involved in any high-profile legal case – where the stakes for whichever side wins are considerable, both financially and reputationally. But the Duke of Sussex’s emotive, even angry appearance in court today made it quite clear to any onlooker that his motives were deeply personal. It appears that victory for him would represent a spectacular

The Sussexes have come to personify grievance, vanity and betrayal

Let’s not let Megs delude herself that her throwing an apron on and frying chicken for her husband is helping anyone

Whether or not Harry’s accomplishments measure up to Pat Tillman’s legacy is up for debate

In America, there is a far greater irreverence that is unsurprising from a country that threw out its last ruler

The greatest threat to its survival will come from within

The taboo around speaking about race has reached levels that are now nothing less than comical