Labour party

Saturday

Gordon Hector

Trouble over the NHS reforms – inevitable or not?

From our UK edition

Was the stooshie over health reforms inevitable? From much of the coverage, you'd think it was always going to end in tears, as people line up to criticise Lansley and rumours about Number 10's search for a dignified exit strategy (£) swirl around the Westminster village. But it didn't have to be like this. For a start, the basic idea is one that should be easy to sell to the public. Matthew Parris has pointed out (£) that people intuitively look to their GP as the route into healthcare. It shouldn't be hard to convince the public they should lead commissioning. It's been difficult mainly because the health professionals aren't on-side. This could have been largely avoided.

Friday

David Blackburn

An election jam in Leicester spells trouble for Clegg

From our UK edition

Nick Clegg is campaigning in Leicester today, ahead of the local election. The Labour party has just confirmed that Sir Peter Soulsby has stood down as MP for Leicester South today to seek election as the town’s Mayor. A happy coincidence? Probably not. Labour are already running a coherent campaign in Leicester. Michael Crick points out that the by-election will fall on 5 May, together with the local council elections, the Mayoral election and the referendum on the alternative vote.

James Forsyth

A shameful episode

From our UK edition

Libby Brooks’ piece in The Guardian today is shameful. Writing about the violence that followed last weekend’s march, she  argues that the ‘relevant question is not whether or how to condemn those acts – but if any coherent agenda lies behind them and how important it is for that to sit neatly with the agenda of the whole’. She even quotes approvingly the idea that the violence can be beneficial as it might push the government to do a deal with the moderate elements of the movement and wants us to remember that 'the vast majority of damage on Saturday was sustained by property, not persons (84 people were treated for mainly minor injuries); nor was this vandalism mindless, but targeted at banks and other emblematic high street institutions.

Thursday

Peter Hoskin

Ed Balls ties himself in knots

From our UK edition

The Most Annoying Figure in British Politics™ is spread absolutely everywhere today: in the newspapers, on Twitter and, most notably, in interview with the New Statesman's Mehdi Hasan. The interview really is worth reading, not least because it pulls out and probes some of Ball's arguments, both for himself and for Labour's fiscal reasoning. Guido has already dwelt on the former — "I'm a very loyal person," quoth the shadow chancellor — but what about the latter? Three things struck me: 1) Oh, yeah, there was a structural deficit. The Big News here is probably Balls's admission that Labour did run up a structural deficit (i.e. a deficit that remains even when the economy is functioning as well as it should) after all.

Wednesday

Toby Young

David Miliband’s never-to-be-made best man speech

From our UK edition

Good afternoon. I'd like to thank you all for coming to this godforsaken hell hole – sorry, I mean, Ed's constituency. Believe it or not, I once expressed an interest in becoming the Labour MP for Doncaster North, but as soon as Ed heard about it he tossed his hat into the ring. Funny that. I'm going to start by reading a few telegrams from people who couldn't be here today. [Reading]: "Dear Ed, Thanks for your kind invitation, but I'd rather stick pins in my eyes." [Looking up]: That's from my wife, Louise. [Reading]: "Dear Ed, I'm happy to pick up the tab. You can pay me back when you get to Number 10." [Looking up]: That's from Brendan Barber, the General Secretary of the TUC. [Reading]: "Dear Ed, Congratulations.

James Forsyth

An explosive session

From our UK edition

This PMQs will be remembered for the Cameron Balls spat. As Cameron was answering a question from a Labour MP, he snapped at Balls who was heckling him, shouting ‘you don’t know the answer, you’re not properly briefed, why don’t you just say you’ll write to her’. A visibly irritated Cameron shot back, ‘I wish the shadow Chancellor would shut up and listen for once’. At this the Labour benches erupted, their aim at PMQs is always to get Cameron to lose his temper and they had succeeded. Cameron then produced a brilliant comeback, saying that Balls was ‘the most annoying person in British politics’ and ‘I suspect that the leader of the opposition will come to agree with me.

Peter Hoskin

PMQs live blog | 30 March 2011

From our UK edition

VERDICT: What happened there, then? The Prime Minister often has a confident swagger about him when it comes to PMQs — but today it went into overdrive. He simply couldn't conceal his glee at taking on Eds Miliband and Balls; the first over his appearance at the anti-cuts demonstration, the second for just being Ed Balls. It was a little bit Flashman from the PM, perhaps. Yet, on this occasion, it also helped him sail through the contest more or less untroubled. Aside from the theatrics, the serious talk was reserved for whether the coalition should help arm the rebels in Libya. The PM's official position was that we shouldn't rule it out, although, if anything, he sounded as though he quite favours the idea.

Peter Hoskin

Ed Miliband and Justine Thornton to marry

From our UK edition

A scoop-and-a-half for the Doncaster Free Press, who were first with the news of Ed Miliband and Justine Thornton's wedding date. It is 27 May, lest you hadn't heard already, and will take place at a country hotel near Nottingham. Here's what the Labour leader tells the paper: "'This is going to be a fantastic day for us both and I feel incredibly priviliged to be marrying someone so beautiful and who is such a special person. It’s the right time for us to do this and I’m really looking forward to a lovely day. 'We’re going to have a party in Doncaster when we get back from honeymoon — which will be in an undisclosed location!

Tuesday

Alex Massie

Iain Gray’s Remarkable No-Man Band

From our UK edition

Meanwhile, STV have a poll asking punters who they think would make the best First Minister. The results are almost entertaining: Don't Know - 37% Alex Salmond - 30% None of Them - 16% Annabel Goldie - 9% Iain Gray - 7% Tavish Scott - 2% Remember that the same poll has Labour and the SNP neck and neck (38% to 37% on the constituency vote and 35% each on the list vote) and so, by my calculations, fewer than one in five Labour voters will tell pollsters their so-called leader is the best man to head the government after this election. Mr Gray complains that the SNP are a "one-man band" which is reasonable enough even if one suspects he'd have been out-polled by Nicola Sturgeon too. But even if he is correct he merely invites the observation that his own party is a no-man band.

Alex Massie

Dogs Will Not Lie Down With Cats.

From our UK edition

I'm fonder of wacky political hypotheticals than the next fellow but even I draw the line at Sunder Katwala's assertion that some people can see a path towards a Labour-SNP coalition in Edinburgh. This is splendidly creative but also, alas, untethered to reality. The party leaders - apart from the Green's Patrick Harvie who has been excluded, perhaps unfairly - gather for their first debate tonight. You can, my friends, watch the drama here. You will notice that Labour-SNP relations are chilly. There is not the slightest reason to suppose that either party would have any interest in governing in partnership with the other. Who is going to tell Iain Gray that despite being, perhaps, the larger party Labour will have to settle for the Deputy First Minister's position?

Monday

James Forsyth

Boris’s remarkable ability to infuriate Labour

From our UK edition

Today’s Commons ding-dong on the riots that followed Saturday’s march was real, politics of the viscera stuff. The Labour benches were furious about Boris’s comments in today’s Telegraph that 'Balls and Miliband will feel quietly satisfied by the disorder' and that they 'will be content to see the police being unfairly attacked on all sides'. Yvette Cooper was so angry that when she tried to read out this section from Boris’s column that she couldn’t get the words out. Boris and Yvette, both Balliol graduates, have previous. But it was still striking quite how angrily Cooper heckled May as she refused to condemn Boris’ comments.

James Forsyth

Another phase in Gove’s revolution

From our UK edition

Michael Gove has just finished announcing to the Commons his proposed replacement for Educational Maintenance Allowance. The new scheme is more targeted than the old one that went to 45 percent of those who stayed in education post-16. Interestingly, it will be administered by the schools and colleges themselves. Gove’s argument is that it is these institutions that are best equipped to know which student needs how much money to support them staying in education. This drew predictable opposition from the Labour benches which wanted a top down, national scheme. On top of this discretionary fund, every student who is receiving income support will receive £1,200 a year.

James Forsyth

Clegg’s new direction?

From our UK edition

Perhaps the most interesting political story of the weekend was Nick Clegg’s political mentor, Paddy Ashdown rejecting the idea that the Lib Dems should be equidistant between the two main parties in an interview with The Times: 'I don’t want to go back to using the word ‘equidistant’ because the world has changed.” He predicts that Labour will look increasingly like “a bunch of superannuated students shouting from the sidelines.' There are two schools of thought in the Lib Dems about their approach to the next election. One has it that the party must appear equally prepared to do a deal with either of the main parties in the event of a hung parliament.

Peter Hoskin

Clegg weaves more divides between himself and Miliband

From our UK edition

“He’s elevated personal abuse into a sort of strategy.” So says Nick Clegg of Ed Miliband in one of the most noteworthy snippets from his laid-back interview with the FT today. Another sign, were it needed, that Labour's animosity towards the Lib Dem leader is mutual — if they won't work with him, then he almost certainly won't work with them. And a sign, perhaps, that the coalition is keen to undermine Miliband's claim to post-partisanship (or whatever). Labour constantly criticise Cameron for being more Flashman than statesman. Now the same charge is being levelled at their leader too.

Alex Massie

Ed Miliband’s Delusions

From our UK edition

Perhaps I'm being a little unfair on Ed Miliband but, no, I don't think I am. Perhaps he's not in denial. There again, he gives every impression of being a man who still doesn't understand why Labour lost the last election. Every so often there'll be a nod to the notion that government spending cannot increase by several points above inflation every year but this is lost in the candyfloss of reassurance he serves (not sells, obviously) to Labour's most devoted supporters. The occasional aside that some spending restraint or retrenchment might be necessary seems dutiful; the thrust of speeches suggests his heart lies elsewhere. That's fine. It's not an illegitimate view. But nor is it persuasive.

Sunday

Peter Hoskin

Signs of nerves from the Lib Dems

From our UK edition

Judging by today's reports, it's fear and self-loathing in Lib Dem Land. And it's not just that one of their Scottish candidates has quit the party in protest at its, ahem, "draconian policies" and "dictatorial style". No, according to this insightful article by Melissa Kite and Patrick Hennessy in the Sunday Telegraph, there are more manoeuvrings going on than that. Here are some passages from it, by way of a summary: 1) Chris Huhne, waiting in the wings. "Mr Huhne, who ran Mr Clegg close in the last Lib Dem leadership election, has told colleagues privately that he would be interested in leading his party in the future." 2) A rebrand (back to the SDP?).

Fraser Nelson

How much are we still paying for Brown?

From our UK edition

The story today of a pregnant woman being downgraded so Gordon Brown and his six aides could travel business class from Abu Dhabi to London may ring a bell with CoffeeHousers. We revealed last August that Brown has a taste for freebies, and that he was offering himself for $100,000 at speaking and award-giving engagements. For an extra $20,000 he would throw in his wife, Sarah. The Mail on Sunday reports that one of the pregnant woman's co-passengers was "livid, asking why it was necessary for all of [Brown's team] to be travelling business — and if it was being paid for by the taxpayer." He raises an interesting point. Tony Blair notoriously claimed a "pension" of £64k, and an £84k contribution for the costs of running his office.

Saturday

Alex Massie

Ed Miliband is an Idiot

From our UK edition

I don't think there's any point in pretending that Ed Miliband is not an idiot. All the evidence the prosecution needs comes from this typically self-aggrandising passage in his address to protestors in London this afternoon. We come in the tradition of those who have marched before us. The suffragettes who fought for votes for women and won. The civil rights movement in America who fought for equality and won. The anti-apartheid movement who fought the horror of that system and won. Our cause may be different but we come together today to realise our voice and we stand on their shoulders. We stand on the shoulders of those who have marched and struggled in the past. Aye right. Another reminder that the left is losing its mind.

James Forsyth

Miliband is marching to the wrong drum

From our UK edition

Ed Miliband’s decision to address today’s anti-cuts march is a strategic mistake. It makes him look like the tribune of an interest group not a national leader. He’ll also be tarred by association, fairly or not, if these scuffles we’re seeing turn into anything more serious. In his speech, Miliband tried to place the march in the tradition of those for female emancipation, civil rights and against apartheid. But this rhetoric doesn’t work as, given Miliband’s commitment to the Darling plan, we are talking about relatively modest differences about the pace of cuts. One other thing that was striking about the speech is Miliband’s attempt to accuse Cameron of practicing the politics of division.

David Blackburn

Marching with no alternative

From our UK edition

Thousands have converged on London today, to march against the monolithic evil of 'cuts'. They have not stated an alternative, a fact that led Phil Collins to write an eloquently savage critique in yesterday's Times (£). That the protesters are incoherent beyond blanket opposition to the government is not really an issue: as this morning's lead article in the Guardian argues, the Hyde Park rioters of 1866 weren't brandishing drafts of the Second Reform Bill. But it's intriguing that Ed Miliband has decided to address this rally, thereby endorsing it. The Labour party hierarchy recognises that it is taking an enormous and perhaps totally unnecessary risk. First, Ed Miliband's oratory is not in the same league as that of Michael Foot, Jim Callaghan and Harold Wilson.