Brexit

Michael Gove has been making his case for Brexit and doing his best to knock the stuffing out of the 'remain' campaign. He started the day on the Today programme, spelling out why he thought Britain was best off outside the EU. In his pitch to the nation, he said: 'I want us to vote to leave the European Union before it's too late, because that's the safer choice for Britain. If we vote to stay, we're not settling for a secure status quo, we're voting to be hostages, locked in the back of the car, driven headlong towards deeper EU integration.' The Justice Secretary then gave a speech later in the day in which he put forward in greater detail why he thought the opposite side in the EU debate are treating the electorate like children.

One of the most striking things about the debate on Britain’s future relationship with Europe is that the case for staying is couched overwhelmingly in negative and pessimistic terms, while the case for leaving is positive and optimistic. Those of us who want to Leave believe Britain’s best days lie ahead, that our country has tremendous untapped potential which independence would unleash and our institutions, values and people would make an even more positive difference to the world if we’re unshackled from the past.

After yesterday’s furore over Treasury warnings about exactly what Brexit will cost British families, today it’s Michael Gove’s turn to hit back. The Justice Secretary is set to accuse the Government of ‘treating voters like children who can be frightened into obedience’. It’s extraordinary just how quickly the war of words seems to be intensifying, given that there are still more than nine weeks to go until the actual referendum. But is there a danger that all this noise is just going to switch off voters to the actual arguments being made? Michael Gove did his best this morning to make a clear-cut case for ditching the EU after being given three minutes on the Today programme to argue for Brexit.

George Osborne has warned today that Brexit will cost each household in the UK around £4,500. The Chancellor also said leaving the EU would make Britain 'permanently poorer'. But is there any truth in Osborne's claims? In this Spectator Coffee House podcast, Fraser Nelson joins Isabel Hardman and James Forsyth to discuss the figures and whether the numbers add up. Speaking on the podcast, Isabel Hardman says the Treasury report shows a change in argument by the Government in making the case for staying in the EU: 'The really interesting thing about this is that George Osborne is doing this at all. He and his Tory colleagues at the start of this year thought that the EU referendum campaign would be about security and talking about the threat to Britain's national security of Brexit.

Sometimes, George Osborne’s dishonesty is simply breathtaking. Let's set aside the way he has positioned himself over the years (if he believed that leaving the European Union ‘would be the most extraordinary self-inflicted wound’ he might have told us – and his constituents – earlier, rather than proceeding with the farce of renegotiation). But it’s his maths, today, which shames his office – and his use of this maths to make the entirely false suggestion that the Treasury thinks Brexit would make you £4,300 worse off. For anyone who cares about honesty in politics, and the abuse (and reporting) of statistics, this is an interesting case study. His chosen date is 2030.

With the outcome of the EU referendum predicted to be on a 'knife edge', there are growing concerns that David Cameron may have misplayed his hand. So, in order for the Remain camp to reclaim a lead in the polls, they need some solid media performances from names the public can trust. Alas, they may soon come to regret Tristram Hunt's appearance on yesterday's Sunday Politics. During a tense exchange with Andrew Neil, Hunt struggled to rebut Neil's questions on immigration, going on to accuse the BBC presenter of offering up his own version of 'project fear'. TH: In the long run, I think there is a really interesting question about the degree of free movement of people across the European Union, but my point is that Britain should be a part of that conversation.