The Spectator

Tuesday

The Spectator

Good Friday for the Middle East

From our UK edition

So Tony Blair is off to the Middle East as peace envoy - not for the US, but for the "Quartet" of UN, EU, America and Russia. His decision to accept this role, and so soon, is more eloquent than any of the (many) farewell speeches he has made. First, it shows that he regards the Good Friday Agreement as his greatest achievement, and his sleepless capacity to make people talk to one another as his greatest talent. Whether the smoke-filled rooms of Stormont will prove to be the same as the conference chambers of Tel Aviv, Damascus and Ramallah is another matter. Second, Mr Blair's new job reveals a desire if not quite to atone for what has happened in the region on his watch then at least to pursue unfinished business. Well, he wasn't going to leave all that be, now was he?

Monday

The Spectator

Why Charles Clarke might make a comeback

From our UK edition

Iain Dale has an interesting post up on the gossip amongst Westminster lobby correspondents that Charles Clarke might return to government this week. He writes that, “None of us could come up with a reason why Gordon Brown would reward a man who has spent the last few months dissing him.” But it is precisely because Clarke has been such a critic of Brown that he might return. What better way would there be for Gordon to show that he really is serious about this whole new ‘inclusive’ thing than by appointing a man who has been so critical of him to the cabinet? If anyone is wondering whether Clarke would take a job from a man he’s called a “control freak” and accused of being “absolutely stupid”, the answer is yes.

The Spectator

A good weekend to bury Europe

From our UK edition

I use to think that Blair’s desire to go to the European summit himself was a little bit vain and born of nothing more than a desire to give Jacques Chirac an Agincourt salute by outlasting him. But now, the cleverness of the move has dawned on me. By making the EU summit his final act, Blair has guaranteed that the EU Constitution has been buried beneath—or, at least folded into—the bigger story about Brown finally taking over. Combine that with the bad weather, always a news favourite, and Wills and Kate supposedly getting back together and you’re already seeing Europe being pushed down the news bulletins.

The Spectator

Germans say nein to Cruise

From our UK edition

The news that the German government has banned Tom Cruise from filming at the defence ministry on the grounds that he is a Scientologist will reopen the whole debate about whether or not Scientology is a religion. The Germans take a very dim view of it; 4 of its biggest political parties even bar Scientologists from joining. I must admit to finding it a tad weird but after reading Tessa Mayes’s undercover investigation of it in this week’s magazine I can’t see it as anything worse than a bit odd.

The Spectator

Heavy stupidity

From our UK edition

If you think Glastonbury is silly, click on the BBC News website and watch the clip of 2,000 heavy metal fans playing Deep Purple’s “Smoke on the Water” in Stuttgart. This, as any fule kno, is one of the most over-rated songs in the history of pop music, plodding and portentous, opening with a mindless riff that has inspired generation after generation of Wayne’s World clones to pick up a guitar when it would have been much better if they had been forced into national service. Sour of me to say so, but sometimes the truth is ugly.

The Spectator

Anyone for venison sushi?

From our UK edition

The price of tuna is now so high that Japanese sushi chefs are considering making their dish with raw horse meat and cuts of smoked deer instead of the traditional tuna. The Japanese, who eat three quarters of the tuna caught each year, are victims of sushi’s global success; it is the new found demand for it from Muswell Hill to Moscow that has sent tuna prices sky rocketing. However, I don’t think even the most adventurous eater is going to be too keen on raw horse meat sushi.

The Spectator

What Cameron should have said

From our UK edition

Here’s what I wish David Cameron had said when discussing social mobility with John Humphrys this morning. The reason I’m in politics, John, is to address the problem you’ve just highlighted. Belief in social mobility is stamped in the DNA of the Conservatives – and perhaps the most scandalous failure of Labour these last ten years is the way it’s failed to covert prosperity into social cohesion. The truth is that 5.3 million people are on out-of-work benefits. Now don’t interrupt me, John, you may not think it’s relevant but this figure is never aired in public and it cuts to the core of the social mobility problem. One in seven of our working-age population are on welfare, John, and they are not breaking out of it.

The Spectator

Don’t put your shirt on Tiger Tim

From our UK edition

Wimbledon fortnight starts today with appropriately awful weather and with Ten Henman left to fly the flag for Britain after Andrew Murray dropped out with injury. But before all the folk on Henman Hiil get too excited, it’s worth pointing out that Henman is 200-1 with the bookies to win Wimbledon. To put that in perspective, the Lib Dems are at 80-1 to have the most seats after the next election and William Hague is 100-1 to be foreign secretary in Gordon Brown’s cabinet.

Sunday

The Spectator

The momentum is with Brown

From our UK edition

Brown has, what the Americans call, the big mo right now. He looks like the man in command and that is dictating how events are seen. Take the job offer to Ashdown and the Lib Dems, if Brown was perceived as weak this could have been seen as desperate, a recognition that Labour is unlikely to have an overall majority after the next general election. But in the current mood, it comes across as bold and decisive.   The speech Brown delivered today was an attempt to take advantage of this momentum to shape the political debate; to use it to present himself as the change, at times you expected him to announce “we are the changemakers,” and to grab hold of chunks of political territory—eg housing—from Cameron.

The Spectator

How Gordon will fight Dave

From our UK edition

"As good as it gets," said Tony Blair of Gordon Brown. What he meant was: "As good as it got", which is not quite the same thing. It is no secret that Mr Blair wanted someone to run against the Chancellor. But it did not happen, and here we all are. And so today, with much backslapping and many tributes, the decree absolute was at last declared on the most turbulent political marriage of modern times. It is almost 13 years since Mr Blair became leader on 21 July 1994, and now Mr Brown has at last succeeded him. The couple are divorced at last. In his expression of absolute liberation, Gordon reminded me of Nicole Kidman when she leapt for joy after freeing herself from Tom Cruise. The marital paperwork out of the way, the new leader got stuck into David Cameron.

The Spectator

The Brown Era Begins

From our UK edition

 I love how Gordon Brown walked on stage, as if he’d just won a vote of some kind. “I will endeavour to justify every day the trust you have placed in me,” – err no, Gordon, you successfully scared off all your rivals, there was no vote and folk were just landed with you. Anyway, it seems Harman will be party chair rather than Deputy Prime Minister – ergo no executive power, ergo whatever she thinks about government doesn’t matter a jot. Wee Dougie Alexander is back as election co-ordinator (he was rudely ousted in 2004). And Brown’s making references to cross-party co-operation. “we reaching out to all people who can be persuaded to share our values”  It’s striking how many rhetorical devices Brown borrows from America.

The Spectator

It is Harman

From our UK edition

So a minister who was dumped from the cabinet for not being up to the job in 1998 is now the deputy leader of the Labour party. Listening to her speech, it became clear how Labour under Brown will attack Cameron. She accused the Tory leader of “opportunism, weakness, no sense of direction”. She also tried to make a joke about Cameron, his “yellow rubber gloves” and the need to “warm women about the sort of man David Cameron is” which didn’t quite come off. Anyway, one wonders what Frank Field makes of a Brown-Harman leadership!

The Spectator

A fitting tribute to John Prescott

From our UK edition

The Labour deputy leadership results are a total shambles. The BBC is reporting that Harman’s won but they don’t seem really sure. If she has won, then it is a remarkable triumph for mediocrity.

The Spectator

No contest

From our UK edition

To put today’s coronation of Gordon Brown as Labour leader into historical perspective -  with the exception of leaders who have stepped into the breach temporarily after deaths (George Brown after Hugh Gaitskell, and Margaret Beckett after John Smith), there has not been an uncontested succession since George Lansbury took the helm in October 1931. “On going to the first Party meeting after the election,” recalled Clement Attlee in his memoirs, “I had a message from Arthur Henderson that George Lansbury would be proposed as Leader and myself as Deputy. These nominations went through without opposition.” New Labour, old stitch-up.

Saturday

The Spectator

Letters to the Editor | 23 June 2007

From our UK edition

Lie of the land Sir: In the past few weeks Hamas has shown itself to be a merciless, power-hungry organisation with little interest in the well-being of its own people, let alone that of its Jewish neighbours, so Dr Hamad must be laughing into his cup of Earl Grey tea at the ease with which he has manipulated Clemency Burton-Hill (‘Tea with Hamas’, 16 June). Her naivety is breathtaking, as is her willingness to pass on his fanciful assertions to the rest of us without challenge. It would not take much research to show Hamas for what it is: a fundamentalist Muslim organisation which gets its money and its orders from Iran. In Dr Hamad’s Promised Land, women like Clemency Burton-Hill have no place outside the kitchen and the breeding chamber.

The Spectator

Referendum politics

From our UK edition

As Matt points out below, whether we have a referendum or not is a political not a legal question. In ruling one out, Gordon Brown is banking on David Cameron not wanting to risk looking Europe-obsessed by banging on about the need for one. (I can already hear Brown taunting Cameron at PMQs with lines like, “he wants to talk about the arcane details of European treaties, we want to talk about schools, hospitals and the other issues that make a difference to the lives of the British people.) Whether Cameron decides to go all out in calling for one depends on if he’ll be charging the Brownite guns alone. If on Monday, The Sun and The Daily Mail demand a vote Cameron will likely come out of what, as Tim notes, is his self-imposed purdah.

The Spectator

Over to you, Gordon

From our UK edition

The great choreographer and negotiator got what he wanted: four red lines on a shirt. Tony Blair is claiming complete victory in his final summit, and the negotiators are particularly relieved that the complexities of voting rights have been kicked into touch till 2014 (what will Blair be doing then? And Gordon?). But, with the battle of Brussels over, the battle in Westminster has only just begun. The new Prime Minister must now try to dodge and weave his way out of offering a referendum. As one close Blair ally said to me with a vengeful smile: "It ain't easy at the top".

The Spectator

A long time in politics

From our UK edition

By the time the next issue of The Spectator hits the news-stands, Tony Blair will have battled his way through his last EU summit; the Labour party will have elected a new leader and deputy leader; and Britain will have a new Prime Minister who will be busy forming his government. Harold Wilson’s over-quoted remark that a week is a long time in politics is, in this case, entirely apposite (Joseph Chamberlain’s version was that ‘there is no use looking beyond the next fortnight’). Such intelligence as has seeped out of the Treasury suggests that Gordon Brown’s reshuffle will be wide and deep: but it should be stressed that planning such a reorganisation is very different from its execution.

Friday

The Spectator

Don’t mention the war!

From our UK edition

Berlin Mentioning Poland's suffering in World War II is usually a sure way to win sympathy and shut down argument. But this week Polish politicians may have pushed the "Christ of Nations" act a bit too far. Explaining his intransigence over EU vote distribution – which has led to a diplomatic train wreck at this week’s EU summit -- President Lech Kaczynski told Polish radio the past justified the present. "We are merely demanding what was taken from us," he said. "If Poland had not had to live through the years of 1939-45, Poland would be today looking at the demographics of a country of 66 million," nearly double the current population of 38 million. The reaction in Europe was, well, disappointed, with clucking from foreign ministers and editorial writers alike.