The Spectator

Introducing Spectator Live

From our UK edition

We’ve added a new feature to the site – Spectator Live.  You can access it via the ‘Live’ tab at the top of the page, or by going to new.spectator.co.uk/live.  It’s a roundup of all the latest blog posts from across Spectator.co.uk, and the best place to keep up-to-date with all the views and analysis from our writers. You don’t even need to visit the page to view the latest content on Spectator Live. If you have an RSS reader on your computer (see here for details), you can subscribe to Spectator Live’s RSS feed and have updates automatically delivered to you. You can subscribe to the Spectator Live RSS feed here.

Just in case you missed them… | 16 June 2008

From our UK edition

...here are some of the posts made over the weekend on Spectator.co.uk Coffee House is looking for interns. James Forsyth sets a Coffee House challenge, and says the Tories should accuse Brown of perpetrating a fraud against the public. Fraser Nelson discovers whether David Davis' actions are unprecedented. Peter Hoskin wonders whether Brown realises that the Lisbon Treaty is dead. Henrietta Bredin congratulates Mark Elder on his knighthood. Stephen Pollard takes on Oliver Kamm over the Lisbon Treaty. Melanie Phillips thinks the response to David Davis' resignation is an example of "the replacement of reason by emotion". Clive Davis bids farewell to the TV critics. And Americano reports on the power of Obama.

Letters | 14 June 2008

From our UK edition

42 days Sir: Thank goodness for Matthew d’Ancona’s clarity of mind on 42-day detention (‘Jacqui Smith’s vote of confidence’, 7 June). People who want to be provoked will always find an excuse. If they are subtle, they will manufacture a grievance based on an issue about which their sworn enemies disagree — and then exploit the difference. Critics who claim that increasing pre-charge detention will be a ‘recruiting sergeant’ for terrorism have fallen into this terrorist trap. Such critics acquired their views in the age of Trotskyism, when the Trots were trying to provoke the establishment into violence in the belief that it would speed up the revolution by exposing the ‘mailed fist behind the velvet glove’ of capitalism.

Coffee House is looking for interns

From our UK edition

Coffee House is offering internships to students and recent graduates.  Successful applicants will be able to write for Coffee House, work on the website, and experience behind-the-scenes life here at The Spectator.  For more information contact phoskin @ spectator.co.

Zero tolerance for Tory sleaze

From our UK edition

‘What gets me,’ said David Cameron in a speech to the CBI last November, ‘is the deliberate extravagance committed by the people at the top of the government machine, the administrators and managers and quangocrats who administer public money.’ He went on to name Home Office officials who had blown £800,000 on taxis in a year, the MoD, which spend £2.3 million on a headquarters for itself while soldiers in Afghanistan had to do without their proper kit, and the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, which ate its way through £1.6 million in just six months on hotels and conference centres. It was a fine and timely speech by the Conservative leader, striking a chord with an electorate increasingly shocked by public sector waste.

The week that was | 13 June 2008

From our UK edition

Some highlights of the week on Spectator.co.uk: David Davis is taking CoffeeHousers' questions. Ruth Dudley Edwards responds to the No campaign's victory in the Irish referendum, Neil O'Brien gives his thoughts on the referendum result. Fraser Nelson outlines the passion of David Davis, and watches Brown struggle through his latest press conference. James Forsyth picks up on the concern surrounding Dominic Grieve's appointment as shadow home secretary, and suggests that men of goodwill disagreed about 42-day detention. Peter Hoskin wonders whether David Davis will achieve anything, and asks whether we should blame the DUP for the Government's victory over 42-day detention. Stephen Pollard offers his thoughts on 42-day detention.

Across the site

From our UK edition

Don't forget to check out the responses - from across Spectator.co.uk - to the events of the past few days. Both Stephen Pollard and Melanie Phillips are sceptical about David Davis' actions.  Whilst Clive Davis remains in the "'don't know' camp" on 42-day detention. Also, over on Trading Floor, Tim Worstall gives his thoughts on the No campaign's victory in Ireland. And, if Kelvin Mackenzie does decide to stand against David Davis in Haltemprice & Howden, it won't be the first time he's run for political office.  He wrote an article for The Spectator on what motivated him to to stand in the recent local elections.  You can read it here.

Oil to reach $250 a barrel?

From our UK edition

Over at Trading Floor, Michael Millar reports on the chief executive of Gazprom's prediction that oil prices will keep rising until they hit $250 per barrel.

Just in case you missed them… | 9 June 2008

From our UK edition

Here are some posts made over the weekend on Spectator.co.uk: James Forsyth identifies the most worrying Tory sleaze story so far, and highlights a new poll which shows that the public back the Tories on national secutiry. Peter Hoskin reports on the recent Tory expenses scandals, and points out Jack Straw's less-than-kind words about Gordon Brown. Fraser Nelson asks: should military casualties be named and honoured in PMQs? Melanie Phillips explains the reasoning behind her blog. Clive Davis marks the start of Euro 2008. And Americano features a video of Barack Obama addressing his Chicago campaign HQ.

Letters | 7 June 2008

From our UK edition

Poppy appeal Sir: Fraser Nelson’s article accurately outlines the urgent need to implement an alternative counter-narcotics policy in Afghanistan (‘The precarious peace in Helmand’, 28 May). Helmand province now cultivates half of Afghanistan’s opium in a country which accounts for 93 per cent of the global illegal opium market. A significant element of the current approach to countering burgeoning opium production levels — forced poppy crop eradication — has proven disastrous. Instead of providing economic stability, heavy-handed policies analogous to the US-sponsored ‘War on Drugs’ approach in Colombia have undermined reconstruction efforts and failed to re-engage with local communities.

Hail to the not-yet-Chief

From our UK edition

The man who four short years ago addressed the Democratic party convention as a little-known state senator from Illinois will do so this August as his party’s nominee for president. It is the most rapid rise in the history of the Republic: not bad for the son of a Kenyan goat herder. Barack Obama’s ascent is all the more remarkable for whom he has passed on the way up. Bill Clinton is the only Democratic president to have won two terms in the post-war era. Hillary Clinton has been marked out for greatness ever since her 1969 Wellesley commencement address; a speech that, in its time, received as much laudatory coverage as Obama’s one at the 2004 convention. The Clintons had, over the years, assembled the most formidable political machine in modern Democratic politics.

The week that was | 6 June 2008

From our UK edition

Some highlights of the week on Spectator.co.uk: James Forsyth wonders whether Nick Clegg is about to perform a left turn, and claims that Sir Richard Dannat is right to be concerned about the pay that servicemen receive. Fraser Nelson thinks the economy points to a two term Tory government, and points out the truth behind Brown's “record employment”. Peter Hoskin recommends a set of British documentaries. Stephen Pollard takes on Yasmin Alibhai-Brown. Clive Davis says the downfall of Chet Baker is the "ultimate anti-heroin commercial". Melanie Phillips discusses the “enemy within British education”. Americano ponders what might be next for Obama and McCain.

How to get hold of the Spectator 180th Anniversary issue

From our UK edition

We've had quite a few people asking how to get hold of the special Spectator 180th Anniversary issue, other than from off newsstands (priced £4.95).  You can do so by either phone or e-mail.  Here's the info from our subscriptions team: Subscriber?  Call the order hotline now to receive the special subscriber price of only £3. Simply call 0800 031 90 19. Living overseas? Order your copy today for only £4.95 plus p&p. Simply call +44 141 22 66 703. Otherwise, e-mail 180th@spectator-business.co.uk to get your hands on a copy.

Letters | 31 May 2008

From our UK edition

Seek the reason why Sir: I greatly enjoyed Peter Jones’s excellent article on Ancient Roman globalisation (‘For real globalisation, look at Ancient Rome’, 24 May). I respectfully disagree with one paragraph, however, in which he describes Greek philosophers as having ‘proceeded from hypotheses, which they never tested’. It is true, of course, that the Greeks were incapable of testing certain things, such as the nature of the elemental constituents of matter. Nevertheless, in what was within their power to observe, they often proceeded, not from hypotheses, but from the empirical study of natures. The pre-eminent example of this approach is the extant work of Aristotle.

The fumes of failure

From our UK edition

‘We have no plans not to implement our budget’: the double negative employed by Phil Woolas, the Environment Minister, on Tuesday’s Newsnight, and the familiar ‘no plans’ formula, told you all you need to know about this government’s collapse of confidence. On the matter of retrospective Vehicle Excise Duty (VED) increases, ministers are desperate to execute a U-turn as quickly and as painlessly as possible — one which, in any case, they fear they will be forced into sooner or later. Equally, Gordon Brown does not want to be seen to be bowing — yet again — to popular pressure, so soon after the 10p tax debacle. It is hard to reconcile ‘long-term decisions’ with budgets rewritten on the back of an envelope.

The week that was | 30 May 2008

From our UK edition

Some highlights of the week on Spectator.co.uk: Matthew d’Ancona surveys the new political landscape. James Forsyth asks if New Labour can survive opposition and looks at the Cruddas alternative. Stephen Pollard explains why he is not unduly worried about 62 percent of the shadow cabinet being privately educated. Americano takes a look at McCain’s VP shortlist and looks at the Republican Obama should pick as his running mate. Clive Davis offers his take on whether Amy Winehouse lyrics have a place on a Cambridge exam paper. Michael Millar wonders why Barclays appears to be encouraging rather reckless financial behaviour and wonders what Northern Rock will do if, as expected, some of its customers default on their mortgages.

Letters | 24 May 2008

From our UK edition

Thatcher’s champion Sir: The Spectator may have been Margaret Thatcher’s first press champion as Fraser Nelson notes (‘Labour’s best hope’, 17 May), but its support was not unwavering. At the end of 1974 it was unduly impressed by the efforts of Heath’s allies to brand her a food-hoarder when she sensibly encouraged pensioners to stock up with tinned food at a time of rising inflation. On 7 December 1974 it opined: ‘for the milk-snatcher to become the food-hoarder shows precisely the same political ineptitude as Sir Keith Joseph and it is likely to have the same political consequence’. Her defiance of the Tory critics swiftly silenced the editor’s doubts.

Here’s what we call progress

From our UK edition

‘Progress prevails’: thus did the Guardian’s editorial on Wednesday celebrate the defeat of amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill that would have reduced the upper limit of 24 weeks for abortion and ensured that IVF clinics would need at least to consider the need for ‘supportive parenting and a father or male role model’. The newspaper observed that ‘political incorrectness [had] threatened to run wild’ in the Commons but ‘the heartening outcome was that the progressives prevailed’. By what perverse definition can it be counted ‘progress’ that the law governing abortion has remained unchanged since 1990, despite dramatic changes both in neonatal care and scientific imaging?