The Spectator

Leading article: Stunted growth

From our UK edition

The royal family has been accused of a great number of things, from extravagance to vulgarity. But to blame the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge for limiting UK economic growth in the second quarter to 0.2 per cent — as the Office of National Statistics did this week — is a bit rich. If an extra day’s holiday for the royal wedding in April closed our offices and factories, it surely boosted the tourist industry and sent bone china manufacturers into overdrive. George Osborne would be ill-advised to bring up the subject of the royal wedding or any of the other excuses given by the ONS for the sluggishness of the economy: the Japanese tsunami, the warm spring weather and consumers — allegedly — drawing in their horns in order to save money for Olympic tickets.

Portrait of the week | 30 July 2011

From our UK edition

Home Gross Domestic Product grew by 0.2 per cent in the second quarter of 2011, after a quarter in which growth was 0.5 per cent, according to the Office for National Statistics, which took the trouble to mention extenuating circumstances such as the Japanese tsunami and the royal wedding. Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, urged George Osborne, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, to cut taxes, including the top rate of 50 per cent. BP made profits of £3.2 billion in the second quarter, less than expected. Sales of beer fell in the second quarter by 15 per cent in supermarkets and 4.5 per cent in pubs. Amy Winehouse, the singer, was found dead at home; she was 27. Lucian Freud, the painter, died, aged 88. Fran Landesman, the poet and performer, died, aged 83.

Letters | 30 July 2011

From our UK edition

The right path Sir: I have always had the greatest respect for Matthew Parris’s incisive comments. However, in his latest column (23 July), he misreads Tory supporters. The Conservative Home survey was statistically accurate. The views expressed were those of thousands of voters and reflect their opinions on ‘U-turn Cameron’. The most frequent comment about him is ‘we do not know what he stands for and if we did, he will change it when he wants’. That is why he did not win the 2010 election, in which he should have wiped the floor with the Labour party. No doubt support could have been found for 10 more ‘pet hates’ from participants. However Nos 1 to 10 were quite sufficient to reflect the majority views of many voters.

The week that was | 29 July 2011

From our UK edition

Here are some of the posts that were made on Spectator.co.uk over the past week: Fraser Nelson undermines Ed Balls's spin about growth and the cuts. Peter Hoskin previews George Osborne's summer of pain, and introduces the Game of Growth. Jonathan Jones wonders how you measure cuddles. Martin Bright has some questions for the police. Alex Massie responds to Tim Montgomerie's cover article for the latest Spectator, asking: was the coalition a mistake? The Spectator Arts Blog reviews the latest production of Somerset Maugham’s For Services Rendered. The Spectator Book Blog has a hatful of facts about PD James. And the Business Blog sifts through the rubble of America's debt crisis.

CoffeeHousers’ Wall, 25 July – 31 July

From our UK edition

Welcome to the latest CoffeeHousers' Wall. For those who haven't come across the Wall before, it's a post we put up each Monday, on which — providing your writing isn't libellous, crammed with swearing, or offensive to common decency — you'll be able to say whatever you like in the comments section. There is no topic, so there's no need to stay 'on topic', which means you'll be able to debate with each other more freely and extensively. There's also no constraint on the length of what you write — so, in effect, you can become Coffee House bloggers. Anything's fair game, from political stories in your local paper, to chat about the latest football results.